Video Over IP Permits South Pole Surgery 125
Henry Malmgren writes "Last week at the South Pole research station, we successfully completed knee surgery using a video over IP link back to the United States. The article is light on technical details, but what we did was to use a Polycom VTC unit to send a video signal to Raytheon Polar Services HQ in Colorado. Our signal went primarily over a Marisat satellite at T1 speeds, and then HQ redistributed the video to Boston via a dedicated ISDN line. We had signal problems several times during the transmission with Marisat, so we had to switch to a NASA TDRS satellite towards the end of the surgery. We also used an Iridium phone as a voice backup for the times when we couldn't get decent quality over either bird. During the surgery there were three cameras that we used to send back video to the states. One was the built in camera on the VTC unit, a second was a handheld Sony 8mm unit, and a third was a black and white "Doc Cam". This was a head mounted camera with a LED light unit that was built on station by our Senior Communications Technican, Jon Berry. This allowed the transmission of video from the Doctor's perspective. Unfortunately, while the Doc cam worked great locally, and we got great recordings of the surgery from it, it didn't work well over the satellite link. The camera view jumped around so much that it didn't compress well over the satellite link. The best video was obtained by putting the hand held camera on a tall tripod which was able to look directly into the surgical wound."
Breast Cancer (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Breast Cancer (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Breast Cancer (Score:4, Informative)
Dr. Ron was airlifted out in the dark. That's a first - it's never, ever been done before.
We had a satellite link with Swedish Medical at the time. Streamed ultrasound images to them and talked via Iridium. I know this, 'cause I set it up.
It got zip media coverage as compared to the "breast cancer" story (which stinks to high heaven).
ISDN vs T1?? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:1)
Do you actually know about this kind of thing, or are you just talking trash?
*DISCLAIMER* I don't really know about this. I'm just askin'
It seems like the lag would be less over a satellite assuming quality setup. You have a speed of light shot to the satellite. Satellite processing time, which is similar qualitatively to one hop through a router, followed by one speed of light shot to the ground. Now, if the satellite is high enough, one hop could get you from the south pole to the north pole. The physics of the situation might require one, two tops more hops. So someone traceroute me a path that only takes three hops on a ground based network from the south pole to the north.
Now, I did say that a satellite hop was *qualitatively* the same as a router hop. Can anyone quantify this? Is one satellite hop time-equivalent to 1, 2
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:1)
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:2)
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:2)
Nope, c = 3e8 m/sec, or 300000 km/sec. Check your friendly physics 101 book for more info.
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:1)
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:1)
Mods: This guy deserves a +3 on every comment for merely responding to comments on his article. Hundreds of others never bother.
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:1)
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:ISDN vs T1?? (Score:2)
The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
I'd say that Dr. Pollard, while a Surgeon, isn't qualified on this knee surgury, so they had Dr. Zarins (in Boston), a qualified specialist, watch over to help with any problems. The live feed was the best 'overwatch' they had.
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
It must have simply been a consultation, albeit by unusual and way-cool means. I'm sure that the local medical team did the surgery, and the remote team gave advice as needed on very specialized issues peculiar to joint surgery. But the article doesn't actually *say* so. Maybe news writers need a satellite link to someone who knows how to tell a story.
Anyway, given the quality of the link, I hope that the use of teleoperators would not even be considered unless the condition were an immediate threat to life. (See Clarke's "A Meeting with Medusa" for a really good story which shows some of the problems with teleoperation.)
I was reminded of the story about the DEC support center guy who got a call via satellite from the crew of a battle tank in the middle of maneuvers, wanting help getting their ruggedized MicroVAX back in operation.
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:2, Insightful)
The in-house doc will be some sort of generalist, probably with a special interest in "winter medicine" (i.e. altered physiology in cold conditions, and illnesses particular to such conditions).
They all have basic grounding in all areas of medicine, but could never safely practise on their own outside their specialty. Just the same as I couldn't take apart a car engine on my own, but with a video link a mechanic could talk me through it because I know how to use basic tools. It really is that simple.
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
Not very stupid. I, myself, respire several times a minute.
respire: 1. To breathe in and out; inhale and exhale. 2. To undergo the metabolic process of respiration. 3. To breathe easily again, as after a period of exertion or trouble.
etymology : Middle English respiren, to breathe again, from Latin respirare, to breathe.
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
As usual, every other country in the world calls it one thing, and the US calls it something else. Why is that?
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:2)
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
IIRC the USian English Vocabulary is much larger than what is used on the other side of the Atlantic.
It might be more fair to say that the US English Vocabulary is larger than what is available on the other side of the Atlantic. I wouldn't be very comfortable suggesting that USians have larger personal vocabularies -- from my observation, that seems patently untrue.
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:1)
Re:The technology is very neat but... (Score:2)
More on Antarctic surgery (Score:1)
When I wintered over at Dumont d'Urville in '93 we broke all records with 7 surgeries, including one appendicitis. I have more info on how we coped with it and pictures as well on my site [gdargaud.net].
At the time all the doctor could rely on was a satellite voice link and a motley crew to assist him. Still much better than what the pioneers had to rely on. In Port-Martin in 1951 they did an appendicitis with sharpened kitchen knives and there's a great story about it but the link seems to be gone.
A russian doctor had to take out his own appendix in Antarctica in 1961.
Re:More on Antarctic surgery (Score:1)
Re:More on Antarctic surgery (Score:2)
Competent technology (Score:1)
Amazing, but... "IP" part irrelevent? (Score:3, Interesting)
But I think that the referenced article had a better take on it than this posting, whose "additional technical details" are, at best, unintentionally misleading.
The implication of "video over IP" is that you did this over the public IP network, which in fact is not the case.
The fact that you did this over what was effectively a dedicated point-to-point link means that the use of the IP transport was irrelevant (worse; it added unnecessary overhead, subtracting from the total data rate).
I understand not wanting to risk someone's knee on a link succeptible to a DOS (or only succeptible as a result of a substantial investment of effort on the part of the attacker). But your posting implies that this is something which took place over the public Internet, or *could* take place over the public Internet, when it's not.
-- Terry
Re:Amazing, but... "IP" part irrelevent? (Score:1)
Still, I think it is relevant. As time goes on, people are making IP do more and more. That this has been done over IP means that maybe when Internet2 is for everyone this will be possible (over VPN I hope
Re:Amazing, but... "IP" part irrelevent? (Score:2)
Re:Amazing, but... "IP" part irrelevent? (Score:2)
However, I do believe there is a lot to be said for these kinds of ideas, and they are gradually taking off but I reckon it'll be a while before they achieve enough credibility to become the norm rather than the occassional events like this.
IP != Internet (Score:3, Insightful)
IP was probably chosen because you could get an end to end link (most likely Ethernet at both ends of the satellite link). Satellite networks do clever things with TCP to make it work better on their high-latency links. Most video apps will be IP based these days, or require a single layer 2 (such as ISDN) end to end, which is restrictive.
Re:Amazing, but... "IP" part irrelevent? (Score:1)
- Fzz
Re:Amazing, but... "IP" part irrelevent? (Score:1)
We did try to use a basic 'net connection to the doctors in Boston at first, but found the delay and quality was unacceptable, thus the conversion to ISDN on that link.
Gibson injured his knee in a fall. (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Gibson injured his knee in a fall. (Score:2)
Ahhhhhh (Score:4, Funny)
web cast it (Score:2)
Re:web cast it (Score:1)
Re:Doubt it (Score:2)
So what'd he build it outa, Duct tape? (Score:5, Funny)
Now this is a Capital G Geek in the best of all possible meanings.
"You wanna what? OK, I got some LEDs and shit...(madly digging through toolbox).Some wires hmmm.. soldering iron over here. Right on surgical lamp, heh. One of these days you'll come up with a challenge for me. Hey, when you're done with the surgery, can we keep the T1 satellite link up for a few. I have some
Seriously, there's a guy who actually earned the "Senior" in his title.
Re:So what'd he build it outa, Duct tape? (Score:1)
This is the kind of article I like to see (Score:2, Troll)
Re:This is the kind of article I like to see (Score:2)
So you consider ZeroConf ipV6 tech 'virtually nothing'? How about full OpenGL Operating System level hardware display acceleration? Bluetooth multi-device portable and peripheral Synchronization?
You must have been watching/reading about it from the lowest level of ignorance possible.
anyways... enough trolling.
This is definitely a good story to see on
Re:This is the kind of article I like to see (Score:1, Offtopic)
I'm a bit surprised to see the moderation my post got: Insightful=1, Overrated=1, Underrated=1. I was really aiming for "Funny."
What about the lag? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What about the lag? (Score:2)
Tim
Re:What about the lag? (Score:1)
NO NO NOT THAT LIGAMENT YOU FOOL! (Score:1)
If you think this is a hoot, wait til this happens on Mars.
Spock's Brain (Score:1)
Any penguins involved? (Score:1)
Re:Any penguins involved? (Score:1)
The most important thing (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The most important thing (Score:1)
i am a very itchy person, its not so much scratching your ass is scratching your head, cant just back into a table or something and scratch your ass but your head... that one takes some trickery.
Necessity is the mother of invention (Score:3, Funny)
Hard Labor? (Score:1)
Knees arent that hard to blow out (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Hard Labor? (Score:2, Funny)
Knees, hearts (Score:1)
And no, nobody was exactly volunteering to be the first high-risk surgery attempt. It seems right that we'd try knee surgeries in a situation like this first; both the isolated patient and the lack of really bad potential outcomes make this a decent first choice.
The people with the remote heart surgery systems saw them as a training tool, for one example, first. They had some specific ideas about the steps that'd happen before the technology could be adapted for real surgery, anyway.
Garth! (Score:2)
But reading the summary, I kept expecting to hear how you ID'd the limo from the vanity plate. [imdb.com]
Party on!
Good morning! (Score:1)
OPEN KNEE SURGERY!!!
Ug... Not an image I want in the morning...
Why not have a Jon Katz article on Kurt Cobain's counter-society life, complete with vaporized head?
Cool for freaky (Score:1)
I really wonder how practical remote surgery besides distance learning.
I was wondering... (Score:2)
For instance, easy prediction models (like the arms/smocks of the doctors, scalpels, hemostats, suction tubes) could with signatures and then compress the difficult to predict stuff (patient's entrails) with compressed video. Contrast in most operating environments means that this shouldn't be too hard to do. Then at the video destination build real-time 3D models of the cut objects to fill in the video. This should dramatically cut down on the ammount of video which needs to be compressed and transmitted.
Re:I was wondering... (Score:1)
My $0.02 will always be worth more than your 0.02, so :P
Better change that signature, pronto :-)
PS. Nyah, nyah, nyah ;-)
no medical facilities? (Score:2)
So, the have people capable, but no facilities for it, how is a satellite connection with an experienced doctor in Boston going to help?
Complete station description - Wired article (Score:1)
Internet on south pole is tricky... not many sattelites going there.
erm... better than nothing (Score:2)
(Always ask lots of questions - even if it pisses people off. If you don't like the setup (as in our situation) refuse to go along. In our case we told them to wait for the surgeon to arrive and be physically present in the operating room during the surgery. Who knows if he was mentally present, though.)
Doctor's office at the south pole? (Score:1)
Great news.... (Score:1)
"Ingrid on Ice" - a doctor's diary in antarctica (Score:4, Interesting)
Great diary, the real issues of life at the south pole, great photos... have a read of Ingrid On Ice [abc.net.au]
Re:That sure is a lot of work.. for.. nothing? (Score:3, Informative)
Oh wait, no you're not.
Try reading the article! You don't understand it!! (Score:1)
Re:Try reading the article! You don't understand i (Score:2)
Anyway, my sister is only 27 and she's had one hip replaced for two years; and needs the other done ASAP. So it's not only old people that have osteo or need joints replaced.[1]
I don't post this for pity, or anything, but more simply to point out that one of the most difficult things for my sister and I with this disease is that no one expects people as young as we are to have such substantial problems just walking around. So I have a bit of a vested interest in pointing out that although rare, it isn't just old people that have osteoarthritis. By the way, my dad and sister have also had several arthroscopic surgeries on their knees, elbows, ankles, and shoulders. They did seem to help at least for a limited amount of time. But the joints just keeps on falling apart and making bony grit that crunches around in there; so it's temporary at best. I did read about that recent study with interest, though.
[1] I should mention that my sister actually resists the "osteoarthritis" non-professional diagnosis of our genetic disorder. It has a real, technical name that's no more descriptive, in my opinion, than "osteoarthritis" actually is; but does have the virtue, in her opinion, of being harder to fail to take seriously. She claims the actual degree of our joint deterioration is much greater than that of, say, the average 70 year-old with osteo. I have no idea. It seems bad, but these are the only joints I've ever had. Our doctors have always said that it's very, very bad.
Re:Try reading the article! You don't understand i (Score:1)
To back up another poster - osteoarthritis is not confined to older people, though it is much more prevalent in older age groups.
Arthroscopy is a procedure which does not require the knee to be opened completely - much better for the patient (faster recovery, no general anaesthetic, etc) and a much simpler and cheaper procedure. You most likely hear about it with sports people who have damaged knees (cruciate ligaments particularly), and it is often used as an exploratory procedure so the surgeon can see exactly what is wrong inside the joint.