New Star in the Neighborhood 39
tachyonflow writes "Well, it's probably been around for a while, but it's new to us. The Sydney Morning Herald is reporting that astronomers have discovered a new star only 7.8 light-years from our sun. It's a red dwarf that's not visible to the naked eye from earth. I guess it's time to update those Celestia databases..."
Why it's dim... (Score:5, Funny)
It's not a "new star" (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:It's not a "new star" (Score:1, Offtopic)
£!/bin/sh
echo $0|grep sh$||(c=`echo 3vvpnqo2zxm|tr 'a-z|$*~.
it wants to replace my # with a
Re:It's not a "new star" (Score:2, Informative)
There's often a delay of a few hours between a submission's approval and its posting, so you probably were just not the first submission. I posted a story and had it almost immediately rejected, then saw the same story posted the next day. Turns out the submitter had sent it in an hour and a half ahead of me, but it wasn't posted for 18 hours. So don't be too bummed out about it.
Re:It's not a "new star" (Score:1)
Please keep up sending in nifty stuff. I think the folks here do a pretty good job of sifting through it all and putting the ones they think everyone would like up the pole.
I haven't seen a one of mine make it yet, but no big deal. There's an art to making a good topic,
Re:It's not a "new star" (Score:2)
OK, just make sure (Score:1)
http://www.reddwarf.com/ (Score:1, Funny)
Re:http://www.reddwarf.com/ (Score:3, Funny)
"Lost a star, Master Obi Wan has..." (Score:1, Funny)
Better Info (Score:3, Informative)
worth a closer look (Score:2, Interesting)
Even if it doesn't have liquid water, gasious oxygen [nasa.gov], or solid land [google.com], then it can still focus as the fulcrum of our local jump point [ucar.edu].
Re:worth a closer look (Score:4, Informative)
Re:worth a closer look (Score:3, Interesting)
It's local if you're headed in that direction. Alpha Centari, Barnard's, and Wolf 359 are all on the same side.
Also, for gravity assist, it's not the size of the mass that matters so much as its relative [arxiv.org] motion [arxiv.org].
Solstation [solstation.com] has a nice 3-D star map Java applet [solstation.com].
a new star? (Score:4, Funny)
Dyson sphere? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Dyson sphere? (Score:1)
Re:Dyson sphere? (Score:1)
A perfect dyson sphere would be invisible to the rest of the universe-except for it's massive gravity well, that is.
So it'd look to outsiders like a MACHO, a dead star, perhaps? Would this explain some of the "dark matter" holding galaxies together?
Re:Dyson sphere? (Score:2)
After all, a direct matter to energy conversion of even relatively small amounts of matter would give you far more energy than a star produces. I don't feel like running the calculations, but the water from a swimming pool or two probably contains enough power to fuel any conc
Re:Dyson sphere? (Score:1)
There's a limit on the amount of energy that you can harness from 30,000 gallons of water. There's no explicit limit on how long the human race is going to last.
Physically it'd be possible to build a dyson sphere. I mean, that's a SMALL step in the engineering/physical sciences ladder compared to turning water into pur
Re:Dyson sphere? (Score:1)
Re:Dyson sphere? (Score:1)
Nemesis anyone? (Score:3, Interesting)
The book starts with the discovery of a neighbor star, later named Nemesis. It is a Red Dwarf, and closer to Earth than Alpha Centuari. It is also dimmer than one would expect because of a dust cloud between it and the solar system.
Now how's that for coincidence?
Re:Nemesis anyone? (Score:3, Funny)
Well, this isn't closer than Alpha Centauri, and it doesn't have a dust cloud. Otherwise there's a lot of coincidence.
Re:Nemesis anyone? (Score:2)
Of course, it's a complete coincidence that Asimov's 1989 story used the same name
Red, or brown? (Score:2)
Re:Red, or brown? (Score:5, Informative)
Oops! (Score:1)
That Neutron Star... (Score:2)
Maybe Brennan gave Kobold some delta-vee? (Score:2)