Microbes Pass Valuable Gas 44
inimicus writes "Wired reports: 'With a reliable source of hydrogen, fuel cells can produce energy with water as the only byproduct.' The good news is that there's a functional prototype (measuring 0.7 square centimeters and less than 1 millimeter thick) that produces 1 microwatt of power -- approximately enough to power a digital wristwatch. Personally, I'm intrigued by the concept of powering my laptop with sugar-water..."
How is the "Battery Life"? (Score:3, Interesting)
Passing gas powers devices? (Score:2, Funny)
Couple this with cold fusion and you have germs passing gas and powering entire cities.
Re:Passing gas powers devices? (Score:1)
I just can't resist... (Score:3, Funny)
Of course, when the battery dies, it really dies.
Re:I just can't resist... (Score:3, Funny)
If my experience with a Tomogatchi is any indication, this technology will be a moneypit.
Re:I just can't resist... (Score:3, Funny)
Sugar Water (Score:2, Funny)
Why not -- I'm sure that when in coding-mode, most of us are already powered by sugar-water (insert favorite carbonated high-fructose corn syrup based beverage).
Re:Sugar Water (Score:2)
It would be interesting if this could be used in the next generation of humanoid robots. Can't you just imagine a robot walking into some bar/restaurant (probably in Japan) and ordering soda? One step closer to making the Matrix a "reality".
Isn't that just a terrible pun?
Re:Sugar Water (Score:2)
Reminds me of Bender...only he needs booze :)
Advanced Bugs (Score:1)
Re:Advanced Bugs (Score:1)
Overclocking (Score:2, Funny)
Pppbbbbrrrrrrrrt! (Score:2)
<waves hands behind fanny>
Hydrogen balooney (Score:5, Interesting)
1. I do not believe that they can produce that much hydrogen from this much volume - maybe she is talking about the peak output her 15 liter tank, multiplied by the factor to get to 200kW "to power 20 houses".
2. 10kW per house is actualy very little - this is another example of "data massage". Average hair dryer takes about 2kW, so does ironing your shirt or vacuum your room. I am not talkig about things like electric laundry dryer or A/C. I *lived* in place which had 20Amp circuit brakers (which gives 20kW at 120V), and the circuit brakers were out all the time. We had an electric heater, but neither A/C nor laundry in the apartment.
3.Running fermentor is not the easiest thing to do - you have to keep the microbes happy - the output can vary, there can be problems with contamination (some mold gets in which wipes out the bacterias over time) etc. And they smell bad.
4. Using a fermentation tank to power laptop is pure unmitigated balooney - here the power source can be more expensive than with household source. With laptop, the premium is on weight+size. Much more compact and fairly affordable source of hydrogen for laptops can be sodium borohydride: this is a common industrial chemical, water-stable and 40g of the stuff + 40g of water produces 8g of hydrogen, which is one of the best weight ratios with nonelectrolytic sources of H2.
5. Enviro-technologies development: most of the time it's a confederacy of shabby science, political pressure and populism. The surest way to protect enviroment is to find a different job for pop-science enviromentalist - preferably in gender studies or postmodernist deconstruction university departments.
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:2, Insightful)
You weren't constantly blowing breakers, just during the peak.
This system might need batteries, but it could work.
Joe
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:4, Informative)
And I suppose you iron your shirt 24 hours a day. I just calculated a thirteen month average of my home's electrical usage (data straight from the power bill), and it comes out to 0.765 kW. The two of us use a 25 year old refrigerator, an electric hot water heater, electric stove, '80s vintage dishwasher, clothes washer and dryer, and limited electric baseboard heating and a space heater during the winter. Oh, yeah, and the computer, tv, stereo.....and lights. And a 24/7 fan to eliminate radon. And the iron and vacuum
I *lived* in place which had 20Amp circuit brakers (which gives 20kW at 120V), and the circuit brakers were out all the time.
Your electrical system's inability to handle peak usage says nothing about average usage.
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:3, Interesting)
10kW per house is actually very little - this is another example of "data massage". Average hair dryer takes about 2kWMost hairdryers are about 1500 watts, and only used for short (5 minute) periods of time. A standard outlet is only capable of supplying 15 amps, even when connected to a 20amp circuit.I live in a 1000sqft house in the South Central US, with high Air Conditioning bills. A "bad" month is 1300kwhrs, divide that by 720hrs in a month and you get only 1.8kw per hour on average, 10kw is actually
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:2, Informative)
Ah, no. At least not for comerical grade breakers.
In college I worked calibrating breakers and they were required to 'break' at 135% voltage within roughly 5 to 45 minutes(Exact time range depending on the ampage of the breaker). Of course it is possible thatt different mfgs calibrate them a litte different.
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:2)
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:2)
Yes, the wiring was ancient, and after greeting the maintainance guy by first name, finally convinced him to put a 30W fuse in, despite his objections that he didn't think the wires could take it.
I'm guessing you meant 30A. He was wrong to do that, your wiring most likely couldn't take it, and had something gone wrong, there would have been a fire. The right thing to do would be a slow blow fuse to handle the spikes.
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:1)
How do you arrive at those figures? Surely 20Amps * 120V = 2.4kW?
Re:Hydrogen balooney (Score:2)
By decimal error.
I do not like the hydrogen energy hype and the proposal to use fermentation tank to power laptop sent me balistic.
Sorry for the mistake. The useful output would be around 2kW, 2,4kW is just the nominal value.
Actually.. (Score:2, Interesting)
They have a new car making scheme with it. The fuel cell is very small and is located in the bottom chassis of the car. You can have one or two types of 'bottoms' of fuel cell and just put a different 'top' chassis on them.
With two fuel cell designs you can make SUVs, compacts, etc. just by changing chassis.
Production expected in 5-8 years I b
Re:Actually.. (Score:3, Informative)
It is a neat idea, but they still have to make it pass safety regulations. Some of their tops call for windows from the floot to the ceiling. I question how they will get that to pass safety tests.
Re:Actually.. (Score:1)
Re:Actually.. (Score:2)
Re:Actually.. (Score:2)
Yeah, I long for the good-old-days when all cars were steered with a tiller!
-
Re:Actually.. (Score:1)
Re:Actually.. (Score:1)
Water Vapour Greenhouse Gas? (Score:4, Insightful)
I often hear people touting hydrogen because the only by-product is water, which sounds wonderful... However, I suspect that's only because we can drink the stuff.
But isn't water vapour the most potent greenhouse agent in our atmosphere?
Not sure, just asking.
One must also ask how much water vapour is currently in the atmosphere, and how much would be added by large numbers of hydrogen-driven power plants. Again, I don't know. Anyone know of any research on this question?
Re:Water Vapour Greenhouse Gas? (Score:1)
Re:Water Vapour Greenhouse Gas? (Score:1)
Plus, you have to get this hydrogen that is producing the electicity from somewhere. The most likely source is of course water.
Re:Water Vapour Greenhouse Gas? (Score:2)
Write your legislators today! Ban dihydrogen-monoxide! DMHO inhalation kills!
-
Re:Water Vapour Greenhouse Gas? (Score:2)
But isn't water vapour the most potent greenhouse agent in our atmosphere?
yes, but IIRC the water and CO2 absorption spectra are complementary; IOW
, CO2 and water block different IR "colors".
Since there is a lot more water vapour (0..4%) in the atmosphere than CO2 (0.035%), CO2 changes are much more important.
Lego my Jolt! (Score:2, Funny)
efficiency (Score:1)
Microbe Farts (Score:1)
I guess it really would be the gas pedal.
But seriously this is great research. I dream of a day when this technology is viable. Especially if it powers my '64 Impala with the same power.