Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space

Genesis: Data in good condition 193

Oxidation writes "Space.com is reporting that the Genesis satellite crash isn't as bad as it appeared to be in the first place. Furthermore, a prime particle-gathering device "appears intact" states Don Sevilla. (Genesis payload recovery leader at NASA's JPL)"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Genesis: Data in good condition

Comments Filter:
  • Thing is. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @01:56PM (#10238478)
    With the possibility of contamination, will most of the scientific world be taken the results gained from Genesis with a pinch of salt?
    • by whopis ( 465819 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:26PM (#10238741)
      With the possibility of contamination, will most of the scientific world be taken the results gained from Genesis with a pinch of salt?

      Well, if they were not contaminated already, taking them with a pinch of salt would do the trick....

      • by eclectro ( 227083 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @06:34PM (#10241439)

        Future scientific analysis will show that the matter of our solar system is made out of a sandy substance that comes from a region of space called yootah. It is everywhere and permeates everything as we know it.

        This also has lead to new techniques at Nasa that will allow them to rescue expensive space missions with a pair of tweezers.

        All in all, I'd call it a good day.
    • Re:Thing is. (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:30PM (#10238782)
      No. That's like saying a parking lot is too contaminated with leaves to do a proper study of car color.
      • Re:Thing is. (Score:5, Insightful)

        by mlyle ( 148697 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @03:52PM (#10239640)
        When they were planning to do things like study distribution of oxygen isotopes from the sun, and they have nanograms of oxygen... probably exposing the probe to a 20% oxygen earth atmosphere probably isn't good.

        Likewise, with a few dozen micrograms of total material, tossing in several kilograms of dirt and doubtlessly several grams of fine dust inside the capsule will make determining what materials are extraterrestial in origin difficult indeed. Determining quantities of any substance which is more than a few parts-per-billion in earth soil or atmosphere is going to be extraordinarily difficult, and any results will be very questionable, unfortunately.
    • with a pinch of salt

      With a clod of dirt, actually.

      --riney
    • should be easy (Score:5, Insightful)

      by bani ( 467531 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:48PM (#10238966)
      should be easy to tell the difference between solar wind particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s vs dust particles which simply settled on the surface.
      • I think you mean, solar wind particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s versus Utah dust particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s. Oh, hm, I guess there's a problem after all.
        • Re:should be easy (Score:5, Informative)

          by bani ( 467531 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @04:32PM (#10240126)
          no i actually meant what i said.

          utah dust particles didnt impact the collectors at several km/s.

          if that had actually happened, the probe would have been completely vaporized, there would have been a crater a hundred meters wide instead of a few meters. instead of the probe going 'crunch' as it did, there would have been a huge explosion, blast wave, and lots of dead bystanders.

          the collector was sealed, and only broke open after the probe hit the ground at only 200km/h instead of several km/s.

          so there's no problem after all.

          +1 insightful? methinks some /. readers need to go back and study basic gradeschool physics.
    • I suppose, the results of the Genesis are essentially a pinch of salt even in the best case. Even, maybe, several pinches of different salts.
    • by isomeme ( 177414 ) <cdberry@gmail.com> on Monday September 13, 2004 @04:28PM (#10240085) Journal
      Back in my chem student days, one of my professors had a poster on his office door offering translations of phrases found in technical papers. My favorite pair were:

      Pure: We only dropped a little on the floor.
      Extremely pure: We didn't drop any on the floor.

      NASA has now added this:

      Adequately pure: We slammed it into the Utah desert floor, but at less than 200 miles per hour so it's probably okay.
      • by ms1234 ( 211056 )
        We slammed it into the Utah desert floor, but at less than 200 miles per hour so it's probably okay.

        Actually they tried to hit SCO but missed.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @01:57PM (#10238484)
    Still... Old... Friend. You've managed to kill just about everyone else. But like a poor marksman you keep missing the target.
  • Ha! (Score:5, Funny)

    by AKAImBatman ( 238306 ) * <akaimbatman@gmaiBLUEl.com minus berry> on Monday September 13, 2004 @01:57PM (#10238485) Homepage Journal
    And here Khan thought he left my probe as I left him!

    Buried alive,
    Buried alive,
    Buried aliiiivvveee...

    KHHHHAAAAAAAANNNNNNN!!!


    (So I'm feeling a bit cheeky today. So sue me. No, I'm not worth anything.) ;-)
    • Kirk says (Score:5, Funny)

      by Prince Vegeta SSJ4 ( 718736 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:28PM (#10238758)

      Khan "Then you will transfer all data pertaining the project named..Genesis"

      Kirk "Genesis? What's that?"

      Khan "Don't insult my intelligence Kirk"

      Kirk "Im not, the enterprise "SuperComputer," is working busily to find money-saving deals for you. You can even name your own price for this 'Genesis' "

      Khan "Damn, I payed too much for staying at Ceti Alpha V"

  • by nightsweat ( 604367 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @01:58PM (#10238506)
    No, not about Genesis.

    They just saved a ton of money on their car insurance...

    • by deman1985 ( 684265 ) <dedwards&kappastone,com> on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:55PM (#10239054) Homepage
      NASA also announced today that Michael Ryschkewitsch, director of the Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, would lead the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) in an effort to determine the exact cause of the disaster

      Whoever knew there'd be real Men In Black-- and they'd work for JPL?
      • "The lessons from this one will affect all future sample returns," said Gentry Lee, a JPL engineer.

        Speaking of sci-fi, does anyone know if this is the same Gentry Lee that co-wrote the latter part of the Rama Series with Arthur C. Clarke? I seem to recall hearing he's an engineer of some kind...

        Maybe by "future sample returns", he means a big honking cylinder full of robots and aliens, on a mission for God? :D
      • MIB? Something tells me that that's probably not a coincidence...
    • by Guppy06 ( 410832 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @03:21PM (#10239347)
      "They just saved a ton of money on their car insurance..."

      Over who, though? NASA employees had been eligible to get insurance from Government Employee's Insurance COmpany long before said company opened their doors to the general public, so maybe their rates aren't as good as they imply... :)
    • Hey, if the data was salvagable from the wreck *without* parachutes and dangerous stunt piloting of helecopters, why bother installing them on future missions? Just crash the pod in the desert .. think of the money saved on explosive bolts, parachutes, inflatable cushions .. and hey sell the crash on TV to sponsors, or put it on Letterman.
  • Probe (Score:5, Interesting)

    by BoldAC ( 735721 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @01:58PM (#10238507)
    From the beginning I didn't think this was quite as bad as people had feared. The worse case scenerio is that we can only detect particles that are unique to the study area.

    No matter how much dirt you pour into that system, any particles that are not common on earth would still be a very interesting finding!

    "It is amazing given the amount of breach in the canister just how clean it is inside" Sevilla said. "We're not talking about great clods of dirt."

    As much as they were overestimating the initial amount of damage, I think they are underestimating now. No matter how little amount of dust has entered into that system, it still has contamination. Contamination is like pregnancy. Either it is, or it isn't. "Genesis brought back a tiny sampling of the raw material of the Sun, a sample weighing no more than a few grains of salt." [genesismission.org] Likely many particles that were captured in space are similiar the particles here on earth; however, with the contamination I am not sure how you can seperate the true origin of the particles... especially when such small amounts are involved. Earth dust >>> sun dust.

    Can you tell which of these are covered with space particles [genesismission.org] and which are covered with space dirt?

    • Re:Probe (Score:5, Interesting)

      by tgd ( 2822 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:21PM (#10238700)
      The interesting particles are not on the surface of the collectors, they're embedded within the collectors.

      They just have to be very careful cleaning the surface, and they can still extract the trapped particles.
    • SUN dust can worm its way through the Internet and advertise itself on slashdot.

      Did we need research to know that?
    • Re:Probe (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Thud457 ( 234763 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:47PM (#10238949) Homepage Journal
      1 [genesismission.org] 2 [genesismission.org] 3 [genesismission.org] 4 [genesismission.org]

      I's sorry, but I think these pictures tell a hilarious story! Photo 1 with the helicopters overlooking the carnage is quite good!

      • After looking at the fourth one I have to wonder why NASA hired Benny Hill to do such sensitive work. Ten bucks says that in five minutes, he's looking up someone's dress instead of brushing dirt off the solar dust.
      • Re:Probe (Score:3, Funny)

        by jstave ( 734089 )
        While I understand (I think) why its necessary, it still seems kinda funny that they'd be doing the whole clean-room proceedure after pulling the thing out of a pile of dirt.
    • Re:Probe (Score:3, Funny)

      by stuktongue ( 140376 )
      The worse case scenerio is that we can only detect particles that are unique to the study area.

      I guess you didn't see (or read) "The Andromeda Strain."

      Just kidding, of course. :-)
    • "It is amazing given the amount of breach in the canister just how clean it is inside."

      Are you saying that some breach reaked into the cannister?! Werr... at reast this way we can be sure it is squeaky-crean!

      -b
  • Budget cuts (Score:5, Funny)

    by papasui ( 567265 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:00PM (#10238518) Homepage
    I can just see some bureaucrat using this as proof to cut funding from the space program. No need to invest in landing gear, just let it crash. :) But seriously that's a testimate to how well they build and designed it.
    • testimate

      I think you might be taking your knowledge of the English language for granite. ;)

    • But seriously that's a testimate to how well they build and designed it.

      The fact that it crashed aside, of couse. :)
  • lol... (Score:5, Funny)

    by here4fun ( 813136 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:00PM (#10238521) Homepage Journal
    Genesis, which launched in 2001, carries a $264 million price tag.

    And to think I freaked out when I dropped my bookbag with my laptop inside it. They should have used something better than a parachute.

    • Re:lol... (Score:5, Informative)

      by romper ( 47937 ) * on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:32PM (#10238799)
      Actually it wasn't the parachute that was the problem. I it was the *battery* that was supposed to trigger an explosive charge the deploy the parachute that was the problem.

      Should've gone with the Copper-Top! (TM) =)
    • They left the price tag on it?! I hate when I buy some clothing and forgot to remove some harrd to see tag or sticker and realize later I've been walking around all day with a tag saying "36x30" 10 times on my ass.

      No wonder the probe chose to off itself.

  • by everyplace ( 527571 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:01PM (#10238530) Homepage
    Man, and I thought this accident was going to turn the project to dust. Oh wait.
  • Great news! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by keiferb ( 267153 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:01PM (#10238533) Homepage
    I saw the crash live, and figured that with how delicate all of the collectors were being made out to be by the folks doing the reporting, that it would be a near-total loss.

    It's good to see that at least some of my tax dollars went into some worst-case scenario planning. =)
    • Re:Great news! (Score:4, Informative)

      by Nos. ( 179609 ) <andrew@nOSPAm.thekerrs.ca> on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:12PM (#10238626) Homepage
      I think the engineers behind this one deserver a few pats on the back. Even though the parachutes never deployed and this thing fell to the Earth, there's still usable samples inside. Just goes to show that this thing was better built than a lot of stuff we use.
      • by bani ( 467531 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:45PM (#10238923)
        engineers often design for worst case scenarios, especially with space probes.

        i wouldnt be suprised if they engineered the probe in such a way that even in catastrophic failure (eg lawn dart) there would still be a good chance of viable data.
      • by lucabrasi999 ( 585141 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:45PM (#10238924) Journal
        Just goes to show that this thing was better built than a lot of stuff we use

        Well, the body of Genesis appears to be rather soundly built. Of course, the parachute that was designed to slow it down was not soundly built. When you think of it that way, your statement can be interpreted this way:

        "Hey, that's a well-built car! Except for the friggin' brakes!"

        • Re:Great news! (Score:3, Interesting)

          by Jugalator ( 259273 )
          Of course, the parachute that was designed to slow it down was not soundly built.

          I'll just jump in and be serious here -- actually, according to the article, the parachute was working, but what happened was instead a communications failutre. Seems like they couldn't tell it to use them for some reason.

          A semi-automatic thing knowing when it enters the atmosphere like the Spirit/Opportunity probes would maybe have been safer?

          But then again, this whole thing was designed to be a publicity stunt with a cool
    • I remember back in grade 7 we had to devise a system that would protect an egg from a fall from the roof of the school. I think we used foam and rubber bands... or something.

      Anyway, the guys that built this probe probably kicked ass on that exercise...
      • Re:Great news! (Score:2, Informative)

        by Fishstick ( 150821 )
        there was a junkyard wars episode where they had to build a rocket that would carry an ostrich egg and return it unbroken.

        IIRC, the team that tried a radical teepee design lost because their parachute failed to open and the egg suspended in a pair of pantyhose in the crumpled nosecone got scrambled.

        The winning team had a conventional design that had an impressive lift-off, had a nice recovery deployment and had a good payload compartment that protected the egg from the shock of landing.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:02PM (#10238535)
    After studying preliminary data from the recovered probe, scientists are reporting that the Sun seems to have originated in the Utah desert.

    "We're finding embedded silicon dioxide particles that are unique to Utah."
  • by qmchenry ( 266894 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:02PM (#10238542)
    The first thing I thought of while watching that video:

    "You're the ones who come up with this shit! Why, I bet you have a bunch of guys sitting around somewhere right now just thinking shit up, and somebody backing them up. What's your contingency plan?"

    And then I went, "eww," and had to look away..
  • Article (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:03PM (#10238549)
    Scientists and engineers are optimistic after having peeked inside the Genesis space capsule, which brought back bits of the Sun but crashed into the Utah desert Wednesday.

    The craft was supposed to deploy a parachute and be retrieved in the air by a helicopter. Instead it broke apart on impact. Amazingly, scientists say, much of the contents -- microscopic particles that once rode the solar wind and are now embedded on shattered collector plates -- should be salvageable.

    In a teleconference with reporters today, mission officials said contamination is their greatest worry, since desert dirt entered the capsule. They need to retrieve the Sun samples in pristine form. The goal is to learn more about the Sun's composition and the history of the solar system and planet formation.

    The team might seek advice on handling the wafer-thin collector devices from the semiconductor industry, said Don Burnett, Genesis principal investigator from the California Institute of Technology.
    Surprise

    "We should be surprised that we have anything," said Don Sevilla, Genesis payload recovery leader at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

    Sevilla said experts are "peeling back the layers of the onion," using a flashlight and a small mirror on a stick to explore inside the fractured, garbage-can-sized capsule. A prime particle-gathering device "appears intact," he said, and another appears to be "in very good condition."

    But pieces of the fragile collectors are "strewn about the canister," so scientists are being very methodical about extracting them.

    "It is amazing given the amount of breach in the canister just how clean it is inside" Sevilla said. "We're not talking about great clods of dirt."

    No timetable has been created for moving the science samples from a Utah facility to a NASA center for ultimate study. Sevilla said engineers are still busy collecting tools to do unexpected "sawing and snipping" that will take place over the weekend.

    Genesis, which launched in 2001, carries a $264 million price tag.

    The scientists said they were demoralized when they first saw the craft stuck more than halfway into the desert floor. Attitudes have changed.

    "The science team is really excited," said Roger Wiens, flight payload leader from the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Wiens expects to "meet many if not all" of the mission's initial goals.

    The investigation

    Meanwhile, Sevilla said three pyrotechnic devices that were supposed to deploy the parachute system failed to trigger as planned. They have been "safed" to allow study of the capsule.

    "None had been fired," he said. "This points to a command and control problem," not to any failure of the parachutes themselves.

    NASA also announced today that Michael Ryschkewitsch, director of the Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, would lead the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) in an effort to determine the exact cause of the disaster. The group is due to report back in mid-November.

    The optimistic assessment led one reporter to ask if future sample-return missions might forego the theatrics of using Hollywood stunt pilots to make mid-air retrievals of capsules, and instead simply design the shells to survive a freefall.

    "The lessons from this one will affect all future sample returns," said Gentry Lee, a JPL engineer.
  • Make money fast! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by nizo ( 81281 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:04PM (#10238566) Homepage Journal
    Where can we bet on the fate of Genesis' twin Stardust, and what are the odds the same thing will happen to it?
    • Am I the only one who thinks they should have named the thing the Scoop 7? I think that would have been much more appropriate given what the thing is doing. Just make sure you're not in the little town where it lands or anything ...
  • ObKhan (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:05PM (#10238574)
    "There she is! Not so wounded as we were led to believe. So much the better."
  • by lateralus_1024 ( 583730 ) <mattbaha@gm a i l . com> on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:06PM (#10238582)
    Anything to get Phil Collins away from the microphone and strictly in charge of drums.
    Oh,the other Genesis...
  • Mirror and Stick? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dostert ( 761476 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:11PM (#10238624)
    Am I the only one who is disturbed by the line that they were "using a flashlight and a small mirror on a stick to explore inside the fractured, garbage-can-sized capsule." This is Nasa... they can't use a tiny camera in there? They have to tape a mirror on the end of a stick and peek around? Reminds me of a line in "Clay Pigeons" when Deputy Barney is poking a body with a stick and when asked why he said "I was just checkin' somethin'"
    • Maybe they learned their lesson from the space pen?

      During the space race back in the 1960's, NASA was faced with a major problem. The astronaut needed a pen that would write in the vacuum of space. NASA went to work. At a cost of $1.5 million they developed the "Astronaut Pen". Some of you may remember. It enjoyed minor success on the commercial market.

      The Russians were faced with the same dilemma.

      They used a pencil.


      (However, this space pen story is a fake. Snopes.com for more detail.)
    • by shfted! ( 600189 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:44PM (#10238921) Journal
      Does your dentist use a camera to look inside your mouth? I don't mean taking xrays. What's wrong with using an old technique if it works just fine? Yes, that's not typical NASA, but these are scientists looking at the wreckage, not bureaucrats -- and scientists tend to be more practical and creative.
      • Does your dentist use a camera to look inside your mouth? I don't mean taking xrays.

        Actually, he does. My dentist has this small camera probe he uses to display magnified images of the hard to see places on teeth on a television monitor so the patient can see up close what kind of nastiness they've got on their molars and stuff. It's pretty crazy, but it does a good job scaring people into flossing regularly.
    • by jfengel ( 409917 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:51PM (#10239014) Homepage Journal
      Of course not. That's a $26,000 triple-autoclaved, platinum-coated, Swiss optic mirror, affixed to a $43,424 surgical steel stick, made to NASA's exacting specifications down to the micrometer. The 3M company launched a whole new division to create the special cellphane tape (release strength 3.434 KPa +/- .002 KPa), $113,285 per yard (but they only used about six inches; the rest is being used to tape the fragments together).
    • by Odin's Raven ( 145278 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @03:03PM (#10239150)
      This is Nasa... they can't use a tiny camera in there? They have to tape a mirror on the end of a stick and peek around?

      First reaction: Over-engineered solution. Why use a multi-thousand dollar miniaturized camera when a $2 mirror on a stick can accomplish the same task?

      Second reaction: Who am I to talk about over-engineering? After all, I spend my weekends geocaching, which is best summed up by this quote [cafepress.com]:

      "I use multi-billion dollar military satellites to find tupperware hidden in the woods...What do YOU do?"
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:13PM (#10238640)
    "Sevilla said experts are 'peeling back the layers of the onion,' using a flashlight and a small mirror on a stick to explore inside the fractured, garbage-can-sized capsule."

    A flashlight and a small mirror on a stick...only cutting edge technology will do for NASA...
    • The article says something about the "onion" being at a facility in Utah, not in a regular NASA lab. They're still assembling the appropriate equipment, so the mirror on a stick is just the first look to see exactly how many hundreds of tupperware boxes they'll need to contain the various fragments...
  • by ttlgDaveh ( 798546 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:15PM (#10238650) Homepage
    ... and they attempt to catch it with a hook and a stick!?
    This is not a fairground, and you are not trying to catch plastic fish from a pond in exchange for a giant teddy-bear.
  • Black Box (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Feneric ( 765069 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:15PM (#10238652) Homepage

    I guess I'm not too surprised. Commercial airliner black boxes seem to be able to survive all sorts of crashes and accidents, and while I realize that the weight limits on components sent into space are far more strict than the weight limits on regular aircraft, I'd expect (hope) that NASA has better technology to work with.

    Of course there's also the differences between the scientific equipment used by NASA and the simple recording equipment used in aircraft, but again I'd like to think that NASA is on top of such things.

  • Good Pictures (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Saeed al-Sahaf ( 665390 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:18PM (#10238676) Homepage
    I submitted the *exact* same story two days ago, BUT I'M NOT BITTER! Anyway, although the official web site [genesismission.org] originally had a bunch pictures of the recovery team with their unprotected hands all over the spacecraft remains, it seems they've moved it to a clean room [genesismission.org]...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:21PM (#10238708)
    On an AP article, the headline read "Sun atoms may be intact after crash". And I thought the only way to split an atom was to bombard it with neutrons. Makes sense now why the conduct nuclear explosion tests deep underground.
  • From the recovery, from another poster: http://www.genesismission.org/images/gen_recovery_ fragments-browse.jpg [genesismission.org]
    interesting... they appear to have collected shards of a large, shiny black object...
    (queue the trumpet)

    My god, it's full of sand!
  • by ARRRLovin ( 807926 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:25PM (#10238738)
    (looks through microscope and sorts through particles with tweezers)

    Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Solar!, Utah, Utah, Utah......
  • Priceless (Score:5, Funny)

    by hckrdave ( 588951 ) * on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:27PM (#10238748) Homepage Journal
    1 Probe $280 Million Dollars 2 Stunt Helicopters $30 Million Dollars Watching a 280 million dollar probe crash at 200 MPH.... PRICELESS Money cant buy everything, but i bet this time it bought the lowest bidder :-)
  • by StalinsNotDead ( 764374 ) <umbaga.gmail@com> on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:27PM (#10238751) Journal
    Imagine the ass-chewing those poor engineers got.

    Maybe it's just the innate lack of confidence in human nature, but of course NASA's going to say that they were still able to get valuable information despite the crash. Their funding is probably on the line, and they don't wish to say "Oh yeah. That was a complete waste of money".
  • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:29PM (#10238775)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Maybe a lesson here; Design your space probes to hard-land in the first place, and dispense with parachutes, helicopters, stunt pilots, etc...
  • But wait (Score:5, Funny)

    by Remlik ( 654872 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:50PM (#10238989) Homepage
    Not to be too tinfoil hatted here but how can we believe anything they are saying?

    Who is going to verify their findings? What if this is all just some smoke and mirror news stories now so we all thing "yea they'll get something for the $260 million spent" only to never ever hear about it again.

    Before the thing even entered the atmosphere we had JPLers saying ANY crash would destroy the experiments. Well we got 200+ mph into the earth, split open, dust everywhere, broken little bits but everything is going to be A OK.

    Huh?
    • Re:But wait (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Christopher Thomas ( 11717 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @03:31PM (#10239428)
      Who is going to verify their findings? What if this is all just some smoke and mirror news stories now so we all thing "yea they'll get something for the $260 million spent" only to never ever hear about it again.

      Before the thing even entered the atmosphere we had JPLers saying ANY crash would destroy the experiments. Well we got 200+ mph into the earth, split open, dust everywhere, broken little bits but everything is going to be A OK.


      There's a difference between "we can get useful scientific information from it" and "A-OK".

      There's also a difference between dust and other contaminants deposited at low speed and what's mostly monatomic gas implanted at high speed (look up "ion implantation" in a semiconductor fabrication glossary for further discussion of this).

      Processing will get a lot more difficult, as they have a bucketful of dust-contaminated shards instead of nice, organized, uncontaminated collection plates, but it's far from impossible.

      Just not an option the mission team would have chosen if it could possibly be avoided.
  • by FWMiller ( 9925 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:51PM (#10239007) Homepage

    OK, maybe one of you lab rats can answer this but...

    Call me irresponsible, but this guy went to all the effort to cover himself, then he leans over WITHOUT A MASK to work on a plate full of DUST!

    I need a mask! [nasa.gov]

  • by chompadventures ( 706030 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @02:53PM (#10239036) Homepage
    NASA also announced today that Michael Ryschkewitsch ... would lead the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) in an effort to determine the exact cause of the disaster. MIB is investigating? This must be a crashed space ship, the whole Genesis project is just a big cover story. Thank you, Neurilizer.
  • by servognome ( 738846 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @03:08PM (#10239204)
    Obligatory Simpsons' quote
    Homer: It's just a little dirty. It's still good, it's still good!
  • by c13v3rm0nk3y ( 189767 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @03:39PM (#10239498) Homepage

    For some reason, one of the datasets retrieved from the device is a human finger. Upon closer inspection, it appears to match other fingers collected from the Hollywood region of the southwestern coastal United States.

    NASA can offer no conclusions at this time, but one NASA insider has speculated that this may indicate that California may, at one time, supported life.

  • restraint (Score:2, Funny)

    by uberjoe ( 726765 )
    I'll refrain from making a really bad Wrath of Kahn joke now.
  • by kencurry ( 471519 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @05:32PM (#10240823)
    wiping off candy he dropped in the dirt, saying "it's still good..." with just a hint of doubt in his voice.

  • I mean come on. Everyone is pissed at the money being spent in Iraq (and yes I understand that I comparing billions to millions) but NASA still spent years of time and almost a third of a billion dollars to get some particles from the Sun and this is BEST idea to get their investment back safely that they can come up with??????

    When is this agency going to get off its ass and come up with something that is meaningful to our nation and humanity as a whole instead of just pure science? I completely underst

  • by TheLittleJetson ( 669035 ) on Monday September 13, 2004 @11:55PM (#10243477)
    when i saw the footage of that hunk of metal slamming into the desert floor, one thought came to mind: they are going to do whatever they can to make it look like they're getting useful data, because this was a very expensive screw-up, not too long after another big screw-up for NASA. sure, it's great to keep scientific purity, but if the scientific truth is "the sample is full of sand" and it means you could lose funding, wouldn't you be tempted to fudge a little?

Do you suffer painful hallucination? -- Don Juan, cited by Carlos Casteneda

Working...