NASA Fixes Galileo, Starts Recovering Data 17
linuxwrangler writes "After radiation damaged the recorders on Galileo it was feared that the data from the November flyby of Amalthea would be lost. Today NASA announced that they have repaired the recorder and are busy downloading the data. Meanwhile they also contacted pioneer 10 (64 bytes from pioneer10.nasa.gov: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=80700000 ms)"
Rocket scientists (Score:3, Interesting)
Most of his experience had been with trying to figure out why solar arrays in orbit weren't doing their job, where the problem turned out to be not a loose wire but defective engineering (not his
Re:Rocket scientists (Score:5, Informative)
High energy protons had damaged an LED.
By running current through the LED for hours, they annealed it enough to get the job done.
Re:Rocket scientists (Score:2)
I really did look for this on my own; like a dolt I went to the NASA site, and here I practically grew up in Pasadena. I forwarded this to my rocket friend, thanks.
How they fixed it. (Score:4, Informative)
Technology (Score:2)
imagine trying to repair a 20 year old computer with continuous hardware and mobo probs from a gazillion miles away with only a console and a lag of a couple of hours....
My hat's off to you, guys...
Dirk
Re:Technology (Score:5, Interesting)
I would like to hear what exactly the engineers did. I have a feeling it was the interplanetary version of whacking your TV set to stop the whine.
Not all twiddle-the-computer exercises work out well. NASA is not one to dwell on failure, but they'll hand-deliver a press release to your door for great news. E.g., I read that contact with one of the Viking landers was lost years ago after someone sent bad data to its antenna tracking system. The lander was very late in its lifespan, but would you like to have been the guy who did it? We've found reasons to keep in touch with even the Voyagers (or should I say V'gers?), as well as the nearly 4x too old Galileo.
The Web is so cool: Galileo's current position [nasa.gov]
And Galileo tour guide [nasa.gov] -- the Galileo stuff at the NASA site is a little dusty.
Should we have a moment of silence with spunky Galileo burns up? Do you think the Jovians will retaliate?
Re:Technology (Score:3, Interesting)
I suspect that it's a myth, but damn, it ought to be true.
Incidentally, did you know that the Pioneer computers were so simple they didn't have any jump instructions? They just executed all the instructions in memory one sweep after another. Conditionals were done by masking out blocks of code using condition codes. Slow, yes; but the processor could be implemented in a handful of radiation hardened transistors, and if the computer ever reset spontaneously due to, e.g., passing through Jupiter's magnetosphere, noone cared.
And they're still going...
Re:Weird Technology (Score:2)
I heard about a guy who timed his code to the speed of rotating drum memory so that "impossible" loops would work. It made the code a tad difficult for others to maintain after he retired.
Re:Weird Technology (Score:1)
Re:Weird Technology (Score:1)
Wait, that's something else.
You're right.
Re:Technology (Score:2, Informative)
Oh, the five problems? The high-gain antenna didn't deploy. The tape in
the tape recorder tends to stick. The thrusters can explode if fired in
long steady burns, which is why Galileo always fires them in pulses, and
need to be burped regularly to avoid slow propellant decomposition --
TVSat 2 fortunately used the same thrusters, was launched before Galileo,
and had a solar array fail to deploy, so its thrusters were fired long and
hard during attempts to shake the array loose.
got it from the link in your parent's post. i'm assuming 5 is pioneer 5. i dunno for sure, though.
Re:Technology (Score:1)
Bunch of damn show offs. (Score:2)
Oh well, would those NASA geniuses be able to improve patient healthcare? (Yes if they worked with me, damnit foiled again!) I guess helping people improve their quality of life is enough for me. It's too bad politics is 99% (coughHIPAAcough) of the problem instead of the solution.
Don't feel bad (Score:2, Interesting)
Started with pilot lessons, then my eyes went bad. Even though I could no longer meet the mil spec for pilots (much less astronauts), I still got a Navy ROTC scholarship. I became an expert at writing embedded real time code. I got a job at Motorola. My code(not my body, but part of my mind) flies in space today.
Just as open source goes to show, pride is the greatest motivator when you want inspired, ultimate quality work. Even though my rate today is more than twice what I made back then, I have never, ever put so much effort and thought into a project as that one.
Cheer up, if you really, really try, chances are you will succeed.
Ohh no we will slashdot pioneer10.nasa.gov !!!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Ohh no we will slashdot pioneer10.nasa.gov !!!! (Score:2)