Satellite Imagery Used to Trace Lewis & Clark Route 112
Woogiemonger writes "To commemorate the 200 year anniversary of the Lewis & Clark expedition, NASA and other researchers are using satellite and aircraft remote-sensing technology to accurately reconstruct the path of the Lewis & Clark expedition, down to the precise location of each encampment. Considering many parts of the landscape along the path may have changed dramatically, this is no easy task. The final result will be a 3D interactive map publicly available on the WWW."
Lewis and Clark IMAX movie... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Lewis and Clark IMAX movie... (Score:5, Funny)
I have faith in technology, but not that much. (Score:3, Funny)
Some claim those mazes of one-way streets were put there on purpose. Keeping a steady flow of 10,000 autos daily going round-and-around-and-around, totally lost, generates enough waste heat to save homeowners millions on fuel oil.
Driving in Boston (Score:1)
There are roads which have no lines in them, and it's left up to the current drivers as to how many lanes they are. The first time I was on a street, it was 2 lanes. When I ended up there again (because of the mazes mentioned in parent) it was 3 lanes - two on the pavement, and one on the streetcar tracks.
We also encountered a dumpster sitting in the middle of the road with no construction in sight. And it wasn't even a big construction dumpster - it was the kind you'd see behind a 7-11. Just sitting there in the street...
It blew my mind. We ended up parking outside the city and using mass transit.
Re:Driving in Boston (Score:1)
Heh. Sounds like you were on Huntington Ave., which is right by my place. That's part of the fun of driving in Boston... There aren't as many pesky lines and signs to cramp your style as there are in other places. Technically speaking, the tracks are legit for driving on, because the double-yellow is in-between the two sets of tracks.
The dumpster thing is wild. Haven't seen that one.
I offer this advice to anyone doing any driving in or around Boston: Expect people to cut you off, jaywalk, and stop at random places. Just expect it, because it happens so much that I don't even notice it anymore except in really egregious cases. Don't take it personally. This city is so dense and poorly laid-out that people really just have to be assholes to get anywhere. Your blood pressure will go down, and you'll be a happier driver. Oh, and don't expect to get anywhere in a hurry, especially around rush hour. One last thing: get a street map of the city and the surrounding area. Invaluable, even when you've been here for years, because the streets do not follow ANY logical pattern.
We ended up parking outside the city and using mass transit.
Yeah, that was my solution, the first time I came here and a few years before I moved to the city.
Boston BINGO (Score:2)
Amen to that--thus I recommend Boston BINGO on any car trip. Each outrageous driver or pedestrian gives me a point--when I get to five points I win!!!
I haven't actually won the game yet, but I once got all the way to three on the few blocks of Mass Ave between Harvard and MIT. (If I hadn't been carting my daughter's pet snake, I would have been riding the Red Line, I do know it's better.)
Re:I have faith in technology, but not that much. (Score:1, Offtopic)
Grumble...grumble... Freshpond Parkway is right...
Then there's the fun trip on Mass Ave, where it suddenly becomes a one-way street past Harvard (Univ). Plus the "guess which lane is the x turn only lane" games that seems popular...
Oh, yeah, and what does Brown [ups.com] do for me? Block the right hand lane with their stupid delivery trucks! Thanks a lot!
Of course, driving in Boston is not the problem. The problem is parking in Boston...
Re:I have faith in technology, but not that much. (Score:2)
Yah yah, offtopic...
Currently showing almost everywhere (Score:2)
In Russia (Score:2)
And I thought TN(where I really live) was as bad as it could get.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:web (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:web (Score:1)
See, I don't think you hate it. I think you just want something to bitch about. I don't fault you for that; the last twenty years people have done nothing but bitch. Personally, I blame the whole thing on Paperboy [klov.com], because that game was way too fucking hard, and everyone who played it was sure to walk away pissed off.
Anyway, I hope you enjoyed those moments of your life you wasted complaining about a triviality.
I realize the irony of wasting my time to point out that this person is wasting his time, so you needn't bother pointing that out.
Why This Is Odd (Score:4, Interesting)
Any way it seems like a good way to use technology for the recording of what man has done...just maybe not the best time to do this.
Why Is This Odd? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Why Is This Odd? (Score:2)
Not a trailer home! Think of it as a flying RV! A high-tech Conestoga Wagon! Our trek to the stars!
Yes, I agree.
Re:Why Is This Odd? (Score:1)
Spaceballs the International Space Station?
Consider the scale (Score:3, Insightful)
Sharp-eyed readers will sense my implicit criticism of ISS.
Re:Consider the scale (Score:1)
NASA is wasting it's money daily, this is just another example of that waste.
The day we get our prioritys right is the day we solve half the problems on this planet..
Re:Consider the scale (Score:2)
Except that this "fundamental advancement of space technology", in the case of the ISS, is being done primarily for its entertainment value!
The ISS is a crowd pleaser, nothing more. Real projects for real science are being hacked and cut so we can have a habitable garbage can in low earth orbit. For example, soon Pluto's atmosphere is going to freeze and blanket its surface, rendering Pluto unvisitable in any practical sense, for a hundred and fifty years. We had a probe ready to enter the Pluto-Charon system before this would happen but it got hacked because of ISS cost overruns. In fact, NASA is hardly doing anything interesting anymore because of that stupid ISS. They're the ISS agency now. The scientific community hates the ISS. The general public loves it, because they're scientifically illiterate and believe it will lead to bigger and more interesting manned spaceflight, but the ISS has little scientific or practical value other than allowing us to observe the horrible long term effects of weightlessness and ionizing radiation on people in space. (In fact, this was one of the very few rationalizations actually offered by its proponents.)
NASA is wasting it's money daily, this is just another example of that waste.
NASA will save a lot of money for way more worthwhile projects if it mothballs this orbiting turkey. Crashing the damn thing into the ocean would be an even better idea if there were enough political will to do it. It breaks people's hearts, and they don't want to believe it, but manned space flight in general is a dead end and an immense waste of money. Things are just too far away and the mere requirement of a return trip cripples all but the least ambitious projects.
Re:Consider the scale (Score:1)
Coordinates! (Score:2)
Re:Coordinates! (Score:5, Informative)
The Missouri has been damed up in many spots and only 3 or so spots remain where one can see the river as they did, from Garrision Dam south to Bismarck (canoed it for 5 days last summer for the second time, very very beutiful) and two sections in Montana before and after FT. Peck Dam. South of Bismarck is Lake Oahe and further south then that going into SD and Nebraska it is kinda polluted.
If you were to ever get near this area I would recommend stoping in, I grew up in ND and still live in ND I don't think it gets the credit it deserves for it's beauty and history.
No I don't work for the ND Dept. of Tourism, hehe
If you have any questions about what to do or stay, email me, moszer AT moszer DOT net
Merry Christmas
Re:Coordinates! (Score:4, Informative)
The Map section [k12.nd.us] has information on each of the major L&C locations in ND. It's pretty interesting, I'd suggest anyone interested in L&C take a look.
Re:Coordinates! (Score:2)
Map Exchange [nationalgeographic.com]
Re:Coordinates! (Score:2)
Neat Trick (Score:3, Funny)
Who discovered this vast cache of satellite imagery along the Lewis and Clark trail, and how did Lewis and Clark come by it 200 years ago? No wonder they only needed $2,500-they already knew they way, they just wanted to milk the job.
They stayed in Metropolis most of the time (Score:5, Funny)
I really think that NASA should have better things to do than tracing the wanderings of superheros and their girlfriends.
Re:They stayed in Metropolis most of the time (Score:2)
Re:They stayed in Metropolis most of the time (Score:2)
Nope, he got it right, Lewis and Clark. He's talking about the The Ambiguously Gay Duo.
satellites? use the command line (Score:5, Funny)
Very interesting boon to history buffs (Score:1)
Re:Very interesting boon to history buffs (Score:1)
Superman? (Score:2, Funny)
Favorite quote from the article: (Score:2)
"There are parts of the trail that are very depressing. The urban transformations have been dramatic in some areas. At the same time, there are areas, certainly not pristine, yet the degree of change is less," he said.
"So I think you get the full gamut of depression, concern, and outright outrage at the change. And then there are other places along the trail where you have hope," Philp told SPACE.com.
I wonder what he means by this? Depressing how, exactly? Are there a bunch of K-Marts on the trail?
Re:Favorite quote from the article: (Score:1)
I don't claim to be an expert or anthing, but my guess about what parts of the trail are probably less than exciting are probably in the eastern half of the trail. I say this because the east is more developed and industrialized and has been this way longer than cities on th western half. In any case, you can follow the trail yourself to make that determination:
http://www.lewisandclark.com/plan/planning.html
favorite L&C trivia (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:favorite L&C trivia (Score:1)
Trivia Fact: A+
Spelling: F
Re:favorite L&C trivia (Score:1)
I used an Apple IIe to trace the route (Score:1, Funny)
Oregon Trail != Lewis & Clark trail (Score:5, Informative)
There is a huge difference between the two... Lewis and Clark (and their many assistants) were explorers. The Oregon trail was an established wagon train route from St Louis to Oregon.
That said, the (early) Oregon Trail games were quite cool. The original Apple II version had pretty crappy graphics, but the (two disk!!) second edition was much better (though required 128 KB of memory!). The early Mac version was cool as well, it supported LocalTalk LAN play for interactive wagon trains (voting, hunting, etc). The more recent versions for Mac/Win are nothing but eyecandy.
Oregon Trail == OT? (Score:2)
Would you stuff him full of pine nuts before you roast him?
Check the caloric gain in the manual...
Yes. <click>
How Sad... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How Sad... (Score:3, Insightful)
Accuracy? (Score:1)
I have a hard enough time following telephone directions to a new dentist. Imagine how hard it is to retrace someone's steps through a journal that's hundreds of years old.
Re:Accuracy? (Score:3, Interesting)
They are thoroughly descriptive.
Excerpt July 24 1806
S.E. 1 mile to a bluff on the Std. (starboard) bend.
N. 70 deg. E. 2 ms. under a bluff on the Std. side Psd. and island on the lard. (lardboard, or port)
N. 20 deg E. 4 m to a lard bend passed island on stard. side high bluff on std. low prarie on lard side.
This is a small part of what was written in each section of the journals. There are actually 2 pages of lat/long descriptions at the beginning of this section. They start each section with Lat/long descriptions of their position, and any visible landmarks. This is followed by accounts of the day.
P.S. Clark spells like Cmdr. Taco, no two words alike.
Re:Accuracy? (Score:1)
Maps (Score:1, Redundant)
Science: Maps Used to Trace Lewis & Clark Route
Now this is *really* cool. (Score:2)
Forget Lewis and Clark, what about Gary and Mike? (Score:1)
Additional Landsat images (Score:4, Informative)
On the more aesthetic side, "Earth as Art" [nasa.gov] is just starting out, but very encouraging.
USGS has done a Landsat study of environmental change [usgs.gov] and NASA's general collection. [nasa.gov]
Wasn't it Al Gore who proposed a live video feed from a satellite watching Earth. Please don't share your opinion on Gore or the cost -- but wouldn't that be a nice little channel to have? I could name about 20 cable channels I'd surrender to get it (small loss). You could be one of the first to detect the first nuclear conflict. See, I'm not all that optimistic.
And linked from my home page is the Earth Science Image of the Day [usra.edu] with explanations.
There are a lot of amazing photos out there, I am always interested in hearing of more, especially if explicated. I'm glad to see them coming to increasingly creative use, beyond assessing crops and measuring ocean temperatures -- useful as these things are!
*semi-inside joke
OT: Cable channels (Score:2)
What I'd like to see, and I'll bet this would even have a profit available, would be a 'reality' channel which showed only the security cameras from really bad neighborhoods (convenience stores, etc). Ideally the places with the highest crime rates or other activity indicators would determine the camera choices.
I lived in an apartment building that had a camera pointed at the front door you could get on an unused cable channel. When we had parties we used to put the TV to that channel with the sound off; there was almost always some amusing people/events happening, especially on weekends.
Even now the Minneapolis cable system shows the "freeway channel" -- a feed from the state highway department that shows a rotation of all the metro area freeway cameras. The rotation is nice if you actually care about the general traffic patterns or want a weather sampler, but it'd be nice if there was a way to pick a specific camera or 'hold' on one that came up.
Re:OT: Cable channels (Score:1)
Relate (Score:3, Funny)
*sigh
History repeats itself... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:History repeats itself... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:History repeats itself... (Score:1)
Naahh. They'll just hurl a multi-zillion dollar probe at the midwest and say
Lewis and Clark, heros of slashdot (Score:1)
Why can't I (Score:1, Offtopic)
Jefferson's Letter..Interesting read (Score:4, Informative)
National Geographic Article (Score:2, Informative)
I remember some interesting commentary on the desire of municipalities to claim ownership of historic sites.
Re:nat'l geo (Score:1)
i'd love 2 do a synthetic timelapse...maybe morphing images in bryce...but i'll have 2 wait 4 santa 2 bring me a g4...this 366mHz iBook's 2 slow;-)
Stumped (Score:2)
In other news, the Total Information Awareness office is stumped at the failure of their satellite tracking experiment. Researchers tentatively conclude that Lewis and Clark may have gone underground.
President Bush announced earlier today that he may "have no choice but to bomb Montana (further) back into the stone age" unless these potential terrorists are turned over to appropriate authorities.
Critics suggest that a search for a live target might prove more fruitful.
Dr. A to Dr. B (Score:1)
Re:Dr. A to Dr. B (Score:1)
So, does this mean that now the satellite will get to have it's picture engraved on a faux-gold coin?
Abuse? (Score:2)
Product Placement (Score:1)
What do you want to bet that the route suddenly now runs thru Las Vegas with special mention of the Bunny's Bordello and the Mustang Ranch and a secure site at NASA that lets you buy a 'Listing' for your town on the route. I already found Crawford TX as magically appeared on the route. Could they finally now have a clue on how to raise money for space exploration?
For the benefit of the non-Americans amongst us... (Score:2)
Re:For the benefit of the non-Americans amongst us (Score:1)
Paltry Money (Score:2, Informative)
> two centuries ago, American President Thomas Jefferson sought a paltry $2,500 in funds.
We can expect a certain lack of financial acumen from a "Senior Space Writer" but what mathemetically-educated person thinks $2500 two hundred years ago is "paltry"? At 6% interest, it would be worth about $287 million today. And at 10% it would be worth $474 billion.
Disclaimer: my calculations were hastily done with Lotus-1-2-3. Nevertheless, my point is that $2500 two hundred years ago is worth more than $2500 in year 2003 dollars.
--
Joe
The route scientists BELIEVE L&C took. (Score:2)
Can they detect rusting sardine cans? (Score:2)
Here's Owen Wister, writing in 1902, waxing nostalgic for the good old days of the 1870's:
"Sardines were called for, and potted chicken, and devilled ham: a sophisticated nourishment, at first sight, for these sons of the sage-brush. But portable ready-made food plays of necessity a great part in the opening of a new country. These picnic pots and cans were the first of her trophies that Civilization dropped upon Wyoming's virgin soil. The cow-boy is now gone to worlds invisible; the wind has blown away the white ashes of his camp-fires; but the empty sardine box lies rusting over the face of the Western earth."
don't blame NASA, blame congress (Score:1)
Here's a good article: Pork-barrel projects threatening NASA's core programs [ledger-enquirer.com]
That said, educational programs like this do serve a useful purpose - they can teach about remote sensing and Earth system science. NASA uses a suite of satellites to monitor the Earth continuously. Applications include mapping, land use/land cover change, global climate studies, atmospheric research, etc. Because the data are complicated, money is needed to process and evaluate it. Data, remote sensing, the electromagnetic spectrum, atmospheric physics, and cartography are all pretty abstract, and something concrete and possibly exciting (or at least interesting enough to attract the press) like the Lewis and Clark Trail is a good way to get people interested.
In any case, the data covering the trail (which the U.S. taxpayer already paid for) will end up being more accesible than otherwise. So it's not a bad investment.
great news!!! for some..... (Score:1)