Scientists Witness Meteor Strike on the Moon 139
Lonesome Squash writes "BBC reports that scientists have seen a smallish meteor strike on the moon. Impact only equivalent to 70kg of TNT, but still, you wouldn't want to have it land on your moonbase. At that size, it's kind of neat they saw it at all."
Dupe (Score:5, Informative)
Thats awesome news! (Score:5, Funny)
Amazing..
Re:Thats awesome news! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Thats awesome news! (Score:1)
Re:Dupe (Score:3, Funny)
KFG
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
I guess dupes only happen on Slashdot once in an exploding Blue Moon though...
Old News (Score:1)
What was more interesting from the article, was the toxicity of Moon Dust and the fact that it's highly abrasive, sticks to everything and gets into everything because it's so light.
Seems back when the contest was announced for an autonomous robot to pick up regolite having to contend with the dust should be the greatest consideration.
In organic gardening, I used fossilized diatoms (diatomaceous earth, often used in pool filters) to fight wo
Re:Old News (Score:2, Informative)
Click "Join mailing list" at the top.
Re:Dupe (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
Re:Dupe (Score:4, Funny)
Yes, but look at the misleading title:
I mean, when did we get scientists back on the moon in the first place? And was the meteor picketing, or was this a sit-down strike?
Corrected headline:
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
Scientists Witness Moon Meteor Strike
But who's counting?
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
Well, we could always send BushCo there as a first step to his "Mars Program" that seems to have sunk like a lead balloon. The resulting torrential outpouring of hot air would give the moon an atmoshpere like Venus - hot and toxic to human life. It would also result in a reduction in those same greenhouse gas emissions here on Earth.
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
This is a pretty lame statement. Many of us were intelligent [or jaded] enough to know when it was announced that it was nothing more than handwaving.
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
We took it as hand-waving, but in retrospect, I think Bush actually believed it.
His powers of self-delusion make the Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field look like the work of an fumble-thumbed amateur with a bread-board kit and cheap, lead-based solder (Bush, OTOH, may have have gotten his from eating cheap, lead-based paint chips :-)
The worst part - a Mars colony is doable with current tech and resources, provided we don't care about bringing anyone back "home", but really want to establish a permanen
Re:Dupe (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Dupe (Score:1, Offtopic)
History Dupes Us All (Score:2)
and do a quick scan for the 5th decent-sized paragraph, that starts with this guy's name: Gervasius
Re:Dupe (Score:1, Funny)
It's a trap!!!
I don't understand (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I don't understand (Score:2, Funny)
Yes there is science behind it, but it's far too hard to understand. That flash wouldn't have been caused by aliens, or the secret NASA Moonbase, or any of the other possible.... [sounds of gunfire]
Pay no attention to the previous paragraph. We're with the government and there is no cover-up...
Re:I don't understand (Score:2, Funny)
Either that or...
What a coincidence that the Reptilian camera caught the explosion with Earth in the background! Should make a good screen saver.
--
Enjoy,
Randy
Re:I don't understand (Score:2)
Re:I don't understand (Score:2)
I've Found a Better Picture (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I've Found a Better Picture (Score:1)
Informative? (Score:2)
They aren't guessing. (Score:2)
Re:I don't understand (Score:2)
Well, I am fairly surprised by that artistic impression too. It seems that a fair bit of artistic license was taken with this. Oh well...
popcorn 'n cheese (Score:5, Funny)
Re:popcorn 'n cheese (Score:2)
That explains it! (Score:4, Funny)
Lunar Embassy (Score:5, Funny)
What next!
Re:Lunar Embassy (Score:1)
Re:Lunar Embassy (Score:2)
It's a shame (Score:4, Interesting)
Would settle the score about earth contamination at least.
Re:It's a shame (Score:2, Interesting)
FF VII-2 (Score:2, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.space.com/news/spacehistory/nuke_moon_
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:2)
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:1)
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:2)
Why not? a: it's better than detonating nukes on Earth
b: everyone would be able to SEE it. It would seem more real than just reading about or watching videos of nukes. Maybe it would have a positive effect on us all.
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:2)
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:2)
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:2, Funny)
Then USSR would nuke the other side, starting a moon war and turn it into a vast sea of craters.......oh wait.
Re:Speaking of explosions on the moon... (Score:2)
Gotta Nuke something... (Score:2)
It was actually not that bad an idea, before the advent of reliable complex telemetry systems, it was a fairly reasonable way to prove you had done it.
Brett
Artistic renderings (Score:2)
Don't you love cool images that make you say "wow!" and have a tiny caption at the bottom, saying:
"The impact may have looked something like this" or
"artist's rendering of
I think I'd stay with the real thing, thank you.
Re:Artistic renderings (Score:3, Funny)
Much science data is boring to non-scientists and the visuals help engage the casual reader.
So That's Where it Went! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So That's Where it Went! (Score:2)
In other news. (Score:4, Funny)
Intelligent Rock Hurler was not available for comment. His coworkers who plot out the precise trajectories of rocks that result in these strikes also refused to talk to our reporters.
a smallish fetish (Score:2, Funny)
I guess (Score:2)
In before quotes (Score:5, Funny)
Odd coincidence... (Score:2)
He's five, so I doubt he's reading Slashdot (yet)...
Re:Odd coincidence... (Score:5, Funny)
are you sure?? I see a lot of five year olds posting to
Re:Odd coincidence... (Score:2)
I don't think CmdrTaco would appreciate you calling him a 5 year old.
Re:Odd coincidence... (Score:1)
Did the conversation end with, "This is what happens when you don't brush your teeth and clean your room"? Always worked on my kids.
Re:Odd coincidence... (Score:2)
Re:Odd coincidence... (Score:1)
You mean like, "Why should I make my bed when the Sun is going to puff up into a huge fireball and cook my bed?"
I'll go out on a limb here... (Score:5, Funny)
However, as Nasa plans to return to the Moon by 2020, the agency says it needs to understand what happens after lunar impacts in order to protect astronauts.
I am guessing that there will be a crater of some sort after the impact. Maybe some floating dust. That sort of thing.
qz
Re:I'll go out on a limb here... (Score:5, Informative)
> impact. Maybe some floating dust.
Dust doesn't float very well in a vacuum. In fact, it doesn't float at all. Dust particles created by the explosion will follow ballistic trajectories just like those of the larger fragments. This is important because while you are unlikely to be hit by a large chunk if you're kilometers away 1000 m/s dust could do a lot of damage.
Re:I'll go out on a limb here... (Score:2)
I think it would look something like "floating" where the dust particles collide with each other an are sent off in new directions. This would simulate the floating phenomenon in areas where the concentration of dust is sufficiently great.
Your point about the 1000 m/s dust made me wonder what the escape velocity is on the moon. I did a little googling, and that number appears to be around 2400 m/s. So I guess the good news is there's an upper limit to the
Re:I'll go out on a limb here... (Score:2)
You mean, if you are shielded from dust on ballistic trajectories? The stuff ejected sideways will travel for some distance, influenced by the gravitational pull of the moon, before escaping.
Re:I'll go out on a limb here... (Score:2)
Re:I'll go out on a limb here... (Score:2)
floating |?fl?ti ng | adjective [ attrib. ]
1 buoyant or suspended in water or air : a massive floating platform.
2 not settled in a definite place; fluctuating or variable : the floating population that is migrating to the citi
Sheer lunacy (Score:2)
Not as big as Moon Base Alpha explosion in '99 (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Not as big as Moon Base Alpha explosion in '99 (Score:3, Funny)
Furthermore, It's minute long spontaneous ignition (caused by improper management of the facility and not following the safety specifications) was hardly an exp
Would an atmosphere have helped? (Score:2)
What I would like to know is, had this same object entered Earth's atmosphere, would it have made it to the surface or burt up? How much atmosphere (as a percentage of Earth's where Earth's = 100%) would be required to "protect" surface objects from significant damage?
Re:Would an atmosphere have helped? (Score:2)
It turns out that what these meteoroids lack in mass they make up for in speed, and this is what causes the flash of light in the sky. Meteoroids enter the atmosphere at extremely high speeds -- 7 to 45 miles per second
So how big does a meteoroid have to be to make it to the surface of the earth? Surprisingly, most of the meteoroids that reach the ground are especially small -- from microscopic debris to dust-particle-size pieces. They don't get vaporized becau
Re:Would an atmosphere have helped? (Score:1)
Apparently a lot more than we have...I just saw a Toyota truck get nailed on TV during the football game last night.
Thank goodness it was one of those meteor-proof models!
How come we didn't hear the impact? (Score:1)
Well .... (Score:3, Funny)
Did it hit the dump outside of MoonBase Alpha ? (Score:1, Funny)
Dammit, I missed! (Score:2)
They didn't mention anything in the warranty about hitting balls in 1/6th gravity..
Need to go back (Score:2)
Can anyone else find it? (Score:1)
Artist's Impression (Score:2)
It's a fake, next please (Score:2)
I hope they don't start increasing in frequency... (Score:2)
Fun in Wing Commander, bad news for Earthlings.
Not the first time (Score:3, Interesting)
Dupes and Dupedupes (Score:2)
Of course if complaining about dupes is a sort of conspicuous consumption behavior where you get to show how much time you have to keep track of what's on
Lunar Transcient Phenomena? (Score:2)
Anybody know?
Re:moon terrorists (Score:2, Funny)
Bush shakes fist.
Re:moon terrorists (Score:1)
Re:moon terrorists (Score:2)
Well, that's basically what happened. The ol'Brigadeer and some of the lads commandeered one of Sir Richard's new spaceships, loaded it up with high-ex and launched it moonwards to celebrate the four hundredth anniversary of religiously-flavoured terrorism. It was a lovely sight on takeoff, and the bonus reward two days later when it hit target was quite delightful. O'course, we had to h
Re:Only 70kg? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Only 70kg? (Score:1)
Which is pretty good for a little 12 centimeter (< 5") rock. Mind you, at 27 km/s, just about anything is a WMD--imagine if it had been a whole Volkswagen (VWMD)!
Re:Slashdot reader's thoughts: (Score:3, Funny)
And they smacked you down to -1 too. Seems the eds spend more time seeking revenge than checking their stories. If you'd been Roland Piquepaille, they wouldn't have been so cavalier.
Re:"Happy Dupe Year!" Poll (Score:2)
Cheers,
Ian
Re:"Happy Dupe Year!" Poll (Score:2)
You mean the editors can read?
Re:Antichristian Scientists (Score:2)
Ewww! Its bad enough that parents are taking videos of your birth and plastering them all over the internet, and showing them to your friends during your birthday - I really don't want to see videos of them conceiving me!
I mean, okay, in my head I can understand they once were my age, they obviously did what any other couple with kids did, but I don't want to be invited to that party. Nobody should see thei
Re:Antichristian Scientists (Score:2)
Wait, wait, wait... are you saying that Darwin is still alive, and living on the moon?
That's awesome!