Jodrell Bank Telescope Gets No Signal From Beagle 425
tipiyano writes "Continuing the story of Beagle 2 from earlier today it seems like the hope for Beagle 2 surviving the landing at Mars is reducing as the Jodrell Bank telescope didn't receive any signal from Beagle. In the words of a mission manager, 'I wasn't too worried about the missed link with Odyssey, but it starts getting serious if Jodrell Bank cannot get a signal either'."
Re:When wil they learn? (Score:4, Informative)
The other failures did not involve airbags - Mars Observer was an orbiter that went silent some kind of problem with the thrusters is suspected to be the cause, but we'll never know for sure; Mars Climate Orbiter got crispy over the metric/imperial units mixup during aerobraking/orbit insertion; and Mars Polar Lander did, in fact, attempt a Viking-like powered descent and it's theorized that when the landing legs deployed and locked, they incorrectly signaled the guidance system that the craft had landed, and the engine cut off too early, and it fell from a height of some 50m.
Next time, test it first! (Score:5, Informative)
The balloons used to cushion the fall were never tested. The original balloons failed testing and they didn't have time to test the replacements.
Wow! Sounds like the way to run a space program.
5 watts...Crazy (Score:5, Informative)
Links
Free Space path loss [planet.nl]
[huizen.deds.nl]
Nifty WLAN link calculator
Re:Wow... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:5 watts...Crazy (Score:3, Informative)
5 watt = +7 dBW (dB REFERRED WATT. 0 dBW BE 1 WATT)
200 dB PATH LOSS reduce power -193 dBW.
= 5 * 10^-20 WATT.
OOGG NOT FIND GOOD INFO ON ANTENNA, FREQUENCY OF BEAGLE RF. NO FREQUENCY INFO MEAN OOGG NOT CHECK FREE SPACE LOSS CALCULATION)
Re:5 watts...Crazy (Score:4, Informative)
from the Beagle2 [beagle2.com] site:
Communication frequency:
Forward (Earth - Mars): 437MHzReturn (Mars - Earth) 401MHz
Re:Next time, test it first! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:When wil they learn? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Suggestion: Venus (Score:2, Informative)
Venus on the other hand has an atmospheric pressure of about 90ATM, or aprox. 1305LPS per square inch, thats more pressure than being under 2900 feet of water. Making a probe that can withstand that is not difficult, we do it all the time in marine exploration. The killer is the heat, once the probe is on the surface it starts to heat up to the 400C of the surounding air, the solder melts, resisters change values, basicly the probe gets roasted. The Russian probes that made it to the surface had been cooled to well below 0C before they where dropped. No cooling system yet devised can maintain a 400C tempature differance, all cooling works by "pumping heat" from one place to the next.
As pointed out the upper atmospher of Venus is much cooler, a simple hot air baloon could stay aloft for months if it had a nuclear heater to keep it floating.
Re:When wil they learn? (Score:3, Informative)
the Venera project by the Soviets was used for landings on Venus by method of protective hemispheric shells, three parachutes, a disk-shaped drag brake, and a compressible, metal, doughnut-shaped, landing cushion.
Venera didn't use retro rocket thrusters.
Oi you git! Beagle 2 is British! (Score:3, Informative)