The Power of Sewage 305
Eridanis writes ""The waste you flush down the toilet could one day power the lights in your home. So say researchers at Pennsylvania State University who last week revealed they have developed an electricity generator fuelled by sewage." Hey, it seems that EA will have to create a new building for Simcity!"
Just doin' my part.. (Score:5, Funny)
Let me at it after a night of Fort Garry Dark Ale [fortgarry.com] and I'll power a city of 50,000 for 2 full days.
Re:Just doin' my part.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Just doin' my part.. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Just doin' my part.. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Just doin' my part.. (Score:5, Funny)
Eventually 'Power Diets' (copyrighted by me here and now
Electric Bran Flakes! - the cereal that makes you regular and powers your day!
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Uh. (Score:5, Funny)
America.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:America.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Moderation +1
60% Funny
20% Overrated
10% Flamebait
Extra 'Funny' Modifier 0
My extra karma modifier didn't even bother to take effect! You guys should be ashamed of yourselves.
Re:America.. (Score:4, Funny)
Sen. Kerry? Is that you??
Re:America.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Besides, anyone who can't change their mind after being presented with new information has no place in office.
Re:Nice sig (Score:3, Funny)
Re:America.. (Score:3, Interesting)
United States 146,583.9 kilowatts
India 533,011.5 kilowatts
China 672,571.3 kilowatts
Clearly, China is the all powerful nation
Ha ha, Amerika, your spacious country is dangerously underpopulated! j/k.
Re:America.. (Score:5, Funny)
Reality check (Score:5, Insightful)
You're not going to run even one room light from this. You could use it to keep your cell phone and PDA charged, but you could probably do that just as well with generators in the soles of your shoes and gain mobility in the bargain.
(Yeah, I know everyone's playing this for yucks. You can see me as a wet blanket or a straight man, your choice.)
Re:America.. (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm cheap... (Score:2, Funny)
Well THAT explains... (Score:5, Funny)
Seriously, I went to school there. I thought it was all of the surrounding farmland that contributed to the odor, but this is indeed news to me!
What if.. (Score:5, Funny)
Just ask the neighbors... (Score:2)
Re:What if.. (Score:5, Funny)
Battery recharger? (Score:4, Funny)
EA, eh? (Score:4, Funny)
Or at least have the raw materials for another of their games...
Re:EA, eh? (Score:2)
So much for... (Score:5, Funny)
slightly different approach.... (Score:5, Informative)
Good for farms where lot of animal waste is there
Re:slightly different approach.... (Score:2)
Re:slightly different approach.... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:slightly different approach.... (Score:5, Informative)
You are already moving the sewage around as it is, so that expense is already there. The waste output of the biogas fermener is much safer than the sludge that existing sewage plants produce, and it can be further composted to produce safe, high quality, organic fertilizer.
There are also existing farm [go.com] waste [auri.org] facilities (as was previously discussed here on
The other implication of this technology that is less spoken about is that it decentralizes the source of energy away from the fossil fuel companies and spreads the profits closer to the community where the energy is being produced, either through lower costs for waste treatment, or through direct profit from the sale of the electricity if the facility is privately owned. This means lower costs for energy and lower trade deficit.
It's a winning situation for those who live in communities that take advantage of this, and the only people who lose out are the energy companies.
Yes but... (Score:5, Funny)
Well, yes, but it would be pretty shitty lighting, wouldn't it?
It seems Tom Lehrer was right... (Score:5, Funny)
Electricity from Waste (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Electricity from Waste (Score:5, Informative)
IAAWWE (I am a wastewater Engineer)
Actually most sewage plants have a digester in them (or several).
Most Sewage Treatment Plants that have anaerobic digesters (the kind that produce methane) simply flare the gas off, because the quantity of gas produced doesn't warrant the expense of setting up to re-use it.
Seafield Sewage Works in Edinburgh, Scotland does though. It was completed in 2000. If you fly into Edinburgh airport over the Firth of Forth, you can see a row of six large pink tanks near the docks. These are the digesters at Seafield. (The reasons why they are pink are complex and architectural, not functional).
Bondi STP in Sydney used to re-use methane for generating power the 1960s, but the the technology was primitive, and the sulphides in the gas made the engines expensive to maintain and they were abandoned.
Now in Australia, with green energy credits on offer, many water authorities are having another look at making use of their methane.
Re:Electricity from Waste (Score:5, Funny)
I have often found myself having business lunches and having to change the subject, having realised what we were loudly discussing in a crowded restaurant.
Re:Electricity from Waste (Score:3, Funny)
"Hey baby... EEYYAAAAAWWEEEEHHEEEEE!!"
Re:Electricity from Waste (Score:5, Informative)
During the gas crunch of the 70s digesters popped up all over the place and there was hardly an issue of Mother Earth News that didn't have some new design/application of a digester featured in it showing how you could power your farm/homestead on shitty methane.
There are still thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of digesters scattered across Americas rural areas. Virtually all of them are built by the owners out of scrap materials for nearly nothing.
Perhaps there are only 20 of this expensive commercial variety. A lot of companies like to make money by taking old ideas that people in general have forgotten about, plate them in chrome, and sell them as the latest technology for a premium price.
Go to the library. See if they've got back issues of Mother Earth News from the 70s and 80s. Lots of good digesters ideas in there, although often a bit crudely implimented.
The mere idea of excrement for fuel energy goes back to God only knows how long. It's certainly prehistoric. The Plains Indian relied on Buffalo Chips for fuel, and the Indian Indian still does today.
Latrine Officer was one of the most important posts in Napoleon's army. His job? To retrieve human excrement. It was too valuable an energy source to waste. They used it to be able to make their own gunpowder as they traveled, which is one of the reasons that Napoleon's armies seemed to be able to pull off almost magical feats of translating themselves from one location to another and arrive ready to fight.
Shit is energy. We know that. We've always known that. We've known that that energy can be extracted as natural gases and used to run combustion engines and turn electric generators for over a century. It's news so old it's boring.
It's even a reasonably viable way to go about making energy, if you live on a small farm with lots and lots of animals producing lots and lots of shit you need to do something with.
For city dwelling humans, well, it will never be anything more than a suppliment to other forms of energy. Something you can use because it's there, but nothing to be relied upon.
Why? Well, how much did you shit today? Does that amount of shit convert into the electricity you used?
Not even close.
You'll need a lot of other animals who don't watch TV shitting for you as well. Like on a farm, say.
And nevermind the fact that most of the shit (including human) is more valuable as a fertilizer (which is where much of the treated sewage is going right now) than it is as a fuel, so you're invoking the whole food for fuel argument. It may be better to burn that fuel we can't eat, or use for food production, and eat the fuel we can.
KFG
So that's where it goes... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:So that's where it goes... (Score:3, Informative)
They do ignore waste, such as that found in excrement and the the heat put off by the body, but that's because that waste is of no interest to them.
Nontheless they do manage to get some of the crude details right. Those chart
Re:Electricity from Waste (Score:3, Informative)
The biogas fermenters produce fertilizer as well as gas, and it's much higher in nitrogen content than if it had not been reduced in the fermener.
It's not an either-or proposition.
The using the fuel cells to convert the energy is far more efficeint than burning natural gas. Even the most efficient gas burning plants (gas turbine engines driving alternators for generation) are only 40%-45% efficient (at most 4
In Related News (Score:2, Funny)
SCO stock skyrockets.
bright idea (Score:2, Funny)
BOFH (Score:2, Funny)
Enjoy!
Not with my excrement... (Score:5, Funny)
Eat your bean! (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, great.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Shit Happens, but .... (Score:3, Interesting)
Out to make a buck (Score:4, Funny)
Reminds me of an article in Discover (Score:5, Informative)
The conspiracy theorist within me fears that these types of technologies will not take off because oil companies have so much power.
Re:Reminds me of an article in Discover (Score:4, Interesting)
I thought that plant next to the turkey-processing place was supposed to be running by now..has anybody heard any follow up on that? You'd think it would be bigger news if it was operating as well as they said it would...
Re:Reminds me of an article in Discover (Score:3, Informative)
AFAIK it works, and it works even better for stuf like oil sand, allowing the processing of the petrolium products from the sand which was never possable before.
Plumber = Electrician? (Score:2)
Biomass (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Biomass (Score:2, Informative)
Bio Plants in the UK (Score:2, Interesting)
Somehow I don't think this will replace the >25% of output we currently get from nuclear plants set to expire over the next decade.
If only we could shit uranium.
Atomation Killing Good Jobs! (Score:3, Funny)
So... (Score:2)
LK
Biogas (Score:4, Informative)
Biomass Energy is produced by burning the solid Biomass fuels (green plants, agricultural residues, carbonaceous waste, wood etc). Direct burning of Biomass in an efficient manner causes the energy loss. But through Gasification programme , Biomass is converted in to high quality of gaseous fuel through Gasifier power plants. In the Biomass Gasifier , Biomass (a solid fuel) is converted into gaseous fuel, called producer gas formed through a series of thermo chemical process. The producer gas mainly consists of carbon-monoxide, hydrogen and nitrogen gas. The gaseous fuel energy is used in several applications.
Another reason not to eat beef! Let 'em live and generate shit...err energy.(Just kidding, it's a joke, laugh).
Article is based on a false premise (Score:3, Informative)
I don't think this is any new. (Score:2)
Re:I don't think this is any new. (Score:3, Informative)
This says something about the cost-effectiveness of current electricity solutions.
High tech solution to a low tech problem (Score:2)
"One way to think of this technology is that it is currently at the state of development that solar power was 20 to 30 years ago - the principle has been shown, but there is a lot of work to do before this is widely used."
In other words, in 30 years it will still not be practical, so let's spend some more money on it.
Old News for those in rural areas (Score:5, Informative)
Lots of places have these; I see someone say "There are only a few in production" fairly often, but this is incorrect; there are more and more every year. Dairy farms are using them in large numbers, but the city of portland has a fairly large one (see http://www.energy.state.or.us/biomass/fuelcell.ht
that processes the residue from 82 million gallons of wastewater a day.
As an example of the economics, see:
http://www.eco-farm.org/sa/sa_dairy_synopsi
Payback in 6 years. Not bad, considering lots of places give grants, as these help cut down on groundwater pollution. You can have payback in 3 years, and then start making money on the juice you sell.
Another Version of This Concept (Score:5, Interesting)
The new Microbial Fuel Cell method sounds interesting, but I bet it fails in the field. I'd bet that nasty substances (the odd pulse of heavy metals, detergents, or drain cleaner) would poison the microbial catalysts in this new fuel cell.
Re:Another Version of This Concept (Score:3, Informative)
It's simple, like the current methods it will not be a one step process. Floculation and gravity seperation can get rid of heavy metals, and high concentrations of petroleum products or detergents can be dealt with too.
Some oil companies use various bacteria to deal with their waste water, and they have methods to stop spills into their waste water system from killing all their bacteria.
Mixing Stories (Score:3, Funny)
Master Blaster Run Barter Town! (Score:5, Funny)
e,.
Power quality.. (Score:2)
Nice and all, but (Score:2)
Seriously, I can't wait for the day when every home has a circady daffodil and a couple of wind turbines on the roof, and a geothermal heat pump in the basement alongsi
SCO's lights must be *REALLY* bright these days... (Score:2)
Duh (Score:2)
I guess saying I have a shitty power company (Score:2)
Great! (Score:2)
No way! (Score:3, Funny)
I, for one, will not use electricity with poo in it!
Do the math: (Score:2)
So, as it is now, it can generate one-half watt per person using it. If it reaches theoretical performance, it would generate 5 watts per person.
Not exactly a lot of power.
Now, perhaps if this were used to process the lagoons near a hog farm or near a cattle feedlot...
bad idea (Score:2, Funny)
Old hat (Score:2)
The methane they cracked off the sewage plant was used to heat the local swimming pool.
Why EA? (Score:3, Insightful)
There is no Maxis (Score:3, Informative)
EA has eaten them all.
Finally! (Score:2)
Not Clean Power (Score:2, Funny)
What's this got to do with SimCity? (Score:2)
I work in the sewage industry and this is old news (Score:3, Informative)
or with our product they can do it at a rate that is up to 60% more efficent...
Shameless plug: Premier Agritech, Inc. [premieragritech.com]
A miniature Von Roll fluidized bed (Score:3, Interesting)
The system essentially works by heating up tons of sand being blown around in a large cyclone tower, and injecting the fluid waste into the whirling vortex. A lot of energy is required to heat up the sand to start the process, but after which the system generates enough power to power the entire treatment plant, and sometimes then some. More info in the white paper [vonrollinc.com].
Conflict scenario... (Score:3, Funny)
"Sewage power!"
"Wind turbines!"
"Sewage power!!!"
"Wind turbines!!!"
. . . - The Day the Shit Hit the Fan...
So all a terrorist would need to do... (Score:3, Funny)
Biogas is tripleplus good (Score:4, Informative)
Here's a blurb about a biogas plant in Oregon [portlandgeneral.com]
Decentralize the power grid and generate your own (Score:3, Interesting)
I would like to see all kinds of technologies that allow private parties to generate electricity become more prevalent. You can decentralize the power grid and open it up as a peer to peer trading network. It's the logic of the internet applied to the outdated logic of the power grid.
Put solar, wind, sewage treatment, and other types of generators in your house. Use what you need and trade what you don't. If you've got a shortage then buy back what you need. In January, south africans can sell solar generated energy to russia. In june, russians can sell it back. Private and commercial ventures alike can create power in large amounts by any means and then sell it in the free market directly to end users and other public entities with large energy demands that are all then free to buy from the lowest cost sources.
Hydrogen fuel cells will also help enable this by allowing the banking of energy for later use and/or trade. Superconductors can improve the efficiency of the whole system and help the private sector economics reach critical mass. Are all of these kinds of technologies going to inevitably converge toward an energy revolution? Between all the bits and pieces it really looks like something is going to come together...
Re:Decentralize the power grid and generate your o (Score:3, Interesting)
This isn't a new idea - there are rural homeowners who do it. Micro-turbine hydro seems to be the most popular tech for it now, probably because it has the highest return on investment.
Go find some issues of Mother Earth News, Countryside & Small Stock Journal, or Backwoods Home. There have been literally hundreds of articles over the last twenty years.
Fuel Cells (and you don't necessarily need hydrogen, there are FC's that can utilize methane, natgas, LP...) are really going to revolutionize sm
OT question: Why not dual flush toilets in USA? (Score:4, Informative)
Now that I live in the US, I wonder why such technology doesn't exist here. It seems like a much better way to save water than the problematic 'low flush' toilets common the US.
Not a completely new idea (Score:5, Interesting)
Phewey Lewis and the News: the Power of Sludge (Score:3, Funny)
Make one man reek, and another man stink
But take some sewage, just a little bit o' fudge
More than a nuisance, that's the power of sludge
You don't need diesel, don't take methane
Don't need plutonium to run this train.
It smells and it's nasty and it's rude sometimes
but it might just turn on your lights
That's the power of sludge
That's the power of sludge
New Ad Slogans (Score:3, Funny)
When you shit you save lives.
Give shit a chance
Beans power the world
Where do you want to shit today?
We bring your shit to life
We've Got the Time, You've Got the Shit.
Where's The Shit?
Do the shit
Smart. Beautiful. Shit.
Ok since I'm appealing to the lowest commmon denominator I have to add one more hilarious dung related item....
Watch the movie Trainspotting with subtitles on and particularly the scene "The Worst Toilet in Scotland". When Mark Renton is on the toilet pay special attention to the words being subtitled and hilarity insues. One of the funniest things I've ever seen!
Los Angeles does this (Score:3, Informative)
The best document I can find online today suggests that Scattergood generates 50 Megawatts. I seem to recall having seen other online documents that provided a lot more detail -- it's possible that those documents have been taken down for "security" reasons.
In any case, it's converting one set of pollutants (sewer gas, methane, etc) into another (CO2, NOx), and generating power in the meantime.
Without knowing all the details, it seems like a pretty good idea to me; there are probably aspects that I don't understand that might change my views.
Re:well that's a first. (Score:2)
Re:well that's a first. (Score:2)
--jeff++
Re:What the hell? (Score:2)
Re:Another amazing invention.... (Score:2)
You mean Mr. Fusion [slashdot.org]?
Re:The Aroma (Score:3, Funny)
Re:DILBERT was a prophet (Score:4, Funny)
Wouldn't that be IPoo packets?
Something back is better than nothing back (Score:3, Informative)
The average person defecates how many times per day? I didn't see it in the article, so I'm assuming that this was the projected measurement of 1 defecation per person. That means you get .51 watts from 100,000 feces. Assume that upon average, those 100,000 people defecate once per day. It is possible that some people defecate less than once per day and others defecate more than once per day. You basically get 2.04 Mw a day for a city of 4 million. That would be electricity bought and paid for by the