Giant Squid Caught on Film 551
caffeined writes "I think almost every geek's heart must skip a beat when they hear about giant squids (think "Jules Verne"). It appears the two Japanese researchers have managed (for the first time) to get actual footage of a live giant squid in action. It was "only" 26 feet long (a little more than 8m) which is big enough for me." Update: Pictures and no registration required at National Geographic.
I cant wait for the video release (Score:5, Funny)
http://www.cdnn.info/news/eco/e050925.html [cdnn.info]
Re:I cant wait for the video release (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I cant wait for the video release (Score:3, Informative)
How long? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How long? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:How long? (Score:3, Interesting)
Without lungs to collapse is the pressure really an issue? I thought the only thing from a fish's point of view (besides the light level) that changes with pressure was the viscosity.
Re:How long? (Score:5, Insightful)
You mean like how humans would do just fine in outer space wearing nothing but a face mask?
No. Pressure is always an issue.
Re:How long? (Score:5, Interesting)
Arguably, one could make a space suit that was simply a skin tight layer + helmet. The problem with that would be that it would have to be *perfectly* skin tight. I.e. Any gas between the suit and you, and you will be VERY uncomfortable, as the gas makes the suit expand like a balloon. Assuming that was worked out, it would have of number advantages over conventional space suits. The joints would be MUCH more flexible, and less complex, as they wouldn't require complicated pressure equalization systems to allow the joints to move.
Hey, I just thought out how to get around the skintight issue. Cover the human in vaseline, or some other viscous nonvolatile (which means the vaseline wouldn't work very long, depending how much was evaporating through the suit) fluid, to fill in all the empty spaces left by the suit!
So you get a system that is = person + skin tight body suit + nonvolatile fluid + bubble helmet + Air supply. I'm certain it would work, just not sure for how long. The limiting factor is how fast you lose volatiles, but it could easily be made to work as long as the longest spacewalks the US has ever attempted, and would be a hell of a lot lighter, simpler, and cheaper.
Re:How long? (Score:5, Funny)
I guess if you got a couple of Slashdotters to try it out in space you'd have two less lonely people in the world.
I dunno, it's entirely possible that Air Supply already has quite a bit of experience with vasoline, skin-tight body suits, etc... maybe they could go up and try it out.
Re:How long? (Score:5, Funny)
I find your ideas intriguing, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter....
Re:How long? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How long? (Score:5, Insightful)
Arguably, one could make a space suit that was simply a skin tight layer + helmet. The problem with that would be that it would have to be *perfectly* skin tight. I.e. Any gas between the suit and you, and you will be VERY uncomfortable, as the gas makes the suit expand like a balloon. Assuming that was worked out, it would have of number advantages over conventional space suits. The joints would be MUCH more flexible, and less complex, as they wouldn't require complicated pressure equalization systems to allow the joints to move.
Hey, I just thought out how to get around the skintight issue. Cover the human in vaseline, or some other viscous nonvolatile (which means the vaseline wouldn't work very long, depending how much was evaporating through the suit) fluid, to fill in all the empty spaces left by the suit!
So you get a system that is = person + skin tight body suit + nonvolatile fluid + bubble helmet + Air supply. I'm certain it would work, just not sure for how long. The limiting factor is how fast you lose volatiles, but it could easily be made to work as long as the longest spacewalks the US has ever attempted, and would be a hell of a lot lighter, simpler, and cheaper.
The fact that the average temperature of all space is 4' kelvin is also an issue. although it's vastly warmer near leo it's still cold enough to have the person get serious frost bite after 0.01 seconds and the limbs would start freezing soon after. This would be the dark side, the light side woudl experience the same or much warmer temperatures depending on the color of your suit.
Also, radiation is an issue.
Add to this fact that it's not so much space making you explode it's the air in your lungs pushing out and nothing pushing in. This makes breathing very very hard. You would have to have the air mask at enough pressure to inflate the lungs, but not too much to have them tear the lungs as nothign outside is pushing back.
So what you actually need is:
person + skin tight body suit + nonvolatile fluid + bubble helmet + Air supply + radiation shielding + rigid structure to allow bretahing + isulation and heating
basically a space suit.
Re:How long? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How long? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How long? (Score:5, Interesting)
Nope. In the void there is no convection -- and that's how you lose most heat. In space you only lose it through thermal radiation.
you wont get cold... silly, just hot. (Score:5, Informative)
So how are you going to get cold? you wont.
You actually will get HOTTER, because of the HEAT from the sun. You need to cool down, something to
take the heat (kinetic energy) away, and there isnt enough medium to do that. Thats why in cold antarctica you
get cold, because there is a LOT OF AIR that steals your heat. In space, what little atoms there are, - are not enough
to take the heat out. We have had this posting before, a human can survive in space because their skin is strong enough
to keep the inside preasure (just dont have cuts on you). Your eyeballs wont blow up though they
might dry up real real fast - so goggles will be usefull. Dont open your mouth either.
The bright side of you wont heat up that fast, it would be the same as you being on the beach or high altitude skiing. There is a maximum level of heat energy per second delivered, its not like your are at mercuries distance. As I said before , you will
get hot because you wont loose heat thats why you get HOT. Even if you rotate slowly to even out exposure. So ironically, space may be -270c, but you will get damn hot because of the suns photons, so you need to cool yourself somehow using liquid nitro or something. Sure if you stayed in the dark you would slowly cool down, but not over 5minutes.
I mean people dont blow up on mount everest do they, and thats pretty damn low PSI. Your inside PSI isnt that high either, not strong enough to burst you.
Re:How long? (Score:3, Interesting)
A modified regulator would take care of the pressure nicely, so that the lungs will fill but not explode. The problem I see is that at such a low pressure, there might not be enough oxygen
Re:How long? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How long? (Score:5, Interesting)
That's not the primary problem. The primary problem is that the human brain needs a minimum level of oxygen to operate; that oxygen can only be provided by the respitory system at a rate directly proportional to the o2 pressure in the respirated environment(or "partial pressure" in mixed gas environments, like earth at sealevel). If you decrease pressure, you must likewise increase o2 or risk cognitive failure and rapid blackout (with little-to-no warning either). Now, as with all biology, individuals differ widely, but
That means that any environmental suit must maintain the same approximate force upon the wearer as exerted by the wearer's respiration gas pressure. Likewise, in order to prevent circulatory damage, the force needs to be exerted pretty evenly across the entire body. So, in effect, you're talking about a suit that can "squeeze" the wearer evenly at a minimum of three or so lbs/sq inch. Assuming such could be designed, how do you propose one would don such an outfit in a pressurised environment? I don't care how great your lubricant of choice is, I can't imagine someone getting into one of these things in the first place without great physical harm occuring.
Re:How long? (Score:5, Informative)
Exposure to vaccuum isn't the catastrophic event hollywood makes it out to be.
Re:How long? (Score:5, Interesting)
Thanks for the link.
Re:How long? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How long? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How long? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How long? (Score:5, Informative)
That really depends on what's inside them. Divers survive because they fill their lungs with air at the same pressure as their surroundings. Thus the lungs don't collapse. Of course, if the air inside your lungs is at 1 bar while you're in the deep, bad things happen. But the far more common accident AFAIK is actually the converse: you resurface while your lungs still hold air pressurized for 5, 10, 20 metres. Your lungs get stretched (ie they "explode"), and you're in a world of pain.
Re:How long? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:pressure (Score:5, Funny)
He could wear a little captain's hat and pretend to steer.
Best laugh I've had all day! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:pressure (Score:5, Informative)
Submarines. You can build submarines capable of diving very deep. But those things are
a) made from steel (many times stronger than _any_ glass
b) self supporting (try cracking an egg by pressing on it from the outside, compare to pressure by chicken form inside)
c) go nowhere near "deep water" besides very small ones (which would be a unsuitable size for an aquarium).
Just imagine: a 1000m deep sea aquarium would have a pressure of 1000 metric tons per m^2 on every surface. Thats a stack of 15 fully supplied M1 tanks.
And it scales _baddly_. if you have a cube, and double the side length, you get square the surface, and thus square the force pushing on one side. But the line of material holding the the face in at the edge is only doubling, so you have to double glass thickness, too...
With those forces, you may build a pressure chamber (i.e. massivly externally supported structure with small volume) from glass (although i dont think it will work well), but an aquarium needs support (air/heating/cleaning), and any of those breaks would make the whole thing instable (remember, glass likes to crack).
Re:pressure (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How long? (Score:5, Interesting)
Divers going below about 90 feet (30 metres) breathing air suffer nitrogen narcosis as dissolved nitrogen in the nerves cause an effect akin to drunkenness or partial anaesthesia.
Because the human breathing response is driven by the absolute partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the bloodstream, not its ratio to oxygen, deep diving means breathing much more air than is needed simply to flush out the apparent elevated level of co2 in the blood - the physiology is tricked by the pressure. Anyone practising emergency surfacing from a deep dive is astonished that they don't need to breath as they rise - you continuously exhale as the gas in the lungs expands (I was taught to sing on the way up) and the breathing response isn't triggered because the detected co2 level keeps falling.
Now this may not affect squid much, it's hard to believe that there are no pressure effects on the chemistry underpinning their biology.
Re:How long? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:How long? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How long? (Score:4, Funny)
It would be tough but possible. (Score:3, Interesting)
Start off with a hollow tube. I would suggest a tube about 60' in length (giant squid grow up to 40', and you have to allow time for this to work) and about 10' in diameter. Possibly a bit more. The tube walls need to be somewhere between 10'-20' in thickness and be good-quality ste
Re:How long? (Score:4, Funny)
Cripes, doesn't anyone even read the summary anymore?
26 feet.
Jeez.
where's the vid (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:where's the vid (Score:5, Informative)
will photos do? (Score:5, Informative)
here... [nationalgeographic.com]
Re:WOW. (Score:5, Interesting)
It only takes one, and the squid is dead. That one happens to be sperm whales, maybe other giant squid as well. Possibly even some other large predators we have never found as of yet (or think are extinct).
Re:WOW. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:WOW. (Score:3, Informative)
The Pictures (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The Pictures (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The Pictures (Score:5, Informative)
Skip a beat, eh? (Score:5, Funny)
Mmmmm.... Tentacle hentai....
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Skip a beat, eh? (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, living here I suspect that it's not that various fetishes are more common here than elsewhere. It's rather that it's much less of a social stigma, and so people are more open about it - which of course increases the available audience for material catering to it, which in turn greatly increases the visibility.
Also, the concept of "fetish" is a rather slippery one (entendre intended). In psychological litterature, having a strong preference for red hair counts as a fetish, but not a similarily strong preference for blonde or black hair. Nothing is a fetish in itself; it's very dependent on the social context. Having a strong preference for tall, blonde women would make you a fetishist in Japan; in Sweden you'd just be seen as boring. If everybody would like tentacle sex, it would cease to be a fetish at all.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Skip a beat, eh? (Score:5, Informative)
Yup. The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife [wikipedia.org] done in 1820.
mmmmm ... calamari (Score:5, Funny)
Re:mmmmm ... calamari (Score:5, Funny)
Bah! Sod It:
In depths of ocean, calamari eats you!
-- Dan =)
A buffet! (Score:5, Funny)
Calamari for EVERYONE!
No video (Score:3, Funny)
Pictures (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Pictures (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Pictures (Score:3, Insightful)
IExploder...that's quality. Is it from Micro$oft? Does it run on windoze?
Re:Pictures (Score:3, Interesting)
Heart Skip (Score:5, Funny)
squid pic (Score:2, Informative)
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9503272/ [msn.com]
Pictures (Score:5, Informative)
I just hope.. (Score:4, Funny)
Giant Squid happy snaps (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.smh.com.au/media/2005/09/28/1127804509
Fuck You Thomas Patterson! (Score:5, Funny)
I had said that carcasses were found, and after making fun of me for using the word "carcass," you proceeded to articulate further on my sexuality (which, btw, you couldnt have been more wrong about.)
Tom, you then declared, through some haphazard strange conglomeration of swears and 6th grade dialogue, that you would drink your own pee if it were real.
Im going to find your number, and ask if you are going to do it. Just to fuck with you.
(name changed)
Worthless without pics (Score:5, Funny)
Researcher 2: Quick, let's get an article up and not give them any pictures!
Researcher 1: Perfect!
"only" 8m...thats big (Score:2, Informative)
Eh (Score:5, Funny)
Now, if it were giant squids with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads...
I have some shocking news for you Mr. Geek (Score:5, Informative)
26 feet = 7.9248 meters
Re:I have some shocking news for you Mr. Geek (Score:5, Funny)
Titanic Struggle (Score:5, Interesting)
I've read that during WWII giant squid would attack red life boats filled with sailors from sunk ships. Apparently the red colour attracts them.
By all accounts they are extremely aggresive, suggesting they don't see themselves as prey and know no predators.
I think I'll keep my exposure to them second hand.
Re:Titanic Struggle (Score:3, Interesting)
As for them attacking life boats, that's ridiculous. If they were that easy to attract we would have photographed and captured them by now.
Thirdly, giant squid do have natural predators, the aforementioned sperm whales and (according to Wikipedia) the pacific sleeper shark.
They are nasty beasts, though. Take a look at their
Re:Titanic Struggle (Score:3, Informative)
What kills them at the surface is the warmer temperature. Giant Squid blood sucks at carrying oxygen at higher temeratures. If they are too big, they will eventually suffercate in temperate water. Th
Re:Titanic Struggle (Score:4, Funny)
And just because you exposed my stupidity I'll mention that you spelled "suffocate" wrong. ;)
Re:Titanic Struggle (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Titanic Struggle (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Titanic Struggle (Score:5, Funny)
Vin Diesel could take one on... probably two on a good day.
Kraken (Score:5, Interesting)
Cthulhu? (Score:3, Funny)
Ummm, no, not EVERY time... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Ummm, no, not EVERY time... (Score:5, Funny)
Tentacle? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Tentacle? (Score:5, Funny)
IT'S A TRAP! (Score:5, Funny)
Well if it becomes a threat (Score:5, Funny)
What do they look like? Duh... (Score:5, Funny)
Well, at a guess, just like a normal squid, only bigger.
Thank god the hunt is over. That was obviously worth the effort.
My god, is "incurious" the same as "funny"?? (Score:3, Interesting)
Ho ho. Imagine a 60-foot-long alien intelligence that's been living in the earth's oceans for millennia -- the source of countless myths and legends -- that escaped direct observation by modern science except in the form of dead specimens.
Cephalopods are cool stuff. Their nerve fibers are unbelievably thick -- used for all sorts of medical research, because you can actually see their axons with the naked eye in some species -- and fast. The
Jules Verne? (Score:3, Funny)
I never knew Jules Verne included tentactle rape in his stories.
Amazing.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Amazing.... Overlord Championships! (Score:4, Funny)
It's worse than that. I was just complaining about having to welcome yet another overlord [slashdot.org] when they announced acetylene based life on Titan. [slashdot.org] Now we add the Giant Squid Overlords and the Poison Dart Dolphin Overlords [slashdot.org] into the mix. The field is just getting too crowded. Maybe the guy who replied to my comment is right. [slashdot.org] It's about having the Overlord Championships and the toy tie ins. He was right. It's all about the children.
Get ready to RUMM-BOLLL!!!! I for one welcome the Overlord Championships. It is the only civilized way to find out who to be subservient and obsequious to.
Octopus attacking shark and other videos (Score:5, Informative)
(Sorry, realplayer only.)
(Low Bandwidth)
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/octopus/media_play
(High Bandwidth)
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/octopus/media_play
WMV of an octopus blending in with its surroundings (which is pretty amazing to watch). http://www.big-boys.com/articles/octopus1.html [big-boys.com]
did you know... (Score:4, Interesting)
Is anyone going to use the adjective "Cthulhoid?" (Score:3, Funny)
This one [nationalgeographic.com] is my favorite. The only thing more satisfying to my aquatic geekiness than a giant squid is a giant squid fighting a giant sperm whale.
Oh come on, you know you've run that fight in d20, or will soon.
An even bigger species than the Giant Squid... (Score:5, Interesting)
The BBC article on the subject has photos... (Score:3, Informative)
Mon Calamari (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Pics here (Score:5, Funny)
Now that you mention sperm whales.. (Score:5, Interesting)
There was an episode on Discovery's Animal Face-off [discovery.com] about a Giant Squid versus a Sperm Whale: The winner was the sperm whale, which stunned the squid with its sonic emitter, and then ate it whole. Of course, before this, the whale had to swim at a very high speed to get rid of the squid's clawed tentacles (this is why some sperm whales have scars on their heads, because you can't just take off a squid's tentacle, you have to rip it off - ouch).
It was an exciting and interesting episode
Re:Now that you mention sperm whales.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Hey, I have an idea, for next season maybe they can add some CGI of the animals talking trash at each other and screaming threats before the face-off. That would be awesome!
Architeuthis tentacles aren't "clawed" like others (Score:3, Informative)
Giant squid don't have clawed tentacles. "Colossal squid" do, but architeuthis does not, for whatever reasons.
There are some smaller species that have truly badass claws on there. Humboldt squid -- which we have on camera as they become curious about a dive
Re:Too bad (Score:5, Informative)