Hotel Tycoon Pushes Inflatable Space Stations 411
heptapod writes "Reclusive millionaire and motel tycoon Robert Bigelow has announced launching inflatable space stations through his personal aerospace firm. He's working off of NASA's TransHab designs and hopes to get launch one as early as November 2005! I'm sure after someone wins the X Prize they'll need someplace to stay the night. I wonder if each inflatable station module won't come with complimentary bibles."
Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:4, Funny)
But will the bibles be inflatable as well?
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:3, Funny)
But will the bibles be inflatable as well?
At first glance, I could have sworn that said "babies" . . .
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:3, Informative)
The Gideons are funded by contributions from local churches. There is no mandate for a motel to carry a Gideon Bible; the Marriots, for example, put their own Bibles and a copy of the Book of Morm
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:2, Funny)
Clowns, and
Grownup adult humans with a literal belief in fairytales
But that's me. I'm kinda weird that way.
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:4, Interesting)
Which explains why Chinese Science was more advanced than Western Science was till roughly 1800.
And also explains why Islamic Scholars preserved the Greek and Roman classics.
And also explains why Algebra has its foundations in the work done by Islamic scholars.[OK, a specific Islamic scholar, if you want to quibble.]
Traditionally, it has been organized Christianity that has opposed scientific progress in the west.
There is no correlation between being a priest, and being a Christian. From roughly 500 CE to roughly 1800 CE, the Holy Roman Catholic Church was the dominant institution in the west. It was the institution that provided education. The net result is that one became a priest, in order to study, or to gain political power. Spiritual conviction had nothing to do with the decision.
And in passing, I'll note that spiritual conviction still is a minor consideration for those who do become priests.
Perhaps if Christians would actually practice the teachings of their holy book, there might be less backlash against them. But when they pick and choose what they want to practice, and believe, then why should they get any respect?
a: That is objecting to something, purely because of the source of the thing.
b: Why don't Christians practice the only diet that the First Testament states does not violate the Aseret ha-Debrot?
a: By that reasoning,organ transplants should be illegal to perform.
b: The First Testament also talks about taking a needed body part from an individual, for the use of another individual --- a body part that the second person needed, in order to live.
OTOH, consistency has never been a strong point with christians, of any sect, religion, creed, dogma, or theology.
Amber
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:4, Insightful)
Faith is the most important component of belief. If there was independently verifiable evidence, there would be no need for faith.
Re:Gideon's in Spaaaaaceeee... (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, but all that applies to unicorns too - but I don't see people arguing for existance of unicorns. In fact, it applies to an infinite number of things, anything that we could conceive, but can't disprove.
The poster didn't say he believed God didn't exist, but rather implied that he simply didn't believe in God.
Not believing on the basis of a lack of evidence is perfectly reasonable, unless you're willing to believe in absolutely anything and everything that hasn't been disproved.
But because I believe that I am in a real universe so must I assume it is real because I cannot disprove that I am not.
But you can't disprove that you're a brain in a jar, so why don't you believe that too?
Inflatable Church (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Inflatable Church (Score:2)
Re:Inflatable Church (Score:3, Funny)
(If you have to think about that, you're not a real geek!)
=Smidge=
Space stations from balloons not a bad idea (Score:5, Insightful)
There's another real advantage to this method that hasn't been mentioned yet: radiation shielding. If you build your station out of plastic instead of aluminum, you'll get far better radiation shielding (it's the hydrogen atoms that do the best job!). Furthermore, aluminum is a kind of nasty metal to use in extreme circumstances because as it warps, it stiffens and eventually will break (metal fatigue). I don't know the sort of stresses that a station is subject to, but I'd imagine that at least the day/night temperature changes provide some stress.
Now they just need to get Dr. Schlock involved... he'll know what to do.
Materials. (Score:4, Insightful)
Depends on the type of radiation being shielded against. High-Z is better for gamma shielding (and shielding against secondary x-rays from other types of radiation, though using low-Z reduces the amount of this). You also have a bulk disadvantage with low-Z materials (though in space, it's weight and not bulk that matters, so you're stuck no matter what).
Furthermore, aluminum is a kind of nasty metal to use in extreme circumstances because as it warps, it stiffens and eventually will break (metal fatigue).
Aluminum itself has very low fatigue strength, but in practice aluminum alloys with better characteristics are used. Google for "duraluminum", an alloy commonly used for aircraft, for one example.
For space uses, the cost of launch dominates over the cost of materials, so you can afford to use as expensive an alloy or composite as you like in the structure. Materials problems typically occur due to design oversight (e.g. carbon composites being etched away by the atmosphere), as opposed to cheap materials being used.
Inflatable stations are still an interesting idea, though. If I recall correctly, the "Cosmos" solar sail was going to be inflatable, to save on mass (a rigid craft would have to be sturdy enough to survive launch, requiring extra mass).
Re:Materials. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Inflatable Church (Score:3, Funny)
Hrmm (Score:4, Funny)
"bring a bike pump.... your life may depend on it!"
Re:Hrmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hrmm (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hrmm (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Hrmm (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Hrmm (Score:3, Funny)
One possible use... (Score:3, Funny)
I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:5, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:5, Interesting)
By not having to send up a rigid structure, you can save on weight and space, resulting in considerable savings, as you can send up a larger structure with less assembly in space required.
Besides, by the time you inflate one of these to 1 atmosphere, the pressure difference between that and outside you'll have a very rigid structure. From looking at the articles, parts of the structure are rigid, providing points for preset 'utilities'. The expandable portions would be to provide space.
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:5, Funny)
Providing space? That must be like shipping ice to the north pole. ;-P
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:4, Interesting)
Such a scenario might actually be safer than the 'tin can' approach as the 'bubble' could heal itself.
I would also be curious if a lead powder suspension could be used in such a gel that could possibly serve as radiation shielding.
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:2, Insightful)
may be some will think, these hotels are space debris
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:3, Interesting)
Obviously you hire some space garbagemen [animenfo.com] to clean it up.
Re:I wonder how many stars this hotel is gonna be. (Score:5, Funny)
Gideon Bibles (Score:5, Funny)
So you'd have to wait for them to visit the place and put some bibles there first.
Re:Gideon Bibles (Score:3, Funny)
Actually the government [insidethex.co.uk] does...
Re:Gideon Bibles (Score:4, Funny)
"Who are the f**king Gideons? Ever met one? No. Ever seen one? No. What are they? Ninjas? Where are they from? Gidea?"
Re:Gideon Bibles (Score:2)
This story's about inflatable space stations! (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, next thing you know, some jackass will start leaving Knoppix liveCDs in the rooms!
Obligitory Red Drawf quote: (Score:3, Funny)
Rimmer: Kryten, unpack Rachel and get out the puncture repair kit. I AM ALIVE!
BANG!
:)
X-Prize == sub-orbital (Score:5, Interesting)
Of course, once the proposed yearly x-prize competitions get going (races for height, shortest turnaround etc), it may only be a few years before a private party is able to launch people into actual orbit. Then it will be cool if someone has an of-the-shelf inflatable habitat ready for use.
Re:X-Prize == sub-orbital (Score:5, Interesting)
Someone [jpaerospace.com] is already working on it.
Re:X-Prize == sub-orbital (Score:3, Funny)
For example, the USA spent trillions of dollars developing an urban legend that could work in zero-gravity, while the Russians simply used a pencil.
Nut job? (Score:4, Interesting)
OK then, I am going to trust this guy with my life in a hostile environment. Right.
I will wait until the mark X model is tested. Thank you very much.
Re:Nut job? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why not? It's basic scientific method: cattle are being mutilated, no-one knows who's doing it, let's watch and see if it happens again. It's not like he bought the ranch and turned it into a landing field for UFOs is it?
Re:Nut job? (Score:3, Insightful)
These folks simply called to verify that reports of lights in the sky they'd received did indeed correspond to our launches. As far as I could tell, they were simply interested in investigating and explaining claims.
Now, maybe they do have nutjobs there, but investigat
Re:Nut job? (Score:3, Funny)
And you can see it at your local McDonald's any time you want.
KFG
expensive arse bibles (Score:2, Funny)
current going rate of $10,000 a pound, I believe the shuttles had? maybe minus an order of magnitude.
Re:expensive arse bibles (Score:2)
hotel or motel? (Score:3, Funny)
Forget space stations (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yeah, (Score:3, Interesting)
Inflatable space station? (Score:3, Funny)
still a long way to go (Score:5, Insightful)
The good news though is that some companies do have a business plan for how to get from here to there in incremental, low risk, steps, and while making a profit along the way. XCOR, for example, has such a plan, financing later development with suborbital tourist flights and a few small satellite launches and sounding rocket replacement flights.
Scaled Composites may well have such a plan, though they haven't said yet what it is. But a story in today's Dominion Post (Wellington, NZ) originally from the Washington Post) [washingtonpost.com] (free registration required) quotes Burt Rutan as saying that suborbital flights are likely to start at US$30k - US$50k and drop to US$8k - US$12k in a second generation vehicle. That's a) a lot lower than the US$98k Space Adventures is planning to sell XCORs initial flights for, and b) indication that Scaled do in fact have an ongoing plan (d'oh).
Jokes aside (Score:5, Interesting)
Transhab had to deal with the problem of micrometerite impacts same as any manned space structure. Not to mention once you deal with much besides a micrometeorite it dosn't matter what the building material is.
On the positive side this could be a serious boost to private space ventures. This guy wants a 3/4 hab up next year ? Falcon V can boost 4000kg+ to Stations orbit for 12 million if all goes well.
http://www.spacex.com/index.html?section=falcon
If they make this work then in short order they could have a station with more inhabitable volume than ISS for a fraction of the cost.
Re:Jokes aside (Score:5, Insightful)
If they make this work then in short order they could have a station with more inhabitable volume than ISS for a fraction of the cost.
That's great, but how are you going to get people to your new station?
To put people into space you have to send them up on a man rated launcher. The only people with those right now are NASA [nasa.gov], RKA (Russia) and CNSA [cnsa.gov.cn] (China). There are no private launchers capable of putting people into orbit and won't be for a considerable amount of time.
Al.Re:Jokes aside (Score:5, Insightful)
You may or may not have been noticed, but NASA does not have the capability of putting humans on orbit in 2004. Its doubtful that they will have this capability in 2005.
Even worse, US government organizations, like NASA, are not allowed to purchase a seat for their astronauts on Soyuz, and i doubt that Shenzou seats are for sale at the moment.
Re:Jokes aside (Score:5, Funny)
I hate to burst your bubble, but I think you're full of hot air. Costs will balloon, profits will float away, and resources will be stretched too tight. Greenspan is predicting renewed inflation, which will cause investors to gasp for breath. I expect this project to be strung along until it hits a snag, then its finished.
A copy of the announcement (Score:2, Funny)
Embarassing... (Score:4, Funny)
Disappointment runs rampant!
it could work... (Score:5, Interesting)
Space, for the most part is an empty environment. Once in space, the aerodynamics of the craft don't matter much. We have very strong synthetic fibers, make huge kevlar-like inflated bubbles. Big enough to dissipate the energy, or deflect the object. Use honeycomb like layers, and it could probably be made from replaceable pieces, in the (I'm thinking, unlikely) event of a puncture.
It would have to be assembled in space, and even large enough to encompase the craft to get to, and for use on the planet surface.
If your going to go anywhere REALLY far away....wear a bubble!
X prize winners don't go into orbit (Score:5, Insightful)
After someone wins the X prize they will be back on the ground very soon, because the X prize is just for 100km altitude, not entering orbit. Entering orbit is very much harder (8 km/s delta-V instead of about 1 km/s). I dare say there will be follow-on competitions (such as the X Prize Cup) but it'll be quite a while before a privately-developed launcher makes it to orbit.
Cheap is good..... (Score:2, Funny)
Sounds more like a space Youth Hostel!
Bring a sleep sack and a TOWEL!
Lair (Score:2, Funny)
Might make sense (Score:2)
Re:Might make sense (Score:2, Interesting)
Hell, if a rubberized foam could be used there's a chance an impacting item wouldn't actually do so much damage. Of course if it's counter-orbiting even battleship plate's gonna seem fairly flimsy...
Nope (Score:3, Informative)
Obligatory (Score:3, Funny)
No, I'm not. But I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. Hey, do you know where I can find a subway? I sure am hungry.
To stay with the theme (Score:2, Funny)
Robert Bigelo : inflatable Gigolo
First my girlfriend.... (Score:5, Funny)
No subject worthy (Score:3, Funny)
Reclusive millionaire and motel tycoon Robert Bigelow.....
Male jigalo? [imdb.com]
Sue me, it rhymes.
Since we all know what the only profitabe (Score:3, Funny)
And will they ship two, or prvide a hermaphoradite to save launch mass?
Inflatable Space Ships (Score:2, Funny)
Inflatable space stations will go nicely with inflatable space ships:
Is air the answer to space?
Anyone else think... (Score:4, Funny)
Contract with the Gideon Bible (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually hotels sign contracts for the Gideon Bible. I would imagine Budget Suites/Bigelow Properties is under this contract.
The author of the slashdot post may not enjoy reading the Bible, the editor that didn't remove the blatant phishing comment may not enjoy reading the Bible, but there are those of us who do read. Even if it is for diversity rather than spiriutual growth.
I mean honestly, you are either going to have to take some reading material or a gameboy - you're not going to be able to go out on the beach for a stroll or to get a picture with Mickey.
Re:Contract with the Gideon Bible (Score:5, Funny)
I read the Bible for the sex and violence, myself.
Radiation? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Radiation? (Score:4, Interesting)
DEMRON (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Radiation? (Score:3, Informative)
Sunuvabitch, but where I couldn't find it the last time I looked, this time it came up as Google hit #1.
Claims for Demron unsupported (Score:3, Informative)
Until the results have been independentl
Re:Radiation? (Score:3, Interesting)
As I recall (I'm mostly an airplane guy, though I Am a Rocket Scientist), outside the Belt, radiation shielding isn't assured, anyway--it would make the craft far too heavy to launch. The trans-lunar Apollo missions, for example--if a solar flare came along at a bad time, those guys were toast. Sure, they could orient the craft to put as much of it be
One word: (Score:4, Funny)
Rich Guy Accomplishments (Score:3, Funny)
Branson just crossed the channel in a car and GHWB just jumped out of a plane, so I guess the other billionaires are feeling somewhat inadequate.
I say let's see more of this, perhaps as a new reality TV show. Except with middle managers and annointed CEOs doing the dangerous stuff with outsourced safety checking.
Hotel Room Bibles (Score:3, Funny)
VIII. Thou shalt not steal.
Did you READ it, or just steal it?
Bigelow = genius (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been looking over the Bigelow patents on USPTO site. Check out "inflatable satelite", "...thermal management" and "spacecraft sleeping berth" for some of the things they have been working on. The most revolutionary item so far seems to be building an inflatable Transhab-type module, but putting the solid core to the edge of the inflated cylinder. The core has two sets of fold-out floor panels that form two floors, plus the core has a vac-safe section. If there is a puncture, the crew can seal it up and evacuate into another section of their station.
Bigelow on USPTO.gov [uspto.gov]
start saving those frequent-flyer miles,
Josh
"Bubbles in the Sky" (Poul Anderson?) (Score:3, Interesting)
The inflatables were made of a multi-layer plastic that healed itself rapidly - if you sliced it with a knife (not easy, but doable), you could watch it "zip" itself back together. (This might be doable using a form of nanotech molecular design.) So, if a micrometeor struck, it would punch holes in several layers, but the cells where air was lost would collapse together, effectively sealing themselves while they healed.
As these squatters became more self-reliant, officialdom tried to get rid of them, of course. In case someone wants to read the book, I'll not reveal what happens.
I've looked online for this book but haven't had any success.
Inflatable Golden Arches (Score:3, Funny)
Risk of Puncture? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who needs Bibles? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Living in a bubble (Score:5, Informative)
Source [space.com]
There is quite a bit of info out there about the Transhabs, NASA are taking this quite seriously.
Re:Living in a bubble (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Living in a bubble (Score:5, Informative)
Pic 1 [gatech.edu]
Pic 2 [marcopolo-education.org]
Re:inflate them with what? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:inflate them with what? (Score:3, Informative)
Of course, they still have to fill the thing with air to breathe, so I'm sure they can manage to carry up a little bit more to actually inflate it.
Re:inflate them with what? (Score:4, Funny)
Ah, the atmosphere.
In related news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Fancy daydreaming (Score:3, Interesting)
They have stayed in the background for some time now, and if they are making a move, it is something that you should pay very strong attention to. It also means that sever