Cassini-Huygens Reaches Phoebe 178
Anonymous Explorer writes "The Cassini-Huygens
probe is set to fly by the largest outer Saturn moon of Phoebe today. Cassini will be roughly 2000 km from the surface of Phoebe at 1:56 Pacific time Friday, June 11. Thats
pretty darn close. The newest
images of Phoebe are already thousands of times better than the previous ones taken by the Voyager
2 mission in 1981. Phoebe is interesting in that it maintains a retrograde orbit around Saturn. This has lead to the hypothesis that it is an ancient asteroid that has been captured by the gravitational pull from Saturn. Phoebe may provide some important insights into the composition of early building blocks of our planets. Phoebe was discovered in 1898 by American astronomer William
Pickering. As always, discussion about this mission can be found at
#cassini on irc.freenode.net."
For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:5, Funny)
I use GIS quite a lot and didn't know that geographical information systems had anything to do with space exploration or Lisa Kudrow. To think all this time all I've been doing with my GIS is mapping and spatial analysis.
I'll have to fire up ArcView and try out these new features you describe...
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:1)
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:3, Interesting)
Just out of interest, how is the second word pronounced ?...
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:2)
Incorrectly?
A Google search for "huygens pronounced" returns the following options:
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:2, Informative)
Just out of interest, how is the second word pronounced ?...
Roughly: Hoy-ginz. We got a pair of servers in a few months ago, named them Cassini and Huygens. First thing we had to do was look that up exactly that.
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:2)
plenty (Score:1, Offtopic)
A little more on Retrograde (Score:5, Informative)
Re:A little more on Retrograde (Score:2)
Re:For those of us who aren't astrophysicists. (Score:2)
Parking (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Parking (Score:1)
Re:Parking (Score:3, Funny)
Come on, it's funny on Fark.
Re:Parking (Score:3, Funny)
"That's no moon... it's a captured carbonaceous asteroid."
Wow (Score:5, Interesting)
you set yourself up (Score:5, Funny)
Re:you set yourself up (Score:5, Funny)
Re:you set yourself up (Score:2)
Re:you set yourself up (Score:2)
Re:you set yourself up (Score:2, Funny)
No, he said "well regulated" :-)
Re:you set yourself up (Score:5, Funny)
Something always gets lost in translation. That's what's hard to understand. For instance, here's the original:
YOU SET YOURSELF UP.
ALL THESE WORLDS ARE BELONG TO YOU EXCEPT EUROPA.
YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO LAND THERE MAKE YOUR TIME.
Re:you set yourself up (Score:2)
Wrong moon, wrong Planet...
Re:you set yourself up (Score:2)
"I really hope I get to see the Europa landings in my lifetime."
Use Celestia to preview the image quality (Score:5, Informative)
If you want to get an idea of just how high res pictures they're going to get, do the following:
1) Download the program "Celestia". Build and run it.
2) While it is building, pull up the last picture that Cassini took of Phoebe.
3) When Celestia comes up, full screen it.
4) Go into the configuration and tell it to include full details. Exit the configuration menu.
5) Press enter, and type in "Phoebe". Press enter.
6) Press 'g' to go to Phoebe (note: Phoebe is currently false-texture in Celestia, since we don't know much about it)
7) Middle click and hold down, and drag the mouse until you're at a distance of 658,000 kilometers.
8) Press ctrl-'+' to zoom, until the resolution of Phoebe that you're seing on the screen is about the same as that in the NASA picture (note: resolution, not size. The nasa picture is enlarged).
9) Without changing the zoom, hold middle click againa nd drag the mouse until the distance is 2,000 kilometers.
10) Hold down shift, and use the arrow keys to look around. That's the sort of resolution images that they should be able to get.
Impressive, isn't it? I can't wait!
Re:Use Celestia to preview the image quality (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:2)
Re:You're a typical Slashbot dumbass. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:You're a typical Slashbot dumbass. (Score:3, Insightful)
Space research is truly the last frontier. The knowledge derived from it lifts all humanity even if only from the perspective of giving us a glimpse into what all of us alive today will never see. Once a spacecraft leaves our planet it become research in it's purest form.
Fixing
More about Phoebe (Score:5, Informative)
Phoebe [wikipedia.org]
Cassini-Huygens [wikipedia.org]
Re:More about Phoebe (Score:1)
Another good link [frii.com] about Phoebe. It should be noted that the satellite is transmitting blurry images of the moon sitting on a couch and drinking coffee while uttering words of wisdom which, at first glance, seem stupid. It also seems eerily older than the rest of the moons.
Re:More about Phoebe (Score:2)
Gradient Shading.. (Score:2, Funny)
mmm gradient shading
When it's actually arriving (Score:4, Insightful)
Having scoured the web sites --- it's actually quite hard to find the information --- the probe is doing the close flyby at 2056 UTC (i.e. about two and a half hours from now). Assuming I've got the daylight saving compensation right, of course...
Re:When it's actually arriving (Score:2)
Re:When it's actually arriving (Score:1, Flamebait)
No, I hadn't... but it still doesn't help. The website won't let me pick a timezone, it wants me to pick a city --- and I don't know where the hell PST is!
I did make a wild stab and fed in Los Angeles, being the only west-coast city I know in the US, and it came out the same, so I am reassured.
Seriously, guys, if you're talking to a world audience it's so much more convenient if you use UTC. Everyone knows how to convert UTC to and from their local time; it's con
Re:When it's actually arriving (Score:2)
Re:When it's actually arriving (Score:1, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Never installed Linux (Score:1)
Of course, if you're like me, you ignored it and had your computer watch running 9 hours ahead of your system clock...
But yeah, PST = Pacific Standard Time. So try looking for a city on the pacific (YellowKnive, Vancouer, Seattle, Portland, LA, San Fran, and Tijunana are all common choices i think). Also, the one refers to 01 as there is no pm or am used you can assume its 24 hour time
Re:When it's actually arriving (Score:2)
-> Type: date -u
This shows the current UTC time.
-> Now that you know what the UTC time is, figure out how many hours off you are and baddabingbaddaboom, you know how to covert UTC to localtime. I suppose I could post a shell script but I am too lazy.
When you send a probe to a ringed gas giant (Score:5, Funny)
Damn you Europeans! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Damn you Europeans! (Score:2)
1001/010100 (9:22 PM, Eastern European Daylight Time)
Re:Damn you Europeans! (Score:2)
NO, 9:20! Gorram it there goes my geekiness
Re:Damn you Europeans! (Score:2)
And now I'm just going stupid. I'll go crawl under a rock.
Re:When it's actually arriving (indeed) (Score:4, Interesting)
Sorry to confuse the issue even more, but since the probe is 80 light minutes from the earth, does that mean that 2056 UTC is when it's actually happening, or is that when we finally find out that it happened 80 minutes in the past?
BTM
Re:When it's actually arriving (indeed) (Score:3, Informative)
Re:When it's actually arriving (indeed) (Score:2)
Re:When it's actually arriving (indeed) (Score:2)
The flyby happened around 19:34 UTC Saturn-Time.
Re:When it's actually arriving (Score:3, Informative)
It's at 20:56 UTC ERT, the SCET (Spacecraft Event Time) was at 19:34 UTC.
See this link for an explination of the time conventions: http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf2-3.html [nasa.gov]
Actually UTC is damn awful time system because of leap seconds which cannot be predicted. All calculations must use ET (Ephemeris Time) which is almost always SCET. The 'REAL' flyby occured around 19:35 ET, the exact time to be determined from tracking after the flyby.
Time: UTC, TAI, etc. (Score:2)
For the purpose at hand (communicating to humans who live around the world about time to within a minute or two) UTC is just the thing.
Leap seconds are necessary for many purposes because the earth spins at an unpredictable rate, and people (and navigators) like to keep in sync with sunrise, star transits, etc.
You might want to check your own reference about "ET":
It is common to see outdat
Re:Time: UTC, TAI, etc. (Score:2)
Navigators (for spacecraft) don't use UTC, precisely because they want to keep in sync with the actual motion of the planets.
Missions like Cassini ar planned several years in advance (Cassini is planned until 2008). Unfortunately, Cassini is planned in UTC (to sync with the wall clock). If a leap second randomly appears, all of those plans w
Re:Time: UTC, TAI, etc. (Score:2)
Further, those "fixed offsets" do matter in the real world, so it makes sense to promote a single standard designed for avoiding leap seconds. It is really u
Everything is a moon (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Everything is a moon (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Everything is a moon (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What's wrong with you people (Score:2)
Re:Everything is a moon (Score:2, Insightful)
It isn't. It's just more accessable.
KFG
Re:Everything is a moon (Score:4, Informative)
Actually it is [yahoo.com].
It's interesting because it only reflects 6% of the suns light received. According to the article I linked, the darkness could be attributed to carbon and scientists are fairly certain that frozen water is there -- two of the main ingredients for life as we know it, not that they are expecting to find any life there.
Re:Everything is a moon (Score:1)
That's entirely possible. We'll know for sure when we can directly compare samples of each.
Making both equally interesting.
KFG
Re:Everything is a moon (Score:4, Informative)
And the pictures arrive when? (Score:1)
Re:And the pictures arrive when? (Score:2)
Re:And the pictures arrive when? (Score:1)
I meant that I can't reach the website to find out when the pictures will be posted somewhere. Does anyone have that information?
Inability to post in understandable language is the Friday effect
Re:And the pictures arrive when? (Score:3, Informative)
After that they will take some time to process, but when they are released they will either be at www.ciclops.org or saturn.jpl.nasa.gov.
Privatize Space? (Score:1)
Re:Privatize Space? (Score:2)
See X-prize.
Not Point, At This Point (Score:5, Insightful)
1. Privatize Space Exploration
2. ????
3. Profit!!
Right now there is little to no incentive for a company like Lockhead-Martin to build system to land people on the moon and build a moonbase. Science is a terrible profit motive unless you can find practicle applications. And since we know the moon isn't made of cheese (which you can sell) or littered with diamons the size of footballs no company has this burning desire to go into space. Its too costly to make money at it.
So we are stuck with government ventures. I'm glad the US, Russia, and China push these things but I have no illusions about how this works. They are doing it because their is a small bet of prestigue and a good way to spend military for R&D without making it so obvious.
So until you find out that Pheobe is made of 99% gold or Mars has rubies the size of boulders or something else interesting there is little point ot privatizing space over having world governments fund it. Simply put, governments don't care about profits.
I don't... (Score:2)
Everyone forgets step #2. People are going after the X-Prize because the prize itself is profit. The moment that disappears what then? How many people will pay for a 3 seat vehilce t
Re:Not Point, At This Point (Score:3, Insightful)
You find a public/private non-government entity that is willing to buy a moon landing system from LM and I'll conceed the point. Right now, there is no profit in deep space. Period. There is no modivation for investing capital in "noble causes". Its sad but very tru
Re:Privatize Space? (Score:1)
I for one can't wait until we can go out there, where there are no semi-corrupt governments to deal with (yet). I'd just love to take off and explore the galaxy on a ship like the Heart of Gold or something...
Re:Privatize Space? (Score:1)
AFAIK, the closest we will be coming is in 10 days:
http://www.xprize.org/press/release_055.html
I ask because the commercial benefits of space will be, well, out of this world. The human race will actually have something to focus on as opposed to worrying about some silly terrorists all the time.
Anticipation (Score:5, Informative)
The newest images of Phoebe are already thousands of times better than the previous ones taken by the Voyager 2 mission in 1981.
No, but it is hoped they will be. At best, the newest released images are 10x better than Voyager. Expect the high res images later today. You are getting ahead of yourself.
Before being a smart ass... (Score:3, Informative)
There is no DSN tracking pass today, so the high res images won't even be in JPL's hot little hands until tomorrow afternoon.
Captured asteroid? (Score:5, Informative)
Phoebe is actually believed to be a captured Kuiper Belt object (KBO). This means its composition might be very icy/organic, making it more like a non-active comet than an asteroid.
Tough to read... (Score:2)
Weren't you in class the day they told you not to start every sentence with the same word? :-)
At least you didn't start each sentence with "I"...
Where are the RAW Images! (Score:4, Insightful)
I havn't seen any links to such a database for Casinni, but I really hope they set one up soon!
Re:Where are the RAW Images! (Score:2)
I hearby start the call for access to every image! I want to decide whether i'm interested in it or not.
Re:No Different (Score:5, Funny)
If Cassini confirms your theory that Phoebe is a probe, I think that will be a very valuable insight. It will mean there are aliens that were building probes long before us, and they could build probes that are hundreds of miles wide.
Re:No Different (Score:2, Funny)
Like Uranus? -- Sorry.. had to.
Re:No Different (Score:1)
Suffice it to say... (Score:1)
Re:Suffice it to say... (Score:2)
If your name is Eric Cartman, you damned well hope not!
Re:No Different (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Of all the mysteries of earth... (Score:1)
Re:No Different (Score:5, Interesting)
Granted there are never any guarantees, but the Cassini probe is going to be over 1000 times closer than previous probes. You never know what it might discover.
On the contrary (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:No Different (Score:2)
BTW, you don't work for the Alexis de Toqueville Institute, by any chance, do you?
Re:No Different (Score:1)
Re:No Different (Score:5, Insightful)
And yes, it is very possible that something unexpected will be seen. That would indeed give valuable insite. Even if it is just an ordinary hunk of rock, it will still give insight into the composition of other Saturnian moons and what to expect in that region of the solar system. Even as just a simple data point. It is expected that even more will be found, and frankly I look forward to visually exploring this world in a way that nobody until today has been able to see it like.
When the Voyager probes went by Io, there was no hint that it could possibly be showing active volcanoes, or be hinting at the distinct possibilities of seeing liquid oceans on Europa (admittedly buired under ice, but still there). I don't expect such a revelation with Phoebe, but you don't know. Perhaps a black monolith with proportions 1 x 4 x 9?
Re:No Different (Score:1)
Up to a point even seeing what you expect is valuable information.
It was the regularity of the behavior of falling bodies that provided the insight that makes this very mission possible.
KFG
Re:No Different (Score:2)
Nope. They won't find that until Cassini images Iapetus.
Now to see who's read the book.
Re:No Different (Score:2)
Actually, I believe WMAP has given extremely valuable information about the "building" of the Universe. In fact, coupled with other observations (such as those of supernovae), it's helped us narrow down to a very good degree of precision the amount of dark energy and non-baryonic dark matter in the Universe--information that is instrumental in tuning Earth-based experiments that search for neutralinos and/or their
Re:Two objects on the picture (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Looking at newest images of Phoebe... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:All this and more... (Score:2, Funny)
But I was too late.
-sigh-
I hate that show, and am convinced that it only suceeded because it ran after the simpsons.
Re:Question (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Question (Score:2)