Australian Overturns 15 Years of Nano-Science Doctrine 79
Roland Piquepaille writes "Dr John Sader, from the University of Melbourne, discovered a design flaw in a key component of the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). He 'used established mechanical principles to prove that the popular V-shaped cantilever inadvertently degrades the performance of the instrument, and delivers none of its intended benefits.' This finding may reshape the industry by proposing a single new standard and because the AFM 'has been the instrument of choice for three dimensional measurements at the atomic scale, since its invention in 1986.' Check this column for more details and an AFM diagram or read the original University of Melbourne's article. You also can visit the
'How AFM works' page."
Re:Great.......but now what? (Score:2, Interesting)
The most exciting thing I can see using AFM is using it in Micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS), which are pretty much just printed onto a chip like your ordinary integrated circuit. I just want to know: will this help or hinder AFM devices?
Making an AFM microscope shouldn't be that hard (Score:1, Interesting)
All you need is a laser ,sensors, tip, tip holder(lever).
Why should these microscopes cost alot ??
Re:Making an AFM microscope shouldn't be that hard (Score:2, Interesting)
Repeat after me: the smaller the volume of production, the higher the unit cost.
Re:Great.......but now what? (Score:2, Interesting)
its got to help, right? i mean, the flaw is a flaw in the sense that they were using an un-optimised detector, now ths guy has just said how a different shape will increase performance. I dont know how much i believe him though... i mean, the guy does design and ship these things around the world (see last paragraph of the article), and if he plays his cards right, he will have every user buying tips from HIM this year :-/ me thinks it might be a $$$ scam. but lets hope not, because developments like this (if true) can only help us all out in the long run.
anyone know what these 'well known mechanical principles' are? i cant see a detialed enough paper on those... if they are 'classical' principles, then this guy is talking out of his arse, as classical mechanics breaks down at this scale. but he is a mathematician, not an engineer, so he will know better (i hope); not knocking engineers or anything... its just you dont get taught quantum mechanics in an engineering profession, but applied mathematicians definitely do.
Yeah... but they work (Score:4, Interesting)
V-shaped cantilevers work fine. People can obtain atomic resolution with them. What more could you want?
I have used both straight and V-shaped. If there is a difference in performance, the difference is mostly likely very small and over-shadowed by other factors.
Re:Great.......but now what? (Score:2, Interesting)
ok, cool, then this may be a very real observation by the ozzy dude... but, how come orignal users of the device found better results with the V-shape than with a flat top?
Re:Making an AFM microscope shouldn't be that hard (Score:4, Interesting)
Not Just Incorrect Measurements (Score:3, Interesting)