Space Shuttles Survive Hurricane Frances 268
maggeth writes "In an update to a previous story, NASA damage assessment teams have begun work at the Kennedy Space Center, which was hit by Hurricane Frances. It appears that there was no damage to any of the space shuttles, according to the first word from NASA. Although more details still are to be released, we know that Frances died down in strength before making landfall, limiting the amount of wind damage."
Reader knix writes, though, that "It looks like NASA did have quite a bit of damage from Hurricane Frances," pointing to an AP story which adds some detail, and noting that besides a knocked over Mercury-Redstone rocket, the massive VAB (Vehicle Assembly Building) had 1000 panels missing after the storm hit. According to the AP, "The holes left by the missing panels created 40,000 square feet of 'open window' on two sides of the building."
Good News! (Score:5, Insightful)
Rotten news. (Score:5, Interesting)
It is an amazingly engineered vehicle, over engineered. It also is nothing more than a jobs program for NASA and a bunch of support companies who all are based in areas with important Congressmen shoveling money for votes.
Kill the shuttle, I just wish nature had so an accident didn't. It would be better to have 3 orbiters for display around than the country than 2 or less.
Re:Rotten news. (Score:2)
But, if that building had been destroyed, where would we build that new fleet?
Re:Rotten news. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Rotten news. (Score:3, Insightful)
Better off having the shuttles now and replacements on the way than nothing at all until something new comes along. And in either scenario there wouldn't be anything on the horizon for at least a decade.
Re:Good News! (Score:2)
My take... If you really disbelieve in NASA and the Shuttle that much, ANYTHING that happens is irrelevant. Because the only thing that will make you happy is shutting down NASA completely, because you have no faith in any of their manned space initiatives.
Watching Slashdotters discuss space is about like seeing the same thing on sci.space.tech. EVERY launch proposal is TERRIBLE, to the others. The only difference is tha
Welcome to Washington! (Score:2, Insightful)
Congress? simpler and cheaper? have you ever read a U.S. newspaper?
If congress does anything to change the status quo, the change would probably be more complicated and more expersive!
Its been over for a while now (Score:2)
Manned space flight has been over in any real sense since the shuttle's inception. All we've done is putter around aimlessly in earth orbit.
Re:Good News! (Score:3, Interesting)
NASA has no monopoly in sending men into space.
Russia still sends men into space and has a great deal experience in doing so. They have great technical knowledge in the field and built what many consider to be a superior shuttle vehicle, the Buran. Unfortunately they lack funding.
China also have a space program and have sent a man into space. They're newcomers in the game, but they're working pretty hard.
Then there's the X-Prize. Sure it's sub-orbital, but many of the competitors
Congress? (Score:2, Funny)
The way I understand it, later this week GWBush will personally take credit for the hurricane not destroying the shuttles and reinforcing his vision that everything is going to plan and, heck, we'll be landing on Mars any day now.
(We'd be on Mars now, if the probes real intent, to find oil, had discovered anything, it's truly amazing how fast Halliburton can move when properly informed in advance while potential competitors have to s
They Haven't Gone Anywhere (Score:5, Insightful)
(I'm deliberately discounting that little coast up to 60 miles. I want to see the private sector put payloads on the order of at leat 100 tons in orbit. That's the kind of capability we need to actually go somewhere.)
Re:They Haven't Gone Anywhere (Score:2)
If they wanted, Microsoft could use their piles of cash to put a station larger than the ISS up there in ONE SHOT. *sigh*
What's You're Plan To Prift From Space? (Score:3, Interesting)
More importantly, no one in the private sector is going to spend $10 billion on an endeavour unless that mission earns more than $10 billion in revenue. Do you know how to get that kind of return from a single launch?
I'm not rejecting priv
Re:They Haven't Gone Anywhere (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good News! (Score:2)
Re:Good News! (Score:2)
Re:NASA needed a facelift anyway... (Score:4, Interesting)
DDDAAAAMMMNN (Score:4, Interesting)
wow
Re:DDDAAAAMMMNN (Score:2)
Re:DDDAAAAMMMNN (Score:3, Informative)
Look at it this way - you could stick Yankee Stadium on the roof and have some extra space left over.
45 degree angles or curves are not going to change the fact that that is just a HUGE amount of square footage that would be facing into the wind, no matter what.
Re:DDDAAAAMMMNN (Score:3, Interesting)
40,000sqf = almost 10 sq. rods!!!!
Where's my +5 Interesting?
Re:DDDAAAAMMMNN (Score:2, Informative)
Dammed Beavers (Score:2, Funny)
Due to this news... (Score:2, Funny)
Reminds me of a gold joke (Score:3, Funny)
So he lined up and tried another shot. Clouds of dirt and sand and ants went flying again. The golf ball didn't even wiggle.
Two ants survived. One dazed ant said to the other, "Whoa! What are we going to do?"
Said the other ant: "I don't know about you, bu
Re:Due to this news... (Score:2)
That flying rock, I highly doubt that even a CAT 5 hurricane would produce enough wind over the wings to get the aircraft above Vs.
Re:Due to this news... (Score:3, Informative)
Googling for shuttle stall speed turns up meaningless links, but, google for landing speed and you get this [nasa.gov] . Scroll down, and you'll find it's using 213 to 225 mph as touchdown speed, and it's likely a valid assumption the range depends on all up landing weight. Working backward using traditional 'airmanship' numbers, touchdown is approximately 110% of stall speed, unless
Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2)
closer to the equator?
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:5, Informative)
That is why ESA launches from French Guinea[sp] instead of the UK mainland and the USSR launched from Kazachstan[sp] instead of Russia itself.
You can see the effect the speed has on you when you're on a merry-go-round. When standing on the edges you are pushed off of it by the centrifugal forces, but when you're standing near the center you don't have to worry about it.
Spelling... (Score:3, Informative)
Kazakhstan
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:5, Funny)
Clearly you had far, FAR cooler merry-go-rounds in your youth then I ever had... Best mine did was break down and make off-tune organ noise...
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:5, Informative)
Florida was about as far south as the US could go, while still being able to launch over the ocean (instead of a populated area). ESA was able to go further south. The same reasoning is what lead Boeing to set up Sea-Launch, which operates out of Long Beach, but sails the launch vehicle down near the equator and launches it from a floating platform.
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:5, Insightful)
Guam
Saipan
The US Virgin Islands
Peurto Rico
American Samoa
Nah, the USA dosen't have any colonies...
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2)
Re:Why did they choose Floridia? (Score:2)
I should hope they would survive... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:4, Insightful)
It's like complaining to Ford that your car got wrecked because a tree fell on it. Cars don't provide protective measures against falling trees. Period.
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:2)
Or foam insulation, for that matter.
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:2)
Innovation isn't always a "here and now" thing.
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:2)
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:2)
I could kill you with a drop of venom. Is that proof that you are a very weak person?
Re:I should hope they would survive... (Score:2)
Heh you know you've made a point when the rebuttal is about yourself instead of about what you have said.
and just think.... (Score:2, Interesting)
NASA maintenance (Score:4, Interesting)
Glad it happened now (Score:4, Insightful)
Damn. (Score:2, Insightful)
And Ivan is on the way (Score:5, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Very sad... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Very sad... (Score:2)
Re:Very sad... (Score:2)
Or possibly very complimentary.
Alan Shepard wasn't human?? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Alan Shepard wasn't human?? (Score:2)
Re:Alan Shepard wasn't human?? (Score:2)
Not true, he was a man and had LOTS of women (even though married).
I just finished reading "Light This Candle" a biography of Shepard.
Good insight into what drove the initial seven astronauts without the fake heroism of "The Right Stuff" which most of the Mercury seven hated.
1,000 missing tiles? (Score:3, Funny)
Each of them a unique size and shape, no doubt.
Eric in Seattle
Two words.... (Score:2)
Duh (Score:4, Funny)
they go forward only... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Duh (Score:2)
Re:Duh (Score:3, Funny)
Thank you Frances. Nothing like a nice powerwash.
don't worry..... (Score:5, Funny)
Hurricane Ivan could cause *real* damage (Score:2, Informative)
Hurricane risk to orbiters is hyperbole. (Score:2)
They knew about Florida hurricanes in the 60's, when they decided to build up Cape Canaveral.
They knew about Florida hurricanes in the 70's, when they designed the shuttle to fly from Cape Kennedy.
They knew about Florida hurricanes in the 80s, when STS flight operations began.
They knew about Florida hurricanes in the 90s, after the Challenger
Re:Hurricane risk to orbiters is hyperbole. (Score:2)
Re:Hurricane risk to orbiters is hyperbole. (Score:3, Informative)
Was NOT a hurricane (Score:2)
Re:Was NOT a hurricane (Score:2)
My sister is an insurance agent near Orland
Mir? (Score:2)
The panels were designed to pop out! (Score:5, Informative)
When a hurricane comes there is a serious drop in pressure... well with a building that large (one of the most volumous buildings in the world) this creates a serious pressure differential and if parts of the building do not give, or of there is not some sort of equalization, then the whole thing would explode from the pressure.
So they built a few thousand of these punch panels designed to pop out during a hurricane in order to save the building. I dont know why that wasn't in the article. These panels are on the north and south faces of the building and can be viewed here:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/LARGE/GPN-2000-0
(the brownish panels in the center section)
and here:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/MEDIUM/GPN-
Also if you don't think the building is all that large, look at the second photograph and notice the water tower
I grew up in Orlando and knew many many people that were engineer types; I feel very fortunate.
When I was in the Boy Scouts (yes I am an Eagle), I actually got a tour of the SSPF, the VAB, the SPF, and LP Complex 39-A. On this tour I learned about these panels.
This wasn't the normal tour though. One of our Scoutmasters was in charge of designing the lav and the escape hatch for the SS and had basically unlimited access. We essentially got the VIP/Congressional tour. I actually got to touch, (and yes I mean physically touch), Columbia as I walked underneath it and around it. I was 5 ft from the SRBs, I got to stand on the launch pad, on the crawler, 5 ft from the Michealangelo module for the SS, and underneath one of their 205k ton cranes.
That tour was something I will never forget for the rest of my life.
Re:Protection (Score:4, Informative)
IIRC the shuttles never really "fly" even in Earth's atmosphere... they only glide back to earth. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Re:Protection (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Protection (Score:4, Informative)
They were protected, hence why the Shuttles were undamaged.
The VAB was damaged, which is unsurprising as its a big (3rd largest by volume in the world) square building, and as such catches the wind a little.
Re:Protection (Score:5, Informative)
Aerodynamically, the shuttles are essentially maneuverable bricks. During its return from orbit, the pilot can control the direction and angle of its descent, but that's about it. The wings cannot produce enough lift to gain altitude, certainly not from a standing start on the ground using the onboard engines (and with what fuel?).
This is why the shuttles have to be ferried atop a 747 back to Canaveral when (usually due to weather conditions) they instead land at Edwards AFB in California. So if NASA wanted to evacuate the orbiters, they'd probably need to, um, shuttle them out one at a time on the jumbo jet.
Re:Protection (Score:5, Insightful)
Unfortunately you can't plan out that far for hurricane hits at this time, so instead of flying them out for every false alarm they take a chance with the orbiters in Florida.
Besides it's safer to have the orbiters buttoned down well in Florida, than have them caught off guard by a fast storm like Andrew with one of the orbiters still in process to be mated with the aircraft.
Re:Protection (Score:2)
Re:Protection (Score:2)
The route must be relatively clear weather because the orbiter 747 combination produces flutter to the air frame from what I understand. And since it can't fly above the bad weather either.
Also actual preparations of the orbiter for ferr
Re:Protection (Score:2)
I am not saying that by the book is not good.
I am saying given a good enough reason they could expedite the process.
The thing about rules and guidelines is knowing when to break them.
The thing about costs is knowing when they matter.
Worrying about 1 million when talking about billions of invested worth irreplaceapbe euipment is being placed at risk is asinine. It is a non issue. The important thing is assessing the ris
Re:Protection (Score:2)
It's not over dramatization, a CAT 4 will destroy most structures not specifically designed to take the wind, it's next to impossible to make the VAB safe and still be affordable to build, the shuttle hanger on the other hand can be.
The average house built before the hurricane standards OTH is another matter.
Though the Space Center hasn't had a direct hit in years (like the
Re:Protection (Score:2)
Have you been to a Florida home? They don't have basements for a reason, our water table is so high that they would leak, it would be even worse at KSC because they are on a island between the Atlantic and ICW.
Also the biggest source of damage is not from the wind, but from the flooding that comes from all the rain, and the storm surge.
Re:Protection (Score:2)
I am kinda torn on the issue of them being blown away being a good thing. If I were positive the response would be to build a replacement capacity ASAP it would deffiantly be a good thing. If it were not then it would be better to have something rather than nothing.
There been any news on the new Delta varient that was sitting out on the pad yet ?
Re:Protection (Score:2)
Re:It might last till next week (Score:2, Funny)
Re:It might last till next week (Score:2)
Remember the last presidential election? Methinks these are the supernatural equivalent of warning shots. Just wait and see what happens if Florida messes things up again this time.
In any case, it's not a good omen for George Bush. 12 years ago Florida got a severe pounding from the tropics and the other George Bush got a severe pounding from the voters.
Re:I beg to differ (Score:3, Funny)
If the left coast of the USA gets an earthquake soon, Chicago, Detroit and New York get hit by a massive blizzard, a few tornadoes in the south, can we start to assume that the higher beings hate the US?
Re:affordable (Score:3, Insightful)
That's why it's so incredibly stupid to include tons of dead weight in the form of wings, landing gear, 1st stage engines and extra heat shields to protect them all in addition to the payload.
Re:affordable (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:affordable (Score:5, Informative)
A simple capsule design can be reusable; just slap a fresh heat shield on the bottom an launch it again. The Gemini capsules were initially designed for reuse. They were going to use a parasail to glide to a landing on a runway on extendable skids. They only used splashdowns on the actual missions because parasails weren't fully debugged by 1965; that probably wouldn't be an issue today. The Soviet Union also test-flew a reusable capsule design.
The bulk of the shuttle system isn't very "reusable" anyway. The huge fuel tank that helps to orbit the extra dead weight costs as much as many smaller rockets by itself. I saw a blurb somewhere that claimed that it costs more to recover and rebuild the solid boosters than fresh ones would cost. The high-strung liquid fuel engines also require hugely expensive overhauls at regular intervals.
Bottom line is that the space shuttle serves mainly as a glaring example of the old phrase "Penny wise, Pound foolish".
Re:affordable (Score:2, Insightful)
as you say, it's the ONLY reusable VTHL SSTO vehicle in the world. (for some values of "reusable" and "SSTO", anyway.) the mere fact that it kinda-sorta works is not sufficient evidence that it's a good idea, or a cheap way to get to orbit.
OTOH, the shuttle alone can't be taken as sufficient evidence that SSTO is a bad idea, or that VTHL is a half-assed way to put a winged airframe someplace without air, or that reusability either is or
Re:affordable (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Let's put things in perspective... (Score:3, Insightful)
Multitasking (Score:3, Insightful)
Or are you saying that every time theres a hurricane/flood/tornado/blizzard/wildfire/earthqu a ke that NASA should scrub a launch and donate that money?
I've been through a couple of hurricanes lately. Floyd and Isabel. Lost most of the roof in Isabel. The longest wait was waiting for a reputable company to redo the roof. The insurance company came out