Electrically Conductive Cement 159
zero_offset writes "The Tokyo Institute of Technology has announced a process for creating an inexpensive, nearly transparent, electrically conductive alumina cement. The conductivity is comparable to metal, and the transparency should be adequate for use in display panels. The process relies upon commonplace and inexpensive metals compared to the rare metals such as iridium currently used in display panels."
Plexicorp (Score:2, Informative)
Indium (Score:4, Informative)
Cement != concrete (Score:5, Informative)
Concrete = a building material composed of aggregates and cement
Concrete is used for buildings, roads, sidewalks, etc. The aggregate in that case is usually rocks. The cement is usually Portland cement. It's not correct to call it "cement", though people will usually understand what you mean.
But judging from the comments so far, not in this case. This isn't a replacement for Portland cement, and they're not talking about building materials. This is the kind of cement used to glue bits of LCD screens to each other.
Home circuit fabs? (Score:5, Informative)
Unfortunately, it seems as though the process is a bit more complicated, and I don't know how you can get a nozzle heated to 1100 degrees C in a reduced oxygen environment (presumably why it is in a sealed glass tube to work) that would also be something you would want on your kitchen table.
While of interest to a materials science guy, this really isn't that spectacular of a deal here. It does have the potential of improving LCD screen luminance values, reducing power requirements for laptops (the screen sucks quite a bit of power in the overall system), and helping in other ways. But it isn't something that simply can be poured out of a nozzle.
Re:Never mind display panels... (Score:5, Informative)
Mistakes in the article! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:cheaper tvs? (Score:3, Informative)
While making it cheaper may be true, the big problem that happens with displays is that you have wires which cross between pixels on any display.... simply to turn the pixel "on" or "off". These can be quite thin and are made of several different kinds of materials, but they do get into the way of the display. By making these wires transparent, you would have a huge increase in the throughput of the light coming from something like a back-lit light source (common for laptops).
As far as replacing Indium or other rare earth metals... I don't understand that at all. Those metals are used to floresce in a CRT (television picture tube) and produce color pixels. This is what makes the TV be in bright colors. This article on color televsion [digitaltvdesignline.com] gets into some of the specific color properites of Indium compounds and how they enhance the color gamut that can faithfully reproduce color from electronic media. This cement is not going to have those same kind of properties.
Re:Tokyo Institute of Technology: TiTech (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Never mind display panels... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:cheaper tvs? (Score:3, Informative)
I believe the main benefit is the cost of Indium and similar substances.
This substance isn't intended to be part of the light emitting (or blocking) part of a display. It's for the wiring to those parts, built into the screen. By making it more transparent, the light level required can be reduced which saves battery life in laptops and possibly the cost of the light components.
Uhm... Old News? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Does anybody else remember conductive LEGOs? (Score:5, Informative)
Uh, I don't know about yours, but my 9V LEGOs (such as in the monorail) weren't electrically conductive themselves; they just used regular plastic blocks with metal bits embedded in them. For example, see the pictures on this site [akasa.bc.ca].
Re:cheaper tvs? (Score:3, Informative)
Trust me when I say that it is the use of Indium compounds and their phosphorescence at bold primary colors that makes it so valuable, and is driving up the world market price of Indium. Compared to Gold, Indium is a lousy conductor. A Gold or Silver trace would be much easier to hide because you would not have to use as much material. The use of Indium as a wire is not the issue, although the amount of the Indium compounds could be reduced slightly in a matrix of this cement and other composite materials used in a display system. That would be something that would appeal to a CEO or bean counter that is really concerned about the expense of getting Indium on the world metals market, but the concern would be about simply getting bulk Indium in the first place.
Re:Cement != concrete (Score:2, Informative)
First, the dictionaries suck. American Heritage also gives cement=Portland cement, or even concrete before cement=glue or binder. This is wrong. The use of the word cement to mean Portland cement -used to make concrete- or worse yet concrete itself, is essentially slang. Its like calling network cable "copper," or fiber-optic cable "fiber." Why they give that definition before "A substance that hardens to act as an adhesive; glue," and "Something that serves to bind or unite," I don't understand. For the best explanation, please see Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cement [wikipedia.org]
Please people, stop telling people you have a "cement" sidewalk and an "asphalt" driveway (or worse yet, tar). You have a "concrete" sidewalk, and a "blacktop" driveway (or "asphalt cement" if you want to get really technical).
Now, after rereading the article, I see that they say "lime-alumina" cement, which sounds like Portland cement to me, but then they say aluminum is used as a substitute for indium, which, AFAIK, is not used in Portland cement. So, I don't know WTF to think they mean.