Ancient Antarctic Bacteria Revived 64
Danny Rathjens writes "Frozen bacteria from Antarctica, estimated to be between five to eight million years old, were brought back to life simply by warming them up! NASA folks also participated since they think this can give them better clues on where to look for life on Mars."
Re:YAY (Score:4, Informative)
Umm - how can a BACTERIA be a VIRUS since these are completely different organisms?
Re:HEY (Score:5, Funny)
Damn right-wingers...
Re:YAY (Score:2)
A bacterium on the other hand very well might cause issues. Since bacteria dont normally try and make you sick. They just try and live their lives and sometimes happen to release toxins into you. SO aincient bacteria could very well cause us troubles (but its not really their fault).
Re:YAY (Score:1)
Theoretically, all an ancient virus needs to do to infect you is have some way of getting into your cells and a mechanism by which to copy itself (or co-opt
Re:YAY (Score:2)
Before opening, please see (Score:5, Insightful)
A.
Re: Before opening, please see (Score:2, Funny)
Also, check the expiration date on the bottom of the can.
Re:Before opening, please see (Score:1)
Re:Before opening, please see (Score:3, Interesting)
cruel and unusual! (Score:2)
Feh (Score:3, Funny)
The geeky perspective... (Score:5, Interesting)
What is a bit more suprising about this is that the cells were not stored in any special solution. DMSO or glycerol based solutions are typically added to the cell media right before freezing because they prevent ice crystals from burtsting the cells. You ever fill a sealed glass container with water and then freeze it? The water will expand and crack the glass. Same principle here.
These bacteria cells are hardy little suckers.
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:1)
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:2)
I think I answered your criticism with my closing statement. Obviously immortalized mammalian cells would not have survived such treatment. These bacteria cells did.
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:2)
But yeah, extremophiles are really nifty cell types. Do you know if these bacteria have been classified as e
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:1)
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:1)
Scary thought...
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:1)
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:2)
I've always wondered why the geologic dating is given the priority of being accurate and the improbability of bacteria surviving that long is NOT taken as a check on the geologic dating.
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:2)
It would be more surprising to see a bacteria that is common in high temperature areas to do the same.
Re:The geeky perspective... (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah I have meat, yoghurt and bread dough in my freezer as well. Its very common in the "breakfast lunch and dinner" world as well.
Obviously... (Score:5, Funny)
Sci-fi mumbojumbo (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Sci-fi mumbojumbo (Score:2)
reasonable? (Score:3, Insightful)
BC
Really Grave Responsibility Here (Score:2, Insightful)
No, I did not RTFA, but I hope these guys know what the hell they're doing, i.e. I hope to hell [er- heaven] that they're doing this in one of those negative pressure Category III facilities, and that they're all wearing those Intel bunny spacesuits.
While I'll agree that it's a low probability event, if they were to revive some bacteria for which modern organisms lacked an immune response, there could be some serious hell to pay.
I have the same feeling about this idiotic mission to return a mist sample
Re:Really Grave Responsibility Here (Score:2)
Certainly, there's a chance with older Earth-bound microbes, but I wonder if 'space-faring' organisms would even survive (much less thrive) in our rather rare environment.
Re:Really Grave Responsibility Here (Score:2)
-cp-
Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets [alaska-freegold.com]
Re:Really Grave Responsibility Here (Score:1)
Antarctic ice and CO2 [slashdot.org]
8 million years is nothing. (Score:5, Informative)
A few years later, scientists revived bacteria that had been dormant inside a crystal of common table salt for 250 million years!
Even so, Mars has been geologically dead for 1.5 billion years, so I don't know how how these paltry 8 million years are suddenly so significant.
Re:8 million years is nothing. (Score:2)
Re:8 million years is nothing. (Score:2)
But how far does it penetrate ice and soil in general? Mars has polar caps, and while I dont know for sure, I always assumed they were like ours: huge layers of ice several miles thick.
I'm not a physicist
Re:8 million years is nothing. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:8 million years is nothing. (Score:4, Informative)
My wife's cousin Sid was on the team analyzing the heritage of these bacteria (actually, I think, their mitochondria). They were able to demonstrate that the strain extracted was ancestral to those found in various species of modern bees.
Normally, when you publish stuff like this, everyone insists that the bacteria you have must have come from contamination on your equipment, and didn't really come out of the bee at all. To prove them wrong you have to show that the bacteria are quantifiably different from any modern strain.
Re:8 million years is nothing. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:8 million years is nothing. (Score:2)
Table Salt? Makes me wonder where they found the 250 million year old saltshaker?
Seeds might also be revivable (Score:5, Interesting)
What I'm wondering is, I wonder if any seeds (or at least pollen) can be found preserved by extreme cold in the Antartic that could grow to be real plants ? If so, it seems to me a study of the amino acids, etc. in the plants might be worthwhile of study.
Does anyone know if plants have DNA? I am thinking that only animals have DNA, that plants have different structures like RNA or something. Sorry for my ignorance, I'm willing to read this online if someone can point me in the right direction to a site on the basics of plant biology without being too 'biochemical genetic engineering' (expert level) text. I've had HS bio, and college chem, and lots and lots and lots of physics, but that's it...
Thanks,
-- Kevin J. Rice
Re:Seeds might also be revivable (Score:5, Informative)
Even viruses, which are debatable as to their status as organisms keep DNA around (though a few are RNA based and known as retro viruses. HIV is an example)
Re:Seeds might also be revivable (Score:1)
Re:Seeds might also be revivable (Score:4, Interesting)
All biological organisms use DNA. While early life forms are likely to have used RNA exclusively, DNA is used because it's very stable (from a biochemical point of view). Only some viruses contain a string of RNA instead of DNA.
You might find this site interesting. [ultranet.com]
Re:Seeds might also be revivable (Score:2, Informative)
A house in Britain that was moved / removed. Underneath the stone and misc. flooring (which was all removed) a bunch of flowers sprouted that were totally unlike any in the area, but which matched descriptions from the middle ages of flowers at the
From Kew Article (Score:1)
I recall reading something about this. The lotus seed was found in a dugout canoe in a peat bog. The estimate in the article I read, was the seed would have been ~1,200 years old.
While treating poison oak I found the
Re:Seeds might also be revivable (Score:2, Informative)
Current day implications... (Score:5, Funny)
In related news.. (Score:2, Funny)
Oh Please! (Score:2)
At the Mountains of Madness (Score:1)
obligatory (Score:1)