Vehicle for Cockroaches 198
William Robinson wrote to mention an entertaining Wired news article about vehicle meant for cockroaches. From the article: "Hertz has constructed a three-wheeled robotic vehicle that lets a Madagascan hissing cockroach navigate a room while perched atop a ping-pong ball. The ball works like a computer mouse's track ball. Where the roach moves on the ball, the vehicle moves in the room.
Sensors on the bot can tell when it's going to hit something. It also has a semi-circle of LED lights facing the roach, so when it's about to hit an obstacle an LED will shine on the creature from the direction of the barrier, hopefully causing it to run in the other direction."
Duperlicious! (Score:4, Informative)
Way to stay on top of things, Wired and Slashdot!
Submitter... Editor... is it that fucking hard to punch the word "roach" into the search field before posting? I mean, the duplicate article is the FIRST FUCKING RESULT.
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:2)
It's like when I look through the TV listings and see that HBO is running "Earnest Goes To Camp" or some other really bad 20-year-old movie. I just have to shake my head and wonder if people are mad that they're actually paying for garbage.
(For the record, I get all of the HBOs and Showtimes included in my rent.)
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:2)
Poor fool.
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:2)
Just like you don't have the option of getting a lower credit card rate because you don't call customer service every day. Or like you have pay property taxes, either direct
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:1, Offtopic)
Point two: STFU! I think moderators should agree to start modding these posts as off-topic, unless the post has some relevant information besides a complaint. And give the editors a break. It's a miracle the site is still operating, let alone somewhat useful given the traffic
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:2)
Did you know that they actually get money from operating this site? And they don't even bother to read it
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:2)
Dupes in the same day I could see complaining about. Same week maybe worth a mention.
But 6 weeks ago? You're just digging for osmething to bitch about.
What they need... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What they need... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Duperlicious! (Score:2)
Oh, wait...
Only two things will survive nuclear war (Score:2, Funny)
Cockroach-Controlled Robot [slashdot.org]
Re:Only two things will survive nuclear war (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Only two things will survive nuclear war (Score:2)
And yes, the story is a dupe. I read it in Wired close to 2 months ago.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly.
Anyone else... (Score:5, Funny)
It was like living in a Ziggy strip, I swear to God.
Re:Anyone else... (Score:2)
...not exactly.
Re:Anyone else... (Score:4, Funny)
- Greg
Re:Anyone else... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Anyone else... (Score:1)
Classic! (Score:2)
Re:Anyone else... (Score:2)
Didn't you see those roaches running from booth to booth at the airport trying to find a ping pong ball to rent ?
And they say... (Score:5, Funny)
...Innovation is slowing down. HA! Take that Jonathan Huebner!
first post?
Re:And they say... (Score:2, Funny)
KFG
Re:And they say... (Score:1)
Re:And they say... (Score:1)
It'd be innovative if they had frickin' laser beams attached to their heads...
Re:And they say... (Score:1)
KFG
Re:And they say... (Score:2)
Re:And they say... (Score:2)
Sounds to me like you don't understand metric; the words 'Lucas' and 'Kessel' spring to mind.
If you are going to duplicate articles: (Score:4, Funny)
Why subject us to the thought of ROBOTICALLY AMPLIFIED COCKROACHES twice? Or is this just for everyone whose mind blanked this out the first time?
Re:If you are going to duplicate articles: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:If you are going to duplicate articles: (Score:2)
Wow.... (Score:4, Insightful)
But from the purely technical aspects of it - it's amazing... a trackball driven vehicle, designed for cockroaches. A for creativity.... C- for relativity...
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Wow.... (Score:2)
Re:Wow.... (Score:2)
Re:Wow.... (Score:1)
Re:Wow.... (Score:1, Funny)
The solution: Borrow an existing solution from nature. All you need is an insect, rat, or reptile to interface with the device and for them to obtain feedback with sensors it would closely be accustomed too.
Just imagine for a moment using a pigeon mounted inside a scramjet with the only purpose to get an item from point A to B in a battle field autonomously.
Re:Wow.... (Score:2)
Behaviorist B.F. Skinner imagined it before any of us, way back in the 1940s [psychcentral.com]
Re:Wow.... (Score:2, Funny)
we3 [wikipedia.org]
Re:Wow.... (Score:2)
-Matt
Re:Wow.... (Score:1)
disclaimer: yes, I know that this comment was not technically correct. There are always plenty of reference frames in which it is moving at relavistic speeds, and general relativity deals with all gravity, not just high mass. its a joke. deal with it.
Re:Wow.... (Score:2)
In the end, it proved not to be true. While the cockroach would often respond correctly to the lights he put into the device, it would not always do so. And sometimes the cockroach would just "spaz out" and run in circles for awhile. Other times it control the robot perfectly for a while, then decide to ram it into th
Re:Wow.... (Score:2, Funny)
And sometimes ... would just "spaz out" and run in circles for awhile.
You just described my 2-year old son.
--
It's not the PC's I hate, it's...oh wait-yes it is.
Re:Wow.... (Score:2)
I mean, isn't there enough things to research - without having to break out the need for transportation for house vermin?
Considering the number of accidents happening on the roads nowadays, maybe they're submitted to find a new DDT substitute. Pack a cartload of all those damn roaches in a nice Ferrari, all drunk, and see them smash at 180Mph on the guard rails! The pure violence of the scene would compensate for the costs of a full scale research on the balistics of roaches intestines!
Which makes me
Re:Wow.... (Score:2)
Make (Score:2)
Do they describe how to make one? (Score:2)
Roaches (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Roaches (Score:2)
I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Drive-by's (Score:1)
I can see it now, roaches selling drugs, roaches in drive-by's.
In soviet russia roach exterminates YOU.
Re:I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... (Score:2)
Ironically, roaches are also good at duplication (Score:1)
GuardedNet! (Score:2)
This gives new meaning to the phrase: (Score:2, Funny)
Getaway car (Score:1)
Yet my Open Source Flea Circus Java Spyware Toolbar Firefox Extension article submission was rejected AGAIN!?
Re:Getaway car (Score:2)
Very smart (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah that's a good idea (Score:2)
As if fighting off the cockroach hoardes isn't going to be tough enough in the future.
Re:Yeah that's a good idea (Score:1)
I wonder... (Score:2)
I'd have the terrible urge to smash his invention with a rolled up newspaper.
Its obligatory (Score:3, Funny)
End of Future... (Score:2)
In other words, the perfect antidote to politicians, and GuardedNet executives.
Innovation Getting Slower? (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Innovation Getting Slower? (Score:2)
Innovation (Score:1, Redundant)
Great... (Score:5, Funny)
Violating the Prime Directive (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm actually relative serious when I say: I hope they're disposing of the test subjects afterward and not sending them back to the hive to say: "I figured out the rosetta stone to their technology. Now we'll have no trouble taking over."
I recently re-watched the original Jurassic Park and was properly impacted by someone's remark at some point that they'd be safe from the Raptors untilt hey figured out how to turn a doorknob. It was an excellent point about intelligent creatures. I'm actually not worried a bug is going to drive a car, but I do worry that Einstein's remark "a mind one stretched by a new idea never regains its original shape" might have some applicability here if we make a regular practice of this kind of thing.
We don't need to be artificially creating triggers that put roaches into a more advanced intellectual state ahead of their own natural evolution.
Star Trek teaches us the Prime Directive, which says approximately: don't interfere with the evolution of lower life forms because they may not have the wisdom to use their newfound knowledge for the betterment of mankind. I say we follow that lead in this case.
Evolution does not have any purpose (Score:2)
You seem to be falling for the ID crap. Evolution itself does not exist, it is just a concept. Evolution is not some godlike entity. Therefore it can not have any purpose, like a 'god' could have. That also means there is no 'natural evolution.' Stuff just happens. What happens to one species does always influence other species in its environment. So if mankind d
Re:Violating the Prime Directive (Score:2)
Well, I expected a certain statistical number of this remark for having tried to have an open discussion. Today's science is blurred by a belief that we can pre-judge the answers to questions like this. But I don't think we can.
I don't think we know how intelligence is bootstrapped, and I think it would be a good idea if we asked questions about that before risking giving things the "idea" of being intelligent (for want of a better phrasing).
Ethics is about not b
Re:Violating the Prime Directive (Score:2)
Ok, I'll confess to minor sensationalism by using "the Prime Directive" as my model, since I think it's more complex than that. But it seemed a pithy way of introducing the issue of ethics without putting people to sleep. I'm not so sure that a strict rule of non-interference is really the issue, though I think that's a good debate topic. What I do think is a more useful ethical line is "if the thing I'm experimenting on act
Re:Violating the Prime Directive (Score:2)
Well, I guess part of what I was getting at is that we don't know what triggers this, whether it's a gradual process or a sudden epiphany-like event. Would this particular thing cause it? My point here was not that I was alleging I'm the keeper of the Secret Knowledge that if you put a roach in a car, it will evolve. My point was that I'd feel better if research like this were coupl
Sigh.... (Score:2, Funny)
2. Make obvious reference to previous story
3. Welcome our newly mobile cockroach overlords
4. ????
5. Profit!
But does it play... (Score:4, Funny)
Cockroach Auto Insurance (Score:1)
Accepted forms of payment are RoachPal, MasterDung Cards, and The Madagascar Express Card ("Don't leave roach droppings without it!")
We are currently accepting new investors.
Crash testing (Score:1)
CONVERGENCE (Score:2, Insightful)
I live in Japan. My wife's car beeps when you put it into reverse. Not outside the car, mind you, where it might warn a luckless pedestrian (tm). INSIDE THE CAR ONLY. Perhaps the roach's semi-sircle of LEDs could be added to my wif's car, and we could give the roach a backing beeper.
Fuck LEDs to move roaches... (Score:2)
Well... (Score:3, Funny)
No brainer (Score:3, Informative)
"It was kind of a no-brainer that (Hertz's bot) would be a piece we would include..."
Zing!
dupe (Score:1)
is the original post
HOORAY! (Score:2, Funny)
Great! (Score:1)
That's a great idea for a new FPS right there! I hereby licence this concept under the Creative Commons licence, which I've never read but can't be
I move, you move -- just like that (Score:2)
So I'm forced to disagree with Hertz -- this system is far less interesting than a computer.
I'll never figure out these editors... (Score:2)
Sigh.
That takes the cake. (Score:2)
They're going to be driving our ping pong balls!
Pigeon guided missile (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeon_guided_missil
During World War 2, Project Pigeon was American behaviourist B. F. Skinner's attempt to develop a pigeon-guided missile.
The control system involved a lens at the front of the missile projecting an image of the target to a screen inside, while a pigeon trained (by operant conditioning) to recognise the target pecked at it. As long as the pecks remained in the center of the screen, the missile would fly straight, but pecks off-center would cause the screen to tilt, which would then, via a connection to the missile's flight controls, cause the missile to change course.
Although skeptical of the idea, the National Defense Research Committee nevertheless contributed $25,000 to the research. However, Skinner's plans to use pigeons in Pelican missiles was apparently too radical for the military establishment; although he had some success with the training, he could not get his idea taken seriously.
Dupe (Score:2)
Hurrah! (Score:2)
Close up picture... (Score:2)
Creepy... (Score:2)
And we all know, of course, this is how many horror films begin, right?
That's just great... (Score:2)
So... (Score:2)
That's sad, really. It must suck to be you.
Re:So... (Score:2)
Re:Sick (Score:2)
Where is your sense of patriotism, Faldore?
Given time and funding, this cockroach joyride could mature into deployable military technology.
Let's hope so. As it grows increasingly hard to trick Americans into volunteering for imperial wars, we're facing a serious manpower shortage.
But perhaps the answer has been staring us in the face, all along, and we've simply been a bit hasty rejecting recruits because we didn't like their antennae or their habit--in the case of these Madagas
Re:Sick (Score:2)
Re:Confusion... (Score:2)
Besides, the point of this is supposed to be at least somewhat artistic. Also, a kind of experiment to see how a cockroach compares to traditional methods of using programmed microcontrollers to ac
Re:Confusion... (Score:2)