Bill Would Require Labels on Cloned Food 251
ComeBack writes "Steaks, pork chops, milk and other products from cloned livestock would have to be clearly labeled on grocers' shelves under a bill pending in the California Legislature.
If passed, the requirement could be more stringent than federal rules. The Food and Drug Administration is poised to give final approval to meat and milk from cloned animals without any special labeling, though a bill introduced in Congress would require it."
Somewhat surprising (Score:5, Informative)
Do not get me wrong. I have no qualm about eating irradiated food. But I do believe that I should get to know what I am eating. As it is, it bother me that the markets are required to show that a fish comes from china (as it should), but a dog food with imported products such as Wheat Glutin can be labeled as made in America/Canada.
Good thing it isn't on fruits and vegitables (Score:2, Informative)
Apples? Cloned. Potatos? Cloned. Bannanas? Cloned.
Most commercial strawberries are propagated via runners.
Corn is a freak hybrid. Always has been.
And yet a bunch of kook Californians are trying to use cloning to stoke fear in consumers.
Never say the hard left isn't as anti-scientific as the hard right.
Re:The Point? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Required? Why? (Score:3, Informative)
So the dairy cow isn't technically cloned.
Now would the milk be labeled coned?
This is laughable (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Good thing it isn't on fruits and vegitables (Score:4, Informative)
No, precisely his point is that most people (including you) are very confused as to what cloning really means. [wikipedia.org] It just turns out that cloning vegetables is so much easier than cloning animals, that we have been doing it for -literally- centuries.
Re:Required? Why? (Score:2, Informative)
Already being done with beef cattle.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200704/s1898
In this case it's not a gimmick but a way to retain the same high-quality tenderness and flavour genes in his herd.
Re:Why I want GM & Cloned foods to be labeled. (Score:4, Informative)
Yup, but the lifespans are irrelevant since we kill off these animals ahead of time anyway. The diseases we check for, so again, it doesn't matter.
I was born in cow country. All the abnormalities and birth defects occur with normally grown animals as well, they occur more frequently with clones. I could hang around a couple farms for no more than 2 years and show you enough animal deformities and abnormalities to make you swear off the regular stuff (not that the farmers would be inclined to let me document that). More frequent abnormalities occur with inbreeding and how much more inbred can you get than a clone?
I'm with those who are selling the meat. Its all the same thing.
Re:How far down the chain does the labelling exten (Score:3, Informative)
So if you pair up two clones from the same dna parent... well it's the same as pairing up two siblings... could be a problem. Pair up two clones from separate dna parents... no problems.
Re:Why I want GM & Cloned foods to be labeled. (Score:4, Informative)
article [mindfully.org]
Scientists found out that Dolly is actually one of the best clones ever made, most of the attemps done on mammals did not give as good results.
When we speak about defects, we mean that none of them is normal, natural born animals have defects usually but in a lesser percentage and do not transmit to the next generation these problems if too important since they just die before to be able to
Re:Ahh, the ignorance (Score:2, Informative)