Wisconsin Researchers Create Nano-Bio-Circuits 135
opencity writes "A team of scientists at UW-Madison has successfully used single bacterial cells to make tiny bio-electronic circuits. Slipping between the electrodes, the microbes, in effect, become electrical "junctions," giving researchers the ability to capture, interrogate and release bacterial cells one by one. Built into a sensor, such a capability would enable real-time detection of dangerous biological agents, including anthrax and other microbial pathogens. Two mpegs -- 11MB and 35MB -- available here. Related by scale and buzzwords: physorg.com reports scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have developed a way to sneak nano-sized probes inside cell nuclei, where they can track life's fundamental processes, such as DNA repair, for hours on end. Related cool pictures and strange font choices on Nano-Bio Interface Center."
Not enough buzzwords (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Not enough buzzwords (Score:2, Informative)
Trouble is, microbes and bacteria vary hugely in size and shape, and may break and divide. Bits may stick, dust and foreign bodies get jammed in the works.If the gates are so narrow, wonder if they bend, or current electroylsis corrodes one terminal over time? Same as a chicken egg size sorter, only smaller, and without light detection circuitry.
Disposable filter paper, or a roll of filter paper, works, and is cheap, as are glass needletips. A scanning electron microsc
Re:Not enough buzzwords (Score:3, Interesting)
The answer, of course, is quantum dot technology [tudelft.nl]
Re:Not enough buzzwords (Score:2)
I mean, on one hand it looks tangled and inelegant. But then I think how it twists this way because of the fundamental laws of my favorite place (the universe).
Which then led to my recollection of the following (hope this image hosting doesn't bork:/)
I'v
Re:Not enough buzzwords (Score:2)
One word: phi [google.com]
Interrogate (Score:4, Funny)
Mor-on (Score:2)
Re:Mor-on (Score:2)
Re:Interrogate (Score:1)
Re:Terri Shiavo (Score:2)
Re:Heh (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Heh (Score:1)
Alright... (Score:1, Funny)
...still won't talk, eh? Well let me introduce you to my little friend here... We like to call him "Mr. Microbe."
Noooo! I'll do anything, please!!!
WTf? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:WTf? (Score:1)
Re:WTf? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:WTf? (Score:3, Informative)
Re: WTf? (Score:1)
Yes, I've noticed this, and it's VERY annoying. If an URL isn't valid or doesn't exist, a browser should just say so, nothing more. Doing a Google search on (something not found) may be useful, but let the user decide that, alright?
For Mozilla/Firefox developers, some suggestions: a) don't do this, or b) do the Google search, but leave it to users to select and click on
Re: WTf? (Score:1, Informative)
Re: WTf? (Score:1)
Re:WTf? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:WTf? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:WTf? (Score:1)
Re:WTf? (Score:1)
Re:WTf? (Score:1)
Damn. It was a good letter too. (Score:1)
So this means I can't mail my senator my letters?
Re:Damn. It was a good letter too. (Score:2)
Hmm - maybe I need to think further 'up the chain'?
Bad link! (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.news.wisc.edu/newsphotos/hamers.html
Ironically, under Firefox the link forwards to Microsoft.
Re:Bad link! (Score:2)
Re:Bad link! (Score:2)
Correct Link to Video (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Correct Link to Video (Score:1)
Should I be wearing my tinfoil hat for this one?
Re:Correct Link to Video (Score:1)
I'm guessing UW-Madison wants to Slashdot MS. It's a conspiracy.
Re:Correct Link to Video (Score:2)
Re:Correct Link to Video (Score:2)
Re:Correct Link to Video (Score:1)
obligatory Wisconsin joke. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Its the answer! (Score:1, Funny)
This will improve cohabitation with the female sex by two orders, solving all the worlds problems, Since stinky cheese is the root of all evil.
Well, That and alcohol and drugs and greed and
Jim D.
Re:It redirects me to MS... (Score:1)
But, does it...? (Score:1)
But, does it work with MRTG?
New meaning to virus problem (Score:2, Funny)
Resistance (Score:1)
Re:Resistance (Score:2)
Re:Resistance (Score:2)
microsoft owns http:// now?! (Score:1)
Re:microsoft owns http:// now?! (Score:4, Informative)
Torrents (Score:5, Informative)
Sign me up! (Score:2)
So if I spill this stuff on my hands, do I get to see a swirling mass of fluorescence with d
Re:Sign me up! (Score:2, Informative)
"So if I spill this stuff on my hands, do I get to see a swirling mass of fluorescence with dancing stars and arrows for hours on end?"
No, for that effect you have to drink it.
billy - bring on the Nanoberry Quantum Koolaide
bittorrents available (Score:5, Informative)
hamers1 (35MB) [schlitt.net]
hamers1 (11MB) [schlitt.net]
Re:bittorrents available (Score:2)
the poor microbes (Score:1)
PETA? (Score:1)
Re:the poor microbes (Score:1)
Just respond to PETA by saying "Every time a loaf of bread is baked, one million yeast cry out in pain!"
Strange fonts? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Strange fonts? (Score:1)
Re:Strange fonts? (Score:1)
You know what amazes me? (Score:1)
I read this and instantly think, Nano-probes, intra-cellular monitoring - Borg!!!
Not that I believe the scientists working on this based their research on the Borg from ST, however the paralells are quite intriguing.
Give it a couple more years and these nano-probes will be repairing cells in addition to monitoring them - I'm joking here, although who knows what
Re:You know what amazes me? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes.
It's almost as if the scientific research precedes Star Trek... or as if a million-bajillion other science fiction stories had similar ideas that Star Trek could copy...
Don't give Star Trek too much credit. About all they've ever invented is terminology, much of which is surprisingly crappy if you actually learn about the fields they are raping for ideas.
You know what amazes me?-Books! (Score:1, Informative)
Obviously someone who hasn't read the book "The science of Star Trek".
Re:You know what amazes me?-Books! (Score:3, Insightful)
That's about as useful as "The science of the Bible". It's easy to go in after the fact and justify whether or not something can be made to fit science. It's harder to examine the evidence at hand and decide whether or not the bible/Star Trek came to the right conclusion.
Re:You know what amazes me?-Books! (Score:2)
so... (Score:3, Interesting)
detection is nice, removal is the next step.
University of Wisconsin?! (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:University of Wisconsin?! (Score:1)
Nano-bio circuits (Score:2)
Re:Nano-bio circuits (Score:2)
Actually, the University of Wisconsin has a long history of turning academic research into commercial products. Lots of vitamin research was done at the U-W. So when you see vitamin-D in milk, think U-W.
Vitamin-K, think U-W. The generic name of a very popular anti-coagulant (vitamin K antagonist) is Warfarin. WARF = Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation - whose purpose is to handle the commercial applications of research.
This is your brain... (Score:1)
Bio-Circuit Cheez Whiz? (Score:2)
Re:Bio-Circuit Cheez Whiz? (Score:1)
hmm... and all of this time I thought those foods already were smarter...
What the heck is this? (Score:2)
Yes, but SHOULD we? (Score:2, Insightful)
I found it interesting that the Nano/Bio Interface Center [upenn.edu] places what seems to be an equal emphasis on the development of an ethical structure applicable for these new technologies as on the research itself. Arthur Caplan, who is the director of the Center for Bioethics, used to chair the UN advisory committee on human cloning. His associate, Paul Wolpe, former Chief of Bioethics for NASA and bioethics advisor to Planned Parenthood, is another big gun in the medical ethics arena. With the heavy talent on
Re:Yes, but SHOULD we? (Score:2, Insightful)
That doesnt make any sense. At all.
That would be like saying spam is unethical, before there was spam. Before there was email. Or like saying hacking/phishing is bad, before the all-encompassing web existed. Heck, people didnt know "bugs" existed until they started programming computers ...
Ethics before technology ? doesnt work
Re:Yes, but SHOULD we? (Score:1)
one can anticipate future events and put guidelines in place, only if one has the character to later return and say "i was wrong, lets change item A to this instead, it makes more sense now"
Woot! Soon I shall monitor my liver! Mein leben! (Score:1)
Then my PDA/phone can beep and alert me when I hit a BAC threshhold...
Re:Nanotechnology & Chinese Threat (Score:1)
Re:Nanotechnology & Chinese Threat (Score:1)