Y-12 Plant Turns Sixty 27
GMontag writes "The Einstein icon seems quite appropriate for this story: The Y-12 Electromagnetic Separation Plant, in Oak Ridge, TN, turns 60 today." The linked Knoxville News Sentinel story begins "On a cold February morning 60 years ago (Feb. 18, 1943), ground was broken in rural East Tennessee for the first production building at the Y-12 Electromagnetic Separation Plant. The plant's job was to make enough enriched uranium for a new kind of bomb, an atomic bomb. In a short time Bear Creek Valley, where the plant is located, was filled with machinery and round-the-clock bustle of people on a mission. At its peak in 1945 more than 22,000 workers were employed at the site in Oak Ridge." I've been meaning to get out to Oak Ridge to see if their museum's gotten better in the past 20 years.
Ooops! (Score:1)
Museum (Score:3, Informative)
I took my son there a little over 10 years ago, it seemed to be a bit improved from what it was over 20 yrs ago.
Dr. Johnson(sp?), one of my history instructors at UT [utk.edu] wrote a book about OR, "City Behind the Fence" IIRC. Seemed very interesting and he was an excellent teacher. May be worth a browse if you can find it.
Re:Museum (Score:2)
Probably can't even get close to the facility.
Re:Museum (Score:2)
Huh?
Not sure where you are or what you know about. The museum [amse.org] we are talking about is in Oak Ridge, but nothing you said makes any sense.
They have not turned all of Anderson County, nor the city of Oak Ridge into a locked-down prison or anything.
Looks open (Score:2)
But tours are pretty common at big federal facilities these days. The federal facilities still want to promote themselves to the public, and a bus allows more secure control and over the visitors.
My wife and I were able to take a special bus tour through the Kennedy Space Center, which brought us within 1000 feet of the Shuttle launching pad and the huge storage building (the normal tour took you within a mile, and you have to stay in the bus). This was April, 2002. The special tours had been closed from 9/11 until a few days before we got there, so we were very lucky.
Re:Museum - still open - so-so. (Score:2)
I work at X-10, which is 'next-door' to Y-12. The museum is still open - it is in the Oak Ridge town itself - not at Y-12.
I have no idea what it was like 10-20 years ago, but it wasn't that interesting 3 years ago. Worth a look if you're in the vicinity, but I personally wouldn't travel to just visit it.
Y12 60 years later (Score:4, Interesting)
But don't expect to see much of the y-12 complex. That's where they store all the enriched uranium that has been removed from all the decommissioned bombs. They're a bit touchy about uninvited guests there these days.
But you can go look at the Graphite Reactor. This was the first production reactor ever built. 1 kilowatt total output and air cooled. It was shut down in the 60's but, unlike the west coast where they cart the things off and bury them when they are too old to use anymore, we made ours into a National Historic Landmark. It's not like we're going to be able to use that spot for anything else for the next couple of hundred thousand years.
Re:Y12 60 years later (Score:2)
Is that the X-10 facility? Cool! I haven't been there since HS!
Also, when I was in the Oak Ridge National Guard unit, we used to take the tanks (it was a Tank Co. then) to some Y-12 property for training.
Re:Y12 60 years later (Score:1)
Re:Y12 60 years later (Score:1)
Einstein (Score:1)
Re:Einstein (Score:2)
Re:Einstein (Score:3, Interesting)
Prior to this time, Einstein was on record as being very skeptical that any sort of nuclear power or weapon was possible. He did not write this letter on his own initiative, and he did not actually present it to FDR.
When the Manhatten Project got underway, he made it known that he was willing to work on it in some capacity, but he was blackballed by many people in the security establishment because of his outspoken pacifist views. I think, in fact, that FDR didn't trust him completely for this reason.
Einstein's letter was influential, but it was not even close to being as important as popular imagination has it as being. Einstein's work did show the equivalence between matter and energy, but that is the extent of his professional influence on this matter.
The person that is absolutely critical in the history of the nuclear program is Leo Szilard.
Re:Einstein (Score:1)
Re:Einstein (Score:5, Informative)
If you read the page you linked to carefully, you'll see that this is the sequence:
On July 12, 1939, Szilard and Wigner meet with Einstein in Peconic, Einstein dictates to Wigner (in German) a letter to the Belgian ambassador.
Shortly thereafter, Szilard met with Alexander Sachs, an unofficial adviser to the President. He agreed to carry a letter from Einstein to FDR, if Szilard could get one.
Szilard wrote a four-page draft version of this letter, and mailed it to Einstein.
Einstein asked to meet again with Szilard in person to discuss the letter, and so on July 30, 1939--this time with Edward Teller as chauffeur--Szilard travels out to Peconic a second time.
Einstein felt that Szilard's version was too long and technical for the President, and dictated (again, in German) a shorter version to Szilard.
Szilard spent a few days translating Einstein's letter into English, and even produced an even more shortened version. He took both to Einstein; Einstein signed both but preffered the longer of the two.
Szilard gave the longer letter to Sachs to take to FDR.
Sachs was not able to meet with FDR until October 11, 1939.
Here is one summary account [timesreview.com] of that meeting (an account which corresponds with my memory of its description in Rhodes's book--probably the source for this one):
So, none of this was Einstein's initiative. Szilard wrote the first version of the letter that Einstein was to send to FDR. Einstein rewrote it by dictating a new version of Szilard; then Szilard himself translated that into two versions which he took back to Einstein to sign. Sachs met with the President, but didn't present Einstein's letter until the end of the meeting, by then FDR was bored and not paying attention. Sachs met with FDR again the next day, this time convincing FDR to support an atomic program. There's not much evidence that Einstein's letter was particularly influential in this discussion. All evidence indicates that it was Sachs himself was who was persuasive. And, even then, the initial support was still very tepid.
In retrospect, I shouldn't have posted a simple "Why?" in response to the story, since doing so was a little bit coy and sort of an entrapment. But I partly did it because I was trying to be cautious about assuming why people so strongly associate Einstein with the bomb. Some people, for example, argue that he's in some sense the "father" of the bomb because of "e=mc^2".
But I've always thought that his importance to the development of the bomb was greatly overestimated in popular imagination. I imagine that a lot of people, uninformed about physics, just assume that the greatest physicist they're familiar with must be responsible in some way for the bomb. Others that are more knowledgable probably believe that he was intimately familiar with the work on atomic theory and the possibility of the bomb and took it upon himself to write FDR that letter and thus made the whole thing happen with his enormous influence. But that's not the way that it happened.
There are a few people that really were crucial to getting the ball rolling. The first and foremost is Szilard, who, if anyone, is the appropriate person to have his photo associated with this story. The two civilians are probably Vannevar Bush [doug-long.com] and James Conant (and possibly Sachs for his one crucial meeting with FDR). The former three worked tirelessly for years trying to get the US involved in atomic research, and then were instrumental after it began.
Re:Einstein (Score:2)
Excellent post. Where are my mod points when I really need them?
Excellent mention of Szilard and the role he played. Why don't more people appreciate his pivotal role in this CRUCIAL transitional period in world history?
Re:Einstein (Score:2)
they did not reply.
When's the real anniversary? (Score:2)
I have a party to celebrate the day I was born, not the day I was conceived.
Re:When's the real anniversary? (Score:2)
Not to be a wet towel... (Score:2)
I know similar questions were raised about the Rocky Flats Plant [epa.gov] (renamed "Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site" in an Orwellian twist) in Golden, CO (of Coors fame?).
(Another leaky drum example, in northwest DC a few miles from here, they have to be careful when excavation of drums of chemical warfare materials that were misplaced 70 years ago. One wonders how these things happen in the first place.)
Here [doe.gov] is a Dec. 2002 DOE press release re cleanup near Y-12. Cleanup is part of the price of nuclear programs, military or civilian.
hunting with geiger counters (Score:2)
K-25, the actual reactor site, is now considered an 'enviromental lab'. Read: we don't know how to clean it, so can anyone figure it out and get a PhD out of it?
Re:hunting with geiger counters (Score:1)
Isn't letting a dead animal go kind of futile? Or maybe at ORNL the animals never really die....
Maybe I watch too much of The Simpsons.
True Oak Ridge Story (Score:4, Interesting)
Fast forward 12 years later to 1978, where my father and I are taking a long road trip together. As we pass by Knoxville we decide to take a small detour and visit the museum again. Of course, by this time they had moved to a new building and all the old exhibits had been removed (I think the van der graaf generator was about the only thing that made the transition). We looked around but couldn't find the dime irradiator, so we grabbed the tour guide and asked where it was. The tour guide shuffled his feet nervously and said, "we don't do that anymore - it became unsafe when they changed to composition of the dimes." He then hurried off.
While I am sure that whatever radiation those dimes picked up was low energy, short lived, and short range - I sometimes wonder why I haven't had kids yet...
Tangentially Related Anecdote (Score:4, Interesting)
Howerver, Feynman was able to work it out so that he got to tour one of the uranium refinement facilities once. On this tour, he noticed that the processed uranium was being stacked up in warehouse. It eventually dawned on him that this was a horrible idea, as a tight configuration of enriched uranium like that could easily start a sustained reaction!
Of course, since the groups were kept separate and not allowed to freely communicate, this had never occurred to the people producing the stockpiles of enriched uranium.
Anyway, just a sort of funny story. That could have been a disaster and could easily have changed history.
Re:Tangentially Related Anecdote (Score:3, Insightful)
Now, in those days Feynman was just a kid, in his 20's or early 30's or something, and he had no idea how to read a blueprint. So he's looking at this thing and it's just making no sense at all, and right in the middle of the sheet there's a thing that kinda looks like a window. So, figuring what the hell, he puts his finger right on it and says, "What happens if this valve gets stuck?" He's expecting somebody to say, "That's not a valve, sir, that's a window," but instead everybody gets quiet and thinks for a minute. Finally, one of the guys says, "My God, sir, you're absolutely right! We'll have that fixed immediately!"
From reading his books, you kinda get the impression that Feynman lived his whole life that way, just pretending he knew what was going on and plunging ahead.
Wow... I seriously misread this at first (Score:2)