NASA Reveals Dust Devil Data from Mars 116
saskboy writes "NASA reports that Martian dust devils could be much more destructive than previously considered. You may remember this past April when it was revealed that whirlwinds actually helped the current rovers by cleaning accumulated dust from their solar cells which increased their energy collection efficiency.
But after studying the mini-storms more, they realize that the dust and sand particles could cause static electricity discharges, also known as lightning. The high speed grains of sand blowing around at about 30 meters/second (70 miles per hour) are nothing to blink at either, since they can damage astronauts or equipment on the Martian surface. The height of a Martian dust devil can reach 10km (6 miles), which means it's more like the size of a terran tornado."
A quick question (Score:4, Insightful)
Does that mean that a tornado is only on earth? Why are these referred to as "Dust Devils" and not tornadoes generally? Cheers
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
Re:A quick question (Score:1)
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
Two questions. Show me where the link answers either of them.
Re:A quick question (Score:1)
"Also, like, dust devils are not tornados, because they aren't. Dust devils are primarilly dust, while tornado are primarilly not."
That pretty much nails it eh?
Perhaps homeland security will increase spending or mars research to combat the dust devil menace.
Mars - that's no moon.
Re:A quick question (Score:2, Insightful)
In actuality, naked links get used by folks to lazy to summarize the information themselves, but want some mod points. I called yours out as the link doesn't even answer his questions.
Have a nice day.
Re:A quick question (Score:1)
If you meant to provide a general link on dust devils, great. Without labeling it as such it is very easy for people to think it was intended as an answer to the specific questions that were asked and for people to be dissappointed when they read it and not get an answer.
If you thought it did answer the questions, well I rea
Re:A quick question (Score:1)
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
Also, like, dust devils are not tornados, because they aren't. Dust devils are primarilly dust, while tornado are primarilly not.
It definitely wasn't there before. Talk about pathetic.
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
Also, like, dust devils are not tornados, because they aren't. Dust devils are primarilly dust, while tornado are primarilly not.
It definitely wasn't there before. Talk about pathetic.
And that, for those who were wondering, is why Slashdot doesn't and probably never will allow editing of posts.
Re:A quick question (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:A quick question (Score:3, Informative)
Both tornados and dust devils happen when the air close to the ground is warmer than the air up a bit higher. In tornados, there is a lot more power generated over a larger area (and has the potential to do more damage) than a dust devil would.
Because of the thin martian air, the dust devils have little destructive power so they aren't called tornados.
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
F0 light 40-72 mph
F1 moderate 73-112 mph
F2 significant 113-157 mph
F3 severe 158-206 mph
F4 devastating 207-260 mph
F5 incredible 261-318 mph
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
When the sun heats the ground, the air next to the ground gets hot, expands, becomes less dense than unheated air, becomes buoyant, and rises. Air from less heated ground areas (cultivated fields, for instance) flows radially in to replace the air rising from hotspots (like rocky areas), and owing to some rather complex mathematical considerations, comes in in a spiral path. The air rising from the hotter spots is called a thermal. Buzzards circle in them to stay aloft and hu
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
No, although Tornadoes may only be found on Earth (I highly doubt it), tyhe fact it's called a dust devil doesn't mean Tornadoes are only found on Earth. It would have been compared with a Tornado, because it's is comparable to a tornado in size only (and most people would have an idea as to what the size would be).
Re:A quick question (Score:1, Interesting)
New term: "Dustinado" (Score:1)
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
Who's with me?
Re:A quick question (Score:2)
OTOH, I tend to avoid (and flee from) tornadoes, as there's a high degree of certainty if we were to interesect one another, I wouldn't survive.
At 1/100th earth pressure? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:At 1/100th earth pressure? (Score:2)
Re:At 1/100th earth pressure? (Score:1, Flamebait)
The problem isn't the force, but the dust. The dust is a problem on its own; it almost seems designed to create static charges and then penetrate tiny cracks in everything around.
Thanks :) (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks
Re:Thanks :) (Score:1)
Re:Thanks :) (Score:2)
Last I knew, most American's (and this website has an American bias) experience with lightning was in the form of the rain-storm type. Lightning of this variety isn't a result of dust and sand particles causing static electricity discharges. On a planet that (as far as I know) has no rain, the idea of lightning, isn't obvious. Even though I know lightning can occur in sandstorms, I had never put this together with lightning on Mars.
So while yo
Re:Thanks :) (Score:2)
I have what may be a dumb question (There are no dumb questions... Just dumb people asking questions...) but if this thing has rubber tires, couldn't they just put a roll bar on the next one with a lightning rod, and shoot the electricity right out the bottom? Or is the equipment to sensitive to be around a discharge? Electricity has always been something a bit over my head, so if someone on here knows, please share.
That being
Re:Thanks :) (Score:2)
-
Re:Thanks :) (Score:2)
-Jes
Re:Thanks :) (Score:1)
Re:Thanks :) (Score:1)
Many people [sciam.com] are still wondering what "lightning" is.
I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:2, Informative)
My friend and I were on a road trip, and I asked him to pull over.
I ran into this thing, and it was really weird - the air around it was still, but the dust devil itself was really windy inside!
It took only a second or two to walk in and out of it, but it was an interesting experience.
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:1)
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:1)
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:1)
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:2)
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:3, Interesting)
It should be pointed out to
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:2)
I dunno, maybe in some parts of the world you get the occasional uber dust devil or something, so don't walk in if you see big things flying around
Re:I walked into a dust devil here on earth... (Score:2)
Wind energy? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Wind energy? (Score:2)
Another problem is, are winds regular and strong enough for the thing to be able to be powered as reliably as solar powered vehicles? If it gets stuck somewhere that isn't windy for a week, that's a week of it being down (once it's reserves run out). On the other hand, the sun rises every day.
Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:5, Informative)
But no where near the destructive force of a tornado, which may be why they're calling them dust devils...
It's less than 1/3 the windspeed and since the atmosphere is less dense the total energy will not be anywhere close...
Re:Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:5, Funny)
We may not be able to reliably measure their destructive force because there are no trailer parks for them to tear up...
Re:Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:5, Funny)
Many of the other variables mentioned as possible influences on the frequency of tornadoes, such as camcorder sales, are also substantially lower or in fact zero on Mars.
Re:Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:1)
Ah, I'll go finish my coffee before attempting more humor...
Re:Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:1)
But NASA's Department of Martian Live Video can always borrow some trailers from Miramax or Universal.
Re:Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:1)
Re:Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:1)
Re:Not as powerful as tornadoes... (Score:2)
Well then (Score:1, Funny)
Dust Devil on Mars? (Score:1)
Re:Lightning (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Lightning (Score:2)
Re:Lightning (Score:1)
Grounding to help with static electricity? (Score:5, Informative)
Confusion (Score:2)
The page you link to, titled "How is a plane protected from Lightning strikes?" references a page "Wingtips [b737.org.uk] by The 737 Technical Site", which says about the static wicks: Note that they are not for lightning protection.
So, I am a little confused here. They obviously stop some smaller charge build-ups, but what about the lightning issue? Yes or no, and if no, what does protect an airplain from lightning, other then not flying into a storm?
Re:Grounding to help with static electricity? (Score:1)
"Sand" (Score:4, Informative)
Just to be clear, we're not talking about "sand" in the sense that your average beachgoer thinks of it. The typical size of the dust grains on Mars is a few tens of microns (say 10-30m or so), which is quite a bit smaller than sand, which ranges from a few hundredths of a millimeter to a couple millimeters in size (roughly, using geological definitions).
Re:"Sand" (Score:2)
Re:"Sand" (Score:1, Informative)
The typical size of the dust grains on Mars is a few tens of microns
ten microns = 10um
than sand, which ranges from a few hundredths of a millimeter
hundreths of a millimeter = 10um
So you are saying that they have the same size, aren't you?
(Gratulations to the mods who modded this up. You failed it.)
Re:"Sand" (Score:2)
Wind-blown Martian dust -- which IS different from sand, as is obvious from Mars' low air density/atmospheric pressure -- can be as small as 1 micron. No terrestrial sand is that small, and the VAST majority of terrestrial sand is on the order of a millimeter, much larger than martian dust, even at the high end of its size range.
Please refrain from pointing fingers when you don't know what you're talking about.
Re:"Sand" (Score:1, Informative)
Your original post was stupid and gave a wrong impression: you were talking about tens of microns and hundredths of a milimeter, which is the same but gives to the casual reader the impression that the one is bigger than the other. Learn to express yourself clearly. Or do you want to go into politics?
Re:"Sand" (Score:2)
Quick! (Score:1)
Re:Quick! (Score:1)
a terran tornado ? (Score:2)
There's a reference to "terrestrial dustdevils", that's close.
I would have been surprised to see sci-fi jargon in the middle of a NASA report.
Terra (Score:2)
It really irrirates me when SF people (who often should know better). Terra is nothing more then the Latin word for "earth" or "land". It has no more implict value or distiction or anything else over modern-English "Earth". Since all space-traveling cultures speak English anyway (just watch any TV show or movie), "Earth" would be a lot more appropriate then "Terra" ever would.
As you note, the correct term for "occuring on Earth" is "terrestrial" (which does derive from
Uh, oh Toto, I don't think were in Kansas anymore (Score:1)
Could Dust Devils be... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Could Dust Devils be... (Score:1)
Re:Could Dust Devils be... (Score:2)
Re:Could Dust Devils be... (Score:1)
Re:Could Dust Devils be... (Score:2)
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=hilaryduff+h
Re:Could Dust Devils be... (Score:1)
ok, I'll expalin. Mars atmosphere != Earth atmosphere. In the same sense as 200kmph tornado is much less devastating than hypothetical 200kmph wall of water. Got it?
(and the Beagle probably has been found)
Re:Could Dust Devils be... (Score:1)
(and the Beagle probably has been found)
Nope, at least not convincingly. The Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) [msss.com] found a dark spot near the predicted Beagle landing site, but further imaging showed that spot to be a small impact crater with wind-blown sediment on its floor, which is not consistent with an impact as recent as late 2003.
From the MSSS link: Based on the MGS MOC imaging campaign and subsequent analyses, no incontrovertible evidence of the Beagle 2 lander was found within the areas imaged by MOC.
Thank you Dr. Obvious (Score:1)
REALLY? Lightning is electricity? Amazing! All along we thought it was from the Gods being angry! Maybe someone should take a kite, and put a key on the string, and fly it in a thunderstorm...
This should have been in the poll (Score:1)
Typical Windspeeds on Mars (Score:1)
Windspeeds of 70mph are not really excessive on Mars.
The Mariner probes detected a typical wind speed of 125mph and gusts of 300-375mph. (source) [uiuc.edu]
The reason that these winds are never mentioned is that the atmosphere is so thin (0.75% of the density of Earth's) so they don't have that much force behind them.
like a common F0-F1 tornado here on earth (Score:1)
Re:like a common F0-F1 tornado here on earth (Score:2)
Re:like a common F0-F1 tornado here on earth (Score:1)
Re:like a common F0-F1 tornado here on earth (Score:1)
Now we can find life on Mars, at last (Score:2, Funny)
If your house has wheels... (Score:1)
---
I started with nothing and I still have most of it left.
Generated by SlashdotRndSig [snop.com] via GreaseMonkey [mozdev.org]
Damage astronauts? (Score:1, Funny)
As far as I know, there are no astronauts on Mars so it is not possible for them to be damaged. However, they could be damaged if they were there. Is some kind of backwards Capricorn 1? We actually go there, but don't tell anyone? Conspiracy theorists awake!
For those too lazy to read TFA, as it turns out... (Score:2)
Tall astronauts not an option (Score:1)
So, that leaves out even the last option of sending tall astronauts to Mars.
Damage astronauts? (Score:1)
Damage astronauts eh? That doesn't sound good. If it wears and tears on the EVA suits that's bad but if it damages the astronauts that's real bad. I think the state of an astronaut on Mars subject to such elemental damage probably changes in quanta (alive vs. not alive).
Problem Solved (Score:1)
Just make sure the astronauts don't take off their space suits.
blink (Score:3, Funny)
I dunno... they sound like a good reason to blink, if you ask me.
Re:blink (Score:1)
Better whirlwind videos (Score:4, Informative)
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA07139 [nasa.gov]
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA07140 [nasa.gov]
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA07138 [nasa.gov]
There's also a rather neat video of Opportunity escaping from the sand trap [nasa.gov].