ESA Selects Targets for Asteroid Deflection Test 284
Vandil X writes "The European Space Agency has announced that it has selected two candidate asteroid targets for a planned mission to impact an asteroid in an attempt to deflect the asteroid off course by a measurable amount. The mission, dubbed "Don Quijote," will send two spacecraft to their final choice asteroid. One craft will impact the asteroid while the other will observe the asteroid before and after the collision. The mission craft and target selection are expected to be finalized sometime in 2007."
Crash? (Score:5, Interesting)
I would think something like white paint (using the reflective properties to move the asteroid) would be more interesting. Slower, for sure, but much more effective over a period of months or years.
Is there something to this mission that I am missing?
Fighting windmills? (Score:4, Interesting)
And they could have spelled it correctly: Don Quixote.
Hmm... But wait... (Score:2, Interesting)
Also, never has the quote at the bottom of the screen been so appropriate.
Oh, wow! Look at the moon!
Re:Awesome (Score:3, Interesting)
It doesn't have to be a nuke. Read "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" written by an Annapolis grad named Robert Heinlein back in the last century.
"I don't think we should throw any more rocks at Cheyenne Mountain." " -- Why? " "..It isn't there any more."
The grants game (Score:5, Interesting)
If you think about this even semi rationally, look at the data from the Deep Impact mission. The trajectory of the rock prior to impact was quite well known, well enough, an intercept course could be plotted and executed. Does anybody think that nobody at nasa thought to measure trajectory AFTER the impact, and possibly calculate trajectory changes of the target rock? This is a mission that cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and that's extremely valuable information, available for the taking after the impact. I'm quite sure that while the primary investigators on Deep Impact are all wrapped up in analyzing ejecta data, there are secondary investigators measuring and calculating trajectory changes.
The proposed ESA mission is basically Deep Impact Version 2.0, a more refined variant than version 1. Version 1 (executed by Nasa) intended to hit the target rock, and studying ejecta was labelled as the 'primary' objective. In Version 2, the objective is to hit the target rock much more precisely, relabel the 'primary data' as that of the trajectory change, and re-label the ejecta data as 'secondary'. The end result is, a mission plan that hits more political hot buttons (reference the data collection re-labelling), its easier to get grants for impactor related investigation today.
The reality is, this mission is a logical follow on which builds on the success of Deep Impact. The re-labelling of primary mission goals is just an artifact of the political process required to procure funding, the 'grants game'. The data regarding target object composition will still be collected in various forms, and it'll still get analyzed, just as trajectory data is still being collected and analyzed from the Deep Impact mission.
Should I Worry? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Something wrong with p? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Crash? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Crash? (Score:2, Interesting)
of the experiment.
Mainly because they need to know how much energy they need
to deflect the asteroid, a deflected explosive may need to
more energetic, where an embeded explosive runs more risk
of breaking it up.
They need to know what will happen.
Re:NO DADDY NO (Score:3, Interesting)
Don't believe what you see in movies.