Drilling to the Center of the Earth 298
indylaw writes "Japanese scientists are attempting to explore the centre of the Earth." From the article: "Using a giant drill ship launched next month, the researchers aim to be the first to punch a hole through the rocky crust that covers our planet and to reach the mantle below. The team wants to retrieve samples from the mantle, six miles down, to learn more about what triggers undersea earthquakes, such as the one off Sumatra that caused the Boxing Day tsunami."
Wrong bloody title. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wrong bloody title. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wrong bloody title. (Score:2)
Yes, but as we also know, the earth is round, like a Frisbee(R). So, as with any disc, it is perfectly possible to find the center of the earth by simply finding the midpoint of its diameter. Obviously that is where they plan to drill.
NEWS FLASH: English is ambiguous. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:NEWS FLASH: English is ambiguous. (Score:2, Funny)
So if the Earth suddenly shatters to pieces.. we can blame Japan?
No (Score:3, Funny)
Re:No (Score:4, Funny)
Re:No (Score:2)
Re:No (Score:3, Informative)
The liquid outer core is made of mostly the same stuff as the deep mantle, Iron with about 5% assorted dense metals mixed in. It's just hot enought to be liquid. The boudary region between them shades gradually from solid to liquid, so what we mean by outer core is essentially arbitrary. Geologists assign a level where it's 'liquid enough', as the boundary.
The solid inner core is a single Iron crystal. 1,500 Km across, and with damned near no c
Re:NEWS FLASH: English is ambiguous. (Score:2)
English is ambiguous, but they are only going through the candy shell to grab a little chocolate. They aren't getting anywhere near the peanut or the center of the earth.
Re:NEWS FLASH: English is ambiguous. (Score:2)
The center (Score:2)
Re:Wrong bloody title. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wrong bloody title. (Score:2)
That sentence is just wrong on *so* many levels.
mantle makes you repeat yourself (Score:2)
This article is very interesting. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:This article is very interesting. (Score:5, Funny)
It's ingenious!
Re:This article is very interesting. (Score:4, Funny)
Slashdot editors repeat articles
On their website, despite 'em
Dupes repeat phrases, which the comments repeat,
And so it threads ad infinitum
Re:Obligatory Simpsons Quote (Score:2)
Re:Obligatory Simpsons Quote (Score:2)
cause (Score:2)
Madness! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Madness! (Score:2)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0298814/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZ
Re:Madness! (Score:2)
Chris Mattern
Re:Madness! (Score:2)
Question (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Question (Score:2)
Re:Question (Score:2)
typo? (Score:2)
Re:typo? (Score:2)
Gosh... (Score:2, Funny)
Energy (Score:2, Redundant)
Could it be viable to turn the molten into powerful energy source after that? Anyone?
__Funny Adult Videos [laughdaily.com]
Re:Energy (Score:2)
Re:Energy (Score:2)
Re:Energy (Score:2)
Bullshit. Volcanoes cool the Earth mantle much more than anything we might come up to.
Re:Energy (Score:2)
Hot dry rock (HDR) is looking like an interesting clean power source, but in most places its just too deep. The average thermal gradient is 25 to 30 oC/km, so you'd have to drill several kilometres to get useful heat, and at the moment that's too expensive. For those areas with a steep gradient, or if deep drilling gets cheaper, it might be a better long-term prospect than nuclear or solar energy. http://www.seav.vic.gov [vic.gov.au]
Re:Energy (Score:2)
If we run out of oil, we are just out of oil. If we burn up everything, we just have dirty air. If we spill it all out into the ocean, we have some dirty water. If we drain a substantial amount of energy from the Earths core (stop thinking shortterm, if we start it is possible that we will be leeching juice for hundreds of thousands of years into the future) we destroy all life on Earth
Re:Energy (Score:3, Insightful)
Why don't you back that up with somne figures? I can't be botherd to spend the time to refute it, but my feeling is that you could "drain" all the energy we could feasibly use for millions of years with negligible effect. Much less effect than fossil fuels certainly. Actually, if
Re:Energy (Score:3, Informative)
Temp ~6000K
Density of Iron 7800kg/m^3, Nickel 8900km/m^3
Diameter of outer core ~5000km
Mass of core = 5*10^24 kg, less than the mass of earth = 5.97*10^24
Heat content of core = 12*10^33 J, which combined with this data [ouc.bc.ca] of 12 trillion kwh electricity usage/year = 43*10^18 J/year gives us over a billion years to drain it 1%, well past the life of our planet.
Re:Energy (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Energy (Score:2)
Historical note (Score:2)
Read up on Project Mohole [wikipedia.org].
That's nice except... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Pfffff... (Score:2)
Cover for something far more sinister. (Score:2)
Similar /. Story in April (Score:2)
Come on! (Score:2)
Dupe much? Dupe much? (Score:2)
Begin project Vulcan! (Score:5, Funny)
2. Arm the probe with nuclear weapons
3. Hold the world hostage for... ONE MILLION DOLLARS
4. Profit!
Re:Begin project Vulcan! (Score:2)
I hear... (Score:2)
Edge of mantle != center of the earth (Score:2)
Reaching the mantle is very impressive. Just keep it in perspective.
How inspiring. (Score:2)
Previously undiscovered bacteria that can survive the anticipated 100C temperatures of the upper mantle could be useful on the surface. Heatproof enzymes isolated from bugs brought back by earlier Japanese drill missions are now used in washing powders.
WOW! Just imagine the kinds of laundry detergent we could make with super heat resistant bacterial enzymes. WOW! Just imagine the kinds of laundry detergent we could make with super heat resistant bacterial enzymes.
From "A short history of nearly Everything" (Score:2, Informative)
About the earth's layers (p216): "... the various layers, using average figures:
From 0 to 40 km (25 mi) is the crust.
From 40 to 400 (250 mi) is the upper mantle.
From 400 to 650 (400 mi) is a transition zone between the upper and lower mantle.
From 650 to 2,700 km (1,700 mi) is the lower mantle.
From 2,700 to 2,890 (1,900 mi) is the "D" layer.
From 2,890 to 5,150 km (3,200 mi) is the outer core,
and from 5,150 to 6,378 km (3,967 mi) is the inner core."
About an attempt to drill
Re:From "A short history of nearly Everything" (Score:2)
They will find great HEAT (Score:2)
perhaps... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:perhaps... (Score:2)
It was the people on the inside drilling out to see what's there!
Wait, you mean the earth isn't a Dyson Sphere?
Similar projects (Score:5, Informative)
There have been a number of other projects to drill deep into the Earth's crust, though none has succeeded in reaching the mantle, as this Japanese team is trying to do. Some of the more well-known ones:
Another poster already provided the wikipedia page for Project Mohole [wikipedia.org]. That was a US team back in 1961 that managed to drill to 183 m below the sea floor, in 3500 m of water off the Mexican coast. From a ship, floating on the ocean surface -- I just find that incredible.
As far as land-based projects go, there have been 2 big ones that I know of. The Kola Superdeep Borehole [wikipedia.org] was a Russian project, started in 1970, that drilled at a site on the Kola Peninsula near Finland. Their deepest hole reached 12.262 km in depth, which is the current record. This page [compuserve.com] has a section (scroll down a few screens) with some very interesting findings from the project. Apparently, geologic theory doesn't quite correspond with what we find when we actually go down there to see for ourselves.
There's also the KTB (long German acronym) Borehole, started in 1978 in Bavaria. They reached a depth of 9.101 km. Information on this one is hard to find, at least in English, though there is a great Oilfield Review article (big pdf) [slb.com] available.
This Japanese project is going to drill through the sea floor in the Pacific, in a spot where the crust is thin, which will hopefully allow them to reach the mantle in only 7 km, under 2.5 km of water. For comparison: the previous record seafloor drill was only 2.1 km. So they've definitely got their work cut out for them.
Re:Similar projects (Score:2)
Godzilla!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Godzilla!! (Score:2)
Think of all the screaming girls we could save!
Re:Godzilla!! (Score:2)
Relax, dude. All we need to do is find Kenny.
using unobtainium ? (Score:2)
--
The Core: "Someone set up us the bomb"
Re:using unobtainium ? (Score:2)
Re:using unobtainium ? (Score:2)
The team wants to.... (Score:2)
and this might help in -- (Score:2)
Now that's interesting. Rocket science meets home science.
--
Watch Out... (Score:2)
Sounds like a plot to a Godzilla movie (Score:2)
MUST STOP THEM! (Score:2)
six miles down... (Score:2)
Danger! (Score:2)
And believe me, they're about to find out.
Cataclysms Ensue (Score:2)
Don't do this (Score:2)
Apolagies to Jules Vern
A better idea (Score:2)
The trick seems to be finding a probe that can ride the iron blob the whole way down, and keep it hot (probably through radioactivity). This was also considered as a wa
Journalism Going to Hell (Score:2)
Pressure Drop (Score:2)
Does anyone remember ... (Score:2)
I hope this project turns out better than The Project in the film.
Hell of a project (Score:2)
(notices Paris Hilton on CNN)
... on second thought. Bring 'em on.
Re: Article (Score:2)
> Something strange about the recursiveness of the article text
That's nothing - wait 'til you see what the dupe looks like!
Re: Article (Score:2)
That's nothing - wait 'til you see what the dupe looks like!
Re:Article (Score:2)
Either that or the text was written by Johnny Two Times, they called him that becaue he said everything two times. "I'm gonna get the papers, get the papers." I watched Goodfellas tonight.
-B
Re:Article (Score:2)
Hot mantle (Score:2)
Re:Hot mantle (Score:2)
Re:Hot mantle (Score:2)
earth will crack into two pieces and fall into the sun, from drilling one hole.
Re:Hot mantle (Score:3, Insightful)
It wouldn't have time to "heat up the planet (surface)", even if it was significant, which it isn't, since volcanoes already do the same job on much larger scale. Any such drill hole that isn't actively kept open would instantly close either because pressure pushed the rock walls together, or if they go deep enough, magma would go up, cool, and form a cork.
The solid c
Re:a new low ! (Score:2)
Re:a new low ! (Score:2, Funny)
No no no (Score:3, Funny)
Re:a new low ! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:How interesting... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:2)
Re:Mystery Solved! (Score:2)
Re:Let's leave it alone (Score:2)
Yes, that's the problem, you don't know. It's generally good idea to think about perhaps gaining the knowledge before you open your mouth and start gabbling nonsense.
She's not going to like it one way or another, she won't even notice. We're talking about 7.5km hole (that's also very small width-vise) in a planet with radius of almost 6400km, that's just about 0.1% way down to the core.
The thing is over 4 billion years old - is it really a good id
Re:Let's leave it alone (Score:2)
Isn't not knowing better than presuming to know?
The thing is indeed over 4 billion years old. That should tell you something about how much she can handle,
That is a good point.
think this is the first time she feels a pinprick?
No, but apparently we haven't done it before ("the researchers aim to be the first to punch a hole through the rocky crust that covers our planet"). Yes, there have probably been huge objects hitting the planet in the past, volc
Re:Ship? (Score:2)
The earth's crust is thinnest below some oceans and hence there it's easyer to drill into the hotter areas.
But that's aswell where the problem for this project lies, the extreme temperatures can and will melt the drill bit unless these guys have some new and very smart technology.
Re:The CORE II (Score:2)
http:/ [intuitor.com]
Re:Center of Earth 6 miles down? (Score:2)