Bacteria Used to Create Nanowires 188
FnH writes "Derek Lovley and his colleagues of the University of Massachusetts discovered that the Geobacter bacteria is capable of producing nanowires. The bacteria is normally used to clean up toxic waste. Geobacter does not use oxygen, but metal as its source for power. This probably explains the 3nm to 5nm nanowires it excretes while working. What metal the nanowires are made of is not yet known, but the genetic code responsible for their creation is. This opens up the possibility of modifying the bacteria to create nanowires on chips."
Dupe (Score:5, Informative)
Dupe [slashdot.org].
Re:The 986 will be a piece of shit (Score:2)
The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:5, Informative)
The reduction of metal (iron) in a geobacter metallireducens bacteria functions as little more than an electron sink for getting rid of electrons at the end of the respiratory chain.
Fe3+ (metal ion from the environment) + 3 e- --> Fe (metal)
There are other bacteria which turn nitrate into nitrogen and sulphur into H2S (smelly bastards!), among others.
We humans (and our relatives) do this using oxygen:
O2 (oxygen from the environment) + 4 e- + 4H+ --> 2 H2O (water)
There's nothing particularily surprizing about the fact that it produces metal. Nor is it terribly surprizing that the metal comes out as a long strand. Respiration is a rather continuous process, after all!
So no signalling. (And what could they possibly signal anyway?) But that doesn't mean there couldn't be benefits for the bacteria to have its metal threads connected. It might help ground any excess negative charge on the resulting metal, aiding the respiration process.
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:2, Interesting)
The original basis for my post was this quote:
quote
Patrinos said the bacteria may organize to form minipower grids in the soil by linking up via the nanowires.
Born from "Star Trek"... (Score:4, Interesting)
"It would be just like that one Star Trek Episode where Wesley was doing this experiment with Nanobots that networked together and formed a rudimentary, then more evolved Artificial Intelligence. They like took over Lt. Cmdr. Data and then took over the ship and all they wanted was a chance to have a place of their own, that they could turn into grey ooze."
"It could be just like that one Star Trek Episode where there was this terraforming project going on at this lifeless rock and the Enterprise was sent to investigate some terrible disasters that were happening there. It turns out that there were this mircoscopic silicone based lifeforms living in the sands on this planet and they were like, getting killed by the terraforming process. Anyway, the leader of the terraforming colony knew what was going on, he just didn't want to admit that he was killing little silicone sand creatures. The silicone sand creatures networked together and started being all bad-ass as they increased in capability and inteligent as they joined together, kinda like the Constructicons from The Transformers television series, that was cool, you know? So, anyway, these bacteria might be doing the same thing!"
Anyway, I have to blame Star Trek. While the series has been known to inspire tons of people to do great things, it's pseudo-science has done some harm as people assume that what happens in a Science Fantasy show can happen in real life.
No hatin' to the original poster, btw. I am just saying.
Re:Born from "Star Trek"... (Score:2)
Silicon, not Silicone!
(Unless you're talking about the Horta costume... but that might be a gooey pile of melted foam latex costumes)
Re:Born from "Star Trek"... (Score:1)
Re:Born from "Star Trek"... (Score:2)
It conjures strange visuals of silicone life forms and silicon breast implants.
Re:Born from "Star Trek"... (Score:1)
Little patterns beget bigger patterns beget complex patterns.
I'll have to be on the lookout for those two episodes. I haven't seen the show in a long
Yeah.... well that's... (Score:1)
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:2)
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, I think finding any decent catalyst for nanotubes would be a huge breakthrough. The way they're made today is basically by blasting carbon (creating a whole bunch of different crap) and sorting out the bits you want. Not very efficient or controlled.
or perhaps even Hydrogen gas
There are already bacteria who produce hydrogen gas. Current research is already trying to do stuff with this. For instance, the EU is funding a project to try and c
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:2)
We do that too, of course. But it's not analogous, that reaction produces NADH+ and FADH2 (citric acid cycle) and enters the electron transport chain, where the final step (in Cytochrome C oxidiase) is to reduce oxygen to water.
AFAIK it's usually a quite energy demanding procedure.
Yes, it is. (The analogy to huamns doesn't hold here, since reducing oxygen produces energy). But photosynthesis is (IMHO) even more impressive. And energy-demanding.
What if we can
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:2, Interesting)
The ability of the bacteria to link their nanowires has been observed in Lovley's lab. The hairlike wires emanating from the bacteria had been seen previously, but their conducting function was discovered via atomic-force microscope techniques.
Or perhaps this:
Patrinos said the bacteria may organize to form minipower grids in the soil by linking up via the nanowires.
I
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:1)
If the first one says that bacteria (plural) "link their nanowires", and the second quote says that they "may...form minipower grid(s)", then yes, I would extrapolate that they are talking about interconnected meshes of these wires which carry "power".
Which, if you take a look at my original post (I'll quote it for you)
quote
the bacteria seem to produce these tiny wires which then carry electrical sign
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:1)
Yes, I'd have to agree. I didn't mean it as a slight. This article is rather vague and offers little insight as to what has actually been discovered and what its significance is. Coming to an inaccurate conclusion as a result of trying to parse it is understandable.
Re:The bacteria "link up" with each other (Score:1)
oxigen? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:oxigen? (Score:1, Informative)
Never use spell check, and never learn elementary-school English grammar, either.
Re:oxigen? (Score:2)
If you insist on being a grammar Nazi at least get it right before complaining about it.
It's is short for "it is" or "it has" (e.g. "It's a very hot Summer day.").
Its is a possesive form of it, and is used when referring to something already mentioned (e.g. "The hot Summer day has lost its heat.").
Now RFTA and quit complaining.
Re:oxigen? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Can you provide a reference for that?
From the Oxford American Dictionaries:
and
Re:oxigen? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:oxigen? (Score:1)
Firefox has a form spellchecker via a plugin.
Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:5, Interesting)
In the same was as it opens up the possibility of modifying the bacteria to code Linux kernel patches.
This certainly is cool biotech, but slapping this wild prediction on to the end of the article doesn't make it more so.
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:2)
Indeed. It seems to me that you have a better chance to let these bacteria poop the complete works of Shakespeare than to let them poop computer chips.
Creating the poop is not the problem. Organising the poop is. A lion tamer is better equipped to tackle that problem than a poop scient
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:1)
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:2)
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:2)
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:2)
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:1)
Now, if we could just get them to crap out fibre optic cable, we'd be set.
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:1)
Yes, and no. Yes, it seems terribly far-fetched to start growing bacteria on chips just so they can excrete random nanowires, but OTOH, a great deal of what we might refer to as classic science fiction - Verne, Wells, etc. was also far-fetched at the time it was written. A fair quantity of what Wells wrote hasn't even come true yet, but it catalyzed exploration, or at least the more cons
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:3, Insightful)
It's no more improbable than most of the "Possible Cure For Cancer!" stuff we see here, probably on the order of modifying "Yuo have teh source code so fix it yuorself!!!" Lunix fanboys to code kernel p
Re:Crystal Ball Hackery (Score:2)
An etching process to guide the bacteria would have to shine a smaller beam than the trace, but not too small. That would be interesting research. Anyway, the wavelength would have to be (maybe) 30nm for current work, which is pushing into the x-ray band. I'm not sure the little critters would respond very well if the beam
Possible cyberjack material? (Score:1, Interesting)
Interesting read...the first thing that came to my mind when I read this is that these organic wires may be just the thing for the interface between electronics and organic tisue. One of the major problems in cybernetics is that the chemistry of the implants tends to be poisonous to the surrounding tissue, while the chemistry of the surrounding tisue tends to be corrosive to the implant. Over time, the interface degrades and must eventually be replaced. Utilizing the genetic code from these microbes to expr
Re:Possible cyberjack material? (Score:5, Funny)
Hey, if the editors can dupe, why not you? [slashdot.org]
For once (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, crap (Score:5, Funny)
So... the next generation of electronics is going to be made of shit?
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2, Funny)
Stands to reason it will be. Heaven knows the previous couple of generations have been
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
To make things more twisted, we shit dead bacteria. (THEY eat food we swallowed, and WE digest THEM to get energy, then excrete "dead shells" - they are the primary compound of the shit...)
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
Hmmmmm sweet, sweet multiple-regurgitated and fermented insect vomit...
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
Let's not forget alcohol: yeast pee.
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
Re:Oh, crap (Score:2)
So... the next generation of electronics is going to be made of shit?
Isn't that true of every generation?
Clean up toxic... waste. (Score:1)
Re:Clean up toxic... waste. (Score:1)
If you think so, can we really call it green if its full of bacterias?
And when you turn on the power, you fry millions of innocent, helpful little creatures?
Re:Clean up toxic... waste. (Score:1)
Re:Clean up toxic... waste. (Score:1)
Re:Clean up toxic... waste. (Score:2)
Or a Soylent Green CPU?
I always said Intel chips (Score:2, Funny)
Fungus (Score:2)
Grep microscope (really strong one)
O no, no worry, it is some nanowiring expension set.
Metallic Excreta (Score:1)
ooooooooh.........that was a painful thought !!
Geobacter infected metals (Score:4, Interesting)
Geobacter does not use oxigen, but metal as it's source for power
Now, our cars will not only rust in winter because of salted snow, but they may rot eaten by Geobacter.
More seriously:
Could this bacteria be genetically engineered to eat common metals like steel, or more uncommon ones targeted at destroying military or sabotage foundrys?
Is another bio weapon on the way?
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:1)
I don't mean to strap on the pedantipants right off the bat, but that's a silly notion. If you'd read the article, you'd know that it's using the metals not used as an energy source, but as an electron acceptor for respiration. So no, it couldn't "eat" steel, but it might change it into something different. (most metals have many different transitio
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:1)
Well that's reassuring, so it will only transform my car into a pile of goo ?
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:2)
They're talking about them being rust monsters. And that could seriously weaken any structure.
A high level fly over that sprays bacteria on a steel structure. Two months later, shoot holes in it using a bb gun.
It's not that unreasonable. Now, we'll have to start putting antibacterial compounds on our metal buildings/ships/guns/etc.
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:3, Informative)
from followng a few links [nih.gov]: geobacter is anaerobic; it can tolerate a low level of oxygen, but basically lives in underground water with very low oxygen concentration. So spraying it not the air will kill it. Also, if I understand the chemistry (quite likely I haven't), it consumes rust, not iron pe
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:2)
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:2)
Gee, thats so much more effective than using a BOMB.
P.S. Ships are eaten away every day by salt water.
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:2)
And the bacteria option provides so many more options: kick through wall, drive through wall, laser through wall, etc.
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Geobacter infected metals (Score:2)
Then it veered off course and was going to smash into its sun, and for the rest I won't ruin it for you.
What's amazing is it was written in 1980, and doesn't feel old at all.
Bacteria shit = wires (Score:1)
Bacteria making wires?! (Score:5, Funny)
Wake me up when they finally find bacteria that use Bluetooth.
Re:Bacteria making wires?! (Score:1)
I suppose you think they were just using wires without thinking it through?
Bluetooth ? (Score:1)
Grammar and logic and more, oh my (Score:2)
Re:Grammar and logic and more, oh my (Score:2)
10 chips at once, 1 chip a second = 1 second for 10 chips
1000 chips at once, 1 chip every 100 seconds = 1 second for 10 chips
my maths my be off there though, and obvioulsy this is completely unfounded speculation.
Re:Grammar and logic and more, oh my (Score:1)
Perhaps a single bacterium would "lay cable" (snigger, sorry) very slowly, but we have potentially massive parallelism here, provided you can find a way to actually control what these organisms do. No use if they just produce a load of nano-wire-wool, obviously!
Argh the bugs! (Score:1, Funny)
New Meaning (Score:1)
This brings new meaning to the term S.O.S.
HELP HELP: Need experts advice!!!! (Score:1)
I decided to give it a try and, my CPU started to sweat!!! What should I do? Give water to my bacterias?
Nice (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Nice (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Nice (Score:2)
damn... (Score:1)
Cool beans (Score:2)
-
This is already Patented... (Score:2, Funny)
>nanowires it excretes while working.
and Microsoft will vigorously defend its patented ability to turn your PC into excrement.
Carbon Nanotubes (Score:4, Insightful)
Wow! Just like STNG! (Score:2)
Unfortunately for us, we have no way to offload them from our homeworld. Because of this, if we unleash this technology it can only be to our own undoing!
That is the only conceivable future of this technology!
Kent Brockman: "Professor, without knowing precisely what the danger is, wo
I was fired from this project... (Score:3, Funny)
Could this be used for Space Elevators? (Score:2)
Re:Could this be used for Space Elevators? (Score:2)
Re:Could this be used for Space Elevators? (Score:2)
Derek Lovley and his colleagues at the University of Massachusetts (Amherst, Mass.) reported observing and measuring the conductivity of long wires, 3 to 5 nanometers in diameter, emanating from the Geobacter bacteria.
RSS /. inconsistancy (Score:2)
Any ideas why?
Do the articles have to be manually entered to the RSS feed? The the editors actually (GASP!) edit something??
~D
Excrement (Score:1)
he said excrement, he he
So does this mean (Score:1)
Link to the Paper? (Score:2)
Links for the Curious (Answering My Own Question) (Score:2)
Enjoy!
Had to say it... (Score:2)
How fast does the bateria work? Could you drop a couple barrels of it on enemy hardware (tanks, planes, buildings, refineries, etc) and have it eat the metal away, or would sun/rain/snow/heat wash them away?
Finally! (Score:2)
Great. (Score:2)
I for one welcome our new archaeobacterial underlords.
Maybe they'll be able to make oil faster out of subducted organic material that comes their way, the next time life on the surface of the planet almost dies off.
Logistically speaking... (Score:2, Funny)
I mean, all it takes is one of the little buggers to go off in a random direction and it'll short the whole damned circuit.
Unless, of course, we can engineer another strain of bacteria that eat the metal wire and excrete insulated wire.
-
-
-
-
Select * from users where clue > 0
0 Rows Selected
Re:Oxigen (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Bacteria in higher education... (Score:1)
Re:I guess... (Score:2)