Longest Chemical Name: 64,060 letters 133
mycro writes "A new article on Wikipedia shows the longest chemical name, reaching 64,060 letters. Methionylalanylthreonyl...leucine is a chemical name for enaptin, a nuclear envelope protein found in human myocytes and synapses, which is made up of 8,797 amino acids. It is involved in the maintenance of nuclear organization and structural integrity, tethering the cell nucleus to the cytoskeleton by interacting with the nuclear envelope and with F-actin in the cytoplasm."
Easy Paradox (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Easy Paradox (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Easy Paradox (Score:2)
Re:Easy Paradox (Score:2)
I call it bloatware.
Re:Easy Paradox (Score:1)
Re:Easy Paradox (Score:2)
Re:Easy Paradox (Score:1, Funny)
Sincerely, He Who Must Not Be Named
With an article like that... (Score:2, Funny)
Spelling bee (Score:5, Funny)
..... and? (Score:2)
saippuakauppias (translated: soap dealer,or soap merchant, anyways, a guy that sells soap you get the point) is the most commonly used finnish palindrom. AND that chemical name would be probably longer if written in finnish(glutamiini instead of glutamin).
OK, it's late and this story didn't make any sense from apart being a pure tidbit - what kind of other discussion can you spur from this anyways?
Re:..... and? (Score:2)
saippuakauppias (translated: soap dealer,or soap merchant, anyways, a guy that sells soap you get the point) is the most commonly used finnish palindrom.
Not to mention that a variant of that word, "saippuakivikauppias", is the worlds longest palindrome.
I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:4, Informative)
Something easier to remember (not an acronym of this long-ass acronym) that clearly explained the form and function of the amino acid would be much more useful.
In programmer terms, this IUPAC nomenclature is like Hungarian notation, putting too much information about the data into the name without sufficiently ascribing useful information to it.
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:5, Informative)
By the way, if you want a longer and equally useless chemical name, you can always spell out the nucleotid sequence of a whole chromosome in full nomenclature.
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:2)
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:2)
Anyway, IUPAC nomenclature wasn't meant to describe proteins - the amino acid sequence should be shorter and less wordy but that still doesn't represent specific isomers.
Still it's quite the supercalafragilisticexpialadocious endeavour to write it down (OK, so someone hacked a script to
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:3, Funny)
Besides, the name can't even be used in Scrabble.
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:2)
Hungarian notation is useful information in itself, by definition. You don't simply affix some notation, then go somewhere else to assign useful information to that notation. There are unquestionably situations and places where it is not useful, or even simply undesirable, and even casual browsing of the Win32 API will cl
Re:I blame IUPAC nomenclature (Score:2)
The idea for a name, to my mind, is that it should be semantics free. Hence the use of meaningless accession numbers (P05443) in addition to the (thin) semantic content of identifiers (OPSD_HUMAN).
IUPAC strings are not actually names at all, but representations of structure. While I have some do
oh please (Score:3, Funny)
Spelling? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Spelling? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Spelling? (Score:2)
Re:Spelling? (Score:1)
Re:Spelling? (Score:2)
Re:Spelling? (Score:2)
Do not change the name, (Score:2)
"The chemical formerly known as Methionylalanylthreonyl...leucine". adding 31 more characters...
Hmm... (Score:3, Informative)
a - 5940
b - 0
c - 1946
d - 238
e - 3210
f - 0
g - 2738
h - 1192
i - 2666
j - 0
k - 0
l - 14645
m - 1938
n - 3195
o - 1457
p - 1398
q - 0
r - 2771
s - 3069
t - 3575
u - 3273
v - 430
w - 0
x - 0
y - 10379
z - 0
Nope...it's probably not random.
Re:Hmm... (Score:2, Insightful)
$ du -sh chem
68k chem
$ gzip chem
$ du -sh chem.gz
12k chem.gz
Re:Hmm... (Score:2)
Re:Hmm... (Score:3, Informative)
There are 26 characters, as you point out. On the other hand, as the grandparent poster points out, only 18 are used.
log2(18)=4.17 (to the largest hundredth)
So you only need 4.17 bits to represent 26 characters.
8 bits/4.7 bits = 1.9
So using a more compact bit-level representation of characters, you could achieve a compression ratio of 1:1.9. This would reduce the file from 68K to 36K.
The commen
Re:Hmm... (Score:2)
Re:Hmm... (Score:2)
Re:Hmm... (Score:2)
Re:Hmm... (Score:3, Funny)
See freq analysis at http://www.fizzl.net/projects/crypto/
The plaintext is simply:
wioglcnteaeante
I think I also saw Cthulhu there somewhere...
Research papers... (Score:2, Funny)
Jds
Comment haiku (Score:5, Funny)
anylthreonyl... oh just
call me enaptin.
Re:Comment haiku (Score:2)
What about titin? (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?c
Re:What about titin? Non-broken tinyurl link (Score:1)
Re:What about titin? (Score:1)
Re:What about titin? (Score:1)
Re:What about titin? (Score:2)
Re:What about titin? (Score:1)
In related news... (Score:5, Funny)
His upcoming album will have a 10 page foldout with his name printed on it.
God? (Score:3, Funny)
I guess I'd need to look into it's functionality but that doesn't seem like something that just SPRINGS into existence.
On the positive side all the sci-fi where they talk about advanced races with overly complicated DNA well they need to move forward right now...Like when we actually got to mars.
Re:God? (Score:2)
As an athiest, I assume you believe in evolution. The very word "evolution" implies that the subject did not "spring" into existence. Contrast this with, "Let there be light!" as a means of explaining away just about everything.
The protein formerly known as enaptin (Score:1, Redundant)
I MADE THIS! (Score:1)
Re:I MADE THIS! (Score:1)
Re:I MADE THIS! (Score:1)
Re:MOD PARENT DOWN (Score:1)
M64058y (Score:2)
M64058e (Score:1, Redundant)
That's nothing. (Score:2)
Yeah, and? (Score:2, Funny)
News for Nerds? Check.
Stuff that Matters? Um... Well... Oh, nevermind...
Slow news day, methinks.Worst Submission Ever (Score:4, Insightful)
The Dystrophin exon (coding sequence) is over 2.4 MILLION bases or 800,000 amino acids long.
Using the moron's system of naming proteins, Dystrophin's name would be ~3.5 MILLION characters long.
Wow and this made it past the Slashdot editors. Good job guys! Maybe it's because the editors have no clue about most science. Maybe they need to hire someone who does.
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:2)
May I suggest you edit your profile and remove the "It's Funny Laugh" section out of your homepage? I mean, humor is subjective and all, but smile and move on!
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:2)
And it's not really that funny. I mean, if I told the joke to all of my engineer friends, there'd be crickets. And they're engineers. That bad.
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:2)
spell it backwards, it's finnish. this 'joke' is just about as funny as linking to this stuff.
hell, even goatse is funnier even after all the reruns.
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:1)
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:2)
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:1)
I immediately thought of titin, at 20k AAs. I think you're right that the slashdot editors are a little weak on their biochemistry. You rarely see articles about drugs or genes on slashdot(they are covered well enough elsewhere) and I've had a quibble or two about the few I have seen. Oh well, I'm glad it was posted because that gives us a chance to educate people.
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:2)
Re:Worst Submission Ever (Score:2)
Acronym. (Score:2)
(Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.)
Did anyone else see that? (Score:2, Funny)
"I think we forgot an "e" in there someplace..."
This little tidbit was the most interesting part of this whole thing.
I am serious here ... (Score:1)
And people say computer acronyms are hard
Re:I am serious here ... (Score:2)
Re:I am serious here ... (Score:2)
Wow.... (Score:2, Funny)
At last (Score:1)
Why is this news? (Score:2)
Re:Why is this news? (Score:1)
There are stretches of DNA that are far bigger than that (e.g. chromosomes). But noone bothers writing down the chemical formula for any of them, because listing the sequence of bases is sufficient.
I agree with pre
Re:Why is this news? (Score:1)
2nd longest? (Score:2)
Re:2nd longest? (Score:1)
Problem with wikipedia (Score:2)
It says the '2nd' longest written down.
Also, who knows if the original is correct, and I guess with diffs the 1 letter chanegs can be found.
Anyone posted the largest known prime to wiki yet?
Trolls putting a 2 onthe end will cause some giggles.
ok that is me.,
Common Name: Cymru-onium (Score:2)
Well, it sounds like some village in Wales [luoac.co.uk]...
Methionylalanylthreonyl...leucine... (Score:2, Funny)
Or not.
.WAV file? (Score:1)
Personally... (Score:1)
Now, can you imagine this one being on the Spelling Bee list?
rotflmfao!
I'm E-Mailing that to a few people (Score:1)
Re:I'm E-Mailing that to a few people (Score:1)
Re:I'm E-Mailing that to a few people (Score:1)
link to the full name (Score:1)
See all 64,060 bytes in their full glory here [wikisource.org].
I think I'll name my first born after this chemical name.I'd like to see what this molecule looks like... (Score:1)
It doesn't sound like something that I would expect to show up at Folding@Home [stanford.edu] anytime soon.
Good lord... (Score:2)
It's all a big farkin' joke.
The full name has "allyourbasearebelongtous" embedded in it. sheesh.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Good lord... (Score:1)
Early Loof Lipra? (Score:1)
araginylglycylprolylprolylprolylleucineallyourbas
I call foul! I think this one should have been kept under wraps for another few days...
oh. (Score:1)
Spelling bee (Score:1)
"Sorry Timmy....It's spelled m-e-t-h-I-o-n...."
Methionylalanylthreonyl...leucine.... (Score:2)
T-Shirt? (Score:2)
Where's the Think Geek T-Shirt?
shorter DNA sequence than name (Score:2)
Sure, but... (Score:1)
Overheard in the science lab that worked on this.. (Score:2)
Bill: Over in that cabinet there... why?
Bob: Oh, I was just writing up a two-paragraph blurb about our little chemical here, and I mentioned it by full name a few times...