Rock Face of Kilauea Volcano Collapses 180
jurt1235 writes "The rockface on the Kilauea volcano in Hawaii recently collapsed over the course of about four hours. The collapse was predicted. The USGS has some great pictures of nature in action. The new rockface, which most likely will fall again, is already being build up by the vulcano." From the CNN article: "The plume, 6 feet in diameter, sent up a tower of steam as it hit the water and began forming a ramp of new land. The collapse of solidified lava shelf and sea cliff Monday was the largest since Kilauea Volcano began its current eruption in 1983."
Oh, man. (Score:5, Funny)
(ducks)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:1)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Fine, (insert Mustafar joke here)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:5, Informative)
For anyone who didn't get it you might read the wiki page for Scientology [wikipedia.org]. However, to spare you from going through an entire page on that "religion", here's the related excerpt:
Space planes and nuclear weapons. The basis for any worthwhile religion.
[insert comments about WMDs and Bush searching for Xenu here
Re:Oh, man. (Score:5, Informative)
Heh, better yet, download the really funny Southpark Episode on scientology from Xenu.net [xenu.net] (free and legal, thanks to Matt Stone and Trey Parker). This is the one that asks Tom Cruise to come out of the closet ~forty times...
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:3, Interesting)
I've had some exposure to Scientology from different perspectives. My first introduction was, actually, Operation Clambake and some similar WWW resources. Since then, I've met some actual Scientologists and discussed the religion and the controversies it creates. And, full disclosure, I'm seeing a woman right now who works for the Church of Scientology. For real.
First point: My girlfriend is part of a religion that believes
The lesson? (Score:2)
Your girlfriend must be a damn good lay.
Re:Oh, man. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
There are two core points here:
1) Attacking Scientology's abuses while ignoring/minimizing the (worse) abuses of other groups diminishes the credibility of the attacker. If you're a bulldog on one particular group but don't seem to be bothered by other, similarly bad groups, it makes me wonder why you've got it in for your chosen foe.
2) Maligning Scientology for
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Except that nobody specifically ignored or minimized the actions of other groups. Catholicism is essentially silent on the volcano subject. I think cridibility is strained more when you randomly accuse them of giving Catholicism a pass when Catholicism is not germane to the subject at hand.
2) Maligning Scientology for its outlandish, but harmless, beliefs is silly, bec
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
0% of Heaven's Gate cult members have historically tortured and killed people for heresy. I leave it as an exercise to the reader to determine whether 30-odd people committing suicide is better or worse than the Inquisition...
I love how ignorant people are of religion on ./
I love how people on /. use strawman arguments to prove ignorance.
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Why is it a bad thing? If it's something that helps define a person's moral framework, you should in fact appreciate it. Think of it as a sort of built-in track record. Let's say you're deciding who you would like to be on the supreme court. You have Potential Justice A with no known opinion on many i
Re:I won't flame you... (Score:2)
Ad hominem? That would mean that I'm attacking the character of the person making the argument. There is a name for the logical fallacy I'm committing, but I forget what it is.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not legitimizing Scientology--of course its silly, non-factual BS
Re:I won't flame you... (Score:2)
Re:I won't flame you... (Score:2)
The thing about the Xenu story is that the Co$ promises people deep and important secrets once they've reached Operating Clear Super Saiyajin Thetan 5 or whatever the hell they call it. Secrets, they say, that could cause serious damage if told to someone not prepared by years of incredibly expensive courses.
Once you get there, you hear the Xenu story. At which point you eit
Re:I won't flame you... (Score:2)
Damn lack of an 'edit' button... Come on, at least we should be able to edit our posts as long as we do it before anyone has replied or moderated?
Obviously, this should have been '(a) is pretty rare'.
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Right, but why do you get to conveniently edit Genesis out when asking whether Christian, Jewish, and Muslim beliefs are demonstrably false?
And COME ON, do we really need to argue over whether the resurrection of Jesus Christ is demonstrably false? At the very least, it's not empirically proven--absent pure religious faith, what rational observer would accept it as historical fact? (Not to harsh on Christians, here--I'm just saying that if
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
j/k
Re:Oh, man. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: Pattern-seeking individuals (Score:2)
I think that's exactly right.
Next question: how do you make someone want to believe something? I think the answer is to provide an unacceptable alternative, like "if you don't believe and be saved, your life will be meaningless, and when you die, you will burn in hell." Well, that's the Christian version, I don't know what Scientology says is the punish
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Yeah, and he was, like, the first and only guy to think anything in that direction.
Now, the executive summary of the church's teachings (almost from the start) is guilt, shame, shame, guilt, more guilt, with an extra helping of guilt on top.
Re:Oh, man. (Score:3, Funny)
As a representative of the Church of Scientology. I would like to infor you that we recently came upon and read one of your posts on the social website forthwith known here as 'slashdot'. We saw that you ridiculed the faith, and as you must understand this is intolerable. We have deployed a crack team of lawyers to your residence and that of the website 'slashdot'. In the case that we are unable to disabuse you of these misconceptions, we have teams
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
Re:Oh, man. (Score:2)
No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot? (Score:5, Insightful)
This should read:
The new rock face, which most likely will fall again, is already being built up by the volcano.
Have the Slashdot editors been replaced with ESL monkeys?
Or perhaps, are there no open source apps with spelling and grammar checking?
Or perhaps, do they just not care because idiots like me will probably continue coming here out of habit, regardless of how bad the writing and editing is?
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:2)
There are plenty. Don't blame OSS for the editors' Engrish.
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:2)
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:3, Funny)
v1. Have you ever heard of a spellchekcer?
v2. That should me "spellchecker" ^^
v3. ^^ Obviously spellchecker's can't fix everything.
v4. Neithe'r can' obssessiv'e apostrophes's ^
v4.1. That's why I use VI
v4.2. Emacs said this ^^ doesn't need to be capitalized
Wait... that's not progress. Eh, then again, neither
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:2)
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:1)
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:1)
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:1)
This should read:
Or perhaps, do they just not care because idiots like me will probably continue coming here out of habit, regardless of how bad the whining and complaining is?
haha, ESL monkeys (Score:1, Funny)
Re: All the EFL monkeys are busy... (Score:1)
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:2)
The term Slashdot Editor is a joke. On you. =)
Re:No english-speaking editors working at Slashdot (Score:2)
A million monkeys typing at a million keyboards...but that theory was only for English!
Wikipedia/Cool Pictures (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Wikipedia/Cool Pictures (Score:1)
Hawaiian volcanoes have caused tsunamis before (Score:4, Informative)
Bad news is that if it happened again, it would decimate Hawaii, but the good news (if you can call it that) is that this sort of tsunami would attenuate before reaching the mainland.
http://www.mala.bc.ca/~earles/kohala-tsunami-sep0
Re:Hawaiian volcanoes have caused tsunamis before (Score:2, Interesting)
-JMP
dot TV (Score:2)
Is Tuvalu underwater yet?
Re:Hawaiian volcanoes have caused tsunamis before (Score:2)
Granted it would not eradicate Los Angles, but likely smash some seafront buildings (still a mess).
Yours Yazeran
Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer.
Re:Wikipedia/Cool Pictures (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Wikipedia/Cool Pictures (Score:2)
The Thing (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The Thing (Score:2)
underwater land slide ? (Score:2)
I recall reading once that the cliff created by volcanoes lava flow could eventually break off causeing an underwater landlslide that could potentially wipe out the pacific rim, and the US west coast. I wonder how this all plays into things.
Re:underwater land slide ? (Score:2)
Superman flies around the earth so fast he goes back in time so he can be in two places at once to save both Lois and the whales. Everyone's happy except for Luthor.
Re:underwater land slide ? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:underwater land slide ? (Score:2)
IIRC, the fault line runes pretty near the summit of Kilauea.
Re:underwater land slide ? (Score:2)
Re:underwater land slide ? (Score:2)
Summary and title is wrong, didn't see that coming (Score:5, Informative)
The rock face of Kilauea didn't collapse. A shelf on the coastline formed by lava flows from Kilauea collapsed. Kilauea is located fairly far inland and has no chance of collapsing without taking a decent portion of the island of Hawai'i with it.
Re:Summary and title is wrong, didn't see that com (Score:2)
Re:Summary and title is wrong, didn't see that com (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Summary and title is wrong, didn't see that com (Score:2)
The rock face of Kilauea didn't collapse. A shelf on the coastline formed by lava flows from Kilauea collapsed. Kilauea is located fairly far inland and has no chance of collapsing without taking a decent portion of the island of Hawai'i with it.
Bogus meter pegged when headline omitted "Mile High Tsunami Devastates LA".Dead tourists? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Some other pictures are available too (Score:3, Informative)
I wonder (Score:3, Interesting)
New land
Who owns it?
If my 2 3/8 acre lot suddenly got bigger on on side, somehow, would I own it? My neighbor?
Would I have to pay increased taxes on my suddenly-newer lot?
Does anyone know how this all works?
Re:I wonder (Score:5, Informative)
The federal government. It's all generally a part of Volcanoes National Park.
"If my 2 3/8 acre lot suddenly got bigger on on side, somehow, would I own it? My neighbor?"
First off, let's assume for the moment that the process of adding new land doesn't destroy any improvmenets (i. e. lava didn't run down your house). If you're on the wrong side of Kilauea, do you want to know what your property insurance rates look like?
But beyond that, even after everything had cooled and solidified, this new land generally isn't anything you'd want. It is black rock; it will bake your sorry ass off in the sun (just ask the triathelets in the Ironman, and the parts they run/bike through is much older and much less reflective than the new stuff). Generally speaking, on Hawai'i, there are two flavors of cooled lava: 'a'a and pahoehoe. 'A'a is essentially broken, jumbled black rocks, but very sharp broken, jumbled black rocks (new rocks means no erosion) that can be trecharous to walk on and can kill a new pair of shoes (or your knees and hands when you stumble). Pahoehoe looks like solidifed toffee, a single, solid sheet of EasyBake Oven.
Not all of the island of Hawai'i is the lush, tropical paradise everybody writes home about. Tropical rainforests (and all that it entails) on the windward side, desert on the leeward, snow on Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa, and an outright moonscape on the wrong side of the volcanoes. Even outside of the national park there is a whole mess of land that won't be selling any time soon.
"Would I have to pay increased taxes on my suddenly-newer lot?"
Probably the other direction; your property value would likely plummet once Pele is done with it.
Re:I wonder (Score:2, Interesting)
Major disaster? Nope. (Score:5, Informative)
"Rock Face of Kilauea Volcano Collapses" almost had me lunging for CNN in the hope of spectacular footage of Hawaii sliding into the ocean beneath mile-high plumes of steam and lava, while the USA's west coast falls into panic before the approaching tsunami.
"Biggish Lumps of Lava Miles from Kilauea Fall Into Sea" would be a more accurate description. Maybe the editors can use that for next week's dupe.
A Related Site (Score:3, Interesting)
Cooled lava flows may look stable to walk on, but the crust may be thin, which would expose the hiker to a falling into a lava tube. There may even be flowing lava under a thin crust of aa lava. Falling into an active lava tube will be instant death.
http://www.volcanolive.com/safety.html [volcanolive.com]
Don't come running to me.. (Score:1)
Re:A Related Site (Score:1)
Re:A Related Site (Score:3, Interesting)
Although since a lava stream is anywhere between 800C and 1200C which is enough to melt most metals below manganese [go.com], you would probably just end up being a large carbon statue.
Re:A Related Site (Score:3, Interesting)
then again if it was shallow and/or barely liquid it could be an excruciating few seconds as boiling flesh creates a steam barrier slowing the burning.
old news (Score:1)
Was there three days before it happened... (Score:5, Interesting)
So I finally got a chance to go with some friends last Friday, day after Thanksgiving. Unfortunately, the park rangers had closed the trail a mile and a half from the lava flow, saying that a bench had collapsed into the ocean several months ago, taking 14 hikers with it, who were never found. I can only imagine that they either drowned, were incinerated, or were buried alive by the landslide, or some ungodly combination of the three. There are also a lot of signs at the park with pictures of a bench breaking off into the ocean and an unfortunate stick figure hiker falling in with it, but the pics are out of scale and make the bench look like a rather small edge of land by the sea, easily steered clear of.
Anyway, it was a disappointment b/c I really wanted to see the lave up close. My friends and I debated a bit about sneaking out across the lava fields anyway, which would have been quite easy to do since the ranger station was over a mile back down the road, and there were no rangers guarding the trail or anywhere near. We figured we would just stay a good 50 yards or more inland, away from these fragile "benches". We didn't care so much about seeing the lave go into the ocean as we did about just seeing it flowing across the ground.
But in the end we decided to turn back and head home, and return another day. Only yesterday did I see in the news that a ~40-acre bench had broken off into the ocean. Holy moly, 40 acres! And that was only three days after we almost snuck out on this exact bench, not realizing its massive size! I also discovered that that bench that took the 14 hikers with it was actually ~12 acres, certainly not easily steered clear of. Further, like an iceberg, the lava flowing across the surface of the bench is only a fraction of the total flow, as most of it flows down the hill, hits the bench at the base of the hill, and seeps into tunnels which spread out over a wider swath than the surface flow, and through which it continues its flow to the ocean. These hollow tunnels, combined with the porous brittleness of hardened lava rock and erosion from the ocean water seaping into the bench causes large sections to crumble and break off periodically.
It's all quite fascinating, but the moral of the story is, kids, when the park ranger at a volcano tells you not to do something but doesn't volunteer the details or say why, trust him anyway and don't do it!
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:2)
They were suffered a combination of being boiled alive and drowning. Th
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:2)
And then the sharks said "Yumm!!"
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:2)
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:2)
Why is this a game that most kids play on the playground? "Don't touch the ground, it's LAVA!!!!"
Was there around the same time - close up pics (Score:2)
I met two guys there who were local Lava Junkies, and visited pretty often - walking in places I thought were a bit unsafe. They were kind enough to show my some of the safer places to walk close to the lava and I got some great pictures [pbase.com] as a result.
Read the text from "Close Enough" for a small funny story about them.
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:2)
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Was there three days before it happened... (Score:2)
at least get mentioned somewhere. . .
So how do we... (Score:2, Funny)
I dunno (Score:2)
Time Lapse (Score:2)
Apalling post (Score:3, Informative)
First, Kilauea is not errupting per-say. Kilauea volcano, and the Kilauea caldera, are located within the park itself and the caldera is NOT errupting. Lava is (and has for many years now) been moving from under kilauea caldera towards the Pu'u O'o vent, about 15 or so miles away (as the Nene fly) where the lava both comes out in surface flows as well as moves through lava tubes. While Pu'u O'o does sit on, and is part of, kilauea caldera - and while one could technically say that kilauea volcano is errupting, it is a bit misleading.
Also... the 'rock face' of kilauea did NOT collapse. The rock face is just dandy and totally intact as it is only a mile from me - and has a very nice road all the way around it for people to enjoy.
What REALLY happened is that lava flowing through lava tubes from the Pu'u O'o vent, which sits at about 2500 feet above sea level, is moving down a steep pali (cliff) and out onto the flats near sea level. It continues allt he way to the ocean where it comes out of the cliff side and pours into the ocean. Over time a false chunk of land builds up - often many many acres in size. This new land is called a Lava Bench and it is extremely unstable as it is both very new, has active lava in it, and is being undercut by the ocean water. Over time (anywhere from days, to months) this bench builds to the point where it can't sustain it's own weight and other environmental factors, and at that point it breaks appart in a spectacular burst of lava and explosions and disappears into the ocean.
This has been going on for a very long time now. I personally have witnessed two lava benches collapse only yards from me (one in fact threw red hot lava up into the air, and over my head, to land behind me - needless to say we quickly retreated to a safer position).
As per the question being asked of who owns the new land... it depends on where the lava comes out. The lava tends to have about a 6 to 8 mile wide area that it likes to flow. Sometimes it is entirely on one side, placing it in the park boundries and thus under control of the feds. Other times it swings the other side and flows outside of park boundries, and away from the feds - to spots where we can have much more fun playing with lava.
And play we like to do... besides cooking in lava (die-hard slashdotters may require my question in the interview to Alton Brown on how cooking in lava works, and his flippant reply questioning the type of drugs I was on), dropping steel cable into lava tubes to pull out samples, and other more questionable practices that will go unmentioned here.
However, it was NOT the rock face of kilauea caldera (volcano) that has collapsed... it is merely the cliff side and lava bench which are extremely unstable and EXPECTED to collapse. This one made the news only because it was very very big - but not unexpected, not rare, not the caldera or volcano itself, and certainly not something which is unusual.
If you want more information about our wonderful volcano - and recipes for cooking in it, or poking things in it, or dangers of lava, or even how to walk on the hot stuff... see our portal below:
http://www.instanthawaii.com/cgi-bin/hawaii?Volcan o [instanthawaii.com]
Mahalo nui loa!
Re:How... (Score:2)
Re:How... (Score:1, Troll)
Re:How... (Score:2)
Count me as one. I'm a geologist and a computer geek.
Besides, it's interesting. And it breaks up the constant monotony of reading Microsoft vs. Google articles.
Re:How... (Score:2)
Does it require a huge interest in technology, or in science in general?
Geology is most definitely a science anyway.
Re:How... (Score:1)
Re:How... (Score:2)
But for some people, Slashdot just isn't entertaining enough on a Saturday night.
Re:Arghh (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Arghh (Score:5, Funny)
Re:so what!?!?! (Score:2)
You clearly don't get it. (Score:2)