Studying Avalanches A Little Too Closely 31
Makarand writes "ABC News has
an interesting
article about a Professor in
Montana State University who is trying to
perfect avalanche prediction techniques. He studies
avalanches using the 'direct method,' i.e. he
sets off an avalanche and puts himself right
ahead of it so that he gets buried alive, a routine he has been doing for 20 years now.
His goal is to be able to use data about the climate, mountain topography and snow microstructure in a model to forecast if we
are prone to avalanche conditions."
Just a quick posting request... (Score:2)
"Thank you for saving the lives of people you'll probably never meet, and who will never know that it was you who saved them."
I mean, come on - I just don't want this guy buried in an avalanche of negative comments. I mean, that might be like giving him the cold shoulder...
Okay, I'm going to stop now. Just leave it at the "thanks for the life-saving stuff..."
Wow (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:1, Funny)
the 'direct method' (Score:1)
If hes creating these.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:If hes creating these.... (Score:3, Informative)
As for the purpose of his study, it seems to be focused more on with how an avalanche moves once it's triggered than on the actual cause. However, unless I missed something, he didn't make it clear how that data would be of use to most people. Maybe it could be used to construct climbing gear better suited to protecting someone caught in an avalanche, who knows. At any rate, I hope this answers your question.
Re:If hes creating these.... (Score:2)
More likely it is to just build up data on avalanche flow so backcountry skiers and climbers know what to predict. Any skier will dig pits and the like to get an idea of what is going on. This will possibly give even more information. In theory anyway - in practice I think the general knowledge is available right now. It is just that many want to go out in semi-safe or even unsafe conditions.
Re:If hes creating these.... (Score:2)
Spam (Score:3, Funny)
Sounds like studying spam by giving out your e-mail address in an EFNet warez channel...
Or submitting a story with a link to the site you run off your DSL connection to Slashdot, and then trying to surf the 'net...
darwin (Score:1)
Re:darwin (Score:2)
Re:darwin (Score:1)
Although you do have to admit that this guy is a perfect future candidate for the Darwin award....
I don't know.. he's not doing something right.
He's been trying for 20 years to bury himself -- I think a Darwin Award candidate would have gotten it right within a few times. A "perfect" candidate would have gotten it right after a few failures; success on the first try is less impressive.
Rule out the invariant (Score:4, Funny)
I have a short list here that will help fix this otherwise wonderful experiment.
Having met the Prof in Question (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Having met the Prof in Question (Score:1)
As well as... (Score:2)
not so crazy (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Jackass (Score:2)
I'm sure this guy's watched that series a wee bit too much. But I support him completely for making science more fun. Imagine the number of snowboarder teens flocking to colleges to make a career of major spills. Maybe the scientific journal paper by this guy is signed "Awesome Dude". Envy of many PHDs I'm sure.
Career choice: avalanche professional (Score:2)
Considering that avalanche professionals are probably less than 1/1000th of 1 percent of the population, I think maybe I'll just get a job shuffling papers
-
Re:Career choice: avalanche professional (Score:1)