Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Meet the Nasalnaut 229

Roland Piquepaille writes "George Aldrich works at NASA and is not an astronaut. Instead, he's a 'master sniffer.' He tests everything that goes up in space on the shuttle or on the ISS for smelliness, from tennis shoes to teddy bears, and from refrigerators to socks or mascara. Why? Because things smell different in spacecrafts which experience a full day/night cycle every 90 minutes. And bad odors into a spacecraft can even lead to the abortion of a mission, like it happened to a Russian mission back in 1976. Wired Magazine tells us more about NASA's nasalnaut, a man whose colleagues call "Most Smella Fella" and has performed 771 flawless smelling missions. This overview contains more details and selected excerpts from a previous interview with Aldrich given to New Scientist. It also includes a picture showing how the NASA's nasalnaut smells things."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Meet the Nasalnaut

Comments Filter:
  • Smellinaut (Score:3, Funny)

    by poptix_work ( 79063 ) * on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:42PM (#8444496) Homepage
    Wow, 771 FLAWLESS smelling missions. Our tax dollars at work.
  • by jwthompson2 ( 749521 ) * on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:43PM (#8444507) Homepage
    that Febreze [homemadesimple.com] would be a cheaper solution...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:44PM (#8444531)
    He should post his profile on Dogster.com. Sniff. Sniff.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    to CowboyNeal's house.
  • Wow! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by James A. H. Joyce ( 757819 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:45PM (#8444538)
    771 flawless missions. That is actually pretty impressive, you'd think someone's sense of smell would degrade after so much time and so many tests. I wonder if he has to prepare himself in any way before he carries out one of these "missions".
    • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by therealcaf ( 697590 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:47PM (#8444572)
      i would think its the opposite. usually a sense is heightened the more you use it.
      • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Informative)

        by John Courtland ( 585609 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:15PM (#8444900)
        That is true unless you are smelling toxins or very caustic substances. Or you're a smoker...
      • Re:Wow! (Score:2, Interesting)

        by vikstar ( 615372 )
        Making an educated guess based on neuroscience, if your always smelling the same odor, then your sense of smell will be diminished to that odor as your perception adapts to a stable environment. However, if your always smelling different odors then your sense of smell should be heightened for those odors.

        Hmm, however this would contradict the need to have a nasalnaught since in space you will always smell that same odor. Oh well, perhaps the guess was not as educated as I had thought :)

    • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by .c ( 115916 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:52PM (#8444652)
      Although it's very fine and noble to try to minimize unpleasant odours aboard spacecraft, what can be done about us stinky mammals? Humans supposedly produce half a litre of gastrointestinal gas daily -- I would imagine that in an enclosed space occupied by several humans, that could get unpleasant quickly.

      Farts! [heptune.com]
      • Re:Wow! (Score:2, Funny)

        by BuckaBooBob ( 635108 )
        They probably arm them with lots of Beano before they go up :)
      • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Interesting)

        by qw(name) ( 718245 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:54PM (#8445291) Journal

        One thing's for sure: this man has never worked as a sniffer on board a submarine! If he had, he would have lost that keen sense of smell. After a deployment, even the crew's loved ones have a tough time being around them! It's like a gym locker room that never gets cleaned.
      • Re:Wow! (Score:3, Informative)

        The sci-fi novel 'The Second Angel' [amazon.com] by Phillip Kerr [fantasticfiction.co.uk] is set some 70 years into the future and has a section where the crew is travelling on an old shuttle with a dodgy environmental system.

        Apart from the smells induced by the bright idea of a curry for dinner, there also come to be chunks of poo floating around when someone fails to use the zero-g toilet properly. You see, poo don't fall down without gravity. Ahem.

      • The solution is to screen for astronauts who like the smell of flatus. NASA could start with SCO employees.
    • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

      by christopherfinke ( 608750 ) <chris@efinke.com> on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:58PM (#8444712) Homepage Journal
      I wonder if he has to prepare himself in any way before he carries out one of these "missions".
      I believe it's called the "farmer's blow." [spies.com]
    • Re:Wow! (Score:5, Informative)

      by Snowmit ( 704081 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @05:13PM (#8445488) Homepage
      771 flawless missions. That is actually pretty impressive, you'd think someone's sense of smell would degrade after so much time and so many tests. I wonder if he has to prepare himself in any way before he carries out one of these "missions".

      If you were to RTFA you would learn that he does in fact need to prepare himself and that he callibrates his nose at the beginning of this mission. Also, how awesome is it that someone's job involves them CALLIBRATING THEIR NOSE? Very awesome.
  • An Ill Wind (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Cruciform ( 42896 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:46PM (#8444561) Homepage
    There was a story in Analog back around '86 that dealt with odors in space. In this case the cook had smuggled garlic on board a ship, despite a ban on it's use.
    It revealed the presence of alien parasites when it turned out they were allergic to the garlic.

    Story or not though, the idea of being trapped in a small ship with someone reeking of garlic, curry, and onions is enough to make me consider purging the atmosphere.
    • When I cook.... (Score:3, Interesting)

      by nebenfun ( 530284 )
      Indian food, you can smell it from the adjacent apartment complex. I remember taking the trash out during a curry making session and as I was walking back wondering "What the hell is that smell?"....Then I figured it out. :)

      I'd have a problem of being stuck in space with someone with a GI problem or bad personal hygiene.
      But onions, garlic, ginger, etc are the best!

      • I've been in a couple motels owned by Indians (from India) whose spice intake, and subsequent body smell, actually made my eyes water. Now, I love spices, but not in that concentration.

        (not a troll, it's true - two motels in Flagstaff, AZ in '91)

        SB
  • Competency (Score:5, Funny)

    by Guy Innagorillasuit ( 249136 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:46PM (#8444562) Journal
    It certainly sounds like he nose what he's doing.
  • What Soviet Mission? (Score:5, Informative)

    by PipianJ ( 574459 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:47PM (#8444566)
    Seems to me it was Soyuz 21 [astronautix.com]?
    • According to the interview, it may have been the ink. Apparently some ink tested for an apollo mission caused a big stink similar to what the soviets described:

      "...back in the Apollo days, the sniffers smelt some ink that blistered their noses. After Apollo 13 was brought back to Earth, they had to reprint a lot of the instructions for experiments..."

  • by bad enema ( 745446 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:47PM (#8444568)
    That's a pretty vague word to describe a smell.

    Imagine that - the perfect smell. Eau de Space - available in 75 ml bottles.
    • In this case, they meant that his sense of smell was flawless, in that he was never off. From the articles I'd say that he was compared to the average human reaction, or the other people testing the odors.

      At no point in the articles does it describe an odor as "flawless". Wired just states that they were 771 "official" missions, and the only one to list them as flawless is the weblog cited.
  • what about (Score:5, Interesting)

    by WormholeFiend ( 674934 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:48PM (#8444579)
    astronaut flatulence... what's done about it?

    do astronauts have to take anti-flatulence meds like Simethicone?
    • by real gumby ( 11516 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:11PM (#8444860)
      astronaut flatulence... what's done about it?
      I don't know about these days, but this was one of the criteria in the selection of the initial astronauts in the 1960s. I believe this was written up in The Right Stuff, along with the comment "what a way to wash out."

      I'm not sure how they measured it either, but it can't have been pleasant. I think it involved a tube...

    • by Ralph Wiggam ( 22354 ) * on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @05:36PM (#8445660) Homepage
      If I was an astronaut, I would smuggle on a philly steak, float next to one end of the module, and see if I could cut a huge fart and shoot across the room. Actually, it must get pretty boring on a space flight. I'll bet those guys do it all the time. There are certainly fart propelled speed records for several spacecraft. Definately for MIR.

      -B
    • What about the smell of Jizz? As much as I like producing it, I'm not crazy about the smell.

      Joining the 150 Mile High Club would be fun, but the aftersmell wouldn't be.

      wbs.

  • by stuffduff ( 681819 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:48PM (#8444580) Journal
    The shuttle uses a variety of devices to remove solid and not so solid waste from the crew. There was one mission where the fan which drives the system failed. While it did not end the mission, it was sure a stinky trip.
  • Houston!!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by plams ( 744927 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:48PM (#8444587) Homepage
    Jack just slipped a stinker! Awful egg-ish odor! Requesting permission to abort mission!
  • by RobertB-DC ( 622190 ) * on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:48PM (#8444589) Homepage Journal
    Just a little tidbit. This article was nearly posted a couple of hours ago -- it showed up as a "Mysterious Future" article at about 1:45 Eastern time. Then it was yanked -- see my journal for other "Ghosts of Slashdot", articles that got yanked just before going live.

    I guess someone realized that the NASA news conference was just about to begin, and that we didn't really need to have the two stories back-to-back.

    There's a lot of whining about Slashdot's editors. This article's hidden history shows that they're not just sitting around twiddling their thumbs and posting dupes. As I'm sure someone has suggested before -- if you're so upset, go make your own "news for nerds" site!

    • I agree with you - really - so let's put some geeks together and find some advertising funding, so we can edit articles 24/7 - then listen to people whine about our editing.

      It happens *everywhere*, dude.

      BTW, I enjoy Ghosts of Slashdot.

      SB
  • by BigZaphod ( 12942 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:48PM (#8444594) Homepage
    A promotion path for the Iowa Nasal Rangers [cnn.com]? Cool!
  • Well at least he is not manually m@5+rub@+3ing , caged animals for artificial insemination.
  • Wow... (Score:3, Informative)

    by Metallic Matty ( 579124 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:50PM (#8444625)
    I think I speak for us all when I say, these are some of the worst puns I've ever heard.

    God bless you, Nasalnauts. *tear*
  • So... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by kwelch007 ( 197081 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:50PM (#8444627) Homepage
    Does he eat space food, then wait 12-24 hours, and analyze the smell coming from his restroom to determine which space-foods produce the least smelly farts?
  • Olfactory overload (Score:5, Informative)

    by savagedome ( 742194 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:50PM (#8444634)
    I am sure its not as bad as flatus odor judge [popsci.com] !!
    • Sixteen healthy subjects volunteered to eat pinto beans and insert small plastic collection tubes into their anuses .... After each "episode of flatulence," Levitt syringed the gas into a discrete container, rigorously maintaining fart integrity

      A fart in a jar?! I didn't know that was actually possible.

    • God, Popular Science's website sucks nowadays. Where's the text? *squints* Oh! There it is! 1 1/2 let column of links, 1 column text, 1 column links, and the rest of the page on the right side is blank.

      Someone has to teach them what relative table width means. Fer chrissakes... /rant

      SB
  • And bad odors into a spacecraft can even lead to the abortion of a mission

    DAMNIT Jim, I TOLD you not to eat that broccoli!!!
  • Paint and markers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Fiz Ocelot ( 642698 ) <baelzharon&gmail,com> on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:52PM (#8444645)
    What kind of things do you smell?

    Anything that goes inside the capsule. We do things like paints, magic markers, ink, fabrics, epoxies.

    Paint and magic markers eh... Just how much of this does he do? Can't be healthy that's for sure.

  • by AtariAmarok ( 451306 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:52PM (#8444653)
    10. 34-year-old Tang someone left in orbit after one of the apollo missions
    9. Dmitri's socks
    8. Even in space, monkeys fling poo
    7. When Galactus forgets to use deoderant, half the quadrant knows about it
    6. Someone left the windows in MIR open again
    5. Venturing too close to the Onion Planet
    4. "The Phantom Menace"
    3. Smell bits of alien underwear (thank you Douglas Adams)
    2. Saddam's WMDs hidden on Mars (see today's Mars news items)
    1. And the number one stinky problem in space: "Star Trek: Voyager"
  • scrubbed mission (Score:3, Insightful)

    by millahtime ( 710421 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:53PM (#8444655) Homepage Journal
    I wonder if a mission has ever been scrubbed because he got a cold and couldn't smell?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:54PM (#8444665)
    Stink, the final fronteer.

    Capt'n Jean Luc Picknose and the crew of the Stinkerprize are on a five year mission.

    To Hell with the prime directive Number One, put on some deoderant!
  • Back to Apollo... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Pig Hogger ( 10379 ) <pig DOT hogger AT gmail DOT com> on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @03:56PM (#8444678) Journal
    My father used to say about Apollo: "take three guys, put'em in a Wolkswagen (beetle); after a week, they must **hate** each other"...

    Coming back from the moon, an astronaut once remarked that, going back into the Command Module some 30 minutes after it had splashed-down and was recovered, he was taken aback by the smell. "My god! How could I have stood that smell for so long???" he asked himself...

    • Can you imagine how bad it would have been to be on Apollo 13 when one of the astronauts got sick all over the place? Sitting in a small, air-tight container for half a week filled with the pungent odors of vomit and diarrea just isn't my idea of a good time.
      • Re:Back to Apollo... (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Tassach ( 137772 )
        After an hour or so you would become acclimitized. You'd still smell it, but your brain woult block it out so you don't notice it.

        This used to happen all the time back at one of my first real jobs. The owner of the company smoked really foul cigars. When I'd first walk in my eyes would water from the fumes, but after an hour I didn't notice it anymore. What was ironic was if you opened the windows to get fresh air, it actually made it worse... you'd get enough fresh air to disrupt the acclimitazion,

  • Finally someone can answer the question:
    "Who got da funk?"
  • If you rub garlic on someones feet while they sleep, they will wake up smelling and tasting garlic - alegedly.

    Sleep deprevation seems to affect ones sense of smell sometimes. As does MSG in your food.

  • aww (Score:4, Funny)

    by Digitus1337 ( 671442 ) <(moc.liamtoh) (ta) (sutigid_kl)> on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:02PM (#8444769) Homepage
    Do the astronauts get lonely or something? Teddy bears?
  • Mascara?!?! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by fugoo ( 720640 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:03PM (#8444775)
    OK, maybe it's just me, but isn't sending things to low Earth orbit still $10k/lb?
    WHY ARE WE SENDING MAKEUP TO SPACE?!
    Even at a few ounces, a mascara bottle is dead weight. surely there's some nut or bolt that they'd love to have a spare of up there instead.
    • The article doesn't mention mascara, only the Slashdot posting. As another commenter said, I think it's just color for the post, at the expense of accuracy.

      I hope we're not sending makeup into space. It's not so much for the weight (it takes a lot of mascara to equal a teddy bear) but for the personalities. Makeup is a mask. It doesn't just make you beautiful. It allows you to paint your own face and present the face you want.

      Which works fine here on earth, but when you spend all day every day with a
      • Re:Mascara?!?! (Score:2, Insightful)

        by naxi ( 707606 )
        from the longer article:

        "What kind of things have you rejected?

        We rejected some mascaras from Sally Ride. She was the first American female astronaut and we tested a lot of things for her."


        I have seen several books of the missions Sally Ride was on, and they all included many pictures. I'd like to see you tell a woman that you're going to take pictures of her, show these pictures to millions of people, and not allow her to take up at least one tube of lipstick and one of mascara.
        • Good point. I'd forgotten the publicity angle.
        • I'd like to see you tell a woman that you're going to take pictures of her, show these pictures to millions of people, and not allow her to take up at least one tube of lipstick and one of mascara.

          I don't know, take a look at this [about.com], and this [about.com].
      • What kind of things have you rejected?

        We rejected some mascaras from Sally Ride. She was the first American female astronaut and we tested a lot of things for her.


        From the New Scientist artical.
    • Re:Mascara?!?! (Score:3, Interesting)

      They shoot stuff in space that goes on tv. Some female astronauts proboblly feel much more comftorble on camera if they're wearing makeup.
  • by sunking2 ( 521698 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:03PM (#8444779)
    So, we're supposed to believe that because the sun rises and sets every 90 minutes things smell differently? The station isn't exactly a sun porch, and the temperature is maintained pretty constant, so I just don't really buy what that has to do with anything. Am I to believe that fruit ripens faster and you need to shower more often because your hair greases up every 90 minutes? If things smell it's because it's an closed system. Noise is probably a much bigger issue. In the quietness of space the soft whir of a fan in the ventelation system will sound like a 747.
    • Light on surfaces (esp paint, ink) causes them to outgas. UV light wreaks havoc on plastics and other resins.

      And while the crew cabins are likely temperature controlled, much of the craft wouldnt be, like the parts that recirculate air.
      • The UV probably isn't going through the shell of the craft. And everything that the article mentions are things that are in fact located in the livable space. The parts that recirculate the air most certainly are controlled. What do you think they use to control the cabin temp?
    • So, we're supposed to believe that because the sun rises and sets every 90 minutes things smell differently?

      Yep. The internal temperature is mostly constant, yes, but not perfectly so. There are parts of the Shuttle that are less-than-perfectly insulated, and there are areas that are exposed to sunlight through windows. All of those areas are going to expand and contract during the day/night cycle. That expansion and contraction will squeeze objects like a sponge on a microscopic scale, resulting in

    • So, we're supposed to believe that because the sun rises and sets every 90 minutes things smell differently?
      Nope, it's more that zero-G causes mucus to back up in the sinuses, blood to pool in the soft tissues, etc.. causing physiological changes.
  • Sounds like a candidate for The Worst Jobs in Science. [popsci.com]

    Although, he can tell people he works for NASA, and leave it at that.
  • excuse (Score:5, Funny)

    by Bender Unit 22 ( 216955 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:09PM (#8444841) Journal
    I've got four grandchildren and when my wife's changing their diapers I try to stay far enough away from her to avoid the smell, because I try not to shock my nose.

    Who wouldn't love to have that excuse.
    Sorry, no nose, no job. I have to protect it.
    • Re:excuse (Score:2, Interesting)

      by naxi ( 707606 )
      yea, I was reading that thinking "right. I'm sure that's the real reason.

      On the other hand, I've yet to meet a dad who couldn't manage to ensure that he was doing less than half of the total stinky diapers, often by volunteering on the ones he knew wouldn't smell...
  • by Geancanach ( 652302 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:11PM (#8444858)
    With sweat, flatulance, possible vomit and diarrhea, you would think that the worst smells would be from the astronauts themselves. Do they also test the odors coming off people? Do they have to carefully monitor astronauts' diets so that they won't produce foul sweat or gases?
  • by Stile 65 ( 722451 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:13PM (#8444871) Homepage Journal
    Aldrich has smelled stuffed animals, cameras, film, grease, oil, tampons, toothpaste, aftershave, an IBM laptop, cosmonaut Alexander Lazutkin's photo album, and Disposable Absorption Containment Trunks (adult diapers for space walks).

    Perfect for anyone with a weird fetish. :)
  • Important work (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Hu's_on_first ( 707394 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:13PM (#8444879)
    Although this may seem like a silly, simple little thing, it highlights just how complex space travel is. Consider all the variables in this "smell testing" alone. "How long does a certain amount of substance X have to be exposed in a given volume of air at what temperature to accurately demonstrate how 'smelly' it would be on a spacecraft?" The mind boggles... Mars may be on the horizon, but it's a long way off.
  • by oGMo ( 379 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:15PM (#8444905)

    And here I thought NASA had technology to take care of this remotely [gotfuturama.com].

  • by edxwelch ( 600979 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:17PM (#8444913)
    I was curious and googled. Here is what I found:

    According to other Russian reports, at least three missions have been aborted for reasons that were in part psychological. In one case, the Soyuz 21 mission to the Salyut 5 space station in 1976, the crew was brought home early after the cosmonauts complained fiercely of an acrid odor in the space station's environmental control system. No cause was ever found, nor did other crews smell it; conceivably it was a hallucination. Coincidentally, the crew had not been getting along. In the case of the Soyuz T-14 mission to Salyut 7 in 1985, the crew was brought home after 65 days when Vladimir Vasyutin complained that he had a prostate infection and couldn't urinate. Later, doctors felt that the problem was partly psychological. Vasyutin had been getting behind in his work, and he was also under pressure because he had been passed over for a flight several times before. Alexander Laveikin was brought back early from the Soyuz TM-2 mission to Mir in 1987 because he complained of a cardiac irregularity. According to flight surgeons, there had been no sign of it before flight, nor could they find any sign of it in flight or afterwards. The cosmonaut had been under stress--he had made a couple of potentially serious errors. Later, he complained of the arrhythmia. He also had not been getting along with his partner, Yuri Romanenko.

    A good deal of this information is undocumented and anecdotal; it makes for good stories, but not necessarily for great psychology. U.S. psychologists sometimes fault their Russian colleagues for being stronger on anecdotes than on verifiable experiments or statistics. "Rumor, rumor, rumor," one Western psychologist said to me recently, shaking his head, when I asked him about these tales.

    http://www.airspacemag.com/ASM/Mag/Index/1996/JJ /l lda.html
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:18PM (#8444926)
    According to:

    http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/01/27/107 50 88017658.html

    According to Henry Cooper, who wrote a book, A House in Space, on the loneliness of the long-distance astronaut, at least three missions have been aborted for reasons that were in part psychological. In the 1976 Soyuz- 21 mission to the Salyut-5 space station, the crew was brought home early after the cosmonauts complained fiercely of an acrid odour in the space station's environmental control system. No cause was ever found, nor did other crews smell it; conceivably, it was a hallucination. Coincidentally, the crew had not been getting along.
  • ....nobody can smell your socks.

    wbs.
  • by myowntrueself ( 607117 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @04:24PM (#8444985)
    I once had the misfortune to visit a diesel sub.
    The first thing I noticed was the foul, *foul* odor.

    Its a wonder people could crew those things without having their noses cauterised.

    • Believe it or not, there are regulations concerning things that can and cannot be brought onboard a submarine. Ask a submariner what an "atmospheric contaminant" is. Things like shoe polish, aerosols, super glue, and masking tape. NASA should be recruiting some of these guys as consultants.
  • by danila ( 69889 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @05:14PM (#8445493) Homepage
    I think there must be some medical solutions to temporarily reduce human sense of smell. Some nasal spray should be capable of disabling or outright killing chemoreceptors in our noses. When something really smelly is found in the space, [temporarily] losing the smell might be preferable to cancelling the mission.
    • That's interesting. However, in some cases our sense of smell protects us. For example, when you smell leaking gas etc.

      If astronauts were to use this spray to mask the smell from a particular non-hazardous source, they may be unable to detect, say, a fainter smell that could be from something potentially hazardous.

  • Mars Smell-o-phone (Score:3, Interesting)

    by wildsurf ( 535389 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2004 @06:37PM (#8446276) Homepage
    Seriously, the next Mars mission should carry an odor sensor, so we can find out what the place smells like.

    I mean, what if it turns out we'd have to terraform it with perfume?
  • by Anonymous Coward
    The smelloscope?

    Come on, people!

Whoever dies with the most toys wins.

Working...