Falcon-1 X-Prize Entry Nears First Flight 17
hpulley writes "With the X-Prize January 1, 2005 deadline looming closer, these announcements are becoming more common. The SpaceX Eagle-1 spacecraft is being readied for a possible November launch, after some static engine testing. There are plans for a larger Falcon-5 with 5 engines instead of one to be launched in 2005. At costs of around $6 and $12 million, respectively, for the launch vehicles it appears that the dream of affordable launch vehicles may finally come true. If you check the manifest you'll see they actually have three contracted and two tentative launch contracts through next year." Well, not quite affordable for everyone just yet, but not a bad pricetag for a millionaire.
It just occurred to me... (Score:2, Funny)
The wealthiest man in the world, who tries to take over any market that appears to be about to boom, has not bothered funding his own space flight project.
Then again, he always did wait until a boom had already occurred before jumping in (like the internet, for example).
Heh, 'sides... would anyone actually want to fly on something made by the people who bring you the BSOD?
Maybe it was a good business-decision after-all.
Re:It just occurred to me... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It just occurred to me... (Score:2)
Not an X-Prize Contender (Score:5, Informative)
The general hope is that the Falcon-series will be able to do unmanned space launch for significantly less that existing designs, both saving clients money and letting SpaceX profit.
Re:Not an X-Prize Contender (Score:2)
Nothing to do with the Ansari X-Prize (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Nothing to do with the Ansari X-Prize (Score:1)
Re:Nothing to do with the Ansari X-Prize (Score:1)
No, MY bad, REALLY! Sorry about that, everyone. I must have X-Prize on the brain...
For the love of Slashdot (Score:1, Insightful)
Thanks.
Re:For the love of Slashdot (Score:2)
Nah, need to be a billionaire (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nah, need to be a billionaire (Score:3, Informative)
2) A 747 costs well over a hundred million, yet I can afford to fly on one. The airlines don't make you buy the airplane before they'll give you a ticket, and I see no reason why space travel will be any different.
Re:Nah, need to be a billionaire (Score:2)
I can imagine machines, which don't need life support, to be WAY easier to launch than people, and thus cost less.
Falcon, X-Prize and the Future (Score:4, Interesting)
While not as lucrative as PayPal which he co-founded, he will have created a legitimate business in an area he is passionate about.
What does this mean for the future? I think when all the X-Prize hype has evaporated people will pay more attention to what SpaceX has developed. Which is cheaper, partly reusable rockets. And although his rockets are not man rated, yet, anyone who knows Elon knows what he wants for the future of space exploration.