Zero Gravity Flights for the Rest of Us 332
waynegoode writes "Zero G Corporation, whose motto is "Question Gravity", is now offering zero gravity flights to the general public. For $3000 you get training and a 90 minute ride with 15 periods of 25 seconds of low or zero-gravity: 3 1/3 Mars gravity, 3 1/6 Lunar gravity, and 9 zero gravity. Peter Diamandis, the man behind the Ansari X Prize, worked 11 years to get FAA approval. Previously, such flights were available only to astronauts, researchers, and Tom Hanks; although recently flights for the public began Russia for about twice the price. Story also here."
And I thought... (Score:5, Funny)
Come to think about it, maybe they'll start using this as well, though 25 seconds isn't very long.
Re:And I thought... (Score:2)
Re:And I thought... (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/ [imdb.com]
(see the trivia section)
There's a review here:-
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=3
Re:And I thought... (Score:5, Insightful)
I do think, however, they might want to charge an extra "clean up" premium on porn shoots...
Re:And I thought... (Score:2)
Re:And I thought... (Score:2)
Re:And I thought... (Score:5, Funny)
I do think, however, they might want to charge an extra "clean up" premium on porn shoots...
This is the porn industry we're talking about here - they could afford to buy their own damn plane. Pad all the walls with foam rubber upholstered in pink velvet, put in '70s colored lighting, and have "bow-chicka-bow-bow" in 3D surround... Hell, I'm surprised the porn industry doesn't have their own space station already.
25 seconds? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:And I thought... (Score:2)
Because it *has* been done already.
Or at least, I remember something about it. The soundtrack was written by the Prodigy and it cost nearly a million dollars to make... I just wish I could remember the source...
- at work, and not a connoseur of heterosexual pornography.
Re:And I thought... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:And I thought... (Score:2)
Re:And I thought... (Score:2)
Or... (Score:5, Funny)
Wow, when I want to throw up.... (Score:5, Funny)
Question Gravity? (Score:4, Funny)
Now, to gravitate to the story...
Soko
It sounds nice... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It sounds nice... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:It sounds nice... (Score:4, Insightful)
Consider that sky-diving can also offer you zero-g styled environment
Not really, because in skydiving the local atmosphere is not falling at the same rate as you. I would expect the sensations to be very different.
Re:It sounds nice... (Score:2)
Not too mention that some of us do not find the idea of throwing oneself out of a perfectly good airplane a particularly thrilling one, especially when you have to pay for it! For people who are afraid of heights, this may be the only way we would ever experience free-fall in perceived safety. There is a big difference between throwing yourself out into the open air with only a parachute to save you and falling within an enclosed space which (you hope) is under control.
Re:It sounds nice... (Score:2, Informative)
Skydiving not the same. (Score:2)
Spoken like someone who has never done it (Score:2)
Skydiving has wind rushing by you at 140mph. There's no real sensation of weightlessness, just thirty seconds of rush followed by a nuclear wedgie.
Re:It sounds nice... (Score:2)
In the zero-g flight, for the entire 25 seconds you are accelerating downwards at 1 g, along with the air in the ship, and everything else around you. During that time you will not notice gravity pulling you.
Skydiving seems like it would be more fun and scenic, but the zero-g flight would
strange needs (Score:2)
CBdfs(setwhore-yest)
First person account (Score:5, Informative)
Cessna Version of this, quite fun, dirt cheap. (Score:3, Interesting)
We've actually done the free fall experience in Cessna 172's. I think all those Cessna's are rated for 0G or even -1G or more no problem. Of course, it is no where near 25 seconds long, but we were still cackling like crazy kids.
Simply fly long up and down swoops. When you arch over the top and start to descend, the pilot controls the rate so that everything in the cabin lifts up and floats. I spun my 35mm camera in front of me, hanging in the air, so you get a few seconds. Quite a rush.
Excellent! Exciting! (Score:4, Interesting)
Zero G on the Cheep! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Zero G on the Cheep! (Score:5, Funny)
Trampolines work too... not for the car tho...
Re:Zero G on the Cheep! (Score:2)
Deliverer: "Well, you know pal, you could have told me that before I set it up!"
*Boing*
Re:Zero G on the Cheep! (Score:4, Insightful)
I lost friends in high school to "hill topping". In a controlled environment it could be pretty fun, but there are far too many ways to Darwin yourself:
I dare say that the "vomit comet" is far safer than jumping your car on some hill out on the middle of nowhere.
Don't (Score:3)
My (our) roads are not your playground.
good going ! (Score:2)
Re:good going ! (Score:2)
Roller coaster ride for $30? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Or you could... (Score:4, Funny)
You probably can fly like superman for a little bit if you wiggle out of your harness, it's just the landing would be very unsuperman-like.
all about the vomit comet... (Score:4, Interesting)
CB(whr=1)
Combine this with normal travel (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Combine this with normal travel (Score:3, Insightful)
You can do this with a single prop plane now. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:You can do this with a single prop plane now. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:You can do this with a single prop plane now. (Score:3, Informative)
For those of you who don't have access to general aviation, I would suggest a demo flight at your local flight school. You can take a "Discovery Flight" during which time, you can ask for a "zero G pushover." And, if your instructor is nice, he/she will let you fly the aircraft through the pushover yourself. It is a rush and it is $49
Here is a useful link: http://learntofly.com/howto/discovery.chtml [learntofly.com]
Tom Hanks (Score:2, Funny)
Afterwards, Tom Hanks was Quoted as Saying:
"That's not Flying... That was Falling with Style!"
Wouldn't "g_gravity 0" be cheaper?! (Score:3, Funny)
That's cool but... (Score:2)
I have never been sky diving, but you essentially get zero gravity while sky diving right? The only difference or course is you have the wind blowing in your face.
For my money, if I had $3000 I would go buy a Segway scooter to ride around all day. Think how many women that would get me!
Dreams Cost less (Score:2, Funny)
Other private rides on the Vomit Comet (Score:5, Informative)
In Penn's article, he mentions another noteworthy Vomit Comet expedition: The filming of the Pr0n movie, "The Uranus Experiment."
Re:Other private rides on the Vomit Comet (Score:5, Informative)
Yeah, I love that story! Here's Google's cache of it [64.233.161.104]...Art Bell's web site no longer has it (apparently the gray aliens told him to take it down).
Since it's so hard to find, I might as well post the entire thing here. It's not that long:
Learning to Fly, Strip, and Vomit on a 727
Penn Jillette
Since I was a kid, I've wanted to be weightless. I really wanted to go to space, but part of going to space was being weightless. Just to hold something up in front of me, and have it stay right there is the idea of magic. As I got older, I battled gravity. My start in showbiz was as a juggler. Jugglers fight gravity. The hack jugglers cover a drop with a "standard" (meaning it's been stolen so much, those who didn't write it conveniently consider it to be public domain) 'cover' (it doesn't really cover very much, they know the prop is on the floor and they know you're chasing it, bent over like you're chasing a duck) line, "Sudden gust of gravity."
Now, that I'm 45 years old and I weight 280 pounds, gravity is a less sporting and more real enemy. I'm 6'6" tall and I still remember Leslie Fiedler writing in "Freaks, Myths of our Secret Selves" that "gravity is not kind to those who grow too large." As we get older, it seems the jockey build is healthier.
No one knows what gravity is. I mean we just don't know. There is no good theory. A good theory in science is one that we're damn sure is true: The Earth goes around the Sun. Evolution is how we got here. No one seriously doubts those. But, gravity, well, we just don't know.
So, right now, the only way you can feel weightless for more than a couple rollercoaster seconds is by getting far enough away from Earth, or taking the Vomit Comet. The Vomit Comet is how NASA trains astronauts (the Russians must do it too, right?). They take a big old airplane and they go up and down really fast. When they go up, you weight 1.8 times your weight, and when they go down, you weigh around 0.
The FAA has always given NASA a monopoly on losing all your pounds of ugly fat (along with muscle, bone, and everything else). Astronauts get to ride it, some scientists get to ride it, and that's about it. Ron Howard made some backroom deal (it MUST have included sexual favors) to be able to shoot "Apollo 13," on the NASA Vomit Comet and they talked about it a bit, but it was soon quieted down. You're not REALLY supposed to use a government-funded program to make movies. Not really. I mean, I'm glad Tom, Gary, and Kevin got to fly, but if everyone really thought about it, why can't we all ride?
A couple free-market nuts at NASA decided they LOVED Zero G, and it was time to get off the socialist tit, and buy their own Vomit Comet and start selling rides on it. Everything the Vomit Comet does in within the specs of planes, and why can't we do what Ron and Tom got to do? That was the idea.
When they first got this harebrained scheme, I heard about it. It seems that when anyone gets a harebrained scheme, I'm CC'd on the memo. I loved nuts, I'm for nuts, I am nuts. They all get in touch with me. I told them I thought it was a great idea (and you know how much that means), and I wrote them email, gave them tickets to our show, and went to dinner with them a couple times.
They were going to get approval to fly a 727 very fast right straight down very soon. It was going to be a matter of months. That was 6 years ago. But, I kept talking to them, and whenever they gave me a date, I said I would be there, until it fell through again. Us free-market guys are always fighting the man.
Well, they finally fought the law and kinda sorta won. They at least won enough for me to fly. I finally did it. After 6 years of grueling cheerleading, I got be be weightless. Only about
Slashdot Public Service Announcement (Score:5, Informative)
What a person experiences in this case is *identical* to what you'd experience in Space.
You don't suddenly leave the Earths gravitational field in orbit and start floating around. You just fall in a parabola that happens to miss the ground.
One would think this was common knowledge, but from the posts on here, its clearly not.
Re:Slashdot Public Service Announcement (Score:5, Informative)
Gravity is a myth. (Score:2)
act now, and we'll include... (Score:3, Funny)
barf bag, tote bag - don't be such a nitpicker...
Group discount? (Score:3, Funny)
Lunar-G flights: Moonwalk competition.
Mars-G flights: Martian wrestling. (Imagine the bodyslams!)
Zero-G flights: Zero-G dodgeball, baby!
I'm giggling already.
Odd diagram... (Score:3, Interesting)
It's just that they have a rather odd diagram [msn.com] on there showing when the freefall periods occur. It doesn't look right to me.
It shows you get "zero g" (freefall) from the point where the aircraft starts to level off from a climb, until it starts to tip over... surely the freefall would occur from when it started to tip over until it started to pull up ?
Re:Odd diagram... (Score:5, Informative)
The reason the occupants of the plane experience this as a zero-G condition is because they are in freefall. They are moving precisely as they would be moving if they were falling toward the earth without air resistance. You need a plane to accomplish this, because in reality you cannot neglect the air resistance.
You can experience the same condition briefly, simply by jumping in the air. During the time you are in the air, you are in a weighless condition.
As a glider pilot.... (Score:3, Interesting)
They were... (Score:4, Informative)
Pfft cheaper way than that! (Score:4, Funny)
"pardon me son, did we land or were we shot down?"
Wrong Zero G corporation (Score:3, Funny)
Oh well, so much for the free ride for using their product to bundle our product...
Cleanup is extra (Score:3, Funny)
Yikes. (Score:5, Interesting)
The scary thing is that most cargo planes are cargo planes because they're too freakin' OLD for sane passengers to fly in.
Now, okay, I'm no aeronautical engineer, but I can't imagine taking those creaky old (many older than I am; see sig) birds and doing *anything* weird with them. The whole time I was in freefall, I'd be thinking, "okay, is this going to stop, or did the wings fall off?"
Okay, so the things would be all but unloaded, compared to hauling cargo, but still... seems like the stresses would be *different*. (Their FAQ doesn't exactly answer this straightforwardly, either.)
Hmm. Nowhere on their website am I finding the tail number for their bird. Could be one of our 727-200's, but the airline I worked for hasn't updated its website since, well, about the time I left in 1998. Oh, wait. Nope, looks like it's Amerijet N994AJ.
Heh. The reason the Zero-G website only shows the left side of the plane is because the right side is a Diet Rite ad.
Already available in Sweden... (Score:3, Informative)
Been there, done that...for free (Score:3, Interesting)
I got to fly in the the Weightless Wonder (aka V**** C****) as part of a collegiate student program [nasa.gov] this past April. All told, we flew 30 micro-g parabolas, 1 lunar parabola, and 1 martian parabola. Let me say this: roller coasters, jumping cars over hills, even piloting gliders do not come close to comparing. Even when piloting an aircraft, you don't have the ability to get up and move around...there's that darn steering part to take care of.
For $3000, if the track record and maintenence records are clean, I would definitely do it again (granted I plan ahead for this as simply an expensive vacation). Especially since I won't have to be preoccupied with any experiments.
Might I suggest: anyone who is in a science-based major in college should try to come up with an experiment that would yield "intriguing" results when flown in microgravity. Remember, each trial must last a maximum of 25 seconds. And the more hands-off (and more automated), the better...that just means more fun for you.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:5, Funny)
That and the big flat thing rushing towards you at ~140 mph.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:5, Funny)
Don't worry about that. No matter what happens, NASA technicians will most likely be able to recover some useful mission data.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:5, Funny)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Interesting)
It would have to be almost 90 degrees of course, and it would have to level out so that he slows down, but if it's convex, angled correctly, steep enough for long enough at the top and shallow enough for long enough at the bottom, there's no reason (other than failure to get really, really lucky) that he couldn't survive.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Insightful)
I would say the primary difference with skydiving is the wind... which you would not experience if you were inside a box/plane.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
As I said. The primary difference is walls/no walls. Not that difficult to extrapolate from that.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Interesting)
But when you're in an airplane that's in a dive, the airplane is going to reach terminal velocity and stop accelerating much sooner than you are while inside the plane. In other words, relative to earth, both plane and person ar
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
Skydiving you see the world rushing up at you. Your brain generates the "I'm falling" sensation because of the stimuli.
In the plane your brain gets different information. There's no obvious tell-tale signs of falling. Instead the brain sees the walls of the plane. Without the other signs of falling, the brain conclude "I'm floating".
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Informative)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Insightful)
What about the wind?
Tried neither, but seems that sould be very different..
Forget the parent (Score:2)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:5, Informative)
1) "anti-gravity space ship", what kind of rubbish is that?
2) Actually according to relativity, there is no way of distguishing between acceleration and gravity. Therefore if I put you in a sealed box and either a) leave you floating in deep space or b) put you in free fall then there is no way of you telling the difference (ok, there is as there will be slight air resistance slowing you down, and you could measure the very tiny difference in gravity between the top and bottom of the box, etc.).
There is always "c) you hit the ground" too of course
but seriously, this really is zero-G for all intents and purposes foras long as they can accalerate you downwards at 9.8m/s
Re:*Ahem* (Score:4, Informative)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:5, Insightful)
Bah. This is pedantry. (on slashdot!?)
Astronauts floating in the space shuttle are experiencing 'free fall' rather than 'zero gravity'. But not many people would quibble with using the term 'zero gravity' in that instance.
The zero G experienced on this plane is the same zero G experienced by astronauts in orbiting vehicles.
And skydiving isnt very similar at all - you'll reach terminal velocity quickly and will 'feel' the force of gravity thereafter. Not to mention it's a lot windier. Skydiving on the moon on the other hand... just dont come crying to me when your parachute doesnt work.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:5, Interesting)
I've never gone skydiving before, but I have always imagined that it feels an awful lot like falling- something which I have done. I can tell you that the feeling of weightlessness is very different from the sensation of falling. Maybe falling for quite a while makes all the difference but somehow I just don't see that it would.
Finally, if you have that $3k to spend, why not invest it in a Private Pilot Certificate so you can go out and experience it for yourself whenever you have the hankering?
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
Einstein lived in vain apparently.
One of his points is that there is NO physical experiment that will distinguish the effect of a gravity-field and constant acceleration if you are locked in a box with no windows.
The constant acceleration being the free fall in this case.
So if there are no windows in the plane, there is no way to tell if they've invented some advanced anti-gravity machine and are using it on you, or if the plane is just falling...
If theres no way to tell the difference I don't really c
Most Apt. Nickname. Ever. (Score:3, Informative)
I'm in a plane with no windows. Some force is keeping my feet on the floor and giving me the sensation of weight. I take two balls out of my pockets. I drop them.
If the balls fall straight down in parallel paths, I am undergoing constant acceleration.
If the balls do not fall in parallel paths, but rather land closer together, I am feeling the effects of gravity and the two paths intersect at the center of gravity for the system.
Yes, some theoretical gravity field with a center of gravity
I have to disagree (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Informative)
Total cost = $33 admission
Keep the other $2,967 in your pocket.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Interesting)
Zero-gee is when you're in completely flat space. You're not accelerating due to gravity, because there isn't any.
Free fall is when you're in bent space, and are accelerating due to gravity. The space station is falling at one gee; but it's falling sideways, and everything in it is falling at roughly the same speed, so there's very little relative acceleration
Re:*Ahem* (Score:3, Interesting)
How do you know? Imagine an experimental method for determining that a region of space has zero gravitational field (or zero space-time curvature, if you like). How would that method distinguish the zero curvature from free-fall?
Note, in particular, the problem of establishing a "fixed" frame of reference in space-time. Perhaps that is what Einstein was talking about when he called his theory "General RELATIVITY."
You flakes are all getting worked up into a la
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
Sheesh. BIG difference here, fellas.
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
Re:*Ahem* (Score:2)
Err... that's actually my point.
but you don't hear any complaints about calling it "Zero G".
You do and you don't. "Zero-G" (as in Zero G-Forces) is ok, "microgravity" is ok, "weightlessness" is ok, and "free-fall" is ok. "Zero Gravity" is NOT an ok term, because it refers to an object experiencing zero interaction with gravitational fields.
Re:It's the Law (Score:4, Funny)
The secret to flying is to hurl yourself at the ground and miss. (one of the more amusing ideas from HHGG)
Re:It's the Law (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Check (Score:2)
Re:Vomit Comet? (Score:2)
Re:$3000? bwahahah (Score:2)
Re:$3000? bwahahah (Score:2)
Re:11 years! (Score:2)
These guys spent 11 years with the FAA because the FAA kept telling them "No" probably for a large variety of legitimate reasons.
What does that have to do with big government and civil disobedience? (no hyphen is needed)
Speaking of vomit... (Score:3, Funny)