Bacterial Printing Press 90
juushin writes "New Scientist has reported that scientists at Harvard University have created a bacterial printing press that can be reconfigured to print complex patterns of bacteria. The technology is reported to have applications in studying biofilms, communication between bacteria (and colonies of bacteria), and the interaction of bacteria and surfaces. Of medical interest, these applications may lead to a better understanding of how to prevent bacterial infections."
The possibilities... (Score:1)
Re:The possibilities... (Score:2)
Or were you thinking of tiles that you could plant after they have served their official life spans as tiles?
Re:The possibilities... (Score:1)
Hmm. (Score:3, Interesting)
He uses bacteria as 'ink', and presses the bacterial mold onto a sheet to produce a bacteria pattern.
I'm not exactly sure why this is better or worse than simply pipetting bacteria into a large petri dish, though.
Re:Hmm. (Score:1)
It's better because it allows much more detailed and accurate patterns of bacteria to be deposited - using a pipette pretty much all you can do is stick a blob of gunk on a bit of glass.
stamping rather than ink-jet based... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:stamping rather than ink-jet based... (Score:2)
Muppet Labs! (Score:2)
"Okay Beaker, print out a test page now!"
"Meep"
[Whiirrrr zip whirrrrr zip whirrr]
"RAWWWWR!"
"Mee...meee...MEEEP MEEEP MEEEEEEP!"
"Good job, Beaker! Now we know that is definitely too much biological ink!"
(with apologies to the writers of Muppet Island).
Quite ingenious (Score:3, Insightful)
Since a lot of bacteria grow resistant to antibiotics, it makes sense to use this kind of "printing press" to study how they create their protective biofilm. As a species, we are slowly succumbing to our own success at killing off bacteria. However the rise of super-bacteria that are immune to our medicines is a huge worry. If this type of research can shine some light on why these bacteria are so resistant and how we can control them to be less dangerous to us, then we will be able to hold off our extinction for a few more years.
Re:Quite ingenious (Score:3, Insightful)
We're not in danger of becoming extinct from bacteria resistance. We adapt too.
Re:Quite ingenious (Score:1, Insightful)
Antibiotics resistance usually has little to do with biofilm structures, more with genetic adaptations that alter the original target of the antibiotic, making the bacteria resistant to it. When a bacterium happens to combine a series of those adaptations, it becomes multiple drug resistant, which is where the actual problem lies that we're starting t
Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. (Score:2, Funny)
The radical group you are trying to piss off happens to have the same idiotic arguments as you, but is on the other side of the spectrum. And both groups are morons.
I'm tired of this trendy shit in \. where at the drop of a fucking hat people start categorizing people as either a Linux Zealot or a M$ Luvers. Technology is not meant to be worshiped, it is meant to be used to accomplish a goal, and you should use whatever best fits that goal, windows, linux or a fu
Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. (Score:1)
Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. (Score:2)
Backslashdot? BACKSLASHDOT?! You... you... M$ LUVER!!!
Now excuse me while I port Linux to my TI83.
old news (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:old news (Score:1)
KFG
Yay Finally (Score:3, Funny)
Oh-Oh (Score:2, Funny)
With hilarious consequences.
Obligitory simpsons. (Score:2)
Homer at sushi bar - "What is number 23? I haven't had that one yet".
Waiter - "Number 23 is Poison Fish".
Homer - "Poision!!"
Waiter - "Do not be concerned about eating poison fish it is the head chef's speciality, also there is a map to the hospital on the back of your menu."
Now I can..... (Score:1)
Re:Now I can..... (Score:1)
bacterial computation (Score:5, Informative)
Whether we'd be able to get them to behave in reproducible ways would be the question.
Here are some links. The first has some interesting photos of bacterial colonies-- similar to cellular automata, because hey! They are! And the second is a link to an article on bacterial colony computation. Or maybe they're both to Goatse. You won't know until you click.
http://alnk.org/dankwish [alnk.org]
http://alnk.org/nearseal [alnk.org]
Re:bacterial computation (Score:1)
Quite an eye opener!
Are you working in this field? Could you direct me to more material on bacterial computation? I'd love to know more.
Re:bacterial computation (Score:2)
It's so much more interesting than real life.
http://online.itp.ucsb.edu/online/pattern_c03/p_b
Re:bacterial computation (Score:1)
Re:bacterial computation (Score:2)
Sounds familar... (Score:4, Funny)
Here... (Score:2, Funny)
Tommorow's Paper (Score:1)
Re:Good work but (Score:2)
Only on way to explain that adolecent rant... (Score:2)
You finally got an interview with that oh-so-fuckable headhunter at the agency, didn't-ja.
Then she told you it takes more than "installing a distro on mum's PC" to get a $100K blow
You ran off home to mum's basement, had a wank (staring the headhunter), got stoned and started posting.
Game of Life (Score:4, Insightful)
Too bad it'd never work - not unless you could find some REALLY weird bacteria, anyway.
Re:Game of Life (Score:2)
No, you could not.
My first thought was plumbing. (Score:2)
Re:Game of Life (Score:2)
Too bad it'd never work - not unless you could find some REALLY weird bacteria, anyway.
For the 'standard' rules of the Game of Life, this is probably true. Remember though that the rules are changeable; with most real bacteria you've just got a higher chance of survival at higher densities, or some form of lifespan - each point lasting longer than a single turn, with the state of each turn also affecting the lifetime left and spread per unit.
David Brin's Glory Season ta
Next generation of computer viruses? (Score:1)
Re:Next generation of computer viruses? (Score:1)
Neural experimentation kit? (Score:2)
Spatial Properties (Score:3, Interesting)
E.g. those bioplaques can be real killers. Models of bacteria that assume they are all evenly distributed in 2-space or 3-space really don't cut it.
Same thing with blood vessels. They aren't solid tubes, like the plumbing in your house. There's all sorts of transverse stuff happening that doctors fail to model and take into consideration.
Or materials science -- all the "edge effects" that people like to ignore, because they are necessarily messy.
If this advance allows them to study different geometries of bacteria cheaply, that will be a big step -- they'll be able to run big batches of simulations of different layouts. Hopefully they'll get their models right and do better work.
Novel application of existing technology (Score:3, Informative)
One thing in the article that is a bit deceptive is that the article says that one can print with details as small as one micrometer . . . the size of a single bacterium. This may technically be true, but I doubt that controlling which individual bacterium are transferred (printed) or not is possible. And the neither the technique of pipetting bacteria nor regrowing bacteria on the agarose media is likely to have a resolution of one micrometer. Though the postulated one micrometer resolution may be possible, it is for all practical purposes impossible.
Re:Novel application of existing technology (Score:2)
Well that allows... (Score:1)
Yeah, well... (Score:2)
I've dripped cheese on my printer a time or two as well, but it never seemed suitable for a Slashdot headline.
Transfers (Score:2)
Oh great... (Score:2)
Bacterial Printing press? (Score:1)
Real Life (Score:2)
Well this is going to make Snail Mail (Score:3, Informative)
Now it doesn't have to come by an email either.
Send something that looks like junk mail to a congressman's home in the winter and you can just see the trail of death and destruction because the ink itself could kill you. (ebola 'flavoured' ink anyone?)
I don't think this is too smart but the cat's out of the bag now. Pretty soon we're going to need transparent exo-skins to do anything. (Think about it.)
The killer "I'm Sorry" card... (Score:3, Funny)
"Harold -- there's no excuse for this -- I want a divorce, and I'm taking EVERYTHING! INCLUDING THE DOG!"
"But, Lisa -- I really want to apologize -- this card says it all..."
"Card? What? How pathetic...oh...wait...what a wonderful photo from our wedding, Harold..."
"Yeah -- I made it myself with a new printer we got at the labs at the office..."
[wife reads card -- eyes tear up -- lip trembles]
"Oh, Harold...I love you so much...I accept your apology..."
[wife tries to kiss husband]
"Wait -- I'm not worthy of that kind of love just yet...give it time...so you know it's real again..."
"You're right, Harold. I'll read this card over and over and remember that you're going to make an effort to be better and more faithful..."
[28 days later]
"Well, Harold -- it's the weirdest thing..."
"What's that, doc?"
"I have no idea how your wife got a case of bubonic plague. Did you guys have rats in your house?"
"Nope. Really odd. Oh, well."
"It's a mystery to me, Harold. She died such a painful death."
"Yes...she did... Well, I'm off for an appointment. Gotta pick up my secretary. See ya doc!"
IronChefMorimoto
Please. This has been done for years! (Score:2)
Pathogens, too!
And diseases.
Oh, and don't forget syndromes...