Evidence of Glaciers on Mars? 203
cyclop writes "Nature reports that the Mars Express mission has photographed evidence of ancient glaciers on Mars. It seems glaciers have sculpted valleys on the red planet, much like on Earth." Reader macguys writes "Space.com is reporting that the Mars Rover Opportunity has received an unexpected and unexplained power boost of between 2 and 5 percent. The NASA Rover site is so far silent on the boost."
Power Boost (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Power Boost (Score:5, Informative)
A power boost like this means that there is less dust on the panels. Speculation I've seen includes that wind in the crater blew the dust off or that the winter frost somehow condensed the dust so it takes up less surface area...
Re:Power Boost (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Power Boost (Score:3, Funny)
Power Boost explained (Score:3, Funny)
She's been trying to get it to come eat dinner and meet the family; she's a bit miffed that it won't respond...
Re:Power Boost explained (Score:2)
Re:Power Boost (Score:5, Informative)
Other substances can condense at the low temperatures on Mars. I think most of the time the primary component of Martian frost is CO2 - Carbon Dioxide. CO2 frosts were documented by the two Viking landers - so this is a known (though I have no idea how well understood) phenomenon.
understood just fine (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Power Boost (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Power Boost (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Power Boost (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, but the rovers are both too warm for CO2 to form frost on their solar panels.
Solid carbon dioxide on Mars is as rare as solid water on Earth. It will collect on reallycold surfaces near the poles in winter. Electronic devices, even when mostly shutdown for the night, are warm enough to vaporise CO2 from their surfaces
Re:wipers (Score:3, Insightful)
For the last time, Nasa did consider ways to clean the panels, but it decided wisely that the benefits did not outweigh the costs in doing so both in extra weight and money. It's not just a 5 minute job to bolt on a set of wiper blades.
Re:wipers (Score:2)
"Anonymous power boost" (Score:5, Funny)
Re:"Anonymous power boost" (Score:3, Funny)
Re:"Anonymous power boost" (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe they oughta take another scan with the front and rear hazard cams to check for new logos - I bet Opportunity is sportin' a "Type R" sticker now...
power boost (Score:5, Funny)
Re:power boost (Score:2)
Re:power boost (Score:2)
Re:power boost (Score:3, Insightful)
Powerboost old news - rover site posted weeks ago (Score:5, Informative)
This was posted weeks ago...
Re:Powerboost old news - rover site posted weeks a (Score:5, Insightful)
From the site: Seems that perhaps all those Slashdotters who always ask why wipers couldn't have been installed, or claim that dust was immediately going to kill power, can finally be silenced?
One aspect of a particularly long mission like the Mars Rovers is that it acts as a real-world test-bed for the new technologies. Maybe the dust buildup isn't nearly as big an issue as was originally thought, and maybe they've found a good compromise between power consumption and keeping the rover innards warm with the 'deep sleep' capacity. Still, the machinery will fail eventually - here's to hoping that however it does fail, it'll provide them with more information on how to improve things for future missions!
So it was a Martian with a squeegee! (Score:2)
Re:Powerboost old news - rover site posted weeks a (Score:2)
Re:Powerboost old news - rover site posted weeks a (Score:5, Informative)
Very difficult to find-- I had to go to the Opportunity updates page and search for the first occurence of the word "power."
Re:Powerboost old news - rover site posted weeks a (Score:3, Informative)
Dust Devil Cleaning Services (Score:5, Funny)
Dust Devil Cleaning Services, the last remains of the vast martian civilization
The wheel? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The wheel? (Score:5, Informative)
The stuck wheel was on the rover Spirit -this article is about the other one, Opportunity. So no go on that theory. In any case, this change is in the incoming power, not the power expenditure - so changes in the wheel wouldn't change anything.
Powerboost (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Powerboost (Score:2, Funny)
What's Your Prediction? (Score:5, Interesting)
It should be like the site that let everyone bet when the next big version of Linux was coming.
It'd be good clean fun for geeks,
Brandon Petersen
Get Firefox! [spreadfirefox.com]
November 2nd (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:November 2nd (Score:2)
Re:November 2nd (Score:2)
The vast red plains (Score:3, Informative)
This power boost is clear evidence (Score:5, Funny)
Why yes I have been listening to Donald Rumsfeld a lot lately, why do you ask?
Re:This power boost is clear evidence (Score:2)
Mind if I ask which one you're on?
How much are tickets there?
What color is your sky?
Re:This power boost is clear evidence (Score:2)
Call me back when you're not allowed to comlain like that.
Re:This power boost is clear evidence (Score:2)
Power boost (Score:1)
-S
Re:Power boost (Score:2)
But I wonder why he didn't just use his Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator instead of repowering them?
Re:Power boost (Score:1)
There was supposed to be an earth-shattering KABOOM!
OK, I think I have this straight. (Score:5, Funny)
Man, it's Friday, isn't it?
I can envision it already (Score:5, Funny)
And someone at NASA gets the task of giving this poor kid the difficult message that he is not getting anything, because it was unrequested...
Re:I can envision it already (Score:2, Funny)
When it happened to Spirit, Spirit failed to pay up, and the teenager kicked the wheels. That is why Spirit has wheel problems.
Power Boost? (Score:1)
maybe the ambient light on mars, in the proper spectrum is greater than expected. i.e. a higher number of lumens?
maybe the properties (refractivity/reflectivity?) of the dust have a quality that allows the light to pass through at a greater rate than expected? or is it possible for them to emit a non-visible spectrum which can be used by the
Re:Power Boost? (Score:3, Informative)
maybe the properties (refractivity/reflectivity?) of the dust have a quality that allows the light to pass through at a greater rate than expected? or is it possible for them to emit a non-visible spectrum which can be used by the solar cells?
Having two identical rovers on Mars rules out these theories. Whatever is happening is specific to one rover and not the other - so it can't be atmospher
Martian Squeegee Men (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Martian Squeegee Men (Score:1)
At first I thought you mispelled "greenbacks"
Superpowers (Score:5, Funny)
Contents of most recent data transmission:
Re:Superpowers (Score:1)
Mars Express Images (Score:5, Informative)
I'm not saying I don't like what the MERs have sent back, but some of the ESA stuff is pretty sweet looking
ESA's Mars Express [esa.int]
That means... (Score:3, Funny)
That means...
Mars was destroyed by global warming!!!
(Yeah it's tongue in cheek... but it's gotta make you think!)
Re:That means... (Score:2)
Mars was destroyed by global warming!!!
I'm not sure what you mean by destroyed. Is the planet not still there?
Re:That means... (Score:2, Interesting)
Them: "blah blah and the meek shall inherit the Earth..."
You: "Yeah, what's left of it."
Re:That means... (Score:2)
back to the past (Score:2, Funny)
That rover must be on the edge to discover something very important.
I think i watch too much startrek
Should read: Some new results on Mars glaciation (Score:4, Interesting)
This is not a new result. It has long been observed that some valley deposits on Mars resemble glacial morains. By far the best evidence for glaciation on Mars is at its north pole [nasa.gov] and it is well documented.
The increasing power levels of the Mars rovers is explained by the lengthening daylight hours in the Mars northern hemisphere spring. What is surprising is that the solar panels may be being cleaned by wind action.
glacial valleys verses river valleys (Score:3, Informative)
Re:glacial valleys verses river valleys (Score:5, Interesting)
Glaciers carve rounded "U"-shaped valleys while rivers make pointed "V"-shaped valleys.
This does not take account of the uniquely Martian process of sapping [nasa.gov] which also creates U shaped valleys in dendritic, presumably fluvial valley systems. We need to be carefull about infering process from morphology alone.
Re:glacial valleys verses river valleys (Score:3, Funny)
Re:glacial valleys verses river valleys (Score:3, Interesting)
Ok! I am also a geologist (Cornell 1986). Good to find a kindred spirit. Theoretically speaking, a flowing fluid will try to create a cross sectional shape than minimizes drag. I think of this as the glacier following the principle of least action. That cross sectional shape is a semi circle. U-shape to me suggests that. A second order polynomial is a parabola. In low gradient fluvial systems with a deep channel you often see a parabolic cross section. I think that may be an equilibrium cross section w
Re:glacial valleys verses river valleys (Score:2)
Re:glacial valleys verses river valleys (Score:3, Interesting)
But a system with friction isn't conservative, so the principle doesn't apply does it? (Or am I being a moron?) Interesting thought anyway.
Re:glacial valleys verses river valleys (Score:2)
Hamiltons dynamics apply even where dH/dt is not zero. It is one law of physics from which there is no escape.
Martians think... (Score:4, Funny)
Wait 'til it goes from "Look at what those dopes on Earth sent here" to "Let's start messing with them." Mark my words, it'll happen!
The 3D images are mind blowing (Score:2)
If you have ever managed to merge together images on one of those wacky posters before, you know the trick.
All I did was select two of the 3D images they have all ready to go (at nasa.jpl.gov), sized them down with photoshop on a black background, played with the placement for a while until they were just right for me to merge in my brain while aabout eight inches away from my monitor.
It was freaking unreal. The silly red/green im
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:5, Funny)
Not if we send them to Mars.
Re:Why Mars? (Score:1)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:1, Insightful)
Let me re-work that to this:
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
bullshit. (Score:1, Insightful)
bums, vagrants, and hobos
painted as homeless and pandered to as such
I know good people who have ended up homeless. Through no fault of their own. They have held jobs while being homeless.
It's easy to rip on them from your position of relative comfort. Yes, there are some who are bums, but others are not. The fact is, capitalism always leaves some people in the dust. Which is why it must be combined with an effective welfare state for it to be humane.
inflating the number of homeless o
Re:Why Mars? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:1)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:1)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
AAARRRRGGHH!!!! Thanks, now I am going to have that song stuck in my mind right through the entire f*@$!#g holiday season...
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
The earth is not a living system.
It doesn't replicate.
Therefore it can't be shaped by any form of natural selection.
Therefore it is not like our own body.
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
I assume that scientific theory that you are writing about is the Gaia hypothesis of Lovelock, which in my point of view totally flawed.
If natural selection optimizes anything it would be the ability to replicate.
The algorithm of evolution is quite simple:
Organisms replicate.
The replication rate of organisms is higher that their habitat can provide (otherwise we would have billions of eliphants etc).
Selection takes place (the sieve that will shift bet
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
Admittedly, the way some supporters
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
I would rather find a solution that involves less loss of human life. Ultimately taking care of the environ
Re:Why Mars? (Score:4, Insightful)
But in all seriousness, there are better ways of caring for the needy here. Take, for instance, farmers' subsidies. Instead of paying farmers to not plant crops, or buying it then destroying it, why not buy the crops at fair market prices then giving the food to the hungry? How about instead of zoning to attract subdivision developers that build half-million-dollar homes, and homeowners' associations to artifically keep home values high, push to develop affordable and safe housing without skyrocketing property taxes?
Either of these would go much farther in saving the world than stripping NASA of its relative pittance of a budget.
Re:Why Mars? (Score:5, Interesting)
The ability to survive on the moon will require constant importing. It will need water. Nor will it be possible to colonize the moon to any great length.
Mars, OTH, can be truely colonized. It has water, O2, N2, Carbon, etc. It has everything needed, except that it has a thin atmosphere. It is possible that Mars actually has life on it as well.
Finally, how does this impact us (america or even the earth) today? Every time that mankind reaches, it has to develop new ideas and new things. these will always be applied elsewhere. NASA (and I believe the USSR's space program) caused numerous advances for humans, both directly and more indirectly.
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2, Interesting)
Unfortunately, terra-forming Mars is all but impossible due to the lack of a strong magnetosphere, which allowed the solar wind to strip the atmosphere in the first place. Then there is the issue of a surface soil which is radioactive from billions of years of exposure.
IMO, the best use of resources would be towar
Re:Why Mars? (Score:3, Informative)
To the parent:
Mars has rather sparse amounts of nitrogen...you're probably going to bring that from Earth either way. Other than that, the moon has everything Mars has, it's a shorter duration trip
Re:Why Mars? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
That won't hold true for long. Once our inefficient top-down manufacturing methods give way to advancing bottom-up nanotechnology, it will be very easy to create self-contained biospheres with 100% molecular recyclability.
In comes solar, and out goes infrared; everything else can be perfectly broken down and reused. (Not as sci-fi as you might think).
--
Re:Why Mars? (Score:2)
Wha...? (Score:2)
That is one surreal image. Any particular reason for thinking that?
BTW, whoever modded you down as "overrated" when you hadn't even been modded yet is a cunt of the highest order.
Re:Giant Faces (Score:2)
Of course, I originally read the comment as "...giant feces flowing across..." which kinda ruined my lunch.
Wha? (Score:5, Insightful)
But if it existed then it was a long time ago. Plenty of time for all the evidence to be hidden beneath the sand. Mars is not exactly known for its non-sand storm nature.
Even if there are fossils to be found the chances of finding them with 2 little carts pottering about are about zero. It would be like driving around your local city and claiming there never been dinosaurs because you didn't find any.
At the moment what everyone is doing is speculating. Worse the speculations are based on very small samples and compared to only 1 planet wich we don't really understand yet either.
I have lived long enough to have gone through several cycles of mars having and not having water. The only thing I know for certain is that nobody knows for certain.
Could an intelligent species have lived on mars and left? We only recently discovered that a small species of humans has existed very recently very close by. Frankly anyone who claims to know the answer to what lived or didn't live on mars in the past is insane. You can guess. You can estimate. But certain we can't be. More fun anyway.
Re:it seems... (Score:5, Interesting)
>have used all their possible oxygen(assuming they
>brethed it of course), and having nothing to
>reproduce the oxygen, just kinda bounced off the
>planet?
Uh... no. O2 is a byproduct of photosynthesis (well, more specifically, the electron transport chain in the tylakoid that obtains electrons from water to create reduced NAD(P)H, but that's splitting hairs). Life existed for a long time on Earth without atmospheric oxygen. In fact, the apparition of massive quantities of oxygen in the atmosphere was probably a disaster of cataclysmic proportions for many living cells back then (dead cells being notoriously unaffected by changes in the environment).
The fact that there's so much aerobic life as of today (there're still plenty of O2-less ecosystems out there) is just that organisms adapted to those rude algae and plants making O2 like crazy. It's by no means a requirement for life.
Re:it seems... (Score:2)
Re:it seems... (Score:1)
N=1 right now (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, where did the bacteria we have here come from? Did God create them? Were they seeded from another planet/source? Did they grow up out of the muck? If we could find another example in our solar system it could help explain alot! And raise more questions too, as usual...
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Self-Cleaning System (Score:2)