Four Millennia Old Noodles Found In China 264
mollten writes "According to BBC News, the world's oldest noodles have been found at the Lajia site in China. Carbon Dating has found the remains to be over 4000 years old." From the article: "Prior to the discovery of noodles at Lajia, the earliest written record of noodles is traced to a book written during the East Han Dynasty sometime between AD 25 and 220, although it remained a subject of debate whether the Chinese, the Italians, or the Arabs invented it first ... Our discovery indicates that noodles were first produced in China."
Lajia U? (Score:4, Funny)
They should keep digging. I'm betting they've stumbled across an old Lajia University dormitory and discovered students' supplies of Ramen. (Well at least that's what we lived on in college.)
Re:Lajia U? (Score:5, Funny)
*Not the kind you smoke.
Re:Lajia U? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Lajia U? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Lajia U? (Score:2)
I don't get it...
keep digging... (Score:2)
Re:Lajia U? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Lajia U? (Score:2)
Re:Lajia U? (Score:2)
Was it Ramen? (Score:5, Funny)
Probably still good.
Re:Was it Ramen? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Was it Ramen? (Score:2, Interesting)
The noodle chef starts with a well worked ball of dough, rolls it into a rope like thing, takes one end in each hand, pulls it as wide as his armspan while swinging it up and down, doubles it over between his hands and repeats until it's been stretched thin enough. I realize my description doesn't do it justice, but to see it is to be
Re:Was it Ramen? (Score:2)
Translation of text found with noodles (Score:5, Funny)
2. peel back lid on cup and pour water to line
3. cover for 3 minutes
Re:Translation of text found with noodles (Score:5, Funny)
2. peel back lid on cup and pour water to line
3. cover for 3 minutes"
You forgot some:
4. ???
5. GUNPOWDER!
Re:Translation of text found with noodles (Score:2)
mmm (Score:3, Funny)
Arrr matey! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Arrr matey! (Score:5, Funny)
Ramen, brother! (Score:2)
Ancient ramen? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Ancient ramen? (Score:2)
This differs fromt he modern version? how?
This is the proof we needed! (Score:5, Funny)
This may have an impact on the holy books, but I'm sure the clergy is already handling the matter.
Re:This is the proof we needed! (Score:2, Funny)
FSM
Re:This is the proof we needed! (Score:2)
I'm an ordained minister, and have been so for about 4 years now. On days that begin with M and W, I spend my time in thinking about a Tail-swallowing universe. On days beginning with T, I think about an Enternal Universe. On Days starting with S, I eat Spaghetti. On days that start with F, I just give out to sheer solopsist debauchery and say I'm a Christian.
The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
You're right, those noodles are probably pretty dried out after 4000 years.
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2, Interesting)
One theory is that pasta was invented in several different regions independently. Considering the ingredients it seems plausible. Ground grain, water, maybe some eggs.
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who invented gunpowder first? The Chinese (although primarily used for bombs and fireworks.)
Who developed rule by divine right first? The Chinese (see: Chinese Mandate of Heaven.)
Who developed (or adopted) the idea of education as a high priority for all its citizens? The Chinese (see: Confucius.)
Who 'discovered' North and South America firs
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
They just don't tend to mention it very much. Asian achievments that is. Their ussually hevily focused on European history. At leats high school texts. And often the facts in high school level texts are off.
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
By the time you get to the late 1940s with World War II ending, you've got a nation literally divided upon itself: western China was largely untouched, but eastern China was a demolished warzone not to the fact that Nationalist Chinese forces wer
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
Mentioning capitalism as the source of Africa's problems is, let's say, a unique perspective. Many of Africa's problems can be attributed to Western colonialism, but that is NOT capitalism.
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
The last one lasted 600 years. Although civil unrest was common. As well, China takes great pride in teaching it's children about itself. Much liek Europe, America, Canada ect...
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
Rule by diving right is considered a cultural advance now??? I'd say at best it's a crude propaganda tool to keep the superstitious proles in line....
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:4, Insightful)
You mean most *Western* history is written from a Western point of view. Go to China and I suspect that you'll find somewhat different history texts.
Re:The inventions of noodles was in question? (Score:2)
At the shop around the corner (Score:2, Funny)
Article Continued (Score:2)
This finding replaces the previous record, 270 years, previously held by "Uncle Joe's Authentic Chynees" (sic) on 3rd Street. While the restaurant (closed since August under order of the local health department after reports of patrons teeth chipping while eating the "Egg-Foou-Youngings") no longer holds the record, it maintains its distinction as the restaurant serving the oldest noodles. When asked for comment, "Uncle Joe" continued to defend his cuisine stating that his establishment has a policy of
One more proof.... (Score:4, Funny)
If They're Looking For Old Food... (Score:4, Funny)
Shortly after... (Score:2, Funny)
That sound you hear... (Score:5, Funny)
Non sequitur (Score:4, Insightful)
Although I would tend to agree with that theory, this is badly worded, to the verge of being a logical fallacy. It would be better to say that the discovery "rules out the Italians and Arabs," since those cultures post-date these noodles (assuming the accuracy of the dating, despite radiocarbon's vulnerability to contamination). The discovery does not prove that some earlier culture didn't have noodles first. We can only say we have no evidence for an earlier existence.
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2)
Best sentence ever.
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2, Funny)
"It is a Bos taurus," - says the biologist.
"It is black," - says the physicist.
"It is black on not less than one side," - says the mathematician.
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2)
Re:Non sequitur (Score:3, Informative)
In most cases, contamination of C14 samples can come from one of two places: either newer material is introduced or older carbon is absorbed from the matrix. If newer material was introduced (either by the archeologists, or by natural processes), then the date will come out more recent, thus the noodles are older than the dates suggest. On the other hand, older material is generally introduced from the sediment matrix itself, and that is fairly
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2)
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2)
Theological concerns. If C14 dating is correct, then the earth is older than 6000 years ago, and it would anger the sky wizard to have errors poked in a book some guy wrote.
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2)
They aren't, and your article itself says the reason RC works is that
That is, if you have objects of a known age (datable by a different method, such as dendrochronology...) you can use those to calibrate RC.
This still limits range of RC dating, because it works only as far in the past as there is calibration available. Beyond
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2)
They aren't,
Actually, they are, if that relatively means comparing with things like CO2, methane, or ozone. That is, over a period of decades or centuries, you can get 5% or 10% variations. But you don't get 1000% variations, at least not in the past 100,000 years or so.
Suitable corrections are available
Yeah, but there's a small additional qualification: The cor
Re:Non sequitur (Score:2)
You post proves that you have no grasp at logic at all ;-)
The point is that once the material "died" the amount of C-14 entering it's system stopped,
Yes, and that's a good thing too. How else do you think RC dating works? (Hint: if exchange of material didn't stop at death, the C-14/C-12 ratio would be at same level as everything at the time it was found, and you couldn't measure anything useful at all...)
thus the initial ratio is whatever it was when the poor thing died.
Se
Also found nearby... (Score:2)
Re:Also found nearby... (Score:2)
Did the noodles have MSG? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Did the noodles have MSG? (Score:2)
Condiments? (Score:5, Funny)
4000-year old noodles, found... (Score:2)
Cool, but don't forget the beer! (Score:2)
What would be interesting... (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sure it's done to some degree, but it would seem to me that there exists an opportunity for archaeologists to tempt people into the field by taking reproductions of thes
Re:Cool, but don't forget the beer! (Score:2)
I don't understand what the hype about beer is. I have never thought to myself "I could use a nice, refreshing glass of wheat juice", so I am hardly about to think "I could use a nice, refreshing glass of rotten wheat juice". Beer tastes bitter and thick, and its alcohol content is so low that I have to sit drinking it til I fee
This story... (Score:4, Funny)
ha!!
Re:This story... (Score:2)
Re:This story... (Score:2)
Freshness? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Freshness? (Score:2)
Well, a long time.
There is a mild antibiotic in honey, and the sugar content is too high for anything to live in it unless the honey becomes diluted.
Scientific theory (Score:2)
Tired of all these new discoveries to be taken as fact, when they keep changing every few years...
Re:Scientific theory (Score:2)
You know, of course that nothing is ever 'proven' in science. Science is simply the art of observing the universe around you and making your best guess at why things happened a certain way etc. a simple formal standard to document and allow others to critizise your 'discoveries.'
anyone who knows something 'for a fact' simply has stopped trying to look for better answers. take a simple test of dropping a feather and a coin, in normal atmosphere the feat
ramen! (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure some of the Smack ramen I subsisted on in college was pretty close to that.
I didn't see this on ebay! (Score:2)
Totally Off Topic (Score:2)
Although the noodles had to be saved for science (Score:3, Funny)
bio-degradable? (Score:2)
Fascinating (Score:2)
I know this may be kind of weird, but in terms of "culinary evolution"...why have they survived so long as a staple food item?
And also...is anybody here familiar with the concept of culinary evolution? I just kinda made it up for this post, but if it really exists and there is info out there on it
Re:Fascinating (Score:2)
I guess the most simple reason is that you can preserve noodles a long time. Compare how long bread takes to mold with how long noodles take to mold. Especially since noodles are smaller, and can be put inside a closed container easier.
Also, the process of cooking noodles also sanitizes them. In Chinese cuisine, normally most things (including plain water), a
And if they add some boiling water... (Score:2)
Found in preservered white ... (Score:2)
Re:Four Millenia -- Four Millenium (Score:2)
Re:Four Millenia -- Four Millenium (Score:2)
Well you're a bonehead th... never mind.
Re:Four Millenia -- Four Millenium (Score:2)
"My neighbor's daughter is four years old."
Re:Four Millenia -- Four Millenium (Score:2)
"My neighbour's four years old daughter is in the garden," which is clearly wrong.
Re:Four Millenia -- Four Millenium (Score:3, Informative)
No, it's not (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, carbon dating isn't used for anything as old as dinosaur remains, so sorry, tossing out carbon dating won't let you put a younger date on dinosaur fossils.
Re:No, it's not (OT) (Score:5, Insightful)
Creationists can't swallow evolution, but 1000 year old men sounds plausable?
By any sane measure (heh, ironic) using the 'begats', the world is only about 15-20 generations older than it was when christ was born, which would make it much YOUNGER than the creationists believe. I say a branch of science aughtta lay that one out on the table
Then there is the little problem that even with super high-resolution spy satellites, we still haven't found Eden or that big flaming sword that guards its entrance... heh.
And the number 1 least logical thing about this post? I am a protestant christian
Re:No, it's not (OT) (Score:2)
Re:No, it's not (OT) (Score:2)
Re:No, it's not (Score:2)
Re:No, it's not (Score:5, Insightful)
For Carbon dating, "the current maximum radiocarbon age limit lies in the range between 58,000 and 62,000 years" (from wikipedia). So... pretty recent, in the grand scheme of things.
Wikipedia also has an article on radiometric dating in general [wikipedia.org] which outlines some types of radiometric dating that work for much older samples.
Also, when we're dealing with dinosaur remains, even IF we're off by hundreds or even thousands of years, it's not going to affect our data very much. We're dealing with such a large time scale that determining roughly when a creature died is often good enough -- usually we just want to know when some species existed compared to some other species, and species are usually pretty good about lasting for at least a few thousand years.
In any case, if we determine that something is... say... roughly 60-65 million years old, that huge error range doesn't change the fact that the evidence blatantly contradicts Young Earth theory
Re:No, it's not (Score:2)
One important fact that some would-be debunkers of radiocarbon dating fail to note (or deliberately ignore) is that different sources of organic carbon will naturally yield different ages. Living things which draw their carbon from
Re:No, it's not (Score:2)
Re:No, it's not (Score:2)
Re:No, it's not (Score:2)
But your continued use of a painting as an example shows that you have absolutely no idea what carbon dating is and how it works. It only works on living things that contain carbon sourced from their environment. So why don't you go read up on the theory before you try to debunk it, mmm-kay?
Damn creation "scientists."
Re: necro-what?? (Score:4, Funny)
That certainly takes necrophilia to a new low...
Oh, wow, if only I had mod points! (Score:2)
Re:No, it's not (Score:2)
Carbon dating varies due to a varying of the amount of C14 in the atmosphere during different times in the past. One science teach I had in high school pointed out the obvious question to me: when we are dating rocks using radioactive decay, how do we know it was
Re:No, it's not (Score:2)
The reason creationists love the whole 'transitional fossils' thing is that you can keep going forever.
Suppose we have fossil A, and also
Re:OLD STORY!!!!! FUCKING SLASHDOT IDOTS! (Score:3, Funny)