Echolocation for Humans 227
anoopsinha writes "An article in New Scientist reports that bat echos can be used as virtual reality guide. People wearing headphones could easily hunt down a 'virtual insect', using only the echolocation sounds. The report says that it is a 'very intuitive process.' The researchers behind the project hope that a similar system in the cockpit of fighter planes could allow pilots to track some controls using their hearing, freeing up their eyes for other tasks."
Vindicated (Score:5, Funny)
That's what I tried to tell him...
shameless reply (Score:5, Interesting)
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Re:shameless reply (Score:2, Funny)
Re:shameless reply (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:shameless reply - Even Google understands (Score:2, Interesting)
Amazing (Score:3, Interesting)
It does, however, highlight the importance of context and knowledge, since Cmabrigde could be read as anything if we didn't all know about Cambridge.
had to try for myself.. btw, whats a meme? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:had to try for myself.. btw, whats a meme? (Score:3, Informative)
From one of the definitions in the google glossary [google.com]:
From your post, it looks like you just found out what a meme is and how it spreads firsthand.Re:had to try for myself.. btw, whats a meme? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:had to try for myself.. btw, whats a meme? (Score:2)
Note however that I can buffer load more than a single word at once, phrases or whole sentences can be read at a time. Re-arranging word order on those would probably not work to well.
Your sentence simply requires me to focus on each word singly, otherwise, no problem. (Just like reading upside down, each word has to be flipped individually then read. Upside down r
Perl script to do this for you (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:shameless reply (Score:5, Funny)
Try it ylrsuoef -- smcbrlae aritarbry txet (Score:4, Interesting)
(Of crouse, scroue cdoe [lerfjhax.com] is mdae aivllabae uednr the GPL.)
Re:shameless reply (Score:2)
Wow. Cool. Compare that to sentences like this:
This gubblick contains many nonsklarkish English flutzpahs, but the overall pluggandisp can be glorked from context"
(David Moser, quoted by Douglas Hofstadter in his "Metamagical Themas" column in the January 1981 "Scientific American")
The conclusion is that the human brain is a very weird thing indeed :-)
Re:shameless reply (Score:2)
Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
Re:shameless reply (Score:3, Interesting)
Are there experiences with other languages?
Greetings,
Kosmo
Re:shameless reply (Score:2, Interesting)
Thats also why its stuck in the middle ages with useless contructs like gender and different forms of address, for lords and slaves.
It really needs to free itself up a bit more and evolve like english did. Remember english started out as german, but its flexibility permit
Re:shameless reply (Score:3, Informative)
Re:shameless reply (Score:3, Informative)
Re:shameless reply (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:shameless reply (Score:2)
Re:shameless reply (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Vindicated (Score:2)
Give it a try! (Score:5, Interesting)
We did some experiments with this in cognitive theory class, and it was really, really bizarre.
Re:Give it a try! (Score:5, Funny)
Already knew it.. (Score:4, Interesting)
making clicks with your tongue or other brief sounds
Actually, I just use my footfalls - I've got extremely sensitive hearing (I always know where our cat is because I can hear his footfalls on the carpet - which freaked out my wife for the first few years
Re:Give it a try! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Give it a try! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Give it a try! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Give it a try! (Score:5, Informative)
At one time this amazed scientists - blind people could walk through a room without hitting objects. So, they covered their bodies in thick felt, and the blind still had their obstacle sense. Then, they filled their ears with wax, and the blind bumped into things.
Sighted people lack the obstacle sense, but can learn it in a few hours. No clicking or other extra noise generation is necessary.
Re:Give it a try! (Score:3, Informative)
It's based mostly upon hearing the doppler effect from objects that are around us as circulating air hits things. Almost everyone can probably hear these sounds, but they're mostly low frequency and rather quiet, like whispers. The real trouble in doing it is picking the sounds out of all the other random sounds you hear. I've quite gotten used to having the sens
Re:Give it a try! (Score:2)
Re:Give it a try! (Score:5, Funny)
And then they published their results, in a brightly coloured book called "21 Fun Things to do with Blind People."
Re:Give it a try! (Score:2)
This all stems from a very long psychological literature on the capabilities of the blind, almost all of which find there to be only very small enhancements in their perception. The studies on the "obstacle sense" show the largest differences I am aware of.
Re:Give it a try! (Score:2)
Play some ELO or other music with lots of high end sound.
Close your eyes.
Have a friend (or two works better) hold a cat on one side of your head at various distances. (The friend should move around on the other side to avoid you hearing the person moving.)
I bet you can tell where the cat is. They absorb a LOT of high frequency sound.
been done before? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:been done before? (Score:2)
Re:been done before? (Score:2)
I remember it. I think it was on discovery channel. I don't remember skateboards, but they could actually ride bikes while useing a clicker they held in their mouths (IIRC).
Did not understand the article (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Did not understand the article (Score:4, Insightful)
It means that we might be able to absorb more information faster and easier.
Re:Did not understand the article (Score:2)
The researchers behind the project hope that a similar system in the cockpit of fighter planes could allow pilots to track some controls using their hearing, freeing up their eyes for other tasks."
See, you didn't even have to read the article!
Re:Did not understand the article (Score:2)
So was Mr. Wizard. (Score:2)
I've used bat calls before (Score:4, Funny)
Applications for the blind? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Applications for the blind? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Applications for the blind? (Score:2)
Which is why you'll never get to be President.
Re:Applications for the blind? (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd really like to see some independent confirmation of that Team Bat guy's claims, though. I've got doubts as to whether the guy could say, tell a curb was coming up while riding a bike, or avoid a signpost. Larger objects are easy to avoid. Riding a bike in starlight, you can hear mailboxes along the road better than you can see them. But some things, I'm skeptical.
Still, even if they can only detect larger objects, like buildings or fences, it would have to be a tremendous help in navigation for a blind person.
Re:Applications for the blind? (Score:2)
Re:Applications for the blind? (Score:2)
No they don't. No study I know of ever found that the blind hear better.
They just throw more processing power at hearing - and thus are able to interprete more of what they hear.
Re:Applications for the blind? (Score:2)
'Better' can refer to the totality of the experience. If we both close our eyes, someone claps, and we both try to point at him, the blind guy will probably do a better job. His hearing is better, just maybe not better at collecting raw information.
Hmmm... (Score:2)
Someone ought to let Nagel [silcom.com] know.
A blind man does it already. (Score:5, Interesting)
Additional anecdotal evidence (Score:3, Informative)
Apparently we're better than we know at pinpointing sharp sounds in the environment.
Re:A blind man does it already. (Score:2)
I know a few brits who do, but they're on holidays in Iraq now...
Holy smoke! (Score:5, Funny)
George Lucas isn't a fool then (Score:5, Funny)
Re:George Lucas isn't a fool then (Score:2)
Re:George Lucas isn't a fool then (Score:2, Insightful)
I've always imagined that audible explosions in space opera somehow relate to interference picked up on the pilots' radios.
AFAIK, already in development before w/Airforce (Score:3, Insightful)
a similar system in the cockpit of fighter planes could allow pilots to track some controls using their hearing, freeing up their eyes for other tasks
The Airforce already has been developing this already, not with echolocation though. It was shown on discovery channel or something. Uses a more efficient system.
Aircraft uses sensors to measure position of other aircraft in the vicinity then onboard computer replicates positions in 3D audio space fed
Re:George Lucas isn't a fool then (Score:3, Funny)
This would be nifty for cars... (Score:4, Interesting)
see things, eh (Score:3, Funny)
Recording Microscopic Life (Score:5, Interesting)
David Dunn's Angels and Insects [earthear.com], although not a study of audio based VR (or even featuring bat sounds for that matter), is a great place to get started listening to microscopic sounds.
Here's an MP3 [earthear.com] of some insects in Africa getting it on.
If you think this stuff sounds like fun you might want to do what I did a few years ago and pick up a high quality microphone with a big diaphragm, such as an AKG C414, and get out into the woods at night and make some recordings. You'll be surprised what's out there when you start filtering out the sounds humans make and crank the volume!!
Cool... (Score:2)
Cool... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Cool... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Cool... (Score:2)
The brain is a giant, biological, reconfigurable logic device. Essentially it's a 100 billion gate FPGA.
Cool.
Re:Cool... (Score:2)
Didn't 3D audio in games tell us this? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Didn't 3D audio in games tell us this? (Score:2)
With echolocation, the received sound waves have very slight timing/phase differences due to the orientation of our head. Processing this requires significantly more skill, but use this all the time to locate the general direction of a noise source.
The new part about this finding is that we've never used it to provide accurate imaging before.
What it is like to be a bat (Score:4, Funny)
For as long as I can remember, I've been able to echolocate people moving around me while I'm near a CRT -- especially when I'm sitting at a computer. I can...shall we say, "feel" the movements of people behind me. (It's a spatial sense. Not sure how else to describe it.) It's not as if I can tell what they're doing with their hands or anything detailed like that (you know, dodging projectiles and such), but I'm aware of their general position.
So now, of course, my primary machine has an LCD. No more echolocation. (Luckily, it's a laptop, so I can keep my back to the wall.) I don't have the 15.7 KHz whine of an electron tube to bounce off things around me. Ye gods, that infernal CRT whine...most people can't hear it, but it drives me bats.
Oh dear. In all honesty, I wasn't trying to pun.
echolocation = soundhax (Score:3, Funny)
Augmented Reality? (Score:2)
Re:Augmented Reality? (Score:2)
Holy human hacking Batman! (Score:5, Interesting)
The article mentions one potential application being that you could look at dials and switces without taking your eyes off what you were doing. However, would shifting your attention to echo location be as bad as looking away would? Think cell phones. It's kind of like chameleons - they can point their eyes in different directions, but can they concentrate on both of them at the same time? Could humans gain the ability to concentrate on more than one sensory input at a time? Probably not, but the input would still be there and would catch our attention anytime something notable happened. Like when we see something out of the corner of our eye, or hear our name in a crowd. Cognetics is so cool.
It also talked about how bats adjust the frequency of the waves sent out, as the distance to the object changes. I imagine for a bat this would be as automatic as focusing our eyes is to us. We would have to do this manualy, like focusing a camera. Oh, but what if we interfaced the brain or some nerves and trained the mind to do the focusing!
I've always thought that if I were to loose a limb in an accident I would be pounding down doors at universities acrossed the country to find one willing to attempt to use the nerves once controlling my limb to instead control a keyboard/mouse type interface (which would comunicate to the PC via bluetooth eventually). But this is even cooler, and I imagine provided a little information from Dean waters on this, you could build something like this on your own. Hot damn, I have a new project!
Re:Holy human hacking Batman! (Score:2)
First step, cut off arm...
Threat warning (Score:4, Interesting)
Or imagine a radar system encoding direction, distance and speed of a target into some surround sound system...
To me, especially the threat warning system looks interesting, because you can hear something even if it's behind you, while your eyes only see stuff in front of you. Imagine, the advantage if you can hear at once that that radar site that just started chirping seems to be in the direction of the depression in the ridge you just passed so you can do something about it, or the fighter radar that just started chirping is at your 6 o'clock - that guy is in a bad position... wait, now he's switched from search to attack mode - now you're in trouble... ;-]
Or if you could hear the drone of your wingman - you'd definitely hear if he gets out of position...
Cheers, Ulli
Stereolocation (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Stereolocation (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Stereolocation (Score:3, Interesting)
Then again, that may be a bit high a price to achieve sound location abilities.
Unfortunately (Score:4, Interesting)
No clicking required! (Score:5, Interesting)
Not really. You're thinking in terms of radar, where azimuth and range are determined by matching a single ping with a single pong. In such systems, multiple sources or multiple path replies are a source of confusion since they add too much information to the process. If you're trying to paint a sonic landscape, however, you don't want to try and associate a single ping and pong since that would only identify the range to a single reflector in one small portion of your area of interest. Instead, you want to receive as much information about the environment as possible from each ping. Having someone/something else making the ping isn't a problem as long as they don't overwhelm the replies.
As an experiment, try sitting in a place with a fair amount of white noise (such as CPU fans). Now slowly bring your right hand toward your ear with your palm open. The first thing you'll notice is a loss of some higher frequency ambient sounds from the right side. As the hand gets closer, you may notice an increase in reflected noises that originated on your left. Eventually you will be able to judge the distance between your ear and your palm simply by the tone of the noise.
Echolocation (Score:2, Insightful)
Modern Science, innovating new ways of killing our fellow man more effectively!
I also saw something on using echolocation with blind people a while back, according to the story, it doesn't take long for users to adapt. Saying that, Blind people have very sensitive hearing anyway.
Used in Babylon 5 (Score:4, Informative)
So the technique they used was to describe the sound effects as assistive to the pilots like full surround sound in video games to give a viceral sense the position of the other things around. They maybe explained that a total of once of twice on the series itself, but the idea stuck with me as a very good idea even in the relatively normal environment of todays fighter jets or even for situational awareness in cars on the highway.
Oh, take the walkman off! (Score:3, Funny)
I'm sorry officer I was trying to drive by echolocation but I forgot to take the headphones off...
Re:Oh, take the walkman off! (Score:2)
LOL (Score:2)
You would wear a walkman in the car if you wanted to get the best stereo experience, and, to avoid the sounds of things like sirens and other cars!
For prior art... (Score:2)
Mmmm... echolocation (Score:2)
The Acoustic Orientation of Bats and Men (Score:2, Interesting)
Quoted from Amazon [amazon.com]
Echolocation for Dummies (Score:2)
Oooooooh, I see.... More intuitive than the low altitude voice warning, low fuel voice warning, radar illumination tones, missile lock tones, etc, etc, etc....
New Scientist Is Lame Again (Score:3, Interesting)
Virtual insects?! (Score:2)
I can follow the guy through the wall using sound, and open fire just before he emerges from the arch.. I don't need to see him appear, I know he will be there, so I fire regardless and get the kill before he can react.
Used it all my life... (Score:5, Informative)
Now, first things first, I'm not totally blind but I am legally blind. I have Achromatopsia [achromat.org], so I don't see a whole heck of a lot outside yet I can still play soccer, baseball, basketball (especially), Disc Golf and Ultimate Frisbee because I can hear what's going on around me at all times. I don't have to see where my disc lands I listen for the "thunk", with soccer and baseball there have been "beeper" balls for a long time and in basketball there are always sounds to let you know where the ball is (dribbling, passing, team mates, etc).
Now, this technology couldn't be used en masse as another post pointed out because there would be too much interferance from others and using headphones would block out other important sounds like traffic and other pedestrians.
Anywho, my $0.02
BINCAS (Score:5, Informative)
It's surprisingly hard to pick up light planes visually, they are tiny specks right up until the time that they fill the windshield. The response of the FAA has been the TCAS systems -- which are extremely complex and eyewateringly expensive (about $1M per system) This makes sense for jetliners, but is out of the question for light planes.
As near as I can tell, nobody did anything with the BINCAS system after the articles came out. It was a cool idea, though.
thad
Great (Score:2)
Gamers are smarter than these idiots. (Score:2)
I bet these people wonder how they can tell from which direction sounds comes from when someone is talking to them. Seriously, replace "virtual insect" with "other guy on the enemy team in ravenshield" and these people are found to be completly clueless.
Hell, even the part about fighter piolets using more than their eyes is rather old; I'm in a tribes2 clan and I remember awhile back we had installed a soundpack that modified the Beow
Echolocation for Humans? (Score:2)
Vlad T. Impaler
Count of Dracula.
"Can this be modded down too?" (Score:2, Funny)