Second Opportunity For Mars Rover 84
An anonymous reader writes "The Mars Opportunity rover faces a challenging survey around the rim of the stadium-sized Endurance Crater. In addition to what was previously described as the critical choice to go into the steep crater at the risk of not being able to get back out, this "most spectacular view we've seen of the Martian surface" may aid in answering how deep an ancient sea or lake might have been and how long it lasted. Endurance Crater appears much older and thus may pre-date arrival of significant standing water."
Damn (Score:1, Funny)
Well, then its time for me to push the button.
Cant have them snooping around my "lasers" you know.
Better Panorama (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Better Panorama (Score:3, Informative)
I suggest right-clicking the link and saving-as (to your local drive) if you want to give it a look.
And it is amazing, but my computer goes into deep churn for a long while before it finally opens.
Re:Better Panorama (Score:4, Funny)
That's a pretty huge image. Take the full version and zoom around - there's proof martians have advanced technology [danamania.com]
For those of you not aware (Score:5, Informative)
Re:For those of you not aware (Score:1)
Re:Big disappointment (Score:1)
Re:Big disappointment (Score:3, Insightful)
Had it been Oil... (Score:2)
Looks like it could be a job for the "Boys from the Dwarf" and the Jupiter Mining Corporation [reddwarf.co.uk]...
Re:Big disappointment (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Big disappointment (Score:2)
As long as we are a species that exists on one planet only, we are a species that is one errant asteroid or comet away from extinction.
I know this sounds ass backwards, but we need to get colonies setup first, the science can come during and afterwards.
Re:Big disappointment (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm about to go to work, but you can definitely dig around google for evidence, I found a few sites by just typing in CO2 flows.
The overarching goal of the Mars Exploration Rovers was not to determine if there was life on Mars. The goal was to determine if water existed in liquid form in the past. Hematite and cross bedding visible at the Opportunity landing site finally gave us the conclusive answer we needed.
Now that we know water did exist on the surface of the Red Planet, we can try to tackle new questions such as; Did life ever exist? What happened to the water?
Re:Big disappointment (Score:5, Insightful)
The mission exceeded all it's objectives. I don't understand how that can be considered a disappointment. Detecting life, as discovered by the Viking missions, is not always an easy task. Instead, these two rovers have transformed our understanding of Martian geology, for the first time given unrefutable evidence of water's presence, traversed the greatest distance on any body's surface by an unmanned vehicle, and sent back some damn cool pictures. All for a fraction of what the war in Iraq is costing us as taxpayers.
Finding life may be the "end goal" for public relations, etc., but I'm sure there are plenty of planetary geologists that have found these missions to be among the most important endeavours in the history of unmanned missions.
Audio Recording? (Score:2)
Mars Rover gets us free Shrimp! (Score:5, Funny)
They promised that if NASA found evidence of water on Mars that they would give free Shrimp to the whole country. They followed through! (Now if only Mir had hit that Taco Bell sign...)
Re:Mars Rover gets us free Shrimp! (Score:1)
Re:Mars Rover gets us free Shrimp! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Mars Rover gets us free Shrimp! (Score:1)
Thank you for reminding me, I totally forgot about this.
Re:Mars Rover gets us free Shrimp! (Score:2)
But they wouldn't be Martian Brine Shrimp.
Re:Mars Rover gets us free Shrimp! (Score:1)
Re:Mars Rover gets us free Shrimp! (Score:1)
Don't follow that link - reason below: (Score:1, Informative)
Hmm (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Informative)
Theoretically unlimited -- ah the joys of solar power! :)
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hmm (Score:1)
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Hmm (Score:1)
The thing that kills it first, is the batteries, constantly charging from -150c to 20c will limit it chemically.
The "DUST" theory is so minor its not an issue unless we get batteries lasting 2+years on mars.
Though the rover should still work even with really crap batteries or if they are dead, as long as it gets power from solar
Re:Hmm (Score:2, Interesting)
By setting low expecations, they make themselves look like heroes if they are able to exceed their original mission parameters, and they cover their butts if things turn sour.
I think this is pretty common among technical types, since technology (especially cutting edge tech 100 mil
Thanks... (Score:1, Insightful)
Thanks, but we'll ask actual _rocket scientists_ about rocket science, rather that Joe Ignorant on the internet. But we appreciate the offer!
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
- Keep that noise down will you?
- Not me! Another one of them bloody Rovers!
Intergalactic war, why, you ask?
Is it just me... (Score:2, Troll)
on a hollywood special effects set?
Re:Is it just me... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Is it just me... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Is it just me... (Score:2)
a big space supporter since growing up as a kid with the
moon missions. But I took a look at that picture (blown up
I might add) and it just.. well.. perhaps its the lens they
use just makes the scale not look right, and it does rendered
in spots as you have said.
You lied about your weight... (Score:5, Interesting)
On a more serious note, the logistics of firing and using a grappling hook are far outside the realm of 'faster, better, cheaper' methods. Simple is where it's at, and Rube Goldberg devices to pull the rover out of pits are not on the menu.
I do hope they choose to go down... I wanna see what that ripply stuff at the bottom of the crater is made out of.
Re:You lied about your weight... (Score:2)
I suspect that it's just wind-blown sand/dust. I also suspect that the guys at NASA suspect that, and are aren't particularly interested in it. I also suspect that they'll specifically avoid going that far down into the crater because that stuff looks real easy to get stuck in.
Re:You lied about your weight... (Score:2)
Certainly not. Heath Robinson already owns the patents on such devices.
The plane (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The plane (Score:1)
interesting formations (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:interesting formations (Score:5, Informative)
Most definately wind. Those are essentially small sand dunes. A small body of water doesn't have enough surface area to get wave formations like that.
Re:Fake (Score:1, Interesting)
on slahdot you can be branded troll for pointing out something. I once saw a picture on the MSSS site that looked like an entire area was replaced with "dunes". First, the dunes all looked alike including the size, shape and even the same little erosion lines running from the peak... all of them, some thirty or so were right next to one another so it was hard not to notice how similar they were...they were pasted copies of the same "dune". What was being hidden? we will never know but I have seen
Re:Fake (Score:2)
If the crater is the size of a stadium... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:If the crater is the size of a stadium... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:If the crater is the size of a stadium... (Score:2)
Re:You can just see the huge letters already (Score:2)
Well, if I get to deal out mod points I prefer to hand out + points, apart from the rare "overrated" if someone's really gotten too much mod on for example an extremely biased/shaky (think near-troll) view on the subject.
Read this: I was clearly making a JOKE. With so few comments it does make one wonder how 'Redundant' that is. Perhaps I insulted a right wing baggy with patches on it (yes a patch literally means a band-aid talk abou
Expected Mars Rover sequence (Score:4, Funny)
Houston: Receiving data.
MR: *beep* FOUND SCATTERED ARTIFACTS
Houston: (operators go quiet) Zoom in on the artifacts, Mars Rover.
MR: *bzt* REGULAR GEOMETRIC FORMS FOUND. SIZE NO LARGER THAN 5" RESEMBLING FRAGMENTS OF METALS
Houston: Ah, that's the Beagle, Mars Rover, continue.
MR: *bip*
Any cunning linguists out there ? (Score:3, Interesting)
Or is it Russian ?