Hayabusa Earth Flyby Swings Toward Asteroid 85
An anonymous reader writes "As the first of its kind to return asteroid samples to Earth, the Japanese Hayabusa mission took pictures this week during its successful Earth flyby. Eventually headed to the asteroid belt, the probe will feature a novel sample collection 'horn' which hops around on the asteroid's surface and lands intermittently for only a second at a time. The samples will be dust clouds fired up from repeated bullet impacts, since the asteroid's low gravity makes it difficult to 'land' on. When faced with a similar problem, the European Rosetta mission alternatively will harpoon the surface to hang on while also touching down on another small-mass asteroid."
Obligatory Ninja gaiden reference (Score:4, Funny)
(Note for the people who don't get the reference, Hayabusa was the last name of the Ninja in the Ninja Gaiden games)
Re:Obligatory Ninja gaiden reference (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Ultraman (Score:1)
SOVIET RUSSIA! (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Love Japanese names (Score:1)
Ano sa... I think you're looking for Baka [kanji-a-day.com], not 'Bacha'.
Re:Love Japanese names (Score:1)
Hey, I don't see the name 'Bacha' very often. I assumed it sounded like 'Bah-cha'.
Small procedure shortcut? (Score:5, Funny)
Presumably it'll let go of it before coming back? otherwise it'll be the biggest space sample ever collected.
Re:Small procedure shortcut? (Score:2)
Presumably it'll let go of it before coming back? otherwise it'll be the biggest space sample ever collected.
Since the sample is just asteroid fragments broken off by a bullet, it'll hold on to them.
The worrying mission is ESA's "Rosetta" mission. That one's going to harpoon an entire asteroid.
Re:Small procedure shortcut? (Score:2)
Re:Small procedure shortcut? (Score:2)
Re:Small procedure shortcut? (Score:2)
Yes, but will it make the trip in under 12 parces??
Re:Small procedure shortcut? (Score:1)
Let Go! Let Go! No, don't return home!
Re:I got a bridge for sale... (Score:1)
What? (Score:3, Informative)
According to "Moons and Planets" by W. Hartmann, the total mass of asteroids is 3x10^21 kg, "only about 4% the mass of the moon."
Re:I got a bridge for sale... (Score:2)
But for use on Earth it's way cheaper to dig a hole to get those metals than to launch the equipment to mine the asteroids.
Typical Japansese Tourist! (Score:4, Funny)
Harpoon? (Score:5, Funny)
Just a thought.... (Score:1)
*pop* (Score:2, Funny)
Imagine the looks on the faces of those in control as the asteroid pops like a balloon... :)
oh.. (Score:3, Funny)
Ah well, one can never tell these days...
I love Earth flybys... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I love Earth flybys... (Score:2)
</tongue in cheek>
Re:I love Earth flybys... (Score:1)
Artist's impression (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Yes! (Score:2)
Just wait for the Anime version! (Score:1)
Maybe this article should be under the Anime [slashdot.org] section
Four years for one gram? (Score:4, Funny)
I bet on the street you could get at least 100 bones for that gram rock.
But is it the size of France? (Score:5, Interesting)
The only drawback I see for this project is that it is only going to sample the surface of the asteroid, which is the region most exposed to cosmic radiation, cratering, and accumulated dust. Naturally there is still something to be learned from that, but I hope this is just a prelude to a more advanced mission to bore larger samples from the asteroides. I imagine that the difficulties in doing that come mostly from stabilizing the spacecraft, given that it's likely the asteroids are actually loosely bound collections of the rubble left over from previous collisions. Of course, if they're not, that would be interesting too.
And slightly off topic - I think this comparison is funny:
The material in the belt
Exactly how do you compare a large, roughly spherical mass to "the size of Alaska"? Maybe they mean the surface area is the same? The surface area of Alaska is about 1.5 million km-squared; the surface area of Ceres, the largest asteroid, is about 11 million km-squared - that's more like the total area of the US (9.6 million km-squared)!
Or maybe they meant to compare the radii? If Alaska were circular, it would have a radius of 690 km. The radius of Ceres is 466 km. Interestingly, a better comparison in this case would be the size of France (effective radius of 420 km), and France is of course the international standard for measuring astronomical objects... Did you know that the base of Olympus Mons is also about the size of France?
Re:But is it the size of France? (Score:1)
Wouldn't that be disappointing: spend hundreds of millions of dollars only to find out that you have stuff that is identical to meteorites.
Many meterorites were once asteroids that got smashed up in collisions.
But even if so, I suppose it is a better way to waste money than a futile war in Iraq. *duck*
Re:But is it the size of France? (Score:1)
Its another theory proven or disproven, all of which advances our knowledge of the universe.
Re:But is it the size of France? (Score:1)
Re:But is it the size of France? (Score:2)
This is not the first time this type of analogy is made... like in Armageddon the President is told that the rock is the "size of Texas". The president understands this as opposed to something specified in square kilometers.
I envision just a simple projection... if you dug down the rock halfway in Alaska/ Texas the borders of the rock and the state would roughly coincide. Actuyally I think it is a pretty useful measure - I
Re:But is it the size of France? (Score:3, Interesting)
I also noticed it because the tendancy of science writers to compare large things with "the size of France" has become a running joke [sciam.com]. In addition to the Olympus Mons example, you might be interested to know that the Ross Ice Shelf [vims.edu] (the largest ice
France by Alaska (Score:2)
Bad Movie (Score:1)
When faced with a similar problem, the European Rosetta mission alternatively will harpoon the surface to hang on while also touching down on another small-mass asteroid.
This gives me a mental image of the scene in Mission to Mars, where the crew snagged the satellite that was conveniently in orbit around Mars (and crash-landed it to the surface). Although not an identical scenario, this really is the stuff of sci-fi movies, in this particular case.
I call BS! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I call BS! (Score:2)
Come on, you remember that day when is was light all around the world don't you?
Re:I call BS! (Score:2)
I for one... (Score:1)
Bullets & Harpoons in Space? (Score:5, Funny)
-NOW- who's weaponizing space? Looks like the Japanese and Europeans. This is a threat to our national security! We have a space harpoon capability gap! Mr.President, we recommend making a space harpoon that is two times bigger than the european's space harpoon... to deter them from attacking more asteroids.
"Scratching the surface" (Score:3, Interesting)
While this is an improvement, it still only scratches the surface as it will only bring back "up to one gram of material". Also, consider that the gram of material is from the very surface of the asteroid, which is most likely contaminated by other collisions. Still quite an accomplishment if they can recover the material in 2007 as predicted.
Uh, oh (Score:2, Funny)
Mission to Earth (Score:2, Funny)
Scientist 1: "Hmmmm. There are beings on that blue planet."
Scientist 2: "What are they doing?"
Scientist 1: "Let's see. One female is dragging around a naked male on a pet leash in the middle of a war."
Scientist: 3: "I suggest we abort this mission and leave them alone before they find out about us and come here."
Scientists in unison: "Agreed! Abort."
That's Funny... (Score:2)
But hey, if it pleases you to assume that all alien researchers are stupid fucking idiots, who am I to disagree?
Re:That's Funny... (Score:4, Interesting)
Now, since you assume that aliens, if there are any (personally I think there probably are) are not "stupid fucking idiots" then you would also have to assume that they have means of intercepting signals on one of the most simple forms of transmission available.
Which means, for as long as the waves make it through space, anyone who gets the signal, decodes it, watches it, or listens to it and eventually understands it will hear Howard Stearn, Talk radio, really bad music, some really good music, several episodes of law and order a day, war movies, disaster movies, murder mysteries, violence in all formes of transmitted media, news feeds from war zones, news feeds from disaster zones, crime scenes, etc etc etc.
How could they NOT get a very bad picture of earth, just by observing our inadvertant transmissions?
And again, we ARE talking about a completely alien culture. For all they know, Independence Day was a documentary, showing that Earth will destroy anyone who attacks it from space. Or perhaps the War of the Worlds film will show them that if they land here, they will die of disease. Or worse.
Maybe they will see "Day after Tomorrow" and decide that since the earth is now under hundreds of feet of ice and snow, we will be easy pickings.
Then again, they may get wireless or satellite internet access, read slashdot, and fear the
Oddworld... (Score:2)
Hayabusa Confusion (Score:4, Funny)
A Space Hayabusa [hallert.net]
Please? I'd hate to be the only dork out there....
Wow! (Score:1, Funny)
Erm, Bullets and laws of inertia.... (Score:1)
What happens when the probe is pushed back from the recoil?
Re:Erm, Bullets and laws of inertia.... (Score:1)
erm (Score:2)
are the asteroids in question of sufficient mass so as their orbits won't be effected by harpooning, shooting, and horning (?) them?
What's an asteroid worth? (Score:1)
A large asteroid is basically a several thousand ton chunk of nearly pure iron. Think what that would be worth.
1. Build a space probe.
2. Have space probe guide asteroid into Earth orbit.
3. Safely bring asteroid down to Earth's surface.
4. Sell asteroid to local scrap iron dealer for $50/ton.
5. Profit!!
The best part would be watching the rednecks at the scrap yard trying to fit the asteroid into the car crusher. Implementation of the first three steps is left as an exercise to the read
Obligatory ST Reference (Score:1)
Specifically... (Score:4, Interesting)
Hayabusa, which is Japanese for "falcon",...
Specifically, a peregrine falcon [extremescience.com], which is the fastest animal in the world. It can reach speeds of 440 kph (275 mph) when diving for its prey. This also accounts for the name of the fastest road bike in the world, the Suzuki Hayabusa [suzukicycles.com]. Impressive stuff...
Re:Specifically... (Score:2)
Re:Specifically... (Score:1)
AFAIK, the Suzuki can't do 275mph either !