Home Movies Of International Space Station 17
Thomas the Rhymer writes "A UK amateur astromer has taken home movies of the space station during 3 min possover using nothing more than an 8in reflector and a webcam. The BBC article has a link to the short digitial movie. Resolution somewhat short of a Spielberg movie but not bad. FWIW there is a Brit on board at the moment."
way cool (Score:2)
Re:way cool (Score:4, Informative)
Re:way cool (i'm minus karma-read) (Score:1, Informative)
Check out this [nasa.gov] for cool information on the station.
A Brit? (Score:5, Funny)
The resolution must not be that bad if you can pick out someone's teeth that clearly...
Neato (Score:2)
Re:Neato (Score:1, Insightful)
What does the webcam have to do with this? Is it because it connects to a computer, it's kewl? It's the telescope that did all the work, but hey, it's analog, so who cares, right?
Not quite. Imagine that, instead of an 8-inch telescope like this guy did, you've got a 3-meter telescope. That telescope is doing a heck of alot more work for you, right? And then you hook up a web cam that has a resolution of 200x200 pixels. That great image is lost.
This is just another instance of a chain being only as strong as its weakest link. Your image will be no better than the lesser of the abilities of your telescope and your web cam.
The actual site of the guy who took the pics (Score:4, Informative)
Microgravity Porn? (Score:1, Funny)
I had something totally different in mind when I read "Home Movies of ISS".
Re:Microgravity Porn? (Score:2)
Re:Microgravity Porn? (Score:1)
Re:Microgravity Porn? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Microgravity Porn? (Score:2)
Anyway, the first low cost private space travel will come after you can get "Saucy Satelites". Sex will drive the space industry as it has every other industry in history. It's what we are about afterall.
Are webcam's worth it? (Score:3, Interesting)