Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

First Israeli in Space 168

Sleepyman writes "CNN has a story about the first Israeli in space going on STS 107 Slated to takeoff today from NASA's Space Center in Florida this afternoon. Good luck to him and the rest of the crew of STS 107."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Israeli in Space

Comments Filter:
  • by MonTemplar ( 174120 ) on Thursday January 16, 2003 @09:05AM (#5093891) Homepage Journal
    For some reason, the scene from the end of Mel Brooks's film History of The World Part 1 just bounced into my head... :)
    • THANK YOU!

      I was hoping I wasn't the only one humming that song all day. ;0)

    • by Anonymous Coward


      A woman born in India is in the same space shuttle

      In case you didn't know - In addition to the Israeli guy, the space shuttle also has a woman who was born in India and now works for NASA like many other people born in India. Her name is Kalpana Chawla and she has been in space before.
      Here is her bio on NASA's website [nasa.gov]
      In November, 1996, Kalpana Chawla was assigned as mission specialist and prime robotic arm operator on STS-87 (November 19 to December 5, 1997). In completing her first mission, Kalpana Chawla traveled 6.5 million miles in 252 orbits of the Earth and logged 376 hours and 34 minutes in space. This is her second mission.
      Very surprising that the media is covering the story of Israeli guy while they completely ignored her(or not surprising at all, considering that media has been completely oblivious to contribution of Indians in American society which results in ignorant public opinion)!

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • anti-semitism (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Wow, I am always shocked by the amount of anti-semitism on slashdot. I always thought the /. crowd was different. I was wrong.
    • Re:anti-semitism (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      What anti-semitism? All I can see is expressions of anti-Israel sentiment which is quite a different thing. If you look at what Israel is doing these views are quite understandable. The anti-semite label is a great way of shutting up vocal opponents, but it doesn't wash with me anymore.
      • When you posted there were four posts criticizing Israel. One post comparing Israelis to domesticated animals and another alleging complicity in the 9/11 attacks. One post said that the Israelis should move to the moon so that the Palestinians could get their land back and another post spoke about how the average Palestinian might react to this news.

        That seems to me to be about 50% anti-Semite and 50% anti-Israel. The original poster's statement was therefore spot-on.
    • Re:anti-semitism (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      Being anti-israel != anti semitism.

      • Umnnn, Sure it does.
        It was decided by the winners of WWI that they didn't want all of those displaced Jews entering their countries so they allowed the Jews to use the area they had purchased all of the land in as a homeland. The Arabs are just pissed off that the swamp land that they sold to the Jews at a premium price was drained and turned into a great country.

        BTW Palestine is a Roman word understood to mean the land that the Hebrews dwell in.
        • The Arabs are just pissed off that the swamp land that they sold to the Jews at a premium price was drained and turned into a great country.
          A great country?
    • Re:anti-semitism (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      This is probably going to be off-topic, but Slashdot is a discussion site, and I'd like to get everyone's viewpoint.

      I'm Jewish, but not Israeli. And it's an important thing to note that not all Jews are anti-Palestine. The Reform Jewish movement (Judaism has "movements", like Christianity has denomonations) has publically stated it's for the establishment of a Palestinian state. Several Orthodox (!) congregations have chimed in as well.

      However, that doesn't mean that Israel should cease to exist. This is an overused analogy, but considering my wife is full-blooded Chickasaw, a useful one. The Chicaksaw (a Native American nation) were here first, but nobody expects the United States to dissolve and give back the land to the Native Americans. Instead, they've established semi-soverign "states within states" for the Chickasaw. How long does Isreal have to exist before they're considered a valid nation, and not illegal conquerors?

      Now, in Israel/Palestine, the land is still ethnically divided across more geographic lines. Therefore, it'd be easier to make it two states, instead of states-within-states. I'm totally for this.

      But, I've also often noticed that, among a lot of people today, it's "cool" to be anti-Israel. I'm assuming this is because their parents were pro-Israel. I dunno.

      Think about it. Atrocities have been comitted on both sides. Great Britian, who had mandate over the land, gave it to the Zionists for a homeland. Was that right? Maybe, maybe not. But the UN recognized it, and the greater community of nations recognized it, so it happened. Now, we have suicide bombings, and tanks running down children.

      I've lived all over the world, and it's amazing how different the media handles things. Here in the US, it's Palestinians bombing busses. In Europe, it's Israelis shooting houses. Given Europe's past history, I'd be inclined to believe that there is a bit more anti-Semitism in play than we are led to believe. (Before I get flamed into extinction - I'm not saying that all of Europe is anti-Semtic, I just think that European media is anti-Semetic, just like the American media is anti-Palestine. The media takes sides, don't forget). I lived in Europe for two years, and never had a problem. Just noting the media bias.

      So, before you get on a high horse and say "look at how evil Israel is", yadda yadda yadda, remember that boths sides are to blame. *Both* sides. Not one, not the other.

      And it sucks.
      • The Palestinians have a state. It's called Jordan. The people that Arafat has convinced to start calling themselves Palestinians are just a bunch of blood-thirsty Jordanians that keep getting kicked out of every country that they settle in. So now the Arab world has foisted them off in Israel in hopes that one will kill off the other, not mattering which way the hammer falls.

        If the Jews kill off all of the Palestinians, there will be no more Palestinians unsettling the Arab country's governments, and they will have a reason to try invade a weakened Israel once again.

        If the Palestinians kill off the Jews, then great more Jews are dead! And the Palestinians will be easier to contain in the blasted remains of the country.

        Why do you think that no Arab countries are really pushing for a separate Palestinian state?

        They are using them one against the other. Which ever one is left will be weak and easy to control or invade.
      • Re:anti-semitism (Score:2, Informative)

        by StressedEd ( 308123 )
        If there's one thing sure to annoy me it's the use of throw-away terms like "anti-Semitic" used by people incorrectly.

        I'd be inclined to believe that there is a bit more anti-Semitism in play than we are led to believe.

        Are you sure you mean anti-semitism? Semitic refers to the Jews, Arabs and many less well known groups.

        Surely in this context you wanted to say anti-Jewish.

        Reference below for your edification (emphasis mine)

        Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]

        Semitic \Sem*it"ic\, a.
        Of or pertaining to Shem or his descendants; belonging to
        that division of the Caucasian race which includes the Arabs,
        Jews, and related races. [Written also Shemitic.]

        Semitic language, a name used to designate a group of
        Asiatic and African languages, some living and some dead,
        namely: Hebrew and Ph[oe]nician, Aramaic, Assyrian,
        Arabic, Ethiopic (Geez and Ampharic). --Encyc. Brit.

        However, in the current political climate you are probably right, there is almost certainly increasing anti-Semitism. Currently this seems to be mostly coming from the USA and directed at the Arabs of the Middle East in a country whos name begins with "IRA" and ends with "Q" (pun intended).

        -ed
        • Listen, if you are going to be a nitpicker, at least do it correctly. See, for example, The American Heritage Definition of anti-semitism [reference.com]. The fact is that though Semitic refers to an ethnic group of people that includes both Arabs and Jews, the word anti-semitism has come to generally carry the connotation of dislike, hatred of or prejudice against Jews specifically. Webster's Revised Unabriged Dictionary says:


          \An`ti-Sem"i*tism\, n. Opposition to, or hatred of, Semites, esp. Jews


          And the American Heritage Dictionary says:


          anti-Semitism (nt-sm-tzm, nt-)
          n.

          1. Hostility toward or prejudice against Jews or Judaism.

          2. Discrimination against Jews.


          So I think the words modern meaning is pretty clear. Somebody posts this same post every time anybody uses the word, and it's just as bad (actually worse) than the people who bitch about the media's use of the word "hacker" rather than
          "cracker". The evolution of a language is not always perfectly logical, and the important part is that we commonly understand what the words mean.

          • He isnt american (I assume!) so I doubt the American Heritage dictionary carries too much weight with him ;-)
            I submit the following entry for your dictionary:

            The word anti-semitism has come to generally carry the connotation of dislike, hatred of or prejudice against Israel specifically.


          • Listen, if you are going to be a nitpicker, ........surely you mean "pedant" ;-) ? (Please engage ironic humour)

            The fact is that though Semitic refers to an ethnic group of people that includes both Arabs and Jews, the word anti-semitism has come to generally carry the connotation of dislike, hatred of or prejudice against Jews specifically.

            Of course I realise that. It has come to that because people keep using the phrase incorrectly. Hence my pompous one man stand to turn back the tide and influence the linguistic landscape of the English language. (please note my tongue is firmly in my cheek here).

            My point is that the use of the phrase "anti-Semetic" to mean "anti-Jewish" is an unnecessary erosion of meaning. It's like using "British" to mean the English, Scots and the Welsh and using "anti-British" to mean anti-English.

            Sooner or later the continued dilution of meaning will result in the word Semetic meaning Jewish. When we wish to talk about the group of people currently known as Semites someone will have to invent a new word describing the people of the region and their emigrated descendents.

            The evolution of a language is not always perfectly logical

            Amen to that.
      • Re:anti-semitism (Score:1, Interesting)

        by Anonymous Coward
        ummm. as far as rebellious youth goes, I don't know anyone (I'm british) left *AT ALL* who is still pro Israeli, and if they were over thirty *THEY ALL USED TO BE*.

        i'd like to think that our press (can't vouch for it all, but certainly tv) covers the conflict evenly. Whenever a suicide bomber goes off, it is covered HEAVILY. It just so happens at the moment that the Israelis ARE killing more Palestinians at the moment (about three a day it seems like).

        Some media is anti-Israeli, but I would wager most is still more anti-Palestine JUST by virtue of swallowing everything that the Israeli press corp throws at them. so does laziness count?

        We didn't even get that pissed off here when a British UN worker was sniped by a trigger happy israeli kid. We bought the Israeli line that he was "acting suspiciously" (he was actually negotiating a cease-fire - something he kept pissing off the Israeli army by trying to do).
      • Re:anti-semitism (Score:3, Insightful)

        by corebreech ( 469871 )
        The Chicaksaw (a Native American nation) were here first, but nobody expects the United States to dissolve and give back the land to the Native Americans.

        Nobody expects Israel to dissolve. Just stay within your borders, the same as we expect from every single other nation on the planet. Stop invading other peoples' land and demolishing their homes. Stop killing their people.

        And we do give land back to the Native Americans. As much as we should? Hardly. But there's another factor at play here: time. The land stolen from Native Americans was done by Americans who are now long dead. Not so with the Israelis.

        Your position seems to be that simply because people have stolen land from others in the past that it is OK to do so now and in the future. Clearly, that is an unacceptible position. It's embarrassing that anybody even needs to be told this.

        But, I've also often noticed that, among a lot of people today, it's "cool" to be anti-Israel.

        I suppose it never occurred to you that a lot of people think it sucks when a mighty military power subjects a defenseless people to a brutal occupation, taking their lives and stealing their land in the process. Do you think that might have something to do with it?

        Do you understand that a significant chunk of the money I pay in taxes is diverted to Israel every year so they can engage in these brutal exercises? And that they are only able to get this money by virtue of their having bribed our Congress into being so generous with my money? That the reason Israel possesses this mighty military machine is almost entirely due to the aid it receives from America? That most if not all of the news we get from our media here is so hopelessly biased against the Palestinians that I now have to rely on foreign news organizations to keep me informed on what is really happening there?

        "Cool" has nothing to do with it.

        Atrocities have been comitted on both sides.

        Since Sharon's trip to the Temple Mount the number of Palestinian dead exceeds that of Israeli dead by a ratio of nearly 3-to-1. That fact, coupled with the naked aggression on the part of the Israelis by occupying Palestinian lands by force and demolishing Palestinian homes clearly places the atrocities Israel commits in a different class altogether than those committed by the Palestinians.

        Great Britian, who had mandate over the land, gave it to the Zionists for a homeland.

        Why not stick to the matter of Israelis stealing land beyond what was "given" to them by Great Britain, the matter that is foremost in peoples' minds, the matter that so provokes the Palestinians.

        So, before you get on a high horse and say "look at how evil Israel is", yadda yadda yadda, remember that boths sides are to blame. *Both* sides. Not one, not the other.

        Nice try. Israel is the aggressor. Israel is brutalizing a defenseless people. It's amazing that anybody would even try to spin it any other way. The fact that they are is a testament to the tremendous influence Jews have in American media.
  • This is news ? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Eivind ( 15695 ) <eivindorama@gmail.com> on Thursday January 16, 2003 @09:46AM (#5094181) Homepage
    What exactly is news in this ? The *nationality* of a astronaut ? Will we now have slashdot storeis about the first astronaut from all countries ?

    Apparently what he's doing or what the mission is for or anything of the sort is not interesting enough to be worth metioning, only the nationality is so sensational it deserves a story of its own.

    Oh, and offcourse anything who says /anything/ that is a) negative and b) involves israel, however indirectly, is a rabid anti-semite.
    • And now, for your enjoyment, the first /. posting by a cat:

      -----
      sarghbn9o8'
      451902
      0-pkl, mn dsx 32

      -----
      (missed were the multiple function keys that were also stepped on.)
    • Things like this make the news because they ARE important to the groups they represent. Society at large cares because it affects the "general impression" people have of that group. For the same reason, negative news about groups also make headlines.

      Some people who react negatively to positive publicity about other groups feel threatened by those groups.
      • Things like this make the news because they ARE important to the groups they represent.

        Yes, sure. I'm not surprised that say Israeli news-sources would report on it. Like you said, it migth have importance for the groups it represents.

        What I question is why it's newsworthy for Slashdot. For an international collection of mostly hackers or whatever. Do you really think this would be reported if it was the first astronaut from any other tiny country ?

        Was Norways first astronaut reported ? Swedens ? Mexicos ? Italys ?

        To me it still smells like a "Go Israel!" propaganda-article. You're free to disagree offcourse.

  • by 0x69 ( 580798 ) on Thursday January 16, 2003 @10:02AM (#5094286) Journal
    This IS worthy Slashdot Science Section news, but NOT because of the "first person from country X in space" angle.

    The important science news here is all about political use of the Space Shuttle, the security problems created thereby (how many lives and $millions would certain terrorists happily give to sabotage or shoot down this Shuttle?), etc.

    (Yes, i know that the whole Shuttle program is at least as much about pork spreading as space science, and that's *very* old news.)
    • look - space exploration has always been about politics.

      why did the US start the space race? to beat the soviet union to it.

      why did the US want to hit the moon by 1970? to beat the soviet union to it.

      much of the technology used in ICBMs was converted to NASA gear, and vice versa.

      don't fool yourself - no country explores space for the joy of exploration. they do it because it has tangible payoffs in the economic, political, and military worlds.

      jon
  • is how they are able drive a Cadillac into outer space! Gag... moan... argh
  • So ? (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Every day the israeli's try and put Palestinians in orbit. What's the big deal ?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 16, 2003 @01:09PM (#5095872)
    Ilan Ramon, the Israeli astronaut, was one of the F-16 pilots who had bombarded and destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor back in 1981. If not for him (or rather, if not for the Israeli Air Force), ten years later (in 1991) the USA would have had to face an Iraq that owns nuclear weapons. Not a nice prospect.
  • or we might have ourselves a Gaza-Trek strip in space ;).
  • Remeber the end of history of the world? "We're Jews in space, zooming around protecting the hebrew race!" I wish I could find a screen grab of that.
  • Could it be Anti-Semitism?

    When you think about it, Israel is one of the smallest countries in the world. Even if the Israeli and Palestinian populations fought to the death it wouldn't make a dent in the world popultion. Despite all the tragedies, the number killed on both sides combined account for only a tiny fraction of the violent deaths in the world. Israel has no natural resources which Europeans covet. If Europeans were truly concerned about doing good in the world, there are many jucier projects both among the neighboring MidEast dictators and in just about every other corner of the world.

    To many distant observors, the pathological fixation of Europeans on Israel while at the same time selling their soles to the most evil dictators in the world smacks of a delusional illness. That illness bears an uncanny resemblance to the thousand year fixation of Europeans on opressing their small and weak internal minorities. In the scientific and medical world, when 2 species or maladies exhibit many similarities, Occum's razor calls for classifying them as similar. So, to many European knee-jerk anti-Israel sentiment is near indistinguishable from knee-jerk anti-Semitism. Wh

    What else could explain the boycott of Israeli academics even though the academic segment in Israel is about as left wing and pro-Palestinian as any segment?

    Of course, since much of Europe contributed collectively to the near extermination of European Jewry, it is only natural that they now need to turn to Israel to find new sources of Jew hatred.

    If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

    • Why ?

      Probably because they don't hate them, they are just disgusted at the way Israel act, which means:
      - legalization of torture
      - illegal building of settlements in occupied areas in violation of Geneva Conventions
      - violation of UN resolutions since 30 years
      - Israeli army exactions in occupied territories, documented by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch,...
      - collective punishments (houses destruction, olive trees fields destructions,...), which is a violation of human rights and a war crime
      - discrimination towards Israeli-Arabs (and no, being able to be elected is not a proof of non-discrimination) ...

      It's so easy to always accuse people of anti-semitism whenever they criticize Israel, but it won't hide the crimes of the state of Israel, and one day this country will have to pay for these crimes the same way Switzerland had to pay for the jewish gold in its banks, the same way Germany had to pay for everything it has done during World War II,...

      Israel is a criminal state, as Iraq is.
      • You did not answer the question. I asked why do Europeans disproportionately hate Israel compared to the scores of other evil places in the world? Even if you accept as gospel all of your complaints, you can't seriously believe that life is better in Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia or any of the dozens of other dozens of dictatorships that money hungry Europeans open their checkbooks to.
        • Why ?

          Palestinians have CLEARLY a worse life in Israel than they would in Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia,...

          Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia,... do not :
          - violate UN resolutions
          - violate Geneva conventions on rules of war
          - occupy illegaly the land of another people
          - do collective punishments ...

          Life in Israel is nice for Israeli jews, but not for the arabs. Israel is an apartheid state.

          Life in these arab countries under dictatorship is what's called an "internal matter" of these countries, these are sovereign countries and even though most of the world disagree with what's happening inside, they can't do much.

          In Israel's case, it's not an internal matter, Israel is violating international resolutions, occupying another people's land, this is an international matter.

          • Really, you are about as ignorant as they come. Let's take some examples. Many Palestinians are Christians. Do you know how Christians are treated in Saudi Arabia? Did you know that any Moslem who converts to Christianity is given the death penalty. Many Palestinians are used to Western vices such as alcahol and pre-marital sex. Did you know that such crimes result in wipping and execution in countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran Female Palestinians can drive cars and don't have to cover their bodies with shapeless rags. What are their rights in Saudi Arabia. The Palestinian press is pretty lively. Many Palestinians gripe about their leaders almost as much as they gripe about Israel :) Do you know what happens to people who criticize the President of Syria? Interesting that Arabs on the Golan are not part of the intifidah. Did you ever think that the last thing they want to do is become part of Syria? Another test: Which is more dangerous to your physical well-being: 1. Standing up as an Israeli Arab student in the middle of a University classroom and saying that you support the Intifidah and that you think suicide bombers are martyrs 2. Standing in the middle of the street in Saudi Arabia and saying a Christian prayer. I invite you try them both :)
            • So what ?

              These are INTERNAL MATTERS of a sovereign country.

              I don't see why Europe should have a say on Israeli laws which forbid to do [put whatever] during the Sabbath, same thing, I don't see why they should have a say on what Saudi Arabia does on its own territory.

              However Europe has a say on what Israel does on an international level, and fact is that on an internation level, Iran, Saudi Arabia and other countries of the region behave much better than Israel.

              You don't have to tell me that these arab countries are dictatorships, I know it. That doesn't make Israel's treatment of palestinians any better, and that does not change the fact that Israel is violating international laws while Iran, Saudi Arabia,... do not.

              • Now you are being inconsistent.

                When Saudi Arabia stone adultresses or beheads missionaries or forbids people from worshipping in their religion, that is an INTERNAL matter.

                But when Israel destroys houses of terrorists, gives less funding to Israeli Arab communities, or gets tough on terrorists that is not an INTERNAL matter?

                At least try to pretend to be consistent :)

                Of course, we all know the real truth. The very existence of a strong and independent state of Israel is something that Jew-haters like yourself find very hard to swallow. (By the way, when you went to those 2 Jewish weddings which you are so proud of, did you have to shower afterwards?)
                • Idiot.

                  What Israel does on israeli territory is an internal matter.

                  Destroying houses in occupied territories, building settlements,... is done on occupied territory, not on israeli territory, hence the difference.

                  Of course, we all know the real truth. The very existence of a strong and independent state of Israel is something that Jew-haters like yourself find very hard to swallow. (By the way, when you went to those 2 Jewish weddings which you are so proud of, did you have to shower afterwards?)

                  Well, you idiot, tell me where I say that Israel does not have a right to exist.
                  I'm talking about the territories occupied after 1967, not about Israel and its recognized borders.
                  • Tell me please, what country wasn't founded on territory that was at one time occupied by someone else?

                    Israel captured the land fair-and-square in a defensive war. They have already given back 100% of the Sinai. As late as the end of 2000, the Israeli government was willing to give back 100% of Gaza, 95% of the West Bank and all but a 100 feet or so of the Golan. Israel was willing to uproot its own people with a strong historical and religious claim to the land and risk internal conflict all for the sake of a "promise".

                    Remind me again what other country has been so generous in victory against a sea of enemies who at best promise a cold peace.

                    I have nothing against discussing individual disagreements with Israeli policies or actions. But your inability to distinguish between Arab terrorists and extremely restrained pinpoint responses makes you into an anti-Semite.

                    It is precisely this single minded fixation with blaming and hating Jews that is the hallmark of anti-Semitism. Look into your heart for a moment and think about why of all the many truly evil conflicts in the world, you fixate on Israel.

                    Where is your anger about the *millions* of Sudanese Christians being starved, murdered, and sold into slavery?

                    Where is your anger about the treatment of women and minorities throughout the Arab world?

                    What about "occupied" Kurdistan and the 20 million people there without a homeland?

                    Where is your sympathy for the Bahai's who have been persecuted endlessly by Iran?

                    Why are you so outraged by one little country the size of New Jersey that has never asked for more than to be left alone and live in peace with its neighbors?
                    • Why Israel more than the others ?

                      Probably because the media talk about it more than the other conflicts, so I get to have more information about it, and have an opinion about it.

                      I certainly think the Kurds deserve to have a country, I find that Turkey had a very similar behavior to Israel these last few years towards Kurds, and mind you, if the native americans decided they want their own country, I would support them.

                      Israel is not the only one on my list of countries with a disgusting behavior, but it's quite high on the list as its actions have been lasting for decades and are becoming more and more disgusting.

                      Moreover, I don't see Israel's attitude as an "extremely restrained pinpoint response", I see it as a very violent response to a people who has very legitimate claims and who had ultimately to resort to violence to make its claims heard given the fact that negociation didn't work(need I remind you that during the 10 years of negociation Israel kept building settlements, refusing build permits to palestinians and destroying houses, that's not really a proof of good will).

                      And as I told you, what Israel claim to have offered to the palestinians will not be considered seriously until the papers are shown publicly to see what it really looked like, palestinians say one thing, the israeli say something else about this so called offer, I don't see why I should trust either side without proof.
                    • "As late as the end of 2000, the Israeli government was willing to give back 100% of Gaza, 95% of the West Bank and all but a 100 feet or so of the Golan. Israel was willing to uproot its own people with a strong historical and religious claim to the land and risk internal conflict all for the sake of a "promise"."


                      On Paper, sort of. You're missing the rest of the facts. The areas of land had no real transportation, and were disjointed.

                      Look at this map [gush-shalom.org], and see how the Palestinians were being cheated with an offer like that.

                • "But when Israel destroys houses of terrorists, gives less funding to Israeli Arab communities, or gets tough on terrorists that is not an INTERNAL matter?"

                  Israelis are doing this in Palestinian territories, outside of Israel. Bringing in tanks, soldiers, demolishing houses. Doing this while the UN orders them to stop. Not very internal.

                  And get it through your head, people don't dislike Israel because they're Jew-haters, as you said, but because Israel has hurt a lot of innocent people. Blowing up an apartment building, killing over a dozen people and children because one terrorist was sleeping inside is NOT a good way to do things.
              • ...and that does not change the fact that Israel is violating international laws while Iran, Saudi Arabia,... do not.

                Really?
                Some examples:
                - Human rights is part of internation law. Last time I looked stonings, beheadings, freedom of religion, etc. were part of human rights

                - Slavery is also a violation of human rights. It still exists in Saudi Arabia and several other Arab countries that import black Christian slaves captured as war booty in Sudan

                - Iran is a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Almost everybody agrees that they are violating it now in their quest for nuclear weapons (NOTE: Israel is not violating internation law here since joining the treaty is voluntary and Israel decided to not join the treaty rather than join it and lie)

                - Kidnapping - Saudi Arabia refuses to turn over children kidnapped from the United States in violation of international treaties for the protection of children

                - Iran uses child soldiers, another violation of international law

                - I also seem to remember a hostage "situation" back at the American embassy which seemed to violate something about the Geneva convention and treatment of embassies.

                Need I go on... but then again an anti-Semite can never be convinced by the facts. (oh yes, I forgot, you did go to 2 Jewish weddings -- that almost makes you a rabbi)
                • Human rights is part of internation law. Last time I looked stonings, beheadings, freedom of religion, etc. were part of human rights

                  True, they're violating this one

                  Slavery is also a violation of human rights. It still exists in Saudi Arabia and several other Arab countries that import black Christian slaves captured as war booty in Sudan

                  This is not a state policy, this is forbidden by the state.
                  This is like saying that because someone raped a woman in France, then France is guilty.

                  Iran is a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Almost everybody agrees that they are violating it now in their quest for nuclear weapons

                  No, only USA and Israel agree, nobody else does.

                  Kidnapping - Saudi Arabia refuses to turn over children kidnapped from the United States in violation of international treaties for the protection of children

                  Wrong, these are bilateral treaties, and I dare to guess that Saudi Arabia does not have one with USA.

                  Iran uses child soldiers, another violation of international law

                  Not anymore.

                  also seem to remember a hostage "situation" back at the American embassy which seemed to violate something about the Geneva convention and treatment of embassies.

                  Yep, 20 years ago, this was solved

                  I am talking about what's happening NOW.

                  Otherwise we can talk about Sabra&Chatila, Canaa, etc...
      • Time to take off the anti-Semitic mask and anti-Israel propaganda and look at some cold, hard facts

        - Myth: legalization of torture
        Fact: Supreme court in Israel has outlawed even relatively trivial amounts of "physical pressure" even when there is a "ticking bomb." Some interrogation pressure is still allowed when there is a "ticking bomb" such as sleep deprivation, long periods of standing, and emotional pressure. None of this is even remotely comparable to the rampant real-live sadistic torture that is common with many of Europe's best friends in the Middle East. Of course, the US and its allies behave similarly and don't exactly serve tea to captives in Afghanistan and elsewhere... The perhaps legitimate criticism of Israeli behavior is the degree of aggressiveness in pursuing criminal charges against individual violators who do so against regulations. (But then again, we all know about how individual European countries have even more egregriously shielded their UN peacekeeping citizens from prosecution for rape and other crimes while serving in the former Yugoslavia.)

        - Myth: illegal building of settlements in occupied areas in violation of Geneva Conventions
        Fact 1: Many 3rd party legal scholars challenge whether the Geneva Convention even applies to the territories since technically they never had any officially recognized sovereignty since they were previously occupied illegally by Jordan (where was the UN then?) and prior to that they were in the category of mandate.
        Fact 2: Denying Jewish rights to settlement in the Territories would be recognizing the 100% ethnic cleansing performed by the Jordanians in 1948 and by Arab pogroms in the preceding decades. Many settlements have been rebuilt over areas that had been levelled in 1948 (including even some of the settlements in Gaza). Hebron's 3 thousand years of continual Jewish presence was wiped out by the 1929 Arab pogrom - the downtown market area still has Jewish symbols carved into many of the homes.

        Myth: violation of UN resolutions since 30 years
        Fact: First, Israel, in contrast to Iraq, has not violated any of the binding UN resolutions. Second, Israel can hardly be blamed for violating that are completely politically motivated and biased. For example, "Zionism is Racism" is one of the better known examples of UN wisdom. Should Jews be required to remove all references to Zion (a synonym for Jerusalem) from the bible and prayer books?

        - Myth: Israeli army exactions in occupied territories, documented by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch,...
        Fact1: Israel every day takes huge risks to target operations and limit damage. Believe me, it would be a lot easier to solve the problem the US way by carpet bombing with B52s from 30,000+ feet.
        Fact 2: War is hell. People who live in glass houses shouldn't plant bombs. You can't go around launching morters, blowing up busses, knifing kids, throwing Molotov cocktails and be expected to be given a "timeout". On the other hand, I seem to remember Israel offering to give back 95%+ of the territories without even getting a counter-offer.

        - Myth: collective punishments (houses destruction, olive trees fields destructions,...), which is a violation of human rights and a war crime
        Fact: Saying that blowing up a terrorist's home or destroying a mortar factory is collective punishment is a bit of a stretch. Sometimes houses or trees are destroyed when they have been used by snipers to kill civilians. Again, people who live in glass houses, shouldn't throw Molotov Cocktails. Of course, most other countries would have levelled the whole area by now...

        - Myth: discrimination towards Israeli-Arabs (and no, being able to be elected is not a proof of non-discrimination) ...
        Fact 1: Just last week the Supreme Court allowed several Arab candidates to run for election who have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with terrorist leaders in enemy countries and who have praised suicide bombers. Most European countries would have them arrested and certainly would disqualify them from election.
        Fact 2: The average standard of living and infant mortality rate is better among Israeli Arabs than among even the wealthiest Arab countries
        Fact 3: There is way more human rights and freedom of speech for Israeli Arabs in Israel than for Arabs in any other Arab country.

        Bottom line: Is Israel perfect? Of course not. But given that Israel's very existence is challenged daily in both word and deed, it is a true measure of Sainthood that things are not much worse both for Palestinians and for their Israeli Arab supporters.

        I personally think that Israel is stupid for attempting to live up to a higher standard that it is never given credit for.
        • Legalization of torture
          Amnesty International [amnesty.org] Go see by yourself

          Illegal building of settlements
          Everybody in the world except a tiny minority agrees that Israel is illegally occupying the territories gained after the 1967 war. That's a FACT.

          Violation of UN resolutions since 30 years
          Israel is violating UN resolution 242, which was voted by the security council and thus is binding by opposition to general assembly resolutions which are not binding.
          The fact that the resolution is binding or not does not change anything to the fact that Israel is violating them by the way.

          Israeli exactions in occupied territories
          The fact that other armies would be worse does not change the fact that Israel is commiting exactions, period.
          Israel's offer to the palestinians is not clear, 95% of the territories cut in small pieces is not an acceptable offer. Until I've seen the papers explaining clearly the offer I won't believe either the palestinian or the israeli side as to what was proposed during these discussions

          collective punishments
          Destroying a house is a collective punishment, the other people who live in this house are not automatically responsible of what their brother/son had done, the people who live in the apartments nearby are not responsible either Olive fields have been destroyed for non-military reasons many times, this is also documented.

          discrimination towards Israeli-Arabs
          As said before, being able to be elected is not a proof of non-discrimination.
          Israeli-arab communities receive less funds than israeli jewish counterparts.
          Arabs can't live in jewish settlements
          etc...
          Go see This report from Amnesty International [amnesty.org]

          • Your moniker "swissmonkey" is very appropriate :)

            First, you should re-read my original response since you continue to perpetrate myths. I will no waste my time repeating the same responses, but will add some other comments.

            1. First, ethics and legality are not decided by "majority vote". Otherwise slavery and many other bad things would still be here. Majority vote in a UN dominated by third world despots should hardly be taken as the last word in morality. Perhaps, you blame the Jews in Nazi Germany who tried to disobey the laws putting them in gas chambers.

            2. Israel has already withdrawn from more than 95% of the occupied territories. Resolution 242 called for "Withdrawal from occupied territories." The word "the" or "all" was deliberately left out by the drafters.

            Also Resolution 242 calls for withdrawal within the context of secure and recognizable borders and an overall peace settlement. Clearly, none of the above exist due to the rejectionish Palestinian front.

            3. Morality and conduct under wartime conditions is always a relative condition. Hey I wish that I could shit perfume too. Unfortunately, the business of defending civilians from suicide bombers is sometimes a bit ugly. Again, I challenge you to find one example of any army that behaved better under similar conditions.

            4. A lot of things are collective punishment. Here in the US, we often confiscate the boats of drug dealers and the cars of drunk drivers. Is that collective punishment because the rest of the family surely suffers when they lose their cars or luxuries?

            Finally, you would be taken a lot more seriously if you put this into some tight of balanced context.

            For example if you said something like, "I understand that it must be awful to live in daily fear of suicide bombers etc. Nevertheless, I believe that the Israelis should hold themselves to a higher level than their neighbors etc."

            Luckily, though, nobody listens much to Europeans anymore. The Swiss in particular are about as hypocritical as you get. My Swiss "friends" complain about all the foreigners (all 10 of them in the whole country) who are destroying their Christian culture...
            • First, ethics and legality are not decided by "majority vote". Otherwise slavery and many other bad things would still be here. Majority vote in a UN dominated by third world despots should hardly be taken as the last word in morality. Perhaps, you blame the Jews in Nazi Germany who tried to disobey the laws putting them in gas chambers.

              Yes they are, that's what democracy is all about.
              And as far as I know, the UN security council who voted the UN 242 resolution is not dominated by despots. France, UK and USA who voted this resolution are democracies.

              Israel has already withdrawn from more than 95% of the occupied territories. Resolution 242 called for "Withdrawal from occupied territories." The word "the" or "all" was deliberately left out by the drafters.


              Israel has not withdrawn from 95% of the territories, settlements represents more than 5% of the territories.
              The word "the" is present in the french version of the resolution, which is the one binding(yes, that's the way the UN works, I also don't know why it's the french one).

              Morality and conduct under wartime conditions is always a relative condition
              Intifada occured in 2000, during the years before Israel was still building settlements, destroying houses,... This was not war time.

              A lot of things are collective punishment. Here in the US, we often confiscate the boats of drug dealers and the cars of drunk drivers. Is that collective punishment because the rest of the family surely suffers when they lose their cars or luxuries?

              In USA (where I live), we don't destroy the houses of the neighbours of the dealer not his house.

              Don't get me wrong, suicide bombings are horrible things, but they are not more horrible that Israel's attitude towards palestinians.
              Israel is just doing terrorism in a different way than the palestinian extremists, and it's been doing it much more frequently.

              Oh by the way, in Switzerland, 20% of the population is made of foreign people, and they all have the same rights as we do (except that they can't vote, but this is changing), so you obviously are either lying or ignorant.
              • 1. Unless you are a moral relativist (which it seems you are), how could morality and ethics possibly be decided by a majority vote of any body, much less the UN?

                The Nazis were brought to power by a democratic vote and the Nuremberg laws were passed by the legislature. Does that make them right?

                2. The word 'the' is critical to all debates on resolution 242. You should read the memoirs of the US and British negotiators who spent weeks pushing for the exclusion of that word. Plus, last time I looked, Israel had accepted Resolution 242...

                3. Israel has indeed withdrawn from more than 95%. You forget of course the Sinai Pennisula which dwarfs the size of the West Bank and Gaza. While it has fewer people, it was of strong strategic importance and had enough oil to make Israel self-sufficient. It was given back 100% down to the last centimeter.

                4. We are not talking about the neighbors of terrorists. Exactly how many houses have been intentionally destroyed by the army that either were not terrorist houses or that were not used to shield terrorists? (Believe me, if the US army were there, we would have cleared a 2 mile path in every direction. Have you seen Tora Bora recently?)

              • You say:
                Oh by the way, in Switzerland, 20% of the population is made of foreign people, and they all have the same rights as we do (except that they can't vote, but this is changing)

                Most people would say that lacking voting and citizenship rights is pretty significant. My father-in-law was born in Switzerland and his father was a successful publisher in Zurich, yet he was never given citizenship so he moved to the US.

                80% of the foreigners have been living there for more than 20 years, yet they are denied the basic rights of citizenship and voting.

                On the other hand, now I understand why you don't make much of Israel granting full citizenship and voting rights to its Arab population. It means nothing to you since your country denies it!

                Switzerland is in my opinion one of the most racist countries in the world. The way Swiss people speak of and treat non-Western foreigners makes the KKK look enlightened.

                What other country inspects peoples housekeeping skills before making them citizens lest they bring in some "dirty" habits from their original countries?

                Let's not of course forget WWII where the Swiss sat back and made money for both sides and bolted their fronteirs shut while their neigbhors went off to die in concentration camps. Not content with just profiting form ordinary war-trade, they went off and stole the possessions of Holocaust victims.

                Oh yes, but you are not anti-Semitic, since you went to 2 Jewish weddings! I heard that many Nazis had Jewish colleagues too before the war.

                Why don't you go back to Switzerland and rot with the rest of Continent where anti-Semitism is so deeply ingrained that it seeps out of every rock.

                I have a lot more respect for Palestinians than from Eurotrash like you. At least the Palestinians have some grievances and are fighting for something tangible. The Europeans are only in it for the old sport of anti-Semitism. The only wonder perhaps is that it took 50 years for the Europeans to forget the lessons of the Holocaust and start finding excuses to attack Jews.

                Why don't you read some of the news stories about how your beloved Aryan Swiss countrymen murdered a Rabbi a couple of months ago just for being Jewish?

                Why do synagogues in Switzerland (and much of the rest of Europe) require guards armed with submachine guns? Why are Jews told to hide their Jewishness lest some of the pride-and-joy of Switzerland attack them for just being Jewish?

                One could make a good case that it is better to be an Israeli Arab in Haifa (which is a peaceful mixed city with a strong spirit of coexistance) than to be a Jew or foreigner living in Switzerland or France.
                • Dumbass.

                  I'm swiss, but I was not when I was born, some for all my family.

                  Most swiss people except in the deep country have roots which are outside of Switzerland.

                  Next time before you talk, learn about what you're talking about, you'll look much less stupid.

                  Switzerland is on the brink of given voting rights to people who are not citizens, and I don't know many countries who do that actually.
                  • Everybody if you go back far enough has roots somewhere else. Duh!

                    Switzerland is on the brink of giving voting rights like the MidEast is on the brink of breaking out in peace. Plus, citizenship is way more important.

                    It should be interesting though when Europe wakes up one day and realizes that they can no longer buy off their Muslim minorities with anti-Israel sentiment. Sort of like when we woke up and realized that the "Peaceful Religion" ain't so peaceful...
      • You say: Israel is a criminal state, as Iraq is. I can think of only 2 possibilities that would merit such a comparison: 1. You are totally ignorant 2. You are a vile anti-Semite
        • Israel IS a criminal state, you refuse this comparison because you are pro-israeli (and your comment on being anti-semite make me laugh by the way, I don't think I would have gone to two jewish weddings in the last three monthes otherwise)

          Israel's crimes are well known, I've given a list in my previous post and everything can be verified easily.

          Israel IS a criminal state.
          • >You say: your comment on being anti-semite make me laugh by the way, I don't think I would have gone to two jewish weddings in the last three monthes otherwise

            That made me a laugh -- you just gave the modern version of old the joke about the anti-Semite saying "but some of my best friends are Jewish"

            Then again as I said there is another option, you could just be ignorant
  • and the rest of the arab world:

    "First Israeli in Space...

    6.592 million to go."
    • Thank you for your insightful comment. Now we have a quantitative way to test whether you are anti-Semitic or just run-of-the-mill anti-Israel.

      Do you want all 6.592 million (actually more like 6.1 million) Israelis to be sent into space or just the 80% that are Jewish?

      In other words, what should happen to the 1 million or so Israeli Arabs and and couple of hundred thousand Christians?
  • If they're muslum, how do they know which way is East to pray to?
    • the important thing is the intention. if it is not possible to determine the direction of Kabe (not East, muslums do not worship sun), then you pick up a direction and then worship in that direction. same with body, if it is not possible to move your body, you can worship with eyes, or only with thought.
    • They should do all their praying _before_ launch, after all, that's the most dangerous part. In fact, why doesn't NASA employ a load of people representing all of the major world religions to pray for the shuttle's safety before each lift-off?
    • Easy, Muslims pray as best as we can determine towards Mecca (not always east). So we would face Earthwards while doing so. We may not be 100% sure of the direction, but God accepts our prayer if we have the good intentions.

  • I can't wait for the first Scotsperson to reach earth orbit, amid a fanfare of bagpipes, accordions and fiddles. The tartan of the Black Watch will be worn with pride by said astronaut as she circles the earth at 250 miles up, bag of liquidised haggis in hand being consumed through a straw. As the shuttle passes Edinburgh the Capitol's inhabitants and Scots from all over the world will raise their glasses of Glenmorangie in a toast to celebrate this gloroius achievement. A gigantic Saltire will be floated on Loch Lomond, visible from space. Burns will be quoted. Jimmy Shand will be exhumed and Ricky Fulton will provide the comedy. Oh wait, that's Hogmanay...

Whoever dies with the most toys wins.

Working...