Distributed Climate Prediction For Linux: Pending 18
saintp writes "Inspired by earlier discussions about distributed computing initiatives, I emailed the good folks at Climateprediction.net to inquire about a linux client. And, the good news: There will be one. No update yet to their system requirements, but here's what they told me: 'There is certainly a Linux version planned (in fact, already existing), but
we are a small team and can only set up the infrastructure to support
distributed experiments under one O/S at a time. Running climate models is
substantially more ambitious in terms of machine requirements, data
generated, security headaches etc than any other distributed computing
project we know of, so developing a generic O/S independent client is simply
not feasible. As soon as the Windows version is safely launched, the Linux
version will be our next priority.' Hopefully, we'll see it sometime in November or December."
Why? (Score:2)
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:2)
The thing is when you're dealing with executables, and I'm not sure why this is, but for some reason your windows code that compiled just fine under GCC for Windows will need tweaks to move over to (say) OS/2's or *nix's respective GCC ports, or as is the case with OS/2, require an added compatibility layer (the EMX runtime libs - what few OS/2 geeks there are will know these very well). It will likely be the case that you will have to do some significant code massaging in order to get it to work.
Mind you, it's been a time since I did cross-compiling, so AMMV these days.
Distributed computing... (Score:2, Insightful)
Weather reports are not bad though, I just pay for them by viewing annoying advertizing. The projects that really annoy me are the ones used to design drugs to fight cancer or some other like disease, because the information from these projects will be used by pharmaceutical companies to sell me drugs!
If we are going to use ditributed computing to solve problems, the solutions should really be free or discounted for the general public, because they donated their computers cycles, and shouldn't be forced to "pay" twice.
Re:Distributed computing... (Score:3, Funny)
Well, one thing you get in return is some extra heat and the certainty that you just helped change the climate by using more energy.
Re:Distributed computing... (Score:2, Insightful)
as you can tell from my sig, I disagree with your stance.
I'm participating in United Devices to help find a cure for cancer.
Am I paying for it? Sure, but the electricity that I'm using is probably less costly then when I forget to shut off the bathroom light when I leave for work. It's trivial, it's pennies, get over the cost issue.
Will I pay for the cure once it's found? Could be. UD is giving their results to Oxford if I'm not mistaken. From there it might get patented and sold by big industry. So what? What medicine do you currently get for free? except for laughter, none. if you participate in such a project, do you expect the cure to be free for you or do you just want a 0.000000000012% discount for the 0.000000000012% work that you put forth to help find the cure.
Also, if cancer is curable, the drug will probably be found eventually. I have a friend with skin cancer and my grandfather died of cancer. I smoked so that puts me at a higher risk. I'd rather the cure be found sooner than later.
Just because something has to be paid for doesn't mean it's a bad thing or that the little guy is getting screwed.
I'm probably going to get a bunch of responses to this from the "knowledge is free" crowd. Fuck that. If I spend $6 for my energy bill and have to pay $1000 for some magic cancer pill down the road, I'll have a magic cancer pill when all is said and done. If distributed drug simulation isn't done, there's a chance that I or a loved one might die at 80 lbs with no hair. I'd like to know that I did all I could to prevent that situation.
in any case, it sure beats spinning my wheels looking for ET.
Whither Java? (Score:2)
Re:Whither Java? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Whither Java? (Score:2)
Uhm, perhaps there could be subtle issues on how various JVM implementations handle floating point math, despite of the Java specifications? I'd say that when you're doing distributed computing, you don't want to end comparing apples and oranges.
A quick search on Google comes up with something interesting on the subject [naturalbridge.com] (which of course may be true or not).
Well... (Score:1)
I suppose that just goes to show that you can't trust the weatherman.
NewsFlash: Something might happen in the future (Score:1, Funny)
Paradigms? (Score:1, Interesting)
She is 28 years old, has a past in Greenpeace, doesn't understand chemistry, doesn't know math, doesn't know computers, but is very good at negotiating without rational arguments.
My question, is she right? Should we trust in climate models? Or, am I just an old fart still stuck in the scientific paradigm?
Re:Paradigms? (Score:1)
Does she believe that CO2 emissions will lead to global warming? If so, then she does believe in modeling. Think about it: a prediction of climate change inherently implies a model of some sort. If she believes in global warming, I'd suspect she's concerned that the new modeling project might not match her existing belief (or that of whatever vested interest she's representing in these negotiations). Sounds dodgy.
What if she doesn't believe in global warming; i.e. she's one of those "the jury is still out" people. Same issue: if she's concerned about the research, she's most likely concerned that it will come out with more evidence of something she doesn't want proven. Sounds like an ostrich. Again, the question of vested interest is relevant.
Two bottom lines: 1) Refining and testing our climate models can't hurt, especially if we treat the results as mere evidence rather than gospel. And 2) Ask yourself what she's afraid of.
Business model? (Score:3, Interesting)
Each computing unit (whatever size) is allocated a price based on demand. You can use the units at the given price, or you can generate the computing units (have other peoples jobs run on your machine) at $0.50 on the dollar. Your account is tracked/stored with the organization.
The benefits are as follows:
-Your spare computing units are automatically contracted out at a competitive price. You can (arguably) make money doing it with all those spare computers laying about.
-You can stockpile computing units to be used later in your research. (Make your computer work for you even while in the reading phase).
-If you have a project where you need units, but don't have time to contribute, you can simply buy the distributed processing time.
-You could enhance your effective computing time by contributing at peak times (when the price is highest) and processing at off peak times (when the price is lowest). You will effectively have improved your computer.
A sep. DC idea (Score:2)
Bottom line, would DC to track and predict paths of NEAR's be of any practical use, or not?
A few points.. (Score:1)