New Rocket Fuel: A Pinch of Salt 15
samjam writes "'Rodney Bartlett devised a new form of solid nitrogen salt' says Ananova reporting on an article in Nature. 'Scientists at the University of Florida say it should be possible to make nitrogen with atoms linked in groups of five.' 'If their calculations are correct, the new form will have twice as much energy as the same volume of hydrazine which is the compound propelling many spacecraft today.' This new fuel could be a boon for home-brew rocket builders?" Note that by "salt", they don't mean table salt, just a compound of ions. Nitrogen compounds are important in explosives because the formation of nitrogen gas (which is very stable) can give off a lot of energy - so whatever you can do to create new and crazy nitrogen structures can potentially increase the energy density of your explosives.
obvious joke (Score:1)
Re:Salt... (Score:2, Informative)
Well, the technical chemical definition of a salt is a lattice of atoms which are ionically bound together. A bunch of atoms is still a molecule. :)
10 atoms... not 5 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:10 atoms... not 5 (Score:1)
Rocket fuel as warhead propellant (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Rocket fuel as warhead propellant (Score:1)
Re:Rocket fuel as warhead propellant (Score:1)
Time travel (Score:1, Flamebait)
The media has just latched onto some scientists who (probably very guardedly) admitted that if we could get N5- (subscript 5, - at top) then maybee we could make better rocket fuel. Big if. like maybee if we could travel faster than light blah blah blah. Guys were probably gotten drunk by a journo who needed a "revolutionary exclusive".
Not time travel (Score:2, Informative)
I don't think so, read the nature article;
It says that half the compound was made two years ago, and that to make the other half: So we're partway there and with recent developments in chemical synthesis without use of heavy engineering plants we have good hope of getting a decent rocket fuel!Re:Not time travel (Score:2, Funny)
Yeah, it shouldn't be too difficult. After all, it's not rocket sci -- err, never mind.
Re:Not time travel (Score:2)
Propellantless Mass Space Propulsion Engine ! (Score:1)