Free MIT Engineering Text For Download 207
An anonymous reader writes " The (sci-tech) Library Question is reporting, "The third edition of A Heat Transfer Textbook, written by John H Lienhard V (MIT) and John H Lienhard IV (U Houston), has been made available on the web. The book is an introduction to heat transfer, geared towards engineering students. It may be downloaded free of charge. The authors explain:
We are placing a mechanical engineering textbook into an electronic format for worldwide, no-charge distribution. The aim of this effort is to explore the possibilities of placing textbooks online -- effectively giving them away. Two potential benefits should accrue from doing this. First, in electronic format, textbooks can be continually corrected and updated, without the delays inherent in printed books (second and later editions are typically published on a five-year cycle). Second, free textbooks hold the potential for fundamentally altering the economics of higher education, particularly in those environments where money is scarce."
Here are some more free books (Score:4, Informative)
More Free eBooks (Score:5, Informative)
Dedekind library (Score:1, Informative)
http://books.pdox.net/
Wikibooks (Score:5, Informative)
I'm not involved in running Wikibooks, I just use it and contribute to it, and I think it's a great project worth spreading the word about; plus, the more people contribute to it, the better it is.
Re:When can we start (Score:3, Informative)
(Keeping it short cuz I posted about it in a new thread).
Re:posting textbooks (Score:5, Informative)
He has submitted a related story [slashdot.org] on Slashdot before.
The Engines of Our Ingenuity (Score:3, Informative)
The Academic System (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Noble Effort (Score:3, Informative)
According to this Professor: [sa2.info]"A typical [College] textbook earns the author less than $3,000 over a five-year or longer period." That's not a lot of money we're talking about. It could be funded in a number of different ways. We could have featured sponsors, student micropaiments, and paypal donations.
While the Open Source community can survive off the valiant efforts of thousands of coders worldwide, the number of individuals in higher academia qualified to write textbooks is much more limited.
Yes, but we don't need that many books in the first place. If the authors adopt the open source model and allow others to contribute to or take what they need from their work, then the same book won't have to be rewritten from scratch by a thousand different authors.
I just can't envision a scenario where this kind of approach is sustainable in a long-term or wide-reaching context. Thoughts?
This approach is sustainable. It won't replace dead-tree college textbooks, that's for sure, but at least it will be a viable alternative for some students and some poorer countries.
Re:posting textbooks (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Incentive (Score:3, Informative)
With this system, nobody would have to write textbooks at all any more. All the material would already be written, but in a constant state of peer review and revision by people who have an interest in making it better. There would be no point in writing a "new" textbook; simply revising the open textbook to suit your needs would be much easier and would result in a better end product since the open textbook would be high quality starting material.
See The Website www.uh.edu/engines !!! (Score:1, Informative)
More info on MIT's Intermediate Heat XFer Course (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Great idea, let's expand it. (Score:1, Informative)
Where did you get this idea? From a cereal box? There are
no price controls in the UK. I know that doesn't fit the lower
taxes blah blah agenda you were pushing, but it's a fact.
Re:Great idea, let's expand it. (Score:2, Informative)
I earn 60.000 UKP a year (about 105.000 USD). Way over the average, and hence pay significantly more taxes than the average person in the UK.
My tax rate PLUS national health insurance ends up at 32%. Note that you don't really need extra health insurance in the UK, as the NHS (the government operated National Health Service) is actually good enough.
Despite that my employer does cover an additional health insurance, but if I'd pay that myself, it would have been only 200 UKP a year for me AND my wife, as most health insurance in the UK only covers specialist treatment and treatments where the NHS queues are "too long" (that is, if I need an operation and can't get it immediately through the NHS, I can go get it done at a private hospital).
Now, lets look at federal income tax in the US for my income level (note: numbers from 2001, I couldn't bother spending much time on this):
Base tax: $13,708 + 30% of amount over $63,550. Which adds up to $13,708 + $12435 = $26143. 24.9%.
However, 32% was inclusive of health insurance, and the only additional amount is a council (county) tax equivalent to property/land tax (it is based on the value of your property.
If I add that to my UK tax amount, I'm up to 34.5%, all inclusive, with sufficient health insurance.
Now, for most US states, with an income like mine, I'd be paying between 4% and 8% state income tax.
That brings my US taxes up to 28.9% - 32.9%.
US county and property taxes wary wildly, but it would not be unusual for it to end up at 2-3% of income, as plenty of counties have property taxes in the 2-3% of assessed property value, and given that market property value is often 2-3 times salary or more, it wouldn't take much for assessed property value to be that high. I'm not even including other county taxes that are baked into the UK council tax (which I added to the UK number of 34.5%).
Let's say the likely range for property and county taxes is 1%-4% of gross income. This brings my likely US tax up to 29.9% - 36.9%. The high end is already above my UK tax, and my UK tax includes full health insurance
How is that for "astronomically higher"?
Re:Here are some more free books (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Good Idea (Score:2, Informative)
Re:posting textbooks (Score:3, Informative)
It's just a matter of time before public educational institutions at the K-12 and university level (in addition to many private educational institutions)procure all or most of their curriculum materials this way.
American public educational institutions spend several billions of tax dollars per year for textbooks - required by every public school, most private schools, many home schools, and public universities.
Added to this cost is the fact that university and K-12 textbooks have risen at three times the rate of inflation since 1992. In California alone, the annual cost for K-12 textbooks is more than $400M per year.
The textbook industry began its climb to prominence in the 1950's and 60's's, as Baby Boomers entered private and public educational institutions in unpecedented numbers. There was a real need for mass produced educational materials, and commercial textbook publishers filled the demand.
As enrollment in educational institutions continued to increase, commercial educational publishers gradually became the default suppliers of text-based educational materials.
Realizing that they had a near monopoly on the educational publishing market, commercial publishers began to raise prices and force "new editions" of classic textbooks into the market to compell new purchases, and defeat the used textbook market. As a result, textbook prices have risen precipitously; it's not unusual for a high school textbook to approach $100, or more. It's often the case that college textbooks exceed that amount.
Continued dependence on commercial publishers for basic textbooks has led to a "fox is living in the henhouse" situation. As a result, massive diseconomies and inefficiencies have been introduced to the academic textbook market.
We now live in a time where most consumers can walk into their neighborhood bookstore and purchase a 10th-grade level book on Euclidean Geometry for $10-15. Yet, the same curriculum material, embellished for a 10th-grade school district, can cast upwards of $100, often in addition to the purchase of required ancillary materials (teacher's guides, study guides, lab tapes, etc.).
The above example is repeated in many classical mathematical - and other - disciplines at the university level.
Until recently, short of requiring every teacher (or school district) to write its own textbooks, nothing could be done about this costly situation.
With the advent of new Internet technologies and intellectual property licensing innovations it is now possible to create free, high-quality, distributed banks of educational content. This content can published and distributed for far less than similar materials provided by commercial publishers.
Here is a listing of some well-known open source educational projects
Some new current open source content projects are as follows:
California Open Source Textbook Project (COSTP)(conducting pilot projects)
http://www.opensourcetext.org
Wikipedia World History Project (a beginning K-12 pilot inspired by COSTP and based on strict California State surriculum standards)
http://wikibooks.org/wiki/World_Histor y_Project
MIT's OpenCourseWare project (a university-based open curriculum project)
http://ocw.mit.edu/index.html
There is a burgeoning movement to create "open source" educational content banks, from which insitutional (even individual) users can select - and publish - content about virtually *any* educational topic. These content resevoirs will be constructed to meet the most demanding curriculum frameworks, at all levels of curriculum instruction.
The open educational content movement makes sense because the bulk of formal educational content - i.e. the content that is delivered to student by educational ins
Re:posting textbooks (Score:2, Informative)