Yellowstone Supervolcano Making Strange Rumblings 411
Frosty Piss writes "Supervolcanoes can sleep for centuries or millennia before producing incredibly massive eruptions that can drop ash across an entire continent. One of the largest supervolcanoes in the world lies beneath Yellowstone National Park. Significant activity continues beneath the surface. And the activity has been increasing lately, scientists have discovered. In addition, the nearby Teton Range of mountains is somehow getting shorter. The findings, reported this month in the Journal of Journal of Geophysical Research, suggest that a slow and gradual movement of a volcano over time can shape a landscape more than a violent eruption."
Fact for the day (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Fact for the day (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Fact for the day (Score:5, Funny)
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20070314/lnq070 315.gif [yimg.com]
Re:Fact for the day (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Fact for the day (Score:4, Funny)
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll devastate whole ecosystems...
Re:Fact for the day (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.wordreference.com/fren/teton [wordreference.com]
Disgusting! (Score:2)
Re:Fact for the day (Score:4, Funny)
Since p -> (q V r), p being images of French breasts on Google Images, q being the accuracy of your statement and r being the French breasts themselves, we can conclude that the statement might be true or might be false.
Re:Fact for the day (Score:4, Funny)
I'm scared (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm hungry (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'm scared (Score:4, Insightful)
Sure, if it goes off it will ruin a lot of people's days. But if it goes off every million years or so, well, what are the chances of being alive to witness it? Not terribly good. Our species may not even be around the next time this thing blows. Same goes with other super-catastrophes like large asteroid impacts. I'm all for long-term thinking, but there's a danger in thinking too long-term as well, that is, let's worry about next year's hurricane season, or that hundred-year flood, rather than what happens when the sun goes into red giant phase a billion years from now.
Historically, it's the "normal" catastrophes that happen on the order of every few decades or centuries -like earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, plagues, famines, and non-super volcanoes- which have tended to kill hundreds of thousands or millions of people. Not to mention our incredible genius when it comes to killing each other. In terms of minimizing human casualties, odds are the most cost-effective solutions will be things like better building codes to withstand earthquakes, not letting people build in flood-prone areas, and perhaps most importantly, developing the ability to rapidly respond to disasters when they do happen.
50% (Score:2, Funny)
I love quantum theory.
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Quantum theory is very wierd.
Re:50% (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:50% (Score:4, Funny)
2036 (Score:5, Funny)
On the upside, we won't have to worry about the 2038 unix/linux clock rollover.
Re: (Score:2)
Odds are you shouldn't worry in the US48 (Score:3, Funny)
If the Yellowstone Supervolcano blows, the last forecast I heard was that it will be about 100 times as powerful as the Thera/Santorini explosion. The sound alone will probably kill everyone in the contenental US instantly. It's only the rest of the human race that has to suffer and die during the resulting ice age.
Have a nice day. =)
Re:I'm scared (Score:5, Informative)
A "change of pace", if it's not just a lava flow, has a chance to mean something that's massive enough to make Katrina look like someone's dog pooed in a park. It doesn't have to be, it isn't likely to be, but if it's like the previous major eruptions, then then much of the globe is in for a little trouble. The last major eruption in SE Asia basically caused there to be no summer in Europe, meaning major crop failures just about everywhere.
How much warning? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:How much warning? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:How much warning? (Score:4, Insightful)
There will likely be warning signs years it advance, but we won't recognize them as such until afterwards.
Why would you think that? We only had two months warning with Mt. St. Helens, and that was plenty of time to assess risk and clear out the "red zone." There were 57 fatalities, but it's not like we didn't know it was coming.
The problem with warning signs years in advance isn't that they won't be seen -- the problem is people becoming complacent as they wait years for a geological event to play out. If scientists go on and on for years about an imminent disaster, people start to think the scientists are full of crap. Then, of course, the worst happens.
Re:How much warning? (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course, IANAVolcanologist, all I know is what I saw on the one BBC show about it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Hey, we could use a little global cooling...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I'm scared (Score:5, Funny)
The one before that was about 1985
And before that about 1980.
Does that mean that there is a cycle of 5 years between citations and that I'm overdue for another citation?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
However, in the case of the volcano, we are only 1/15th of a cycle late. It is too early to say that we have totally bucked the trend.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Volcanic eruptions are like earthquakes in that they are a release of built up pressure. Earthquakes happen at fault lines when two land masses have moved far enough relative to each other that the sides of the fault slip against each other to relieve the accumulated pressure. Volcanoes accumulate pressure from... uhh... magma upwellings o
Re:I'm scared (Score:5, Informative)
Do not be scared. An eruption is not due for at least another several hundred years.
Really? Know that for a fact do you? Yellowstone could blow up tomorrow, or it could blow up in 17,000 years. All we know is that it will blow up again someday. It's tricky to predict because all the standard warning signs that we usually notice when volcanoes are about to erupt are already happening in Yellowstone.
This hotspot is just grumblinb a little. Even if it does erupt any time soon, it will be a nice change of pace.
Yeah, it would be a change of pace. What, do you think ash melts away?
Let's look at Bill Bryson's description:
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
How do we know that?
Because it has erupted before?
In fact, we have no idea whether or not it will erupt again. It may or it may not -- the only way to know is to wait for it to happen. All we can say is that going by past eruptions, it is likely to erupt again at some time in the future.
Even if it does erupt again, it might not be a supervolcano the next time around.
Why be scared? (Score:5, Insightful)
Odds are very good that it will not happen in your life or you children's, or their children's. It may never happen.
This is a great example of an unreasonable fear.
You are far more likely to die in a car accident than from Yellowstone erupting as a super-volcano.
If you want make an effort to live a long happy life the best things you can do are.
Exercise at least 30 minutes a day.
Eat a good diet.
Don't smoke.
Don't drink and drive.
Don't drive late at night.
Oh and put aside money for your retirment and stay out of debt. That is for the happy part a long and happy life.
You should fear a sedentary life style and tobacco a lot more than volcanoes.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I lived in Europe from 1980 through 1993. In retrospect, I'd rather go with the supervolcano.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Global catastrophe and end of life as know it aside, this could be positive for gaming!
Re:I'm scared (Score:5, Funny)
Imagine what it would take to turn over all the soil in Kansas. Oh... wait... that happens at the start of every planting. So. If this happens during the winter, they might need to scrape off some ash, pile it by the side of the field, or take and put it in a big pile someplace (which is what happens to grain a lot of the time anyway). The real concern is that it will happen during the growing season and interfere with growth and harvest.
You can't compare the clearing of a massive wreck of twisted metal and concrete full of remains to clearing a field. Obviously, interfering with growth and harvest is a major concern. If it's not raining, a strategy involving a blower attachment to a combine might still save the crop. Somebody should test that. If it rains though, your crop couuld end up encased in something with the consistancy of wet cement. Also, you've got to filter those engines really well. Somebody should test this, like FEMA... umm... ok, umm... yeah, we're fucked.
Re:I'm scared (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I'm scared (Score:5, Insightful)
The big problem was what it did to engines -- that stuff is super corrosive well ok more correct would be super abrasive -- you have to have special filters on all your air intakes and they have to be cleaned frequently.
While not as easy as the GP makes it out to be -- farmers for the most part have the equipment to clear the fields and it can be done fairly quickly.
Re:I'm scared (Score:4, Insightful)
In the GP, rujholla explained the widely known experience of thousands of farmers in dealing with volcanic ash.
You appear to be trying to use your imagined idea of what farmers are capable of to disprove the results of this empirical evidence.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I'm scared (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Horizon (Score:2, Funny)
Better not happen before I find out what happens in Lost.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Horizon (Score:5, Informative)
one of the most destructive and yet least-understood natural phenomena in the world - supervolcanoes. Only a handful exist in the world but when one erupts it will be unlike any volcano we have ever witnessed. The explosion will be heard around the world. The sky will darken, black rain will fall, and the Earth will be plunged into the equivalent of a nuclear winter.
Scientists have revealed that it has been on a regular eruption cycle of 600,000 years. The last eruption was 640,000 years ago... so the next is overdue.
BBC Science [bbc.co.uk]
Anyway, have a nice nuclear winter, eithr way.
Re:Horizon (Score:5, Funny)
> equivalent of a nuclear winter.
Fortunately we're compensating with global warming
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That's a bit alarmest (Score:3, Insightful)
That's kind of like saying "it hasn't rained in a couple weeks, so it'll probably rain today". There is a very small chance this thing will erupt in your lifetime. We should be prepared anyway, though.
Re: (Score:2)
though we didn't get the snow they promised.
Re:That's a bit alarmest (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Science requires more data then this to make accurate predictions. Media on the other hand have no problem reporting based on guesses and bad math. So no, there isn't a pattern yet and I am inclined to believe geology rather then the media.
That there has been increased activity is interesting, but given that the Yellowstone
Re: (Score:2)
Yellowstone Volcano Observatory FAQ [cheniere.org]
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Just remember this rule when buying emergency pants:
Emergency pants are always brown.
You already know why.
Re: (Score:2)
The "Supervolcanoes" show was sensationalized (alarmist?) in order to get people to watch it. Did it contain some facts? Sure. Were those facts chosen and presented in such a way to support one theory? In this case the "it's overdue to blow at any moment" theory? Sure seems that way. A quote from a summary of a made-for-TV show isn't necessarily scientific (or
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Looking at their site, they used advanced visualization tools to... help the BBC make a documentary. They also have plans to... evacuate locally, near lava flows.
Hmm. I think I'll update my passport and buy some gold coins.
Re: (Score:2)
You can't stop a volcano. At least not with any known technology, and the consequences of altering a volcano could be worse than it going off in the first place.
Preparing for a supervolcano eruption is like preparing for full-out nuclear war. There is no effective recovery plan that isn't a lot of loca
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure what 'overdue' means. This isn't a stable system like the periodic ice ages over the last few million years. The earth's crust has been moving over that hot spot and some experts think that the crust is thicker than during t
Re: (Score:2)
Using wikipedia as the ultimate source of information, Yellowstone has seen eruptions 2.1 million years ago, 1.3 million years ago and 640,000 years ago.
This gives you a total of 3 data points, spaced 800,000 and 660,000 years apart. Thus, the average times is 730,000 years. We are 640,000 years into it so we should still have 90,000 years.
Of course, the with only 3 data points even that spacing is very speculative at best.
To make matters more interesting, the size of the 3 eruption's
i have an idear (Score:2, Funny)
-Dirtbag
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
NOT IT!
Told them not to do it. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Does someone know how to contact Bruce Willis? (Score:5, Funny)
But I warn you, there will be casualties. Everyone but the romantic leading man and the vulnerable-but-tough woman will be in real mortal danger. But I know we can do it!
Well shit (Score:2)
Tornado Alley and supervolcanos (Score:3, Insightful)
FYI, tornadoes are probably the easiest natural disaster to avoid; all you have to do is pay at least slight attention to the weather and have access to a basement or interior room. I've lived in Tornado Alley my entire life, and it's been 15 years since the last time a tornado came close enough to where I live that taking cover was justified.
On the other hand, even though it's very unlikely to happen in my lifetime, a Yellowstone eruption would almost certainly own much of North America. An eruption fr
Re:Tornado Alley and supervolcanos (Score:5, Funny)
On the bright side, SCO would have front row seats.
Eat hot ash Darl!
Re: (Score:2)
Earthquakes aren't bad either, assuming you choose to live and work in earthquake safe buildings, your odds of getting caught out are pretty low (but of course you have basically no notice if you are caught out).
Volcano TCO (Score:2, Funny)
You need to get your Volcano software from a company that will be there to send you patches and keep your volcano humming along nicely. You can't trust those pesky Linux starups that last only until all the share options are cashed up.
You also need to consider Total C
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Warning (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yellowstone Alone (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Judging by all the inflation, pressure and possible eruptions - scientists have concluded that Yellowstone really needs to get laid.
Ah! I always wondered where that "sacrifice a virgin" meme came from.
Yogi (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How do they know it is increasing? (Score:5, Insightful)
sPh
Well, THAT'LL fix global warming... (Score:3, Insightful)
If Yellowstone went, we might expect "some 2,000 million tons of sulphuric acid were ejected into the atmosphere to block out sunlight over much of the planet causing global temperatures to plummet by between 10C and 20C." from here. [nucnews.net]
WMD's in Jackson's Hole: who would ever have thought? (Cue the Taco Bell jokes...)
Obviously anthropogenic (Score:3, Funny)
The volcano god is angry! (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Unicorns aren't mythical - virgins are.
Awesome. (Score:3, Interesting)
Full Journal article (Score:2)
Build more geothermal power plants (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Paricutin (Score:2)
I beleive you are thinking of Paricutin [und.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
So have I, and my prediction based on previous history it will just change it's name to a three letter acronym, fail to sue IBM and fizzle out leaving a smoking crater in Utah.
Oh, we're talking about geology...
Al Gore (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
the tourists help! We need more (Score:3, Funny)