Mystery Spot on Jupiter Baffles Astronomers 64
seanmeister writes "From Space.com: "Astronomers have spotted a strange, obvious and inexplicable black spot near the equator of Jupiter. A picture of the object is circling this planet electronically as researchers scratch their heads about what they've found. A second image, taken on another day by a different photographer, contains a similar looking spot. As of early today, the second image had deepened the mystery. Some astronomers were at first puzzled over whether the two photos show the same thing or not. As it turns out, they do not." I, for one, welcome our new monolith overlords!"
Solution being resolved. (Score:3, Funny)
Oh
Some conspiracy theorists believe that this may be a space ship, but this was quickly dismissed by chief NASA officials, saying that everybody knows that the space ships that are that size are orbiting Saturn.
-- Joey Joe Joe Jimbobalu
NASA PR Department
Simple answer. (Score:1, Redundant)
I can't wait for Lucifer!
Re:Simple answer. (Score:2)
Thanks (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Thanks (Score:3, Interesting)
Asteroid impact? Comet? Small (former) moon?
Re:Thanks (Score:1)
Distance is relative (Score:2, Interesting)
Since the Gread Red Spot [space.com] is twice the size of earth and I quickly estimate you could fit about two of the Red Spots between it and the black oddity, the distance between them is roughly four times the diameter of Earth. That's something like 50000 kilometers.
Not far, indeed...
Re:Thanks (Score:1)
OH MY GOD, THE SPOT HAS EXPANDED (Score:1, Offtopic)
God. Damn. It.
Mystery spot? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Mystery spot? (Score:1)
I am now cleaning coffee off of my keyboard. You think they have billboards between here and Jupiter?
Re:Mystery spot? (Score:3, Informative)
and water and golf balls run up hill.
http://www.mysteryspot.com/ [mysteryspot.com]
Right outside my home town.
An excellent example of bullshit moderation.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Moderators, just because you don't understand a metaphore or reference, doesn't mean it's not funny. And funny is *NOT* off-topic.
We could certainly use a lot less of the "I don't understand it so it must be off-topic" moderations.
Aaahhhhh! (Score:4, Funny)
[looking at a piece of paper with a black circle on it]
Billy Bones: The Black Spot! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
</reference>
Oh, wrong black spot. Right, the 2010 black spot. So, when do we get our second sun? I don't feel like sleeping anymore.
Re: Aaahhhhh! (Score:1)
> <reference src="Muppet Treasure Island">
Oh, the movies you have to know in order to follow the discussions on Slashdot! The Matrix, Spiderman, LotR,
Galileo's revenge? (Score:5, Funny)
Star Wars Cantina Pickup Lines (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Galileo's revenge? (Score:1)
Top 10 Explanations for Jupiter Mystery DarkSmudge (Score:4, Funny)
9. Then they realized that the dark area was really that dratted corner-logo for the Sci Fi channel in the corner of the screen.
8. Zug Island: A New Beginning [jankaulins.com]
7. Rush Limbaugh is passing in front of the planet.
6. Damn it, Galactus! Why did you spill your coffee again?
5. It's just the new Mystery Spot. The Wal-Drug and the Tommy Bartlett Robot World are on the other side of the planet (as if you did not know already from the billboards plastering Mars and Venus).
4. It started with a blown transformer in Cleveland, I think
3. Those sneaky bastards: New Jersey put a colony on Jupiter already!
2. "Dubya and the corporate military industrial complex are to blame"
1. Jenkins! Did you sneeze on the telescope mirror last night and forget to tell anyone?
0. "I, for one, welcome our new Jovian albedo-reducing overlords."
Re:Top 10 Explanations for Jupiter Mystery DarkSmu (Score:2)
Optimus Prime, you have been a naughty robot.
Re:Top 10 Explanations for Jupiter Mystery DarkSmu (Score:1)
The administrators at NASA are saying... (Score:1, Offtopic)
spots on Jupiter? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Who knows, he and Drew Barrymore may be making sweet
No need to worry (Score:3, Funny)
Correlation? (Score:1)
Re:Correlation? (Score:2)
Re:Correlation? (Score:1)
But no matter what your common sense tells you, remember this: my equations say that that is impossible, and thus it is impossible. You need not trouble me with your insolent questions. I am Science!
Re:Correlation? (Score:1)
Re:Correlation? (Score:1)
My God! (Score:2)
It's full of corny SF references.
And I don't mean my list of recent comments [slashdot.org].
death star (Score:2)
I'm thinking that it is just the final touches to the Jupiter Death Star [google.com] project.
We're like soooo doomed.
Ralf
I, for one, welcome our new monolith overlords! (Score:2)
Re:I, for one, welcome our new monolith overlords! (Score:2, Funny)
Evil (Score:1)
It is a spiritual enemy [washingtonpost.com] that will only be defeated if we come against them in the name of Jesus and pray for this nation and for our leaders.
It is a demonic presence [modbee.com] ... that God revealed to me as the enemy.
We should invade immediately
Maybe not so mysterious... (Score:5, Informative)
An excerpt:
"A recently discovered black spot in Jupiter's clouds is darker than any featue ever before observed on the giant planet. The spot may be theresult of a downward spiraling wind that blows away high clouds and revealsdeeper, very dark cloud layers." Here's the link:
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01496
Spoil Sport! (Score:1)
Re:Spoil Sport! (Score:1)
His comment alone made this collection worth reading.
While I have his link still in my cut and paste buffer, I'll go ahead and throw a href tag on it : http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01496 [nasa.gov].
( Finally! Somebody else out there who is probably puzzled beyond imagination over the number 137, and why it keeps popping up all over the place when studying physical parameters of the Universe. 137. Exac
Sun Spot? (Score:2)
amateur astronomers (Score:2, Interesting)
it's pretty cool some of the things you can capture with a nice 4.5" scope and a modified webcam.
Is it just me (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Is it just me (Score:1)
Re:Is it just me (Score:3, Informative)
In fact, anybody who images Jupiter through a telescope isn't likely to catch it with its equator nicely aligned with with the CCD's pixel
Re:Is it just me (Score:2)
Re:Is it just me (Score:2)
Since astronomers have been images/drawing planets seen south down in telescopes for a hundred plus years, normal convention is to leave the image south down.
Of course NASA decides to do things their own way, so when they publish images from the Hubble Space Telescope they normally put north up (This "
two responses you haven't heard yet (Score:2)
(2) That's where Osama and Saddam are hiding.
2010! (Score:2)
a.c.clarke rulez! (Score:1)
communication satelites, orbital lift, jupiter's moon europe life, jupiter monolith, what's next? moon magnetic anomaly?
Re:a.c.clarke rulez! (Score:1)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0345413970
Er, um?! (Score:1)
Yeah, so... (Score:2)
SL9 was pretty bright and very noticable on the discovery films. Even though it was broken up in to small pieces, they tended to make big spots.
If this is a result of a impactor, given the smallness and light color of the spot, the impactor would have likely been small, very faint and would have likely gone unnoticed.
Especially since the current crop of astroid/comet hunting teams use automate
How nice. (Score:1)
but, is it... (Score:1)
ya. ok it's a bad 2001 shot.
Simple (Score:1)