NASA Develops Tech To Hear Words Not Yet Spoken 466
alex_guy_CA writes "Yahoo News has a story about technology that comes close to reading thoughts not yet spoken, by analyzing nerve commands to the throat. 'A person using the subvocal system thinks of phrases and talks to himself so quietly it cannot be heard, but the tongue and vocal cords do receive speech signals from the brain,' said developer Chuck Jorgensen, of NASA's Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California. Jorgensen's team found that sensors under the chin and one each side of the Adam's apple pick up the brain's commands to the speech organs, allowing the subauditory, or 'silent speech' to be captured. The story indicates the method could be useful on space missions or other difficult working conditions."
sub-vocal communication (Score:5, Interesting)
Way better than text messaging.
Benefit for Stephen Hawking? (Score:5, Interesting)
We are all handicapped. (Score:2, Interesting)
Space travel is trivial in comparison.
Useful if it works... (Score:5, Interesting)
Imagine using voice commands to control your computer remotely - you're on a croweded bus, using your cell phone to connect to your house computer, telling it subvocally to turn on the airconditioning in time for when you get home, to turn on the coffee maker and download some work from the office and a movie for later. And no one hears anything, and the only thing they can see moving is your throat. What about dictating a letter on your way home, or other documents?
What about secret service agents? Or the military? No more needing to talk into their sleeves or using noisy radio to give away their position. You could have the conversation turn up on a pda screen, or have an artifical voice piped into ear phones. How cool would that be?
I'm sure there's lots more stuff you could use this for that I haven't even thought of yet, but I'm betting it is still years away.
Better start practicing (Score:4, Interesting)
Interesting uses... (Score:5, Interesting)
Sports cheating: communicate perfectly to coach when you are not supposed to.
Croc Hunter: sneak up on animals in the wild to research, etc, and communicate with team and not startle animals.
Porn: somehow... someway...
Government: give tech 20 more years and when these signals can be picked up remotely, let FBI tap the signals without a court order because, hey, there is a War On Terror(TM) to fight.
Interrorgation: capture truth someone would have wanted/started to say but then held their tounge at the last second.
Slashdot: this tech + reconition to text + scripting = best chance at first post. Just think about BSD dying, and it's dead!
This scares me (Score:1, Interesting)
A couple implications (Score:5, Interesting)
For instance, you're more likely to simply pick a quarter off the floor than to say, "I am going to pick this quarter off the floor." Whereas, you're very likely to think the sentence, "I should buy some wine on my way home from the market" if that's part of your plans.
Seems to me that this technology could, in short order, discern the verbal sentences we fashion for ourselves as part of our daily thinking. But it won't ever pick up on the million thoughts we have each day that aren't based on words.
If this technology gets deployed, society will have to learn in short order that not every thought is legitimate. My verbalizing the thought to myself, "I am Napoleon" does not necessarily mean that I think I am Napoleon.
One last thought. If we get widespread, cheap deployment of this technology, it will have as big an effect on our lives as the World Wide Web.
hmmm (Score:2, Interesting)
reminds me of this toy (was it a "transformers" toy?) I had when I was a kid. you'd basically talk into this tube (without talking... just form your words) and it'd make the sounds. I guess it worked on pressure differences or something... kids get crappy toys now
Re:Could be dangerous (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:sub-vocal communication (Score:4, Interesting)
cellular phones ! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Could be dangerous (Score:5, Interesting)
Humans right now are trained to keep their mouth shut even when they are thinking, or even talk exactly opposite of what they think. We yet are not used to controlling the previous level, ie subconsciously talking (ever noticed people at bus stops muttering to themselves or even smiling?)
And I think we have done this before. Imagine a non-humanoid alien landing on earth. I am sure he would be surprised that all the humans can actually balance themselves on 2 foot and even run around (They would probably think it a waste trying to balance yourself on a point while crawling is much less brain intensive). And Imagine, these beings can even balance themselves on 2 inch thick wheels around a metre above earth (bicycles).And this technique has no evolutionary basis, almost all the humans learned it within a 100 years or so. Looks like a very adaptable race to me.
Re:A couple implications (Score:3, Interesting)
Who's going to have the first 24/7 subvocal weblog?
Who, extending the webcams, is willing to put every single thought they have, enough to subvocalize, out onto the web?
SubvocalJenny
Jeff
normal speech recognition first (Score:3, Interesting)
Translation: I am making this post using Microsoft's speech recognition. It is obvious that vocalized speech recognition needs a lot of work before subvocal recognition challenges can be considered feasible.
I mean, when with full sound you can't get good dictation, the possibility of eeking it out of throat twitches are fairly low, methinks.
Already in use for years? (Score:1, Interesting)
A good friend of mine gave me this information. Was he just full of it and being a misinforming cock who took advantage of my trust? Or is this really in use today? (And has been since ~2001?)
More Practical Uses (Score:4, Interesting)
Douglas Adams... (Score:2, Interesting)
It's an interesting idea, though. If the FBI/CIA/KGB/MIB get ahold of you and try to interrogate you with this, just start spouting random words, it'll garble the rest of what they're trying to make you think out loud.
Re:I'll take the Fifth - NOT! (Score:3, Interesting)
There must be a perceptible verification of the action. A lot of people are wary of e-voting if there is no paper confirmation of the cast ballot. For legal testimonies, there should be an audible (or written and signed) record of the confession.
New Cell Phone Tech? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Better start practicing (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Could be dangerous (Score:4, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Oh ye of little foresight (Score:3, Interesting)
You know, you say that, but what were to happen if everyone had these on dates?
After an adjustment period, women would get used to the idea of being told, "wow, you have nice tits" when out on a date with someone that finds them attractive. Sure, initially, many (if not most or even virtually all) women would find it less than pleasant, but they already know every guy's secretly thinking it. When every guy starts saying it, well, they'll get used to it. Womankind will adapt.
Probably a harder adjustment for women, though, will be having the doors blown off of their head games. No hard to get, no sadistic toying with guys, no enjoying free stuff without really liking the guy all that much. Of course, at the same time, their brutal honesty would deflate a lot of male egos. Honest opinions about anatomy size, and throwing out fake orgasms, might give men a little more harsh look into the womens' sexuality than they might like. And men have to 'fess up to dating someone just for sex. But men too will adapt. Besides, the men and women that are just looking for sex will be able to find each other more easily - no smokescreens of false affection!
Clearly, this is the next dating revolution.
Re:Could be dangerous (Score:3, Interesting)
Solution for mute people ? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Better start practicing (Score:1, Interesting)
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (Score:2, Interesting)
You'll find a lot of discussion on the web about it. Also, I believe Noam Chomsky has a great deal to say about it.
Forgive my lack of precise knowledge, but this might give you a starting point for further investigation.
Dream content pipeline (Score:2, Interesting)
This goes along with the 'Star Trek:TNG'... (Score:2, Interesting)
Someone was complaining about how silly it was that the Enterprise-D computer would know 'immediately' where to send Captain Picard's voice when he was going to ask for the bridge and why there was an 'immediate' response from Riker, Data or whomever...
This is why!
While the current version might require being connected directly to your head, future versions might 'read' you from afar to be able to anticipate the next words out of your mouth!
Apparently, it seems that you can complain about the impossibility of a Science Fiction show one day and then Slashdot will provide you some answers leading to the technology you griped about previously...
Not a mind reading device (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Could be dangerous (Score:3, Interesting)
There are a number of animals that use tools to complete tasks. Birds hunting for grubs with pointy sticks is a great example. I don't know if this would happen, but if you put such a bird in an enclosure with no pointy sticks but a supply of pointy stick-like objects and used one to catch a grub, there might be an argument for abstract thought. If you offered the bird different grub catching tools and it figured out how to use them, I think you probably have a good case that the bird can abstract the problem and the solution without a real language.
Then, of course, you wonder if the bird has a language or not. They might communicate with each other without a problem, but I doubt they have anything that would pass as a language that supports abstract ideas. But I'm no expert, just guessing.
Oh god, the cheating (Score:4, Interesting)
-Iowa
Invisible Writings (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:sub-vocal communication (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Interesting uses... (Score:1, Interesting)
So, now pr0n babes can talk with their mouth full. Dang, they may have to start memorize lines and take acting lessons.
Re:sub-vocal communication (Score:4, Interesting)
In Earth, wasn't there the added complication of not letting your thoughts wander so far that the computer mistakes idle wool-gathering as command input?
It's really awkward to explain to the cops why your robotic lawnmower was chasing your annoying next door neighbor, or why your dishwasher tried to eat your girlfriend right after you two got into a big fight.