Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

Scientists Attempt To Calm Volcano 244

An anonymous reader writes "Since May 2006, a mud volcano in Indonesia has spewed out up to 126,000 cubic metres of mud a day, flooding an area of more than 4 square kilometres. This unprecedented natural disaster has become so bad that geophysicists now plan to enact an untested scheme to try and slow the flow: dropping concrete balls into the volcano."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Scientists Attempt To Calm Volcano

Comments Filter:
  • by User 956 ( 568564 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @09:59PM (#17837112) Homepage
    This unprecedented natural disaster has become so bad that geophysicists now plan to enact an untested scheme to try and slow the flow: dropping concrete balls into the volcano.

    They've got a lot of balls, trying something like that.
    • by antarctican ( 301636 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:39PM (#17837536) Homepage
      They've got a lot of balls, trying something like that.

      High pressure, large projectile type object....

      Why do I have visions of this turning in to one giant canon? :)
    • by Alien54 ( 180860 ) on Thursday February 01, 2007 @01:18AM (#17838966) Journal
      would be to explode a deeply placed high explosive device, in the range of kilotons. The idea is to breakup the the flow channels, and let it collapse on itself and clog itself up. The explosive does not have to be nuclear, but it needs to be both large and deeply located. Correct placement would help as well.
      • by ColaMan ( 37550 ) on Thursday February 01, 2007 @04:34AM (#17840272) Journal
        would be to explode a deeply placed high explosive device, in the range of kilotons.

        Except for that tedious problem of obtaining, placing and detonating a few thousand tons of HE in the right spot deep down inside a mud volcano that is busily spewing mud upwards.

        But that's just a minor engineering problem, isn't it?
      • by phayes ( 202222 ) on Thursday February 01, 2007 @06:49AM (#17840942) Homepage
        As I remember it from the initial stories, the problem arose when the oil company drilled through a relatively thin clay layer into a very thick mud bearing layer under very high pressure. The clay layer acted as a dike to stop the underlying liquids from migrating upward. Normal drilling technique when such geography is present would have been to insert a liner in the drillhole in order to protect the clay strata from erosion, but this was not employed here. When the drillhole pierced the clay strata, the high pressure mud below it quickly eroded the initial breach into a large breach which followed the drillhole upward to transform it into the mud volcano that now exists.


        It is a situation that has a lot in common with the levee breaches in NO after Katrina. In NO, initial attempts to repair the levee breaches by transporting large, heavy blocks into the breaches were unsuccessful as the breaches were just too large and the blocks were swept away. I expect the big ball method described in TFA to have as little effect as the big block method did in NO. It was only when the water levels equalized in NO that the corps were able to finally seal off the breaches.

        It seems to me that your method of using explosives to fix the problem would do nothing to help and would probably only widen the breach in the clay layer, much as using explosives would not have helped in NO. Using explosives in the mud bearing layer is impractical (beyond just getting the into place as another poster noted) as the mud bearing layer is too thick to be obstructed in this manner. Using explosives in the clay layer would only widen the breach. Using explosives above the clay layer would do nothingf as the pressure is already high enough to work it's way to the surface once it is through the clay layer.

        The only means of resealing the breach as I see it would be to drill through the clay layer (using liners to protect the clay from erosion) and then inject cement in large enough quantities to cause a plug to be formed below the clay. I have no idea if it is feasible as I do not know how large the breach has become and how much cement could be pumped in before being swept away.

        The "experiment" described in TFA where the debit was halved by plugging one out of two holes in a bottle is false as there is only one hole at present. Even if they achieve their goal of dumping the balls so that they settle on the clay layer, the mudflow will just erode around them and create a yet larger breach as nothing in the plan allows for the erosion of the mud layer.

        • by solitas ( 916005 )
          The "experiment" described in TFA where the debit was halved by plugging one out of two holes in a bottle is false as there is only one hole at present.

          Worse than that: apparently they don't understand the difference between internal pressure and gravitic flow.

          You plug all the holes in the bottle and it's still going to be at the same pressure (head). No big deal. BUT, you plug the hole(s) that internal pressure is forcing the mud through (against gravity, mind you), and you're going to have a 'situati

    • by evanbd ( 210358 )
      Great Balls of Fire, even...
  • by antifoidulus ( 807088 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:03PM (#17837164) Homepage Journal
    I'm sure you can find plenty here *looks around nervously*
  • by Whiney Mac Fanboy ( 963289 ) * <whineymacfanboy@gmail.com> on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:03PM (#17837174) Homepage Journal
    This was not a natural disaster: [iht.com]

    The disaster occurred as the company, Lapindo Brantas, drilled thousands of feet to tap natural gas and used practices that geologists, mining engineers and Indonesian officials described as faulty.
    but a poster child for why environmental regulation is a cornerstone to a successful economy:

    Eight villages are completely or partly submerged, with homes and more than 20 factories buried to the rooftops. Some 13,000 people have been evacuated. The four-lane highway west of here has been cut in two, as has the rail line, dealing a serious blow to the economy of this region in East Java, an area vital to the country's economy. The muck has already inundated an area covering one and a half square miles.
    Sadly, the company responsible is shirking their responsibilities:

    But as the liabilities have escalated, Lapindo was sold - for $2 - last month to an offshore company, owned by the Bakrie Group, and many fear it will declare bankruptcy, allowing its owners to walk away.
    Have a look at some hi res satellite images of the disaster [nus.edu.sg]
  • by dickeya ( 733264 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:06PM (#17837208)
    As one of the physicists said "The mud will find another way out". Maybe if they plug the hole, enough pressure will build up to cause a real eruption.

    These events happen for a reason. It's the planet's way of staying in balance.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:47PM (#17837626)
      The company selling the concrete did several studies, and dumping concrete into volcanoes is definitely good.
    • That can't be good [TM].

      Don't they install safety valves on pressure vessels as mandatory equipment to prevent... explosion. Aren't volcanoes nature's own pressure release valve?
    • they realize that, but this wasn't a natural event. it was caused by drilling. controlling the mud flow so it doesn't flood a populated area seems like a good thing to me. the point of the concrete balls isn't to block the passage of the mud. it's to control the flow so it isn't devastating a populated areas as it is at this point.
  • by Weaselmancer ( 533834 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:08PM (#17837234)

    Ever have a bottle of soda suddenly start spraying? How well does sticking your thumb over the nozzle help?

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by neax ( 961176 )
      what? untested...? This might be the equivalent of throwing ice-cubes into a vat of hot oil...
    • to get the hell away from the problem. If they bottle it up causing a worse problem in 5 or 10 years, they won't care.
    • What they hope to accomplish is more like a muffler on car exhaust. Plugging the exhaust pipe doesn't work the way you want, letting it out unimpeded is too loud, so you let it out but only through a maze of twisty passages all alike. A muffler produces some backpressure but not enough to blow holes in the rest of the exhaust system.

      Which is not to say that it will work. Mother Nature is quite capable of hearing both of us out and then saying "Analogies are like goldfish -- sometimes they don't illuminate t
  • by Loadmaster ( 720754 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:11PM (#17837258)
    They want to drop concrete balls into it? Do you take concrete balls when you have an upset stomach? Me neither. What they need is a dump truck full of Tums and a concrete mixer full of Mylanta. If that doesn't work you can always use a virgin. But concrete balls? These "scientists" need to get a real scientist--a witch doctor. They're witches and they're doctors. That's a lot of school. And if they can't fix it you can just throw them in there and save your concrete balls for outside a library or something.

    Swi
    • Re:It'll never work (Score:5, Interesting)

      by sumdumass ( 711423 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @11:33PM (#17838028) Journal
      Well, They are basicly dropping Tums and mylanta into it. The active ingredients of Tums involve calcium carbonate. One of the active ingredients of Mylanta is Aluminum Hydroxide. Note the core elements are calcium and aluminum. The compounds allow them to be digested and used easily in the body.

      The chemical make up of concrete (portland cement mainly) is mostly
      1. Tricalcium silicate
      2. Dicalcium silicate
      3. Tricalcium aluminate
      4. Tetracalcium aluminoferrite
      5. Gypsum
      Notice that these are all compounds of calcium and aluminum. I asume the heated water will help disolve them.

      pfft, we have just solve this problem. Give us another challenge ;)

      Strange how close you are. The witch doctor might add some value too. Maybe they can start a cultist religion surounding the "apeasing the volcano god" and use the funds from the colection plate to pay for the balls. Once a month the witch doctor could say the volcano god said supply it with Tums or it will cause destruction just before the colection plate is passed around.
      • dude, did you like study pharmacology and material science in college or something?
      • Dude, you are totally not living up to your nick.
      • Re:It'll never work (Score:4, Informative)

        by AndersOSU ( 873247 ) on Thursday February 01, 2007 @11:58AM (#17843990)
        I don't know if you're trolling or not, but since you've been modded so highly someone needs to correct these horrible mis-statements.

        First, you have the antacid chemistry precisely backwards. The active part is the hydroxide. You know the part that isn't an acid... as in antacid. The aluminum is there in the Mylanta because they wanted a stable liquid formulation, which hyroxides usually aren't. Aluminum hydroxide is an insoluble salt, and very stable on the shelf, until it reacts with your stomach acids neutraling them.

        Second, the "active" part of the concrete is the silicate. The calcium and aluminum are there because when they hydrate in the presence of sulfates (the gypsum) they act as binders. A binder is undeniably useful, but alternatively we could line our streets with mined chunks of silicate and if would be similar to concrete. The only reason we need the binders is so that we can grind it up for easy transport, slurry it for easy application, and it will still be hard like silicate when all is said and done.
  • Is it just my filthy internet-corrupted mind, or did anyone else immediately think "dog in a bathtub"

    No I'm not linking, go and look it up if you must

  • Cool! (Score:3, Informative)

    by second class skygod ( 242575 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:15PM (#17837304)
    Like I always say:
    There's pretty much nothing that can't be accomplished if you have big enough balls.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:16PM (#17837312)
    Teabagging a volcano...
  • Dangerous (Score:5, Informative)

    by jonadab ( 583620 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:16PM (#17837314) Homepage Journal
    Sounds like a good way to turn a shield volcano into a stratovolcano.

    The milk jug analogy is flawed. With holes in the bottom of a milk jug, it's just gravity that lets the water pour out under the force of its own weight, so yes, plugging one hole, or plugging the hole halfway, reduces the rate of flow and doesn't change the pressure -- because there's no pressure in the first place.

    Hook up a garden hose to the milk jug and then try it, though, and you've got an entirely different situation. Now you can turn the jug _over_, so that the holes are on the top, and you'll still get water squirting out, just like mud flowing *up* out of a volcano, against gravity. Plug one of the holes in the jug then, and you will indeed get more flow out the other hole.

    If the article accurately describes their strategy, they're only going to make matters worse, not better.
    • It is incorrect to say that there is no pressure at the bottom of the milk jug. There *is* pressure due to the weight of water above the holes. This is why the water will come out of the holes at a higher rate when the jug is nearly full than when it's almost empty.

      The garden hose analogy is also a tad flawed. If you attach the hose to the jug the jug will wind up being at same the pressure of the hose whether there's one hole or two in it.

      An analogy that is actually applicable in this case is that of a
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by sumdumass ( 711423 )
        The think best effect this might have should be compared with a percolator coffee pot. Their approach is trying to reach a different means but it could have a positive effect for other reasons. And I beleive the solution they are trying is simular to the same process of a percolator even though they are only trying to block the channel the mud is comming from..

        Now, If you examine a percolator you will notice a tube with a wide part at the bottom and narrower at the top. The large surface area of the heated
    • by khallow ( 566160 )
      It probably won't work, depending on how far down the obstacle gets. My take is that the break that needs to be plugged is almost 2 miles down (where Lapindo Brantas broke through into the aquifer that is currently leaking). But they're aiming to get only 100 meters down.
  • Just use (Score:5, Funny)

    by geekoid ( 135745 ) <dadinportland&yahoo,com> on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:18PM (#17837338) Homepage Journal
    Chuck Norris's balls.

    I don't know why I said that.
  • Last November they were tossing in live chickens and goats......
  • Time to call in Indy for some special consultation. Next thing you know, they'll be dropping natives, snakes, and Nazis into the volcano.
    • by gbobeck ( 926553 )

      Time to call in Indy for some special consultation. Next thing you know, they'll be dropping natives, snakes, and Nazis into the volcano.
      In reality, Harrison Ford would just call George Lucas who would just drop Jar Jar Binks into the volcano, thus causing the volcano to experience a massive sudden existence failure and killing off that damn Jar Jar character.
  • Pun intended. Does anyone else forsee in this the comedy that will likely unfold? I fully expect to read a story next week about a vocano in Indonesia that is firing concrete balls into the orbit and that they're taking our Chinese satellites or that they're pummeling a nearby city. I liken this to sticking your finger in the end of a shotgun barrel.
    • They tested this on mythbusters and while, sure the finger was destroyed it also did cause significant damage to the gun. Perhaps just enough to stop this volcano.
  • by MidnightBrewer ( 97195 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:36PM (#17837514)
    So they demonstrated their theory using a water bottle with two holes cut in the bottom, and showed how covering one hole slowed the rate of water leaving the bottle. That's all good and fine, but we're talking about water that's responding to the force of gravity, not pent-up pressure and geothermal heating. If the weight of the balls can counteract that, great, but if that's their idea of a physically accurate analogy, I think they might be in for some surprises. Here's hoping it works, anyway, despite their faulty physics.
  • Uh, when I first heard the term "mud volcano" I immediately thought about what happens when I eat too much Taco Bell.

    And the idea of sticking 4 concrete balls with metal chains attached to them into my "mud volcano" is kinda sickening.
  • by jon787 ( 512497 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @10:43PM (#17837582) Homepage Journal
    The opposing viewpoint shown in the article reminds me of the 6th networking truth:

    "It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than it is to solve it." --RFC1925
  • Just cram a couple of nukes down it. If you want any how to infomation consult SciFi Channel or any one of a hundred low budget scifi films.
  • geophysicists now plan to enact an untested scheme to try and slow the flow: dropping concrete balls into the volcano

    So basically when the volcano explodes, it won't just throw lava, but we'll also have raining canon balls. Smart!
    • by mikael ( 484 )
      I?f the pressure builds up high enough, we might have the first man-made object launched into space by natural means.
  • by myowntrueself ( 607117 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @11:10PM (#17837836)
    So how, exactly, is this any different from the traditional volcano-god appeasement technique of throwing hundreds of naked virgins into the volcano? Apart from being less exciting.

    • I think it would appease the gods more to throw all the American Idol contestans into the volcano instead. Naked virgins are worth saving. At least, any god I would believe in would think the same thing!
    • by Tablizer ( 95088 )
      So how, exactly, is this any different from the traditional volcano-god appeasement technique of throwing hundreds of naked virgins into the volcano?

      The scientists are smarter: they keep the virgins for themselves and throw just the clothes into the volcano.
               
      • they keep the virgins for themselves and throw just the clothes into the volcano

        Oh hey good one. I'll have to remember that for next time I'm in front of the ethics committee.
    • The key to the "throw the virgins into the volcano" trick seems pretty clear to me. It's a cheap ploy by the local volcano appeasment committee to convince the winsome wenches to prove their vacant virginity through deleterious deeds.

      Obviously this leeds to some pretty lame pick-up/reject lines. "If it were a choice between you and the volcano, I pick the volcano..." Although I wonder how many would really risk it...
  • Aren't we missing the most obvious solution here?

    We are geeks after all. And we know what will calm a volcano.

    V I R G I N S

    O.K., I need 3 Linux nerds, and 3 Linux nerdettes (come on, you know, you mention Linux at a party, you ain't getting laid).

    Volunteers?

    Free trip to Indonesia.

    • (come on, you know, you mention Linux at a party, you ain't getting laid).

      I just go to parties where they like masochists.
  • Just hire Tom Hanks to jump into it. If that doesn't work, at least we'll be rid of Tom Hanks and have a great new You Tube Video!.

    Seriously though, by adding these concrete balls, isn't that like putting shot into a black powder gun? The reason this is happening is to release pressure. Backing up the volcano and building up more pressure can't be a good thing. Especially with such conveniently sized plugs... I can just imagine the first report of someone being killed by man-made volcano debris.

  • ...muzzle loader.

    rj
  • by SeaFox ( 739806 ) on Wednesday January 31, 2007 @11:17PM (#17837888)
    Have they tried burping it? It might have a little gas trapped it its belly. That and a story should get it to calm right down.
  • Haven't we learned from cartoons that this is a really bad idea? Shortly after dumping the balls into the volcano, it's going to contract, then spit them out. The will fly high into the air, then crash into the people, stuck running in place, who threw them in.

    Think of the poor cartoon creatures that will be harmed!
  • by MadnessASAP ( 1052274 ) <madnessasap@gmail.com> on Thursday February 01, 2007 @12:16AM (#17838404)

    dropping concrete balls into the volcano.
    I already tried that and ended up sleeping on the couch for my efforts. They should try some flowers instead.
  • the Universe and Man, the Universe always wins.

    My Dad calls this "shovelling shit against the tide."

    And in this case, it's almost literal.

    --
    BMO
  • Is a volcano without fire still a volcano?
  • If they turn the place into a health spa, they can have lots of tourism and make more money from selling mud, than from selling the rice that used to grow there.
  • Washington, DC - A Congress belching forth shit is causing huge problems for the average US voter. The ravages of this shit-blowing Congress have caused an enormous stench, and scientists are preparing to drop concrete balls on their heads.

    "We're gonna fill Capitol Hill's shit pit with concrete." says Dr. Wulf B. Snerkfart, senior director of the Anti-Shit League. "That should calm down that shit volcano, and then we'll drop large iron anvils on the White House, which is probably the shittiest place on

  • ... all your problems start AFTER your balls drop.
  • My first reaction was: That will just make it mad.

    After reading part of the article, they argue that the speed of escape of one hole doesn't influence the speed of escape in another. This is fine, if you have a volcano with two holes spewing. You might slow one down if the flow of lava there is "annoying".

    But Volcanoes in general tend not to show the behaviour of "Mwah there is hole, the lava flow will be proportional to the size of the hole". Volcanoes tend to "want to" spew this much material, and if it c
  • A previous experience in Italy shows that something can be done even against lava flows, not just slow mud eruptions. If not at the volcano emission site, at least in the "tubes" that keep lava hot and allow it to travel very far semi-buried under its own crust.
    In 1992 a huge eruption from Mount Etna in Sicily (the biggest volcano in Europe) threatened some villages. A lava flow running straight toward them was partially diverted by breaking and obstructing its channel with concrete blocks dropped from hel

The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. -- Merrick Furst

Working...