Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science

Melting Away Ice Hazards 131

RadioheadKid writes "Dartmouth College Professor Victor F. Petrenko is getting a grip on ice. He and his colleagues have found ways to take advantage of the "protonic" semiconductor properties of frozen water. They see many applications of this discovery from melting ice on power lines to electronic speed control for skis and snowboards. I guess those Petrenkos just love the ice."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Melting Away Ice Hazards

Comments Filter:
  • by Lord Bitman ( 95493 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:10AM (#4971551)
    the idea of someone being at an Ice Conference is troubling.
  • by absurdhero ( 614828 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:10AM (#4971552) Homepage
    Using this on skis and snow mobiles would be interesting. If this discovery is applicable to real life beyond melting lines, it could be very powerful. I doubt it will be life changing though. Most discoveries add small conveniences to life.
    • by kiatoa ( 66945 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:00PM (#4973283) Homepage
      Living in Vermont I'd love to be able to hit a switch and have my tires "get a grip" on the ice. I bought Petrenko's text book and I'm slowly making my way through it. Many, many years ago I read an article on how ice is a semiconductor. The authors of that article made transistors (bipolar IIRC) using ice doped with something I can't remember. Petrenko makes a FET using ice but he uses a silicon wafer for making the gate. If anyone reading this knows how to make a BJT using ice please let me know! Its of absolutely no practical use but it sure would be interesting. Email: kiatoa@kiatoa-remove-me-.com
  • by PaybackCS ( 611691 ) <paybackNO@SPAMpdxlan.com> on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:12AM (#4971556) Homepage
    Now those guys who can go 150mph downhill will be able to go 200mph...

    If that doesn't change your life for the better, I don't know what else would...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:12AM (#4971557)
    It would have been nice to have something like this on my car tires this winter when I was sliding around on the thick sheets of ice. I wonder what the time to market will be on this technology.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 28, 2002 @09:21AM (#4971832)
      Dunstar Tetro-Cleany...

      Only you - in your phantasmagorically subsistance based revenue stream - could possibly have set my Interplanar house of cards alight!

      Even now - my tungsten shielded Caterpillar gunships are enroute to your Elven base of total DOOM!

      Why, just this morning I had thoughts of rendering your subspace 38 degree grid TOTALLY and UTTERLY inoperable!

      *pause for a deep breath* ...
  • by neksys ( 87486 ) <grphillips AT gmail DOT com> on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:13AM (#4971559)
    Couldn't this also be applied to vehicle tires? I know I just had a hell of a time driving home tonight, with all the frozen rain on the roads. I've got expensive snow tires on my vehicle, but on slick ice like this, I might as well have a set of skates. I don't know if its a workable (or affordable) solution, but I know I would pay good money to have some additional traction for these icy Canadian west coast winters.
  • Fascinating stuff (Score:4, Interesting)

    by The Tyro ( 247333 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:15AM (#4971561)
    Protons carrying the charge, hmmm? I suppose any charged particle could theoretically carry a current, but I must admit I never thought of "proton flow" as a way to do it...

    Water really is an interesting material.

    Universal solvent (polar solvent, for you organic chemistry nitpickers)

    Has its greatest density BEFORE it reaches its solid state of matter (ice). If you ever wondered why ponds and rivers don't freeze from the bottom up, that's the reason. Someone correct me, but I think the temperature of greatest density is 39F.

    That's really quite a discovery... can't wait to see if they can make something useful out of it.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 28, 2002 @08:43AM (#4971783)
      Ripper:

      You know when fluoridation first began?

      Mandrake:

      No. No, I don't, Jack. No.

      Ripper:

      Nineteen hundred and forty six. Nineteen fortysix, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your postwar commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual, and certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard core commie works.

      Mandrake:

      Jack... Jack, listen, tell me, ah... when did you first become, well, develop this theory.

      Ripper:

      Well, I ah, I I first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.

      Mandrake:

      sighs fearfully

      Ripper:

      Yes a profound sense of fatigue, a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I was able to interpret these feelings correctly: loss of essence.

      Mandrake:

      Yes...
    • by spineboy ( 22918 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @11:17AM (#4972064) Journal
      That's for relatively pure water, and that works out to be about 39 deg F. OF course adding salts and other things to raise the molarity (ionic concentration) of the water will depress the freezing point - I've forgotten what it'll do tho the density curve something about packing inefficiencies
    • by reverseengineer ( 580922 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @02:39PM (#4972709)
      Actually, proton flow occurs regularly in nearly every cell of your body- mitochondria use the energy of electrons from glycolysis and the Krebs cycle in the electron transport chain to pump protons across the inner membrane of the mitochondrion using transport proteins. This creates an electrochemical proton gradient- since the concentration of protons outside is greater than inside, osmotic pressure is created, and since protons are charged particles, a voltage across the membrane also exists. These protons, which have high potential energy, want to "fall" back to a lower potential energy state inside the membrane, but they need a transport protein to let them get back across. ATP synthase fills this role nicely, and as its name suggests, also serves another purpose. ATP synthase is like an electric motor, using the energy of the flowing protons to power conversion of ADP to ATP, which can then be used to power cell activities.

      Come to think of it (no pun intended- you'll see what I mean), in neurons, a voltage gradient is set up not using electrons or protons, but rather large (relatively) ions, specifically Na+ and K+. The activity of these pumps, along with the net charge associated with proteins in the neurons, produces a neuron resting potential of about -70 millivolts relative to the outside of the cell. Nerve impulses travel up and down the long thin neurons by a carefully choreographed operation of ion channels and pumps in the cell- the ion channels are voltage gated, so a nearby chnnge in potential results in ion channel opening, allowing a flood of positive sodium ions back into the neuron, causing the cell to become depolarized. Since a nearby depolarization triggers further depolarization along the length of the neuron, the changing electrical potential in the neuron can be seen as a wave racing down its length. At gaps between neurons (synapses) the electrical signal causes the release of a chemical neurotransmitter like acetylcholine or GABA, which diffuses to the terminus of another neuron, triggering the electrical signal again. In this way, the flow of ions leads to nerve impulses, and thus, even thoughts.
  • by zeendr ( 621380 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:16AM (#4971563)
    I can already see the headlines
  • by MacAndrew ( 463832 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:16AM (#4971565) Homepage
    New Scientist linked this story [newscientist.com] from the ice piece. I know this is sorta OT, but wow, I'm always stunned when I read a hail story like this.

    Ice not nice.
  • by jerryasher ( 151512 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:19AM (#4971569)
    He and his colleagues have found ways to take advantage of the "protonic" semiconductor properties of frozen water...

    That's bad right?
  • by MystikPhish ( 218732 ) <ryan@noSPAm.fishersr.us> on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:40AM (#4971599)
    So could this effect be applied to the skin of a Europoa ice rover that would melt its way through 2km of ice?

    I always hear that using heat to melt it would be impractical, but with a drill and this electric field effect maybe something more energy efficient could be done?
  • by jhair_tocancipa ( 545029 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @07:12AM (#4971662) Homepage
    "they see many applications of this discovery from melting ice on power lines to electronic speed control for skis and snowboards". Yes this discovery is a step further in the development of the mankind... Speed control for skis and snowboards..., this is an example how science can revolutionize the world (and solve some of its toughest problems). Fantastic!
  • by Longjmp ( 632577 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @07:13AM (#4971665)
    "After you, I'll be waiting for you down there." ;)
  • by Jace of Fuse! ( 72042 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @07:34AM (#4971695) Homepage
    The article mentions the possibility of making car tires that get 90% better grip in icy conditions, yet this article cares more about skiers.

    For some reason, I'm thinking someone's vision on the uses for technology is a little out of focus here.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 28, 2002 @07:58AM (#4971725)
      ...and what about pepperoni sandwiches?? There is nothing in these articles about pepperoni sandwiches!

      The research is what it is. It is new. Jesus, what does every expect all scientists to be God answering all questions?
    • by uptownguy ( 215934 ) <UptownGuyEmail@gmail.com> on Saturday December 28, 2002 @08:27AM (#4971764)
      The article mentions the possibility of making car tires that get 90% better grip in icy conditions, yet this article cares more about skiers.

      For some reason, I'm thinking someone's vision on the uses for technology is a little out of focus here.

      ...Or maybe they don't live in shockingly cold places like many of the rest of us (Minneapolis, MN here -- hi everyone) where they need to DRIVE in conditions like that constantly for 5-7 months of the year. It is one thing to live in Southern California and take a drive to the mountains to ski every once in a while -- it is something else completely to have to drive 20 miles to work on a frozen freeway...
    • by alchemist68 ( 550641 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @09:25AM (#4971840)
      Well I suppose if you're a skier this is great news. And I'm a skier, so I'm really happy about this news. There's nothing wrong with this guy's "focus". I'm sure you'd think differently about Micro$oft releasing some new [useful] software that the Slashdot readership thinks should be FREE and open source. Obviously, Bill Gates and his goons are a little out of focus.
    • by sporkboy ( 22212 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @10:39AM (#4971970) Homepage
      seeing as this comes from Dartmouth in northern NH I'm not surprised, skiing is a way of life up there and if people can't deal with the ice they have probably moved away.
  • by ATAMAH ( 578546 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @08:06AM (#4971738)
    ... Soviet Russia - Ice is no obstacle (c) Mr. Petrenko.

    *dodging slaps*
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 28, 2002 @08:07AM (#4971740)
    Kind of interesting...
    One time I had a frozen bottle of water in the dark. I noticed that it producted a nice little spark inside the plastic bottle. Any idea what happen?
    • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 28, 2002 @10:07AM (#4971906)
      What the heck were you doing in the dark staring at a bottle of frozen water? I'll tell ya what happened...you're lying in the back alley of some club after being thrown out for acting too high, and they toss your bottle of water at you too...you're so F'd up on K that an hour passes, so the water freezes...by the time you come back to present reality the E you took previously starts to kick in...it wasn't pure MDMA, though, it was actually aspirin and LSD...so there you are, some pathetic kid whacked out on god-knows-what staring at your frozen bottle of water, and you see a "nice little spark" which more likely was a reflection of the only lightbulb in the alley, or maybe it was a sign from your Angel to get up, go home, sleep, do your homework, and stop doing drugs that you buy from total strangers who have your health as their utmost concern in life.
    • by geoswan ( 316494 ) on Friday January 03, 2003 @12:39AM (#5004213) Journal
      It is called triboluminescence [about.com]. Mechanical stress causes some crystals to spark. Some hard candy can be seen to do this.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 28, 2002 @09:10AM (#4971819)
    Victor F. Petrenko

    Don't you see!!! The "F." stands for Fries [batman-superman.com]!!!
  • by Danta ( 2241 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @09:18AM (#4971828) Homepage
    Slashdot had an article [slashdot.org] on this back in February.
  • How skis work (Score:2, Interesting)

    by squidgyhead ( 613865 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @09:46AM (#4971872)
    The article talks about how their discovery can be applied to skiing, and, analogously, driving and a bunch of other stuff, by melting ice and making it more or less slippery, depending on the interval between meltings. Small interval => more water, less freezing, large interval => more freezing, less slippery water. You get the idea.


    I imagine that most of you know the ideal gas law, ie that pressure and temperature are (almost) linearly related. So, if you increase the pressure, you should be able to melt snow or ice, right? If it gets colder, you just squeeze harder. This means that warm snow should be slipperier, since you can melt more snow, which will lubricate better, right?


    Unfortunately, below 30 degrees Celsius or so, there is no way to get water, no matter what pressure you apply. Look at the following ice/water/vapour [sbu.ac.uk]
    diagram. You will notice that vapour and liquids don't take up much of it, it's ice almost everywhere. And all ice below 240K (=-33C) or so.


    So how could we possibly ski at below -33C? The answer is that we just slide on the snow. Occam's razor, ya?

    • by freeweed ( 309734 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @02:33PM (#4972692)
      Being a responsible Slashdot regular and having not read the article, I don't know where the idea of melting snow to aid in skiing came from. Either you or the article is getting this confused with *skating*. The blade of an ice skate combined with the pressure of your body melts a thin layer of water, providing lubrication. Skis generally have a layer of wax applied to them to provide enough lubrication on the snow - at least cross-country skis, which is all I've ever tried.

      How does one skate at colder than -33C? Simple. That pressure heats up the ice underneath you first, and then it can undergo phase transition.

      Living in a really cold part of Canada is always good for useless cold-weather trivia, and yes, I've actually skated at colder than -40 (F or C, same difference at that point).

  • by Martigan80 ( 305400 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @10:20AM (#4971931) Journal
    Just you wait! Global warming should take care of this little ice problem we have down here;-) Can't speak for a couple of miles in the atmosphere...
  • piezoelectric roads? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by sporkboy ( 22212 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @10:45AM (#4971987) Homepage
    The low power requirements of a system like this remind me of an idea that I had a while back. High-ice surfaces such as bridges (freeze first) could be equipped with a system like this to melt the ice, and the power for the system could be generated by the pressure generated by the weight of passing vehicles. Some sort of storage mechanism would be needed, at least small scale, to keep the ice off when traffic isn't passing.

    Of course IANAEE (I am not an electrical engineer) so I could be speaking from the wrong end here. Not sure on costs of such a system either but it seems like it could have benefit, especially considering how expensive bridges are to begin with.
  • by panurge ( 573432 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @11:20AM (#4972072)
    Why don't I see this as particularly revolutionary? Well, forget the problems of transferring power to rotating car wheels for a moment, consider that significant design changes would almost certainly be needed to make use of such a technology on overhead power lines, bridges, airplane wings etc.

    And the life cycle of such things is enormous. There are standards (codes in USenglish) to consider, which will need to be altered. Given the fear of litigation over design failure, the difficulty of proving the cost benefits, and the innate conservatism of people who make things that can be involved in major catastrophes, the development cycle could well be fifty years or more before there was any widespread application.

    And perhaps that's why snowboards get mentioned. Like piezo tennis rackets, there will be early adopters who aren't actually very good at winter sports but have lots of cash and who will attribute the improvement that comes with practice to the miracle technology...might just sell.

    • by mtec ( 572168 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @12:34PM (#4972278)

      If Man were meant to fly, he'd have wings!

      And if he does, just think of the lawsuits!
    • by Alioth ( 221270 ) <no@spam> on Saturday December 28, 2002 @01:38PM (#4972476) Journal
      Depending how heavy the equipment is, the design change for aircraft wings (especially light aircraft) probably wouldn't be significant. Already, many aircraft types can have pneumatic de-ice boots retrofitted and hot props retrofitted or TKS 'weeping wing' glycol deicers fitted. Assuming this system weighs no more than the usual deicing stuff and can fit the leading edges of wings/tailplanes/propellors it could be a LOT better than boots (high maintenance), weeping wing (lots of fluid to carry around) or hot props (lots of amps off the alternator).

      The real problem would probably be regulatory. The FAA is slow to approve things. Company lawyers are frightened of aircraft (because for some insane reason, plaintiffs have this misplaced belief that planes should be absolutely safe with no risk of crashing, and if there's ever an accident they sue anyone who has even touched the airframe). Also, the limited market tends to mean that new innovations in aviation tend to get limited to things that can be adapted from something else. The only thing that's really advanced in general aviation (i.e. non-airlines/military) has been avionics because of this.
  • solar power (Score:3, Interesting)

    by roman_mir ( 125474 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @11:26AM (#4972086) Homepage Journal
    "Many properties are completely different, but there are similarities between ice and the usual semiconductors," he says. For instance, he discovered that ice crystals can exhibit protonic photoconductivity. "It would be possible to create an ice solar cell," albeit one with substantially lower efficiency than silicon. Field effect transistors made of ice have also been developed that "work the same way as silicon."

    Ok, who right away thought of turning north and south poles into electricity generating power plants?

  • by mtec ( 572168 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @12:10PM (#4972211)
    There once was a man named Petrenko
    who found flow where you'd not think to think so
    In white Russian ice
    he could make juice flow nice
    now he dreams of cool cash and green dough
  • by djward ( 251728 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @01:17PM (#4972399)
    Observe it's effect on this ice swan:

    {fizzlemelt}

    Of course, that would've melted at room temperature, but I just wanted to get rid of it.
  • by godot73 ( 182766 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @01:44PM (#4972497)
    There must be something definitely wrong. From the article:
    It runs off small power units placed along the lines every 100 kilometres or so. The signal does not reduce electricity transmission through the cables, and because it uses around 50 watts per 100 kilometres of line it should cost a fraction of what it normally takes to keep the lines clear

    So 50 watts per 100 kilometres shall be enough to melt quite a lot of ice? there is a lot of energy needed to transform ice of 0 C to water of 0 C, about 80 kcal = 320 kilojoule, so 320 kilowatts for one second or 88 watts for one hour. 50 watts will melt less than one kilogram of ice per hour, and that should be enough on a length of 100km cable?
    I doubt it.

    • by Simon Field ( 563434 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @02:03PM (#4972558) Homepage


      Perhaps they are only thinking of melting the thin layer of ice that holds the rest onto the wire?

    • by SkewlD00d ( 314017 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @08:21PM (#4973711)
      Agreed. Sounds like a load of pseudo-science fantasy from some unpeer-reviewed N00bie Scientists. AFAICR from physics, only electrons can conduct charge. Also, that's only about .0005W/m. Another problem, the lines are usually thickly insulated with rubber or something.

      Wouldn't it be cheaper to melt ice using two larger, parallel loads switched alternately between two sets of lines (PWM)? Also, every line should have a temp sensor to allow for temperature-compenstated capacity throttling. And for urban/suburban runs, for shit's sake put those ugly cables underground!

      Also related: we need more spending on fusion power research so we can break our oil addiction. a fusion plant that produces a net gain in energy is likely to be huge, costing several G$. maybe solar+wind -> hydrogen is the way to go? replace natural gas w/ LH2? do your own electricity generation near home?

      My .002 decadollars.
  • Wireless skis (Score:3, Interesting)

    by isdnip ( 49656 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @04:12PM (#4972992)
    I like his adjustable skis. But how do you set the speed? It's not practical to bend over and tweak a knob on top while going down a hill; at least, it would not be good style.

    But if the control circuit used, say, Bluetooth, and the control buttons were in, say, the pole handles, then the skier would have good control while staying in motion. This could be quite nice.

    (If somebody tries to patent the idea with a later date than today, remember, you heard it first on Slashdot, making it potentially Prior Art.)
  • by salientpoints ( 322296 ) on Saturday December 28, 2002 @06:25PM (#4973341)
    From Men's Figure Skating History [yahoo.com]

    ALBERTVILLE 1992:

    Gold - Viktor Petrenko, Unified Team
    Silver - Paul Wylie, United States
    Bronze - Petr Barna, Czechoslovakia

    He's been studying ice all his life

  • by Vaughn Anderson ( 581869 ) on Sunday December 29, 2002 @06:46AM (#4975750)
    Since only one side of the interface needs high thermal conductivity, this system can also be adapted to car tires, as well as shoe soles--using electrically-conductive rubber--to increase traction on ice by up to 90%.

    Where do you find rubber like that?

    -v
  • by docbrown42 ( 535974 ) on Monday December 30, 2002 @10:14AM (#4981071) Homepage
    Does anyone remember that agony of defeat [ew.com] guy from the old ABC Sport intro? Now imagine a lot more teenagers doing impressions of that guy becuase the tried to make their skis "faster".

    Then again, maybe it'll remove some of the stupid people in the world.

The brain is a wonderful organ; it starts working the moment you get up in the morning, and does not stop until you get to work.

Working...