Force Field. No, Really 434
tqft points out news of "a working force field, using plasma. Now to scale the sucker up." Here's the
Brookhaven press release.
I can think of so many uses for this.
Do you suffer painful hallucination? -- Don Juan, cited by Carlos Casteneda
An enormous breakthrough for parents (Score:5, Funny)
Re:An enormous breakthrough for parents (Score:5, Funny)
Wait, now that I think about it, that would really teach those damn kids to stop messing around.
Temperature != Heat (Score:5, Informative)
Now, the high voltage shock might give you pause before touching it again though...
Re:Zap Field (Score:3, Funny)
Let me get this right.. you want a picture of a vacuum surrounded by air. Now that sounds like a nice picture.
Re:Zap Field (Score:5, Funny)
Re:An enormous breakthrough for parents (Score:4, Funny)
I've already seen a working force field (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I've already seen a working force field (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I've already seen a working force field (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I've already seen a working force field (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I've already seen a working force field (Score:5, Funny)
Easily breached using the proper Force-Field Deactivation Device. [safeshopper.com]
Re:I've already seen a working force field (Score:2, Funny)
No, but you get a prize for being an idiot and driving the joke completely into the ground.
Now what I need.. (Score:3, Funny)
Uses? (Score:5, Funny)
Like keeping PHBs out of the server room?
Re:Uses? (Score:5, Funny)
temperature vs. energy (Score:5, Informative)
for example, some ions trapped by the earth's magnetic field goes up to some 14 MILLION kelvins (notice it's hotter than anywhere on, around, or inside the sun). However, as there are maybe one or two such high-temperature particles per cubic centimeter, you will still freeze to death standing (erm, floating) in the middle of it.
just a pedantic monday morning, i guess. I'll stop now.
Re:temperature vs. energy (Score:3, Interesting)
am i reading this wrong (Score:3, Funny)
Re:am i reading this wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes...
But if it's blocking against atmospheric pressure (not quite sure on that one) then it's an impressive feat...
Re:am i reading this wrong (Score:3, Interesting)
I think it's mostly blocking stray molecules of air that get in from leaks until the leaks can be patched.
Re:am i reading this wrong (Score:2)
I agree, that could mean it's not blocking against much... anyone care to dig up some numbers?... nothing in the article...
Re:am i reading this wrong (Score:5, Informative)
But, the Rent-A-Cop and his/her rope will "kindly" deflect any stray party goers that encounter it. Since you are repelling individual particles at a time, the physics are much different.
Re:am i reading this wrong (Score:3, Interesting)
If it can be used to block a 1 atmosphere pressure (or even above) it would solve a whole bucket load of problems.
Re:am i reading this wrong (Score:2, Interesting)
leak in system plasma wall
| |
| enclosed |
atmos area at | vacuum
| atmos - x |
| |
Obviously wi
Protect your *nix (Score:4, Funny)
from physical contact!
Yipee!
*snicker*
Re:Protect your *nix (Score:2, Funny)
Blast... (Score:5, Funny)
Hasn't anyone explained to him the wonders of open force?
-JDF
Torps (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Torps (Score:2, Informative)
A reference [amazon.com] for the confused.
Force fields have existed for ages (Score:4, Funny)
The Brookhaven Press Release (Score:2, Informative)
Brookhaven Lab and Argonne Lab Scientists Invent a Plasma Valve
UPTON, NY â" Scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory have received U.S. patent number 6,528,94
Harping on the temperature thing one more time (Score:2, Insightful)
I want to say something about this, but the sentence makes my brain hurt, and not in a good way.
So... converting temperatures to Kelvin makes them lower? It may be that I'm too far removed from my math and science classes, but... well, come to think of it, I never learned it that way.
Sheesh, they didn't even say "in Kelvins." "Degrees Kelvin" indee
Spam? (Score:5, Funny)
A much faster, more complex version of a previously introduced "spam window" (see New Scientist, 12 April 2003), the spam valve is the latest example of novel uses of spam for particle-beam applications; other recent ones include spam acceleration of antimatter (Update 634), a spam lens (Update 508), and spam deflection of high-energy beams (Update 540).
Niiieeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Re:Spam? (Score:2)
Lousy Vikings...
The article sucks. (Score:5, Insightful)
A shame, 'cause I'd be interested in the practical implementation of this valve system. And I want pretty movies and/or pictures, of course
It's a BULLETIN (Score:5, Informative)
It's supposed to be short. That's the whole point of the online AIP: short summaries of articles.
Why the poster linked to it instead of to a full published article, I don't know. Perhaps a full published writeup hasn't been made yet. Perhaps the poster thought that short sound bites are all that the /. crowd has attention for.
Re:The article sucks. (Score:2)
Of course it Sucks. It's reporting about how to maintain a vacuum!
Plasma jargon (Score:4, Informative)
*After seeing some of the workers running our corporate guilt-a-thon, I suspect this may be redundant.
Re:Plasma jargon (Score:2)
Re:Plasma jargon (Score:3, Insightful)
What this could be used for (Score:3, Insightful)
Think launch bays that really can be opened up to have a shuttle pass though, and leave the air inside the bay intact.
Yes, this idea has a lot of promise.
Re:What this could be used for (Score:2)
RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" (Score:5, Funny)
2) The plasma valve is INSIDE a copper container.
If you think this is a "force field" then you might also be interested in the "ray gun" in your television tube.
An interesting story nonetheless, spoiled only by the fatuous ignorance of the submitter and editor.
Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" (Score:5, Insightful)
Erm. I dunno. For a lot of laypeople, a valve with no 'solid' parts fits the definition of a 'force field'.
(Note: I am embarrassed to use the following example.) Take the brig on Star Trek: TNG era vessels. There is a ring of emitters surrounding the door opening. These emitters are presumably responsible for maintaining an impenetrable field in the doorway. That 'force field' seems to be at least loosely similar (in form and stated goals) to the 'plasma valve' described--it's just larger.
Oh, and the plasma valve would take your finger off if you touched it. Oh well. This is real life that we're stuck with, after all.
Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:RTFA: NOT, NOT, NOT a "force field" (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, even though they didn't provide pictures, I imagine that the area in which the plasma actually resides is not very big. It may not be too difficult to produce a plasma curtain to block off a 1-2 cm^2 entry point into a particle accelerator, but I wager it would be very difficult to produce the same effect uniformly over a 1 m^2 door opening. I don't know much about plasma physics, but I have a suspicion that a big honkin' 1m^2 sheet of plasma isn't going to be magically stable.
I think the Star Trek force fields are still a long, long way off, if they're even possible at all.Organic life forms have no sense of fun (Score:2)
It's already obsolete (Score:3, Funny)
Hehehe what?? (Score:2)
I can think of one user for this. Making a space that cannot be crossed. Sorta like a wall really only has one purpose.
Just playinwitcha, this is a cool concept.
Walls (Score:2)
1) Organizing space
2) Preventing access
3) Posters/calendars
4) Wall-mounted displays
5) An excuse to use Windows
6) Wacky martial-art stunts
7) Climate control
8) Holding up ceilings
9) Blocking noise
10) Paint retention
Re:Hehehe what?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Thus, you could also make a balloon with extra lifting capasity just by vacuuming out the inside of a field. It could also fly closer to space than any other balloon, since it has a vacuume(essentially 0 density).
Or you could have containment for mass-sensitive matter (antimatter, etc.)
How about a see-through wall with zero heat transfer by contact?
How about a wall that cannot melt, because there is nothing there to melt? We may finally have something we can melt diamond/carbon in
Sometimes you have to think outside the ridgid plasma cube
It's not "degrees Kelvin"!! (Score:3, Insightful)
First, its degrees only when it is Fahrenheit or Centigrade, which are not absolute units. Second, its Kelvins, damn it! (at least when it is more than 1K). People have no problem with Joules, Newtons, Pascals etc which are all people's names, why is Kelvins so different??
[I haven't done any physics after high school, so if I'm wrong correct me.]
Re:It's not "degrees Kelvin"!! (Score:3, Informative)
Daniel
Re:It's not "degrees Kelvin"!! (Score:2, Funny)
i don't know about you, but when someone asks me my height and weight i always say "130 weight units pound" and "70 height units inch".
Since when is Centigrade not absolute units? (Score:2)
Not a Star Trek Style Force Field (Score:5, Interesting)
This thing is for use in sci-tech research only, for creating air tight vacums. It can't be used to protect / encase eevryday objects. For example, I quote:
At 15,000 degrees Celsius (27,032 degrees Fahrenheit), the plasma valve is about 50 times hotter than room temperature when measured in degrees Kelvin. This intense heat makes the ionized atoms and molecules move around and collide with air molecules so rapidly that the ions block any air molecules that might pass through the plasma valve.
In short, don't expect this force field to be in use at your neighborhood brig / jail anytime soon :) A really cool advancement though.
my stupid idea (Score:2, Interesting)
The military would probably be interested, but I'm more into the idea of see-through 747s- just think of the view!
I suppose you'd still have to have most of the aircraft solid, unless force fields can act as wings etc for aerodynamic purposes (IANAP), but you'd still end up with the equivalent of glass-bottomed boats, except far cooler.
graspee
SCI FI wonderland (Score:2, Interesting)
What's next? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What's next? (Score:3, Insightful)
First Use I Can Think Of (Score:2)
Escaping the atmosphere. If the force-field can be generated without consuming too much power, then you can create a "virtual balloon" above your ship, and get the first 20 miles or so for nothing. Then you fire up the regular rockets.
Of course, since they are talking about temperaturs of 70,000K it doesn't sound like this will be competitive with rocket boosters anytime soon.
Re:First Use I Can Think Of (Score:2)
I'm no rocket scientist.... but I would have thought that gravity too would require some sort of propulsion to overcome - that is, the first 20 miles wouldn't be exactly "free".
Limited use, really (Score:2)
It wouldn't stop a bullet or other moving objects or energy beams, so it's not your next spaceship shielf (let alone, it blocks air particles).
Heck, at 15,000 celcius, I wouldn't use it as a patio door screen mesh replacement either (mind you, it would make a good mosquito zapper, but your dog would fry through it as well).
I wonder, really, what this could be used for, other than very specific lab stuff.
Maxwell's Demon Implemented (Score:5, Interesting)
Maxwell's Demon is a physics problem the is the basis of quantum mechanics. Simply, suppose you had a tank of air that was divided in 2 by a tiny split, with a gate. At the gate is a "demon" who lets high energy particle in on side, and low-energy particles in the other.
Theoretically, by expending no energy save that to open and close the gate (plus whatever overhead the Demon requires) you could thwart the laws of physics. Soon one side of the tank would be "cold" and the other "hot" even if they both started off at the same temperature.
Re:Maxwell's Demon Implemented (Score:5, Interesting)
BLow air in the middle, hot air blows out one end and cold air blows out the other. Temperature difference can be as much as a few hundred degrees C depending on the configuration used! (Still doesn't violate any laws of thermodynamics though... but it does 'sort' high and low energy molecules without ant "extra" energy)
=Smidge=
Yeah but... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yeah but... (Score:2, Funny)
How does it stop leaks ? (Score:2)
But I'm having a hard time understanding how this valve would stop a leak. Since that seems to be the primary function of such a valve.
Is it supposed to be placed "on top" of an existing mechanical valve, so that if that valve leaks the plasma one will jump in close it off ?
Murphy(c)
w0000000T! I worked on this project........ (Score:5, Informative)
I worked on the pre-cursor to the plasma valve at BNL, the Vaunted "Plasma Window" (ooooh, ahhh)
The thing really is incredible, and yes, I accepted the project because I read the description, and went..."Holy C*ap! That is just like the shuttle bay!" And it is, well...if the shuttle bay were ~4-6mm in diameter =)
And about the 15K Kelvin thing, yes plasmas do get that hot, but lets get real here, the thing is tiny...I bet the lights above your head get just as hot in the middle of their plasmas.
Anyway, the project I worked on was very robust and partially scaleable, just would require a boatload of power. It was very "loud" but not "noisy" as we could put very sensitive equipment right next to it and there would be no interference (you physics types should get this) and when you take a collimated beam of light...in one case a green laser, it will shine clear through it with next to no loss, which is a huge improvement over any other method of separating Atmosphere from Vacuum.
Mind you, this would be only the first stage in a series of differential pumping to get down to UHVacuum.
Gratz to Ady, he is one helluv a guy!
-Chris
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:4, Informative)
Room temperature is around 290 Kelvin (about 25 degrees Celsius, or 77 Fahrenheit). Remember, 0 Kelvin is absolute zero - -273.something degrees C.
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:4, Informative)
300 kelvin = 26.85 C = 80.33 F
[Temperature Conversion Page [nasa.gov]]
So, about 50 times room temp.
Re:You are smoking crack (Score:5, Funny)
If you convert to C first, you've just assigned an arbitrary zero to the scale and cut off about 90% of room temp, but only about 2% of the force field temp, so of course when you then go dividing by 50 it doesn't work out.
Remember kiddies: arbitrary scales are all well and good for addition and subtraction, but don't go messing around with multiplication and division; you'll end up a pregnant murderer who supports terrorists.
Re:You are smoking crack (Score:2, Funny)
Celsius includes an arbitrary constant. If you multiply a celsius measurement, you're multiplying the constant and creating a new scale.
Not that it really makes much sense to say "x is y times hotter than z" in the first place, but at least there are
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:5, Informative)
15,000 over 50 is 300.
300 Kelvin is about 26 Celcius, 80 Fahrenheit.
Does that help?
J.
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2)
Umm. 15000 K
300 K - 273,15 = 26,85 degrees Celcius, about 80 Fahrenheit. A bit warm, but nothing extreme..
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2)
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:3, Informative)
It's not as bad as you think - 300K = 27C = about 77F.
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2)
273.15K = 0C
300K = 27C
27C = 81F
It is a bit warm for room temperature, but its not that bad. Its well within a football field or LOC error.
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2, Redundant)
Using entry-level physics and math, 15000K/50 yields 300K - roughly 27 Celcius. What's to hate about 27 degrees Celcius? Maybe the guy wrote it on his Athlon powered desktop PC?
How did parent get modded Funny?
Do we remember our basic units? (Score:2)
15,000 / 50 = 300
300 - 273.15 = 26.85
Or approximately 27 degrees Celsius.
Now, I would concur with anyone who might argue this is rather misleading to the average reader, accustomed as we are to Celsius and Fahrenheit. If you translate it to Celsius, then
15,000 - 273 = 14,727
14,727 / 27 = 545.4 recurring
Which means in Celsius it's about 545 times greate
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2, Redundant)
>Kelvin (about 50 times greater than room temperature)
I'd hate to see the "Room Temperature" the guy who wrote that lives in.
That'd be 300 degrees kelvin.
That's 300 - 273.15 = 26.85 degrees centigrade.
For those of you who can't do the conversion in your head, that's 80.33 degrees fahrenheit. Just means his roommates won't let him turn on the air conditioner 'cause of the power bill...
-JDF
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2)
- Robin
Re:Strange Room Temperature (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Well well (Score:2)
Using my portable force-field
I managed to block all the trolls
and hence...I got first post
Ahh, the only thing sadder than a stupid post is the moron who screams "first post" 30 posts in...
Now wheres MY force field?
Re:Well well (Score:2)
> the moron who screams "first post" 30 posts
> in... <<sigh>>
(:D Alas, here I was...looking at a pristine, blank, virgin (oooh, there's a lot of that here on
But of course...by the time MY post had been sent all the way from down here in NZ to
Re:Dont try this at home (Score:2, Funny)
Still, i'll take the plasma field over the 6'5" grinning black man with the jar of vaseline in his left hand and 10" in his right.
Re:Except for that whole reduced boiling point thi (Score:3, Interesting)
Heck, large quantities of youths get smallish (~1 square inch) regio
Re:15,000 kelvins are 50 times room temp? (Score:3, Informative)
S
Come on, fhqwhgads. (Score:2)
Umm, calc please! (Score:2, Interesting)
15,000 / 50 = 300
50 is completely reasonable here...
I'm not as sure about this, but I found a link in Google to something that looks reputable... some plasmas exist at temparatures as low as 1,500 degrees. According to this [san-bernardino.ca.us] [www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us] water turns to plasma at 1,500 degrees - but unspecified Kelvin, Celsius, or Fahrenheit. If it's Fahrenheit (a farely safe assumption that it's either F or K because it's US,) then 1,500 F = 1088.7055555556 Kelvin, so it's still within reason.
Re:Some cool benefits (Score:3, Informative)
Untima® 150 Plasma Welding System. [thermadyne.com]
Re:if you had this, say.... (Score:2)
And the sound would be a general screaming as the poor test pilot is roasted alive inside his cockpit.
Re:if you had this, say.... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Get it right, pimple faced sci fi losers (Score:4, Informative)
This is an advance in technology, for sure - it's a very fast valve. But there's no physics breakthrough involved. It's just an application of an old theory to an old problem, made possible by advances in technological expertise and practice. It's a clever hack but it's not a force field.
Daniel
Re:Just two issues... (Score:2)
The high temperature is what allows them to have fewer particles bumping around real fast inside the EM field and preventing other particles from getting through from the outside. If you're going to have lots of cold particles, you might as well make a glass or plastic window - it'll be cheaper and cost a lot less energy to maintain in place.
Daniel
Re:Flying cars next? (Score:2)
No, but you can mow the lawn with it. ;)
Re:Plasma Rays (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Maybe 'force fields' isn't a good name. (Score:3, Interesting)
rest of arcticle can be found here
http://www.amasci.com/weird/unusual/e-wall.
Re:Scale? (Score:3, Informative)
At 15,000 degrees Celsius (27,032 degrees Fahrenheit), the plasma valve is about 50 times hotter than room temperature when measured in degrees Kelvin.