Rare South Atlantic Hurricane Heads Toward Brazil 52
jellisky writes "An unprecendented sort of weather event has been occuring recently, without much fanfare at all. A tropical cyclone in the south Atlantic is slowly drifting toward Brazil. The southern Atlantic ocean isn't exactly a hurricane hotbed, as pointed out by National Hurricane Center forecaster Jack Beven, "We know there hasn't been a hurricane in that area since at least the satellite era, the mid-60s at the minimum." The storm is a small one, though, but has estimated winds near minimal hurricane strength (74-95 mph). It's quite an interesting sight, perfect for piquing the weather curiousity that many of us have."
Re:salsa (Score:2)
Better picture of it here... (Score:5, Informative)
better how? (Score:3, Informative)
Thanks! (Score:2)
~UP
Re:Better picture of it here... (Score:5, Informative)
Incredible resolution!
hurricanes in California (Score:4, Interesting)
It didn't do a whole lot of damage; many areas get 80-90mph Santa Ana winds occasionally.
Interesting? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Interesting? (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh, but I think that's what makes them so interesting though... The more we know about these storms (their patterns, forces behind them, etc.), the more we can do to be better prepared for them -- potentially saving people's lives that would otherwise be lost.
Re:Interesting? (Score:1)
How long... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:How long... (Score:2)
Re:How long... (Score:2)
Re:How long... (Score:1)
Re:How long... (Score:1)
I think it's pretty well documented that climate change is occuring (though still, the heteroskedasticity of the data makes this hard to prove). However, the link that's never been made is that our actions are what's
Re:How long... (Score:1)
Historical Occurances (Score:5, Interesting)
This becomes a problem because unlike areas that are used to hurricanes (US, Carribbean, Pacific, Australia, Madagascar) the Brazilians have no experience with tropical systems, so they have no way of knowing what to expect. Having lived through 16 of them (including Betsy in 1965, Camille in 1969 and Andrew in 1992) all I can say is that anyone living in the potential landfall area might want to consider going inland a ways.
A good site to look at is the Naval Research Labs Monterey hurricane page located here:
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html
It lists all of the systems they are following, along with a very good collection of satellite images.
God bless... (Score:1)
-psy
Maybe (Score:5, Interesting)
And, as the article says, Bush thinks Global Warmin is a hoax. Typical.
Re:Maybe (Score:1, Flamebait)
What exactly leads you to think the Pentagon report may be wrong ? Why do you think I am jumping to conclusions bonehead ? I just said it could be the cause.
They said weather changes will come sooner than almost everybody expected.
The fact is that our weather is changing. Can you deny that ?
It's been happening for some years already. Read this, from 1999 [newint.org].
From there, things are getting worse. Islands in the South Pacific abandoned by their residents as their ground water turns salty;
Re:Maybe (Score:2)
Like many conspiracy/doomsday theorists you seem to be taking piecemeal evidence and drawing sweeping conclusions from it.
The report cited by the Guardian was actually a "what if" thought experiment by the US government. It is no different than having epidemiologists saying "what if a bio attack happened, what would the outcome be?". It simply predicts the worst case imaginable so government planners can try do thier jobs. The likelihood of anything
Re:Maybe (Score:2)
We face both increased flooding and increased drought. Extended heat waves, more powerful storms, and other extreme weather events will become more and more common.
The greenhouse gases we've already placed in the atmosphere will continue to warm the planet for many decades if not centuries. Right now, there is about 40 percent more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there was at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The CO2 concentrat
Re:Maybe (Score:1)
It always does. It always has. It's the cause that's in question. That's where you're leaping to conclusions based on hunt-and-peck evidence.
Re:Maybe (Score:2)
The extreme rapid change described in that article brings up my skeptic meter a bit. I really wonder if that report is one of the many disaster case studies that the government does for planning purposes. They do lots of fictional thought-experiments for things like biological attack, what happens if russian scientists sell everything to Iran, etc. Before I believe that article, I would need to see corroberating information.
Re:Maybe (Score:3, Interesting)
Note that I am a believer in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to reduce the likelihood of extreme negative climate change events. However, the Pentagon report should really not be used as an example of mainstream climate science (I believe the authors themselves do not work in the field). And t
Re:Maybe (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.ems.org/climate/pentagon_climatechan
Paraguary? (Score:2)
Atlantic anomalously COOL right now (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Atlantic anomalously COOL right now (Score:4, Insightful)
Global warming is just that - a warming, on average, of the globe.
The fact that the majority of the South Atlantic is cooler than average could reflect any one of a number of causes, one of the most likely of which is a warming of the Antarctic leading to increased melting of the icecap, thus releasing lots of cold water into the South Atlantic.
Looking at the chart, this seems plausible, as the concentration of colder water is away from the continental shelf of South America, and appears to skirt around the South Atlantic islands (notice the finger of yellow / orange sticking out from the coast of Argentina).
Cyclone formation is driven by temperature gradients, rather than average temperature, and the fact that the (normally slightly warmer) water on the continental shelf is warmer than usual, whereas the deepwater areas are colder, leads to the conclusion that the temperature gradient is much higher than usual.
So it's not surprising that a cyclone has formed, and the anomalous temperature gradients are perfectly consistent with global warming.
One thing from the map - I'd love to be in a boat off Namibia right now, watching the dolphins and whales - that extra cold water will be full of food, and it'll be a bumper autumn's fishing all along the South-West coast of Africa.
Re:Atlantic anomalously COOL right now (Score:1)
Re:Atlantic anomalously COOL right now (Score:1)
Cyclone formation is driven by temperature gradients, rather than average temperature, and the fact that the (normally slightly warmer) water on the continental shelf is warmer than usual, whereas the deepwater areas are colder, leads to the conclusion that the temperature gradient is much higher than usual.
However, tropical cyclones result from a vertical temperature gradient - rising warm, moist air over warm water - not a horizontal one.Re:Atlantic anomalously COOL right now (Score:1)
A horizontal temperature gradient, starting from a steady state, will warm the air over the warm water more than the air over the cold, causing the warm air to rise and to suck in the air from the cold end of the gradient.
Coriolis does the rest, causing the incoming air to rotate and form the cyclone.
It is the horizontal gradient in the water that provides the differential heating in the air, and leads to the end result that you claim as a cause.
Re:Atlantic anomalously COOL right now (Score:3, Insightful)
Not to say that you are wrong and this does have anything to do with global warming, just that I think only looking at water temperature is not enough to be conclusive.
s/global warming/climate change (Score:5, Informative)
In any case, most models do not predict large warming of the equatorial band, partially because evaporation over tropical oceans keeps the atmosphere from heating. Of course, this increased evaporation leads to increased latent heat, which is a possible cause of extreme weather.
Having said that, one extreme event does not proof of climate change make. Climate change is about long term trends, not short term weather. If we see more South Atlantic hurricanes over the next decade, then there would be an indication that they could be a result of climate change.
Then we could look for the proximate cause: increased latent heat, ocean temperature patterns, change in winds, salinity changes, all of the above concurrent or consecutive, whatever. Then we would ask, is this change something we would expect from human induced change, eg increased greenhouse gas forcing or aerosols or something else.
Re:Hurricane or Cyclone (Score:2)
Re:Hurricane or Cyclone (Score:5, Informative)
Tropical cyclones with maximum sustained surface winds of less than 17 m/s (34 kt, 39 mph) are called "tropical depressions". (This is not to be confused with the condition mid-latitude people get during a long, cold and grey winter wishing they could be closer to the equator ;-)) Once the tropical cyclone reaches winds of at least 17 m/s they are typically called a "tropical storm" and assigned a name. If winds reach 33 m/s (64 kt, 74 mph)), then they are called: a "hurricane" (the North Atlantic Ocean, the Northeast Pacific Ocean east of the dateline, or the South Pacific Ocean east of 160E); a "typhoon" (the Northwest Pacific Ocean west of the dateline); a "severe tropical cyclone" (the Southwest Pacific Ocean west of 160E or Southeast Indian Ocean east of 90E); a "severe cyclonic storm" (the North Indian Ocean); and a "tropical cyclone" (the Southwest Indian Ocean) (Neumann 1993).
Anti-Hurricane (Score:1)
FAQ on South Atlantic Tropical Events (Score:4, Informative)
Subject: G7) Why doesn't the South Atlantic Ocean experience tropical cyclones?
Though many people might speculate that the sea surface temperatures are too cold, the primary reasons that the South Atlantic Ocean gets no tropical cyclones are that the tropospheric (near surface to 200mb) vertical wind shear is much too strong and there is typically no inter-tropical convergence zone (ITCZ) over the ocean (Gray 1968). Without an ITCZ to provide synoptic vorticity and convergence (i.e. large scale spin and thunderstorm activity) as well as having strong wind shear, it becomes very difficult to nearly impossible to have genesis of tropical cyclones.
However, in rare occasions it may be possible to have tropical cyclones form in the South Atlantic. In McAdie and Rappaport (1991), the US National Hurricane Center documented the occurrence of a strong tropical depression/weak tropical storm that formed off the coast of Congo in mid-April 1991. The storm lasted about five days and drifted toward the west-southwest into the central South Atlantic. So far, there has not been a systematic study as to the conditions that accompanied this rare event.
Details, in brazilian portuguese (Score:2, Informative)
Ciclone Catarina ganha forca e deve atingir Santa Catarina neste domingo
ClicRBS
CBN
RIO - Batizado de Catarina, o ciclone extratropical que se formou a 440 quilometros da costa sul do pais ganhou forca durante a madrugada deste sabado e deve chegar ao continente na madrugada deste domingo, se for mantido este ritmo de deslocamento.
O ciclone, que tem ventos de 118 a 152 quilometros por hora, deve entrar no continente brasileiro entre Itajai, no lit
Babelfish good work (Score:2, Interesting)
Cyclone Catherine gains force and must reach Santa Catarina in this sunday ClicRBS CBN
RIVER - Baptized of Catherine, the extratropical cyclone that if formed the 440 kilometers of the south coast of the country gained force during the dawn of this Saturday and must arrive at the continent in the dawn of this sunday, will have remained this rhythm of displac
Re:Babelfish good work (Score:1)
More Links & Information on the Storm... (Score:5, Informative)
2. Dvorak Source [wisc.edu]
3. CNN's 1st page on it. [cnn.com] 4. CNN's follow-up page on it. [cnn.com]
*. Hats off to the person that beat me to a first post.
Follow-up (Score:1)
The Brazilians dispute "Catarina" isn't a hurricane. But they've never had one before. (shrugs)
Funny. (Score:1)