Pumps Without Moving Parts 32
madprof writes "A researcher at Cambridge University has developed a usefully efficient thermofluidic pump to benefit some of the world's poorest people by performing irrigation and other tasks. Tom Smith has been awarded Science Graduate of the Year by the Royal Institution of Great Britain for this breakthrough and is giving a public lecture on 6th October in London. A great example of scientific innovation directly benefiting people."
Sounds like the "Red October" (Score:2, Interesting)
First Post!
Re:Sounds like the "Red October" (Score:2)
Re:Sounds like the "Red October" (Score:2)
Didn't realize that there was actually a working model of the drive, though.
Re:Sounds like the "Red October" (Score:2)
Re:Huh (Score:1)
Re:Huh (Score:2)
"Under Construction" (Score:3, Informative)
Thermally driven pumps without SOLID moving parts: (Score:5, Interesting)
They work fine in some cases. A ramjet is one such. If you want to be picky and want one that uses just heat rather than an injected fuel as an input, then the nuclear thermal ramjet that was looked at in the 50s for Project Pluto.
Apparently he's figured out how to make one that's more effective for liquids in more day to day environments. The site gives few details on it though. He won a prize for it, but I'm a little leary of the hype factor with no technical details.
Re:Thermally driven pumps without SOLID moving par (Score:2)
Cynical? (Score:1, Insightful)
How about some less fuzzy terminology? (Score:3, Interesting)
OK; I understand what they're trying to say, and I also understand that this is hardly news (since the basic idea has been around for a couple of centuries).
But the phrase "moving parts" seems like sometime really in need of replacement by something that's a bit less misleading. The functional parts of this pump are quite definitely moving.
Re:How about some less fuzzy terminology? (Score:4, Informative)
The terminology sounds ok to me -- moving parts implies that there are parts that wear out and have to be replaced because of friction or whatever. Like a metal piston and so forth.
Saying this engine has no moving parts makes senes and seems fair.
Do they count gasoline or coolant or oil as a moving part in car engines? I think THAT would be overly pedantic.
Re:How about some less fuzzy terminology? (Score:1)
Re:How about some less fuzzy terminology? (Score:2)
Re:How about some less fuzzy terminology? (Score:2, Informative)
'fluid' is not a part.
Re:How about some less fuzzy terminology? (Score:2)
Yeah, I know; it's "Picky, picky." But the history of science and engineering is full of examples where the detailed definitions of the terms are very important to
"benefit some of the world's poorest people" (Score:3, Interesting)
On the other hand, if you can run this off solar power (assuming you can generate enough power), this would be great!
Re:"benefit some of the world's poorest people" (Score:1)
Steve
Re:"benefit some of the world's poorest people" (Score:3, Informative)
the pump black and stick it in the Sun) is one option. Light a small fire under it
is another. For all I know it might be enough to shovel a pile of fresh buffalo-dung onto the "hot" end, or tuck it under your sleeping yak.
Power is not always electricity or oil.
Re:"benefit some of the world's poorest people" (Score:1)
Re:"benefit some of the world's poorest people" (Score:2)
This is total vaporware (Score:3, Informative)
If you want solar powered water pumps, they're commercially available. [realgoods.com] A complete kit [realgoods.com], including solar panels, is $1,697. But they're not really cost-effective. Windmill pumps [windmillpower.com] still outperform solar, and newer pumps will work at low wind speeds.
Re:This is total vaporware (Score:4, Interesting)
We had those kind down at grandpa's farm.
And yes, the windmill. It was an old tractor differential with one of the "tire" ends welded shut, as well as the "tail" assembly fin welded there as to always keep the other end facing into the wind. The drive shaft was oriented vertically, transmitting its torque down to a crank that operated this kind of pump. The faster the wind blew, the more furiously the pump cranked.
The whole differential assembly was only supported by the drive shaft so the entire assembly would face whatever way the wind was blowing. The torque actually put on the "drive shaft" ( long piece of irrigation pipe, actually ) was miniscule compared to the force of the wind against the tail assembly, which was bent just a bit to compensate for this torque.
Grandpa designed it and welded it together. All out of farm scrap. Well, I think he had the fan assembly prefab, but the rest of the whole shebang was homegrown.
It damn near always had a small creek of water overflowing from the trough Grandpa had put there to hold the water for his horses and cows, and any other living creature stopping by for a drink.
Grandpa didn't have an engineering degree, yet to me he was a true engineer. I thought my Grandpa could build anything. Still do.
Re:This is total vaporware (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This is total vaporware (Score:1)
It seems when electrification was first coming to the cities, they used DC. So everyone went out and bought motors. Then the power companies started switching to AC, and it fouled a lot of people up who had bought DC technology. Of course, the knowledgeable ones would build power converters, but without the internet and rapid means of disseminating information, this knowledge was in little pockets here and there.
Yes, a lot of DC motors will run on A
Re:This is total vaporware (Score:2)
He was rarely without a good tea
Re:This is total vaporware (Score:2)
Re:This is total vaporware (Score:2)
Solar powered water pumps use electric motors currently.
This doesn't.
The only moving "part" is the fluid....
No moving Parts (Score:1)