Cockroaches Daubed With Yeast As WMD Sensors? 162
Our Man In Redmond writes "OK, yeah, it sounds weird, but it just might work. Researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have come up with the idea of attaching genetically-modified yeast to the back of a cockroach - or a cockroach-sized robot - and using the yeast to detect chemical or biological agents. The story's in today's Seattle Post-Intelligencer. They point out some other possible nifty uses for the yeast-based technology, like detecting diseases by having a patient blow on a piece of paper 'printed' with the yeast."
Problem solved! (Score:5, Funny)
*mumble mumble*
The ideation phase (Score:1)
blow... (Score:1, Funny)
now THAT's a blowjob
Re:blow... (Score:1)
and it's one type you dont have to worry about getting that yeast infection...
Re:blow... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:blow... (Score:2)
Women and children first (Score:1)
They can be our "smart detectors".
Re:Women and children first (Score:2)
They can be our "smart detectors".
Now _that_ would definitely lower the unemployment rate!
Re:Women and children first (Score:1)
Re:Women and children first (Score:1, Funny)
Put them to work!
Just what we need..... (Score:1)
Re:Just what we need..... (Score:2)
Ever wonder if Starship Troopers had to deal with that? There's a propoganda scene with kids squishing cockroaches. Heh.
I know, I know, I'm not very on-topic here. I just find it interesting that PETA and the like seem to value animal life over human life. During the Iraq War there was some information about specially trained Dolphins that could locate mines without setting them off. They'd relay the info back to a nearby sub so they'd know
Re:Just what we need..... (Score:1)
I agree with you that PETA seems to value animal life, more than human life.
But I also think that the argument could be made that they're hypocrites. I don't expect them to make a big deal about this, and, if they don't, they would be _discriminating against cockroaches_ *gasp*
What I'm saying, is that they seem to value some animal life more than other animal life. Why? Maybe because cockroaches disgust some of them?
And that's hypocrisy. If
And how will this pan out? (Score:5, Funny)
2) Government asserts non-cooperation on part of regime under inspection with cockroaches conducting said inspections.
3) ???
4) Democracy!
Re:And how will this pan out? (Score:1)
3) Cockroaches grow by an order of a magnitude due to the genetically modified yeast. All hail our genetically modified overlords.
4) "Democracy!"
Re:And how will this pan out? (Score:1)
there'll never be no.4?
Re:And how will this pan out? (Score:1)
Yeast Based Technology (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, I know one "nifty" technology based on yeast: it's called "beer" and has been around for thousands of years. Hoooray for yeast! ;-)
Re:Yeast Based Technology (Score:1)
If yes to either, the benefits to humanity are infinate then!
I welcome chemical reserach!
Down with Shrub boy, back with So-Damn.
-Grump
Need a name for this critter (Score:5, Funny)
I suggest cockroach + robot = "cockrobot"
As an added benefit: "I, for one, welcome our new cockrobot overlords" has a nice ring to it.
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:1)
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:2)
Damn, that sounds like a cartoon! "Cockbot and Botroach". Heh, heheheh he-heh. . .
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:2)
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:1)
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:1, Funny)
Overall, this joke gets a 5/10.
-- Slashdot joke reviewer
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:1)
Don't you get it? He intentionally picked the stupidest name possible to get flamebots like you to suggest 'cockbot'.
It's like showing you this guy [prestongates.com] and making the joke that he is probably really good at banning gas.
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:2)
Here is a concept drawing. [charldine.com]
Re:Need a name for this critter (Score:2)
Detecting WMDs... (Score:5, Insightful)
Has become the new "Star Wars" angle for research. Looking for new Funding ? Unsure that it will get approved ? Well see how it could possibly be applied to WMD, it doesn't have to be sensible, it just has to be enough to get the funding. After all there are people of billions of dollars out there who can't find WMD, so your research not doing it either won't change anything.
This is for the diagnosis of illnesses, pure and simple. And at 2am in a bar when the funding review was at 10am the researchers had an idea.
Re:Detecting WMDs... (Score:1)
Then again, right now, we don't have much defense against biological weapons, whether they come from "terrorists," lunatics or enemy countries. So any developments in
O-kaaay... (Score:3, Interesting)
Young bachelor to FBI agent: "That's not a biological weapons lab, man; that's my kitchen!
My baker isn't a terrorist (Score:1)
Gr@ve_Rose
Re:My baker isn't a terrorist (Score:4, Funny)
Let's focus, people (Score:5, Funny)
There is one purpose for which yeast, and yeast research, should be put. Beer. Better beer. Beer that tastes great, but is less filling. Beer that I can drink until snookered, then wake up from the next day, hangover free.
Beer.
Any questions?
Any questions about yeast research? (Score:2)
What about bread?
Um, to go with the beer, of course.
Re:Let's focus, people (Score:2)
Re:Let's focus, people (Score:1)
I have 6 gallons of cider fermenting away in my living room as we speak.
Vegimite, marmite, promite, etc. can definately be removed from the list.
Re:Let's focus, people (Score:2)
Re:Let's focus, people (Score:1)
I can see it now: "Michelob Ultra cockroaches have 30% less carbs than Coors cockroaches."
Getting the coackroaches back (Score:5, Funny)
Rus
Re:Getting the coackroaches back (Score:2)
Release the cockroaches, rent an apartment in Baghdad, and put a geiger counter under the sink. When a loud clicking noise wakes you up at 3am, call Geraldo. He'll draw a map for the good guys and the bad guys.
Remote-Controlled Cockroaches (Score:2)
Re:Remote-Controlled Cockroaches (Score:2)
Man, you so know this guy pulled the wings off of flies when he was a little tyke.
Re:Getting the coackroaches back (Score:3, Funny)
Or, they'd take the Rumsfeld approach and just hook the detector to the world's tiniest nuclear weapon. The yeast changes color, and BLAM! Problem solved.
Of course then you have to worry about the 40-foot cockroach . . .
Re:Getting the coackroaches back (Score:2)
Maybe you know something I don't, but I'd consider it rather conspicuous trying sneak a 40-foot cockroach into someplace to check for Windows Media Devices.
Re:Getting the coackroaches back (Score:1)
So you could send them out, then use a bait-laden trap to capture them again. I don't really see it working as an early-warning system though...
That's easy... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Getting the coackroaches back (Score:2)
a. it does not have to make sense
b. collecting the results from runaway roaches might as well be the topic of the new round of research (and funding) for the next year.
Bush election plan (Score:1, Troll)
2) Get some yeast
3) ???
4) WMDs!
Doctor (Score:4, Funny)
Patient blows.
Doctor: "Ehmmm. You have herpes."
Patient: "What? One blow, and you say I have herpes?"
It won't work! (Score:1)
Aaah (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Aaah (Score:2)
And I don't think we'd want our happy little vegemites to glow in the dark after smearing some chemical weapons yeast extract, either. Roses in cheeks just wouldn't be in it then.
Re:Aaah (Score:5, Funny)
"Crikey, it's a big one, look at the plutonium on that-" [Camera pans out, mushroom cloud silently expands to the clouds, and another Aussie stereotype dies a long-awaited death]
Re:Aaah (Score:1)
"Crikey, it's a big one, look at the plutonium on that-" [Camera pans out, mushroom cloud silently expands to the clouds, and another Aussie stereotype dies a long-awaited death]
Oh Please Please, Yes, anything to get that loony tune of my telly. maybe I should start a we hate the Croc loony club.
Now that's too much (Score:5, Funny)
No limits to human cruelty..
Emmm... (Score:3, Funny)
So if they are still alive when all humans are gone, we'll know it was a really, really good weapon. What? Oh...
I for one.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I for one.. (Score:2)
Best Solution Ever!!! (Score:1)
Who said we couldn't find good uses for vermin?
Yeah... (Score:2)
Better than letting those robots search for weapons they should be used to help rescue workers in saving lifes. I think the small form factor would make it easy to let them search for survivors under collapsed buildings after earth quakes or - as we saw in Russia lately - help examine tunnels or mine shafts for survivors after accidents. Why does research always drift in the military direction? *sigh*
Re:Yeah... (Score:1)
The Next Step In Terrorism? (Score:2, Insightful)
The civilized world has more to fear from the development of technology like this than the terrorists do. A cockroach is less of a threat to a terrorist hiding in a cave (they can find a new cave or have a pet snake to eat the cockroaches), verses nations that
Re:The Next Step In Terrorism? (Score:2)
Re:The Next Step In Terrorism? (Score:1)
Sandia Labs has a number of 1 cubic inch robot "critter" designs. They are used in a "swarm" to cooperatively pinpoint threat (e.g., chemical release) locations and map threat contours. I saw several videos on this technology last month, and it's impressive.
It's a WMD sensor and a snack food! (Score:2)
Countermeasure (Score:3, Funny)
In The Future... (Score:1)
Works for Windows Serves Too! (Score:1)
1. Get access to your server.
2. Blow yeast on it.
3. ???
4. If yeast turns green, there's a patch coming out soon. If it turns red, well, you're screwed.
Hollywood has taught us... (Score:2, Funny)
On a brighter note, it could also spawn a new breed of crunchy luxury beer called "Skuttlebrau"
Around here... (Score:2)
No, occifer... (Score:1)
Think of the cockroaches! (Score:1)
Is Orkin a Halliburton Subsidiary? (Score:2, Funny)
And you get the cockroach back, how? (Score:1)
Do they send the cockroach with its yeasty sensors off in search of WMD, and then sit outside waiting for it to come back. Are cockroaches trainable or something. Am I missing something here?
I suppose homing pigeons have been be a bit obvious, and I guess if you send in enough cockroaches, one is bound to come back.
Re: (Score:2)
zerg (Score:2)
Detection? (Score:2)
Re:Detection? (Score:1)
Here is Hawaii... (Score:2)
"Oh good, here come the Americans with a nasty disease carrying pest which can not be killed."
Not From Concentrate.
WMD??? (Score:1)
-Jason
#define WMD (Score:2)
Suddenly two years ago GWB decides that Biological, Chemical and Radioactive "dirty" bombs are now WMDs.
Let's be clear about this. Them beer-dipped roaches are not going to find any nukes ...
Hmmm (Score:1)
And what if you have really bad breath? Will it tell you that you have cancer? Makes you wonder.
Not only WMD -- there's a huge mainstream market (Score:1)
Re:DO NOT MOD UP - KARMA WHORE - NOT /.ED (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Of course... (Score:1, Flamebait)
Exclusive of any other effort? No. Absolutely not.
Now, if some of you monkeys decide you're big enough to address the root cause of all this terrorism, and then, as a complement, work on new technology to thwart further acts of violence, then yeah, that would be good.
But to continue to place all our faith in technology without understanding why people want to kill us? That's stupid.
Are you stupid?
Re:Of course... (Score:3, Funny)
your arrogant attitude and dim consideration of your fellow human being is part of the problem, not the solution
you are not better educated about the problems of the world, you are merely drowning in self-righteous teenage-level cynicism about the world
you're actually a dime a dozen, and you suck
get back to us when you grow up, teenager
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
I see, criticizing the wanton destruction of other nations/cultures constitutes a "dim consideration" of my fellow human beings.
Right.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
I wonder why I chose the term monkey. Oh yeah, that's right... thank you for reminding me.
you can write 1,000 pages (Score:2)
but it will all mean absolutely nothing to anyone reading your words- it will even make people who would otherwise agree with you 100% bow their heads in shame and embarrassment and a desire to distance themselves from you
as long as you continue to demonstrate your mocking, belittling, arrogant tone for your fellow human being
that tone makes you an arrogant teenager, and not one bit more
and so no one will listen to you
you either understand t
Re:you can write 1,000 pages (Score:2)
Hatred finds its ultimate expression in the killing of others. My anger doesn't come anywhere close to that.
They aren't even remotely similar, you fucking retard.
i said (Score:2)
have you grown up yet?
"you fucking retard"
apparently not
consider my talking to you to be intellectual charity, as most everyone else is not reading a word you say
Re:Of course... (Score:1)
Actually, the number is now 2,750 [foxnews.com], idiot. If you bothered keeping current with the news, you'd know that. And yes, ordinarily such a correction would
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
No it isn't.
That's the toll for the WTC alone.
If you bothered to read the news, you'd discover that the WTC was not the only target of terrorism on that day.
Retard.
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
Re:Dubya will stop at nothing ! (Score:2)
There were no Weapons of Mass Destruction
GWB knows there were - his dad has the receipts.